SDNY COURTHOUSE,
Sept 26 – Virgil Griffith,
charged with violating North
Korea sanctions in connection
with a crypto-currency
conference there, faced a bail
review proceeding - in person
- on July 20. He lost and was
remanded. Inner City Press was
there, and live tweeted, here
and below (podcast here)
On
September 14, in the run up to
the trial starting on
September 27, there was a
final pre-trial conference
replete with rulings. Inner
City Press live tweeted it here.
On
September 22, Judge Castel
denied Griffith's sealed
motion to depose the Ethereum
Foundation's general counsel
Tju Liang Chua, or to allow
him to testify by video. Order
on Patreon here.
On other grounds - late
produced discovery -
Griffith's lawyers asked
for a week continuance in the
trial.
On September 23,
initially without Griffith
present, Judge Castel held a
hearing then denied the
request for delay. Inner City
Press live tweeted it here.
On September 26,
the Sunday before the trial
starts on Monday, the US
Attorney's Office docketed
their opposition to the
testimony of Ethereum's
General Counsel, and e-mails
of Virgil Griffith, filing on
DocumentCloud here.
Song here
The motion included: "The
defendant served as one of the
highest-ranking individuals in
the Ethereum Foundation, as
“Head of Special Projects,”
and worked to pursue the DPRK
node in coordination with the
organization’s founder and its
Executive Director.... on
August 7, 2018, the defendant
forwarded a proposal from CC-4
to place an Ethereum node
inside the DPRK to the founder
of the Ethereum Foundation,
and another Foundation
employee. See GX 3013
(attached hereto as Exhibit
5). The next day, on August 8,
2018, Griffith told another
Ethereum colleague, “Let me
ask Tju Liang [that is, the
proposed Deponent] as well as
a DPRK specialist whether if
it’s possible to do this
without violating sanctions.
Will update you both.” When
the colleague emphasized, “It
can’t be a sanction workaround
loophole thing either,”
Griffith responded, “I’ll see
what the lawyer says.” This
record of Griffith’s close
coordination with the leaders
of the Ethereum Foundation to
pursue the node, along with
his decision to seek advice
from Ethereum’s own in-house
General Counsel, make clear
that Griffith was not acting
solely in his personal
capacity when he contacted the
proposed Deponent."
On Saturday,
Griffith's lawyer belatedly
docketed their motion, on
Patreon here.
From September
23: Assistant US Attorney:
There is no basis for an
adjournment of the trial. They
are not requesting to exclude,
it seems. Judge Castel:
The parties agreed the US
would make trial exhibit
available on a rolling basis
up to Sept 17? AUSA: We did
not agree to end then
It's 3:15
pm and... "It's the MCC, I
have Virgil here."
Virgil: Hello.
Judge Castel: Welcome.
Inner City Press
will cover the trial.
The case is US v.
Griffith, 20-cr-15
(Castel).
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2020 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com
,
