In Other Media-eg New Statesman, AJE, FP, Georgia, NYT,  Azerbaijan, CSM Click here to contact us     .

By Matthew Russell Lee Patreon Song Video Ruling
BBC - Decrypt - LightRead - Radio - Podcast

SDNY COURTHOUSE, Dec 6 – Ghislaine Maxwell, charged with sex trafficking and other charges, faces a November 29, 2021 trial today, after the November 23 final-final pre trial conference, vlog here.

  On October 29 and again on November 12 Maxell  and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York filed a flurry of motions in limine, heavily redacted; the Government argued that trial exhibits are not public and will be withheld. Inner City Press opposed and opposes the continued secrecy.

On the morning of December 3 Jeffrey Epstein's long time house manager Juan Alessi was cross examined, and a pseudonymous witness' name was blurted by Team Maxwell, not for the first time. Inner City Press live tweeted here, podcast here, 9 am vlog here.

 On the morning of December 6, a second victim / survivor referred to as Kate testified about being recruited for sex with Epstein when she was 17. Inner City Press live tweeted it here (podcast here, 4-minute live stream here). Then Maxwell's lawyer Bobbi Sternheim cross examined Kate, Inner City Press live tweeted here:

Now Maxwell's lawyer Bobbi Sternheim cross examination of Witness Kate: Sternheim: You had a beautiful mother, didn't you? Kate: Yes. Sternheim: And your step father was rich and you lived in the Belgravia section of London, didn't you? Kate: Yes.

 Sternheim: You were an international model? Kate: I was a model. Sternheim: You were dating an older, prominent gentleman who was an Oxford classmate of Ghislaine, correct? Kate: Yes.

 Sternheim: You were a model for a UK version of Victoria's Secret? Kate: No. The company failed almost right way. Sternheim: But you were a lingerie model? Kate: Yes.

 Sternheim: You were in a piano bar and were discovered by the musician Seal, right? Kate: No. Sternheim: But you said that. You acted in movies?

Kate: I did not have speaking roles. Sternheim: You were in a movie with a very well known UK actor, correct? Kate: Yes Sternheim: You spoke publicly, in your own name, in this courthouse, right? Kate: Yes. 

Sternheim: You were invited by a judge in this courthouse, Judge Berman, to speak, and you spoke, right? Kate: Yes.

 Sternheim: And you've spoke with Virginia Robert Giuffre? Kate: Yes.  Sternheim: You used drugs for 10 years, right? Kate: Yes.

 Sternheim: And you dated other men, right? Kate: Yes, I dated men. Sternheim: And you even married one of them? Kate: Are you asking me if I've been married? Sternheim: And you were with a prominent restauranteur? Kate: I was with a man who owned 2 restaurants.

Sternheim: Didn't a tabloid encourage you to get a man connected to the royal family to buy cocaine? Kate: Not exactly. Sternheim: And that became a big tabloid spectacular, right? Kate: I suppose.

Sternheim: When were you last in contact with Epstein? Kate: 30s. Sternheim: Give me a date. Kate: I don't have a date. Sternheim: How old are you? Kate: 44.

Sternheim: Aren't you trying to get a victim's visa? Isn't this your name?  Kate: My visa application is base on extraordinary ability. Sternheim: Which one? Kate: Music teaching to treat trauma. Sternheim: Any unlicensed music coach can get it?

 Sternheim: Nothing further. Judge Nathan: Re-direct? AUSA: Let's take the lunch break. Judge Nathan: OK.

OK - here was the lunch break live-stream from Foley Square - now back in, with Judge Nathan holding a lawyers' argument session before the jury comes in. #MaximumMaxwell live stream midday edition, trial Day 6, "Kate" - here.

OK, the jury is finally back in, for re-direct of still pseudonymous witness Kate, staring with her award from the Epstein victims' fund. Next US witness: Patrick McHugh of JP Morgan Chase: "I'm an officer of the firm. I can speak to who is authorize to access accounts and the like."

 Assistant US Attorney names a slew of financial exhibits and calls them public exhibits. We'll see when we get access to them. Watch this feed.

 Pending getting all these exhibits, the current one shows a wire transfer involving Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell for $7,400,000, JPM Chase and BONY Mellon.

 Now JPM's McHugh is being asked about helicopter purchase. The exhibits as shown on the screens are blurry - will have to wait to get access to legible copies. Maxwell's lawyer: This document doesn't show who approved it, right? McHugh: Yes, the statement does not

 Next witness is FBI's Ms. Kelly McGuire, Special Agent. AUSA: What is this? Agent McGuire: The front view of the resident [at 9 E. 71 Street]. When there was no response, we forced our way in.

 AUSA: Did you come across the massage room on the third floor? McGuire: We, we did. This photo, 902r, is the entrance to the massage room. AUSA: And 903r? McGuire: It's the massage room.  [The pictures on the wall are redacted, in the public exhibit]

 McGuire is done. Judge Nathan asks if the US has a short witness (for the next 10 minutes).  Now starting: another FBI agent.

AUSA: Does each FBI investigation have its own number? Agent: Yes.  AUSA: Did you review CDs in 2020? Agent: Yes, with Amelia Young.

 AUSA: We offer into evidence this photo of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.

Judge Nathan: We'll break for the day. Jurors, have a good night. Counsel? Anything we need to take up? Maxwell's lawyer: We object to the photo of our client lying on a boat.

  Coverage will continue.
 
  This followed a December 4 letter emphasizing that it "has redacted the exhibits from this letter entirely to avoid publicizing photographs which may not be exhibits at trial." This is not done by the SDNY prosecutors in all cases, far from it. As simply one example, in the prosecution of a Honduras drug trafficker and friend of outgoing Honduras president Juan Orlando Hernandez, photos where included in public filings that were never used in the trial of US v. Geovanny Fuentes Ramirez. Story with SDNY filing and photos here. So this secrecy is a choice, by DOJ. What will Judge Nathan do?

 Inner City Press has launched #MaximumMaxwell & mystery / bonus  #CourtCaseCast coverage will continue. More on Patreon here.

On November 23 there was a final final pre-trial conference and Inner City Press live tweeted it here (podcast here)

  Likewise, Inner City Press opposes censorship by the UN, which after it asked why UN Sec-Gen Antonio Guterres' head of Partnerships Amir Dossal was on the board of Maxwell's Terramar Foundation was roughed up and banned from the UN, summary here, Quinn Emanuel lawyers' letter Q&A here.

  Now this: a petition, submitted Monday to the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, filed by international criminal lawyers François Zimeray and Jessica Finelle on behalf of Maxwell’s three sisters and three brothers, arguing to Maxwell's partners at the UN that Maxwell’s “abnormally rigorous” lock-up conditions at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn are horrific, and thus unlawful and discriminatory.  The petition asks the UN to call on the US government to release Maxwell pending trial and to urge an independent investigation into her “arbitrary detention.”

This while the UN active covers up its own peacekepers child rapes. This is ghoulish.

  On November 15, Judge Nathan held a conference about jury selection, Inner City Press live tweeted here (and podcast here)

On the morning of November 16, Judge Nathan questioned prospective jurors; Inner City Press live tweeted here (podcast here); Nov 16 afternoon here.

Late on November 16 it emerged that Judge Ali Nathan is being nominated for elevation to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals by Senator Chuck Schumer.

She said, "If I am nominated I...will continue to do my day job, which means presiding over this trial until completion and handling the hundreds of other civil and criminal matters on my docket."

So it appears she would complete the Maxwell trial. But any sentencing? Would she follow 2d Circuit Judge Richard J. Sullivan in keeping some SDNY cases? (As noted, Judge Sullivan is still rightly allowing call-in lines to in-person cases, here).

 Podcast here. Watch this site.

On November 17, jury selection continued with questions of seized phones, jail conditions, and the death of Epstein, Inner City Press live tweeted here (podcast here)

On the afternoon of November 17, it continued, Inner City Press live tweeted here (podcast here)

 Jury (pre) selection ended on the morning of November 18, Inner City Press live tweeted here

  With so much of the case, and so many of the victims, far from Epstein's Manhattan townhouse, in Florida, the Caribbean, New Mexico, the UK and by private jet in Africa, the lack amid COVID of a listen-only call-in line during the trial proper would be all the more unfortunate.

On October 29, after the flurry of redacted motions, Inner City Press filed formal requests with SDNY District Judge Alison J. Nathan, on DocumentCloud here.

  On November 12, while Maxwell and DOJ still redacting and a notice that after 50 people, no more would be admitted even on November 15, Inner City Press filed again. This time, both letters were docketed - appreciated - but denied, letter on CourtListener here.

"ENDORSED LETTER as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Matthew Russell Lee, dated 10/29/2021, re: timely opposition to blanket requests to seal portions of motions in limine, trial exhibits, public access. ENDORSEMENT: The Court received the attached letters via email. This District no longer permits public access by telephone for in-court criminal proceedings, including trials. The memorandum can be found here. The Courts public access orders for all proceedings in the case can be found here. The Court has implemented a procedure for docketing filings with proposed redactions and is ruling on the proposals as expeditiously as possible. See Dkt. No. 401. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/12/2021)."

  Earlier on November 12, Inner City Press called in to, and reported on, a January 6 case in the District for the District of Columbia - and even other in-person criminal matters in the SDNY. For November 15, only 50 people will be allowed in. Meanwhile, for example, the Kyle Rittenhouse in Wisconsin state court is on YouTube. While engaged and appreciative on the Federal  / SDNY beat, we'll have more on this.

Here was from the October 29 request: Re: US v. Maxwell, 20-cr-330 (AJN), timely opposition to blanket requests to seal portions of motions in limine, trial exhibits, public access

Dear Judge Nathan:    On behalf of Inner City Press and in my personal capacity, I have been covering the above-captioned case. This concerns in the first instance the flurry of motions in limine filed earlier this evening, replete with redactions justified by a conclusory reference to Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). 

 The Government's Justifications for redaction (Docket No. 399, docketed at 10:06 pm on Friday Oct 29) cites Lugosch then says "The Government also seeks sealing of trial exhibits, which are not public." Inner City Press immediately opposes this.  

 As one example within this motions of limine, the Government has redacted the entirety of its Argument X, even the title and the page number. And as to trial exhibits, see for example Judge Jed S. Rakoff's order in US v. Weigand, 20-cr-188 (JSR), here.

  There, Judge Rakoff ordered the US Attorney's Office to make trial exhibit available to the public at large. While this was done, belatedly, in US v. Parnas, it was refused in the current US v. Cole. It cannot be refused in this case.    Also, Inner City Press understands that the listen-only call-in telephone lines available so far in the case, there may be an attempt to discontinue them. The Court should take judicial notice of continuing COVID-19 issues, including people's understandable concerns about congregating even in so-called overflow rooms. Be aware that the District for the District of Columbia still allows public phone access to all criminal proceedings, even those held in-person. That should happen here. The loss of First Amendment freedoms, even for a short period of time, unquestionably constitutes irreparable injury. Elrod v. Burns, 427 U.S. 347, 373 (1976).     

Inner City Press will cover the trial, and all the comes before and after it; #CourtCaseCast and song I, Song 2, Song 3, fifth song, Nov 27 song and now Dec 4 song

On October 18 the US Attorney's Office opposed the request, saying the the voir dire questions should be asked by Judge Nathan, and that there should only be sidebars on "sensitive questions such as those that relate to sexual abuse and media exposure." Full letter on Patreon here.

 In a conference on October 21 on that as scheduling issues, Judge Nathan denied the request to seal. Inner City Press live tweeted it here (podcast here)

On October 22 the draft jury questionnaire was unsealed and Inner City Press has immediately published it on its DocumentCloud here, including "Have you or a family member ever supported, lobbied, petitioned, protested, or  worked in any other manner for or against any laws, regulations, or organizations relating to sex trafficking, sex crimes against minors, sex abuse or sexual harassment?" Photo here.

   After the death of Jeffrey Epstein in the MCC prison, on July 2 Acting US Attorney for the SDNY Audrey Strauss announced and unsealed in indictment of Maxwell on charges including sex trafficking and perjury.

   Inner City Press went to her press conference at the US Attorney's Office and asked, Doesn't charging Maxwell with perjury undercut any ability to use testimony from her against other, bigger wrong-doers? Periscope here at 23:07.

  Strauss replied that it is not impossible to use a perjurer's testimony. But how often does it work?

  At 3:30 pm on July 2 Maxwell appeared in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampsire, before Magistriate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone. Inner City Press live tweeted it here.
(Also live tweeted bail denial of July 14, here.)

   In the July 3 media coverage of Maxwell, media all of the world used a video and stills from it of Maxwell speaking in front of a blue curtain, like here.

 What they did not mention is something Inner City Press has been asking the UN about, as under UNSG Antonio Guterres with his own sexual exploitation issues (exclusive video and audio) it got roughed up and banned from the UN: Ghislaine Maxwell had a ghoulish United Nations press conference, under the banner of the "Terramar Project," here.

 On July 5, after some crowd-sourcing, Inner City Press reported on another Ghislaine Maxwell use of the United Nations, facilitated by Italy's Permanent Representative to the UN, UN official Nikhil Seth and Amir Dossal, who also let into the UN and in one case took money from convicted UN briber Ng Lap Seng, and Patrick Ho of CEFC China Energy, also linked to UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres.

  At the Ghislaine Maxwell UN event, the UN Deputy Secretary General was directly involved.

List of (some of) the participants on Patreon here.

  Inner City Press has published a phone of Maxwell in the UN with Dossal, here. But the connection runs deeper: Dossal with "25 years of UN involvement" was on Terrarmar's board of directors, one of only five directors, only three not related to Maxwell by blood and name.

The directors: Ghislaine Maxwell, Christine Malina-Maxwell, Steven Haft, Christine Dennison and... Amir Dossal. Inner City Press is publishing this full 990 on Patreon here.

  Dossal has operated through the UN Office of Partnership, with Antonio Guterres and his deputy Amina J. Mohammed, here.

And the links to the world of UN bribery, including Antonio Guterres through the Gulbenkian Foundation, runs deeper. More to follow.

Antonio Guterres claims he has zero tolerance for sexual exploitation, but covers it up and even participate in it. He should be forced to resign - and/or have immunity waived.

  Terramar has been dissolved, even though Maxwell's former fundraiser / director of development Brian Yurasits still lists the URL on his (protected) Twitter profile, also here.

  But now Inner City Press has begun to inquire into Ghislaine Maxwell's other United Nations connections, starting with this photograph of another day's (or at least another outfit's) presentation in the UN, here. While co-conspirator Antonio Guterres has had Inner City Press banned from any entry into the UN for two years and a day, this appears to be in the UN Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) chamber. We'll have more on this, and on Epstein and the UN. Watch this site.

  The case is US v. Maxwell, 20-cr-330 (Nathan).

***

Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA

Mail: Box 20047, Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540

Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

 Copyright 2006-2020 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com for