SDNY COURTHOUSE,
Dec 17 – Ghislaine
Maxwell,
charged with
sex
trafficking
and other
charges, is amid a
trial that
started on
November 29,
after the
November 23
final-final
pre trial conference,
vlog here.
On October 29
and again on November 12
Maxell
and the US
Attorney's
Office for the
Southern
District of
New York filed
a flurry of
motions in
limine,
heavily
redacted; the
Government
argued that
trial exhibits
are not public
and will be
withheld.
Inner City
Press opposed
and opposes
the continued
secrecy. And
see DC op-ed
here.
On
December 16,
after a three
day hiatus as
Judge Nathan
went to DC
seeking
2d Circuit seat,
Maxwell's
defense began,
with her executive
assistant
Cimerly Espinosa.
Inner City Press
live tweeted
here,
8:45 am live
stream here,
podcast here
On
the morning
of December
17, the
defense put on
two agents and
Eva Dubin.
Inner City
Press live
tweeted here,
podcasts
here
and here
it's US
v. Ghislaine
Maxwell trial
Day 12,
defense
arguing to
keep their
case open
until Monday
for a final,
81-year old
witness.
Judge
Nathan: I'm
letting in the
documents
about
residence
versus
ownership. If
I weren't, you
might have a
point. Is this
deposition
transcript new
to you?
Maxwell's
lawyer: She
was deposed in
a slip and
fall case.
Judge Nathan:
You'll provide
the
transcript.
Judge
Nathan: I have
a rule, you
have your next
witness or you
rest. If
otherwise the
case closes
today, it
closes today.
[Couldn't
Maxwell's
lawyers just
do super-long
direct
examination?
And what about
the 3 day
hiatus?]
Maxwell's
lawyer: Also
if the
Marshals can
produce
another
witness we've
subpoenaed...
The other
witness, from
the UK, if
they will
stipulate to
it, there'd be
no review.
Assistant US
Attorney: The
subpoenaed
witness Kelly,
we have no
idea what
she'd say. No
stip
Judge
Nathan: There
are also some
40 prior
inconsistent
statements. My
colleague
Judge Kaplan
has helpfully
set forth the
standard.
[He's the
judge with
Giuffre v.
Prince Andrew
before him,
which Inner
City Press is
also reporting
on]
Judge
Nathan: Annie
said she
didn't
remember a
chef being
there [on the
Zorro ranch]
but that it
made sense to
her, so not
inconsistency.
And the amount
of horseback
riding is a
collateral
issue.
Maxwell's
lawyer: I
think
impeachment is
for the truth
[of the matter
asserted]
Judge Nathan:
That's way too
metaphysical
for me to
handle right
now. (Laughs).
Maxwell's
lawyer: We'll
have a law
enforcement
witness and
we'd like to
ask leading
questions.
Judge Nathan:
Truth comes
out on direct.
Start with
that.
Maxwell's
lawyer: I want
to get to the
absence of
evidence, the
lack of
GPS
given the age
of the
allegations.
Maxwell's
lawyer
Everdell: I
wanted to ask
the agent,
that the
complaint was
first on one
time frame
then more
recent, with
Carolyn. I
think that's
relevant.
AUSA: The
court has
already ruled
on this - the
path of the
investigation.
Let's them
raise it in
closing
Judge
Nathan: Who's
the first
[defense]
witness today?
Maxwell's
lawyer: First
Special Agent
Jason
Richards. Then
we would have
had Agent
Young. Then
[drumroll] Eva
Dubin
OK -
jury is
finally called
in at 10:30
am, an hour
late All rise!
Witness is
Agent Jason
Richards.
Maxwell's
Pagliuca:
Where are you
based?
Richards:
Miami. Before,
Palm Beach.
Pagliuca:
Let's turn to
2006.
Richards: I
was in Unit
PV-2. We
investigated
Epstein.
Pagliuca:
Did you
interview
Carolyn -
don't say her
last name?
Agent
Richards: I
did. Pagluca:
Did you recall
Carolyn saying
she obtained
Epstein's
number from a
phone book and
that Epstein
returned her
call?
Richards: If
that's what's
in the 302
report.
Pagliuca:
No further
questions.
Cross. AUSA:
Do you show
your 302s to
those you
speak to?
Richards:
No.
Judge Nathan:
Defense may
call it's next
witness.
Maxwell's
lawyer: We
call Agent
Amanda Young.
Maxwell's
lawyer: Agent
Young, was
your partner
Detective
Burns? Young:
Yes. We both
check the 302.
Maxwell's
lawyer: You
just heard Ms.
Comey's
questions to
Agent
Richards. 302s
are not
transcripts,
right? Young:
They are not
Maxwell's
lawyer: You
interviewed
Annie Farmer.
About the
boots,
right?
Young: Yes.
The boots were
obtained by
law
enforcement
this year. I
don't remember
which month.
Maxwell's
lawyer: Read
this. Young:
"In the
beginning,
Jane would be
with her
mother and
brothers at
the Epstein
house."
Maxwell's
lawyer
(Menninger) -
I want to turn
to page 7. You
wrote, Jane
did not recall
specific abuse
that may have
occurred in
New Mexico
Maxwell's
lawyer: Just
to emphasize,
the boots were
discussed
recently?
Young: Yes.
Cross. AUSA:
What did you
do before?
Young; I
interviewed
children about
child abuse.
[Now
there is a
sidebar. Agent
Amanda Young
sits in the
plexi-glass
witness box,
in dark blue
shirt, black
jacket.
They're back]
Judge Nathan:
Jurors will
disregard the
statement
about Agent
Young's
previous job
interviewing
children.
AUSA:
Did Jane need
more than one
meeting to say
what happened?
Maxwell's
lawyer:
Objection!
Beyond the
scope!
AUSA:
I'll try
another way.
Who was there
for the
inverviews?
Maxwell's
lawyer:
Objection!
Beyond the
scope - I
didn't ask
about this.
Redirect:
Maxwell's
Menninger: You
used these
notes with the
grand jury,
right? Young:
Some of them.
Maxwell's
Menninger: Did
you show her
the 302s?
Young. No.
It's not
ethical. It's
not
appropriate.
Maxwell's
Menninger: You
don't record
them? Young:
Only those in
custody. Not
victim /
witnesses.
Maxwell's
Menninger: Are
you familiar
with the DOJ
Obtaining
Evidence
protocols?
AUSA:
Objection.
Judge Nathan:
Overruled.
Menninger: I
have a
document, I
can show it
[And
now, yet
another
sidebar. and
now - the next
witness: Eva
Dubin]
Witness: I am
Eva Andersson.
I also go by
Eva
Andersson-Dubin.
I live in NYC.
I am 60.
Maxwell's
lawyer: You
are married to
Glenn Dubin?
Eva: Yes. 28
years. We have
3 children:
27, 25 &
20
Maxwell's
lawyer:
Gender? Eva:
Female, male,
female.
Maxwell's
lawyer: What
does Mr. Dubin
do for
employment?
Eva: He is
self-employed.
I was
previously
employed as a
medical
doctor.
Eva: I
went to
medical school
in Stockholm,
then UCLA.
Then Lenox
Hill Hospital
in NYC.
Maxwell's
lawyer: Did
you know Mr.
Epstein? Eva:
We dated off
and on from
1983 until
1991.
Maxwell's
lawyer: Did
you ever
witness any
sexual contact
between Mr
Epstein and --
AUSA Moe:
Objection!
[Another
sidebar]
Maxwell's
lawyer: Let me
show you some
photographs
under seal. Is
one person Mr.
Epstein and
the other one
of your
children? Eva:
Yes it's the
20. I've never
seen this
picture
before.
Maxwell's
lawyer: Let me
ask you about
flight
records.
[These remain
largely
redacted and
Inner City
Press'
challenge
still not
docketed -
apparently
under the
theory that if
it's denied,
it's not a
judicial
document
Judge
Nathan: I'll
give the
jurors their
mid-morning
break.
Jurors leave,
and witness
steps out.
Judge Nathan:
If there's
something
inaccurate in
the media
writ-large,
like a blog
post...
Judge
Nathan: I
sustain the
government's
objection [to
asking about
published
flight logs]
under 401 and
403. Now we'll
take our
break. On the
screen, flight
with "JE, Eva
Andersson" and
Ms. Francis
Jardine.
Maxwell's
lawyer: Do you
remember
Francis
Jardine? Eva:
I remember
Francis, I
didn't know
her last name.
Maxwell's
lawyer: you
knew Mr.
Epstein was
dating her?
Eva: Yes.
Maxwell's
lawyer: I'll
show you
sealed exhibit
GX12... and
now, only for
the witness
and court,
unredacted
Exhibit 662.
[Nothing shown
on screen]
Eva: I
recognize
Sophie Biddle,
a massage
therapist...
And I see my
husband's
name.
Maxwell's
lawyer:
Without saying
the name that
we are not
saying, do you
see it on the
list? Eva:
Yes. Maxwell's
lawyer: Have
you ever been
in a group
sexual
encounter with
Jane? Eva: I
have not.
Maxwell's
lawyer: That's
all I have.
Judge Nathan:
Ms. Moe.
Cross.
AUSA Moe: Are
you the only
Eva in the
whole wide
world?
Maxwell's
lawyer:
Objection on
relevance.
Judge Nathan:
Overruled.
AUSA Moe: Did
you ever
discuss with
Mr. Epstein
his
relationship
with Ms
Maxwell?
Maxwell's
lawyer:
Hearsay. Judge
Nathan:
Sustained.
AUSA
Moe: With
respect, do
you have
issues with
your memory?
Eva: I can't
remember
things from
last
month.
Maxwell's
lawyer: This
does not need
to be
discussed.
AUSA
Moe: Nothing
further. No
redirect.
On
December 10,
leading up to
the US resting
of its case,
Annie Farmer
was cross
examined, then
her
ex-boyfriend
and mother
testified.
Inner City
Press live
tweeted it here,
podcast here,
stand-up,
GMax
sister -
and circus
Again,
where is the
Press
opposition to
all this
sealing, and
the
decision-maker?
On October 18 the US
Attorney's Office opposed the
request, saying the the voir
dire questions should be asked
by Judge Nathan, and that
there should only be sidebars
on "sensitive questions such
as those that relate to sexual
abuse and media exposure."
Full letter on Patreon here.
In a
conference on October 21 on
that as scheduling issues,
Judge Nathan denied the
request to seal. Inner City
Press live tweeted it
here (podcast here)
On October 22 the
draft jury questionnaire was
unsealed and Inner City Press
has immediately published it
on its DocumentCloud here,
including "Have you or a
family member ever supported,
lobbied, petitioned,
protested, or worked in
any other manner for or
against any laws, regulations,
or organizations relating to
sex trafficking, sex crimes
against minors, sex abuse or
sexual harassment?" Photo here.
After the death of Jeffrey
Epstein in the MCC prison, on
July 2 Acting US Attorney for
the SDNY Audrey Strauss
announced and unsealed in
indictment of Maxwell on
charges including sex
trafficking and perjury.
Inner City Press went to her
press conference at the US
Attorney's Office and asked,
Doesn't charging Maxwell with
perjury undercut any ability
to use testimony from her
against other, bigger
wrong-doers? Periscope here
at 23:07.
Strauss
replied that it is not
impossible to use a perjurer's
testimony. But how often does
it work?
At 3:30 pm
on July 2 Maxwell appeared in
the U.S. District Court for
the District of New Hampsire,
before Magistriate Judge Andrea
K. Johnstone.
Inner City
Press live
tweeted it
here.
(Also
live tweeted
bail denial of
July 14, here.)
In
the July 3 media coverage of
Maxwell, media all of the
world used a video and stills
from it of Maxwell speaking in
front of a blue curtain, like
here.
What they
did not mention is something
Inner City Press has been
asking the UN about, as under
UNSG Antonio Guterres with his
own sexual exploitation issues
(exclusive video
and audio)
it got roughed up and banned
from the UN: Ghislaine Maxwell
had a ghoulish United Nations
press conference, under the
banner of the "Terramar
Project," here.
On July 5,
after some crowd-sourcing,
Inner City Press reported on
another Ghislaine Maxwell use
of the United Nations,
facilitated by Italy's
Permanent Representative to
the UN, UN official Nikhil
Seth and Amir Dossal,
who also let into the UN and
in one case took money from
convicted UN briber Ng Lap
Seng, and Patrick Ho of CEFC
China Energy, also linked to
UN Secretary General Antonio
Guterres.
At the
Ghislaine Maxwell UN event,
the UN Deputy Secretary
General was directly involved.
List of (some of)
the participants on Patreon here.
Inner City
Press has published a phone of
Maxwell in the UN with Dossal,
here. But the connection runs
deeper: Dossal with "25 years
of UN involvement" was on
Terrarmar's board of
directors, one of only five
directors, only three not
related to Maxwell by blood
and name.
The directors:
Ghislaine Maxwell, Christine
Malina-Maxwell, Steven Haft,
Christine Dennison and... Amir
Dossal. Inner City Press is
publishing this full 990 on
Patreon here.
Dossal has
operated through the UN Office
of Partnership, with Antonio
Guterres and his deputy Amina
J. Mohammed, here.
And the links to
the world of UN bribery,
including Antonio Guterres
through the Gulbenkian
Foundation, runs deeper. More
to follow.
Antonio Guterres
claims he has zero tolerance
for sexual exploitation, but
covers it up and even
participate in it. He should
be forced to resign - and/or
have immunity waived.
Terramar
has been dissolved, even
though Maxwell's former
fundraiser / director of
development Brian Yurasits
still lists the URL on his
(protected) Twitter profile,
also here.
But now
Inner City Press has begun to
inquire into Ghislaine
Maxwell's other United Nations
connections, starting with
this photograph of another
day's (or at least another
outfit's) presentation in the
UN, here.
While co-conspirator Antonio
Guterres has had Inner City
Press banned from any entry
into the UN for two years and
a day, this appears to be in
the UN Economic and Social
Council (ECOSOC) chamber.
We'll have more on this, and
on Epstein and the UN. Watch
this site.
The case
is US v. Maxwell, 20-cr-330
(Nathan).
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2020 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for