SDNY COURTHOUSE,
Jan 12 – Ghislaine
Maxwell,
charged with
six counts of
sex
trafficking
and other
charges, was on
December 29
found guilty
on five of the
six counts.
Inner City
Press, which asked
Judge Alison
J. Nathan
for a public
call-in line
and unsealing of
exhibits throughout,
live tweeted
it here.
After
juror
"Scotty David"
gave
interviews,
social media accounts
went down - but
see below -
but Inner City
Press kept
digging, first
publishing the
information here,
then
here:
Scott
C. Hagy, age
35, Carlyle
Group. Global
Credit
Management.
University of
West Georgia,
with a 404
cell phone
number. A time
gentrifying
Brook Avenue
in the South
Bronx - note,
no home
addresses
listed here.
But
previously, the
same Scott(y)
-
Scott Hagy
Office
Coordinator +1
(212) 338-9614
Office
Address: 52
Vanderbilt
Avenue, 20th
Floor New
York, NY 10017
Tel: +1 (212)
661-4060 E-...
Jun 26, 2012
babinc.org - with
Prince Andrew
connection.
Since then,
Inner City
Press is
informed of Juror
50 saying he
only launched
to the media
when he got
the green light
from his
bosses at the
Carlyle Group.
Judge Nathan
on January 12
kept
from the
docket Juror
50's filing,
asking /
urging the US
and Team
Maxwell to
propose
redactions or
complete sealing.
Despite
increasing
indications of a
more
complicated
story behind Juror
50's outreach,
it is claimed
that it
happened
organically,
by spotting
- but not
including in
the reporting
- Juror
50's social
media. Inner
City Press is
today publishing
two
screenshots from
Instagram here
and here.
No inquiry?
Into whose
behind this
gambit to relieve
Maxwell from
the guilty
verdict? Watch
this site.
The
US on January
5 wrote in: "Dear
Judge Nathan:
The Government
has become
aware that a
juror has
given several
interviews to
press outlets
regarding his
jury service
in this case." Full
US
letter on
Inner City
Press' DocumentCloud
here.
Inner City
Press immediate
filing to
unredact,
still not
docketed by
Judge Alison J.
Nathan,
here.
Again through
the UK press,
Team Maxwell
has announced
they have
identified a
third juror who
may have lied
on the juror
questionnaire,
with a fourth
juror "in
question." There
is nothing in
the docket.
As
noted during
the trial by
Inner City
Press, for
example with
regard to Team
Maxwell's Leah
Saffian having
and sharing
her smart
phone
in the courtroom,
there was something
very wrong and
untransparent
about this
trial. It was
the secrecy,
starting with
the denial
of the public
call-in
line and
continuing
through juror
selection
with press
banned from
significant
parts, that
allowed it.
Now what?
"Scotty
David"
(see above)
fled photographers
outside
his midtown
Manhattan apartment,
shielding
his face with
a family-sized box
of Cheez-Its. The private
equity firm
the Carlyle
Group confirms
he works for
them. How then
did Judge
Alison J.
Nathan appoint
him a publicly-paid
lawyer? And
how that Scotty David
has fired the
free
lawyer and
says he has
his own, who's
paying for
that? Who's
paying?
Podcast here.
On
January 5
the defense,
by Christian
Everdell,
sent in
an even more
heavily
redacted letter,
that "presents
incontrovertible
grounds for a
new trial
under Rule 33." Then
lengthy
redactions.
Inner
City Press quickly opposed
these
redactions,
writing to
Judge Nathan:
"Re: US v.
Maxwell,
20-cr-330
(AJN), Press
request that
redactions to
US and defense
letters about
juror
controversy be
removed and
other relevant
documents
unsealed;
request should
be docketed
and ruled on
Dear Judge
Nathan:
On behalf of
Inner City
Press and in
my personal
capacity, I
have been
covering the
above-captioned
case,
including
repeatedly
asking that
sealing and
redactions be
reduced and
that a public
call-in line
be provided
(it
wasn't).
Now on January
5 the
government and
the defense
have submitted
significantly
redacted
letters about
juror "Scotty
David" and his
print and
video
interviews,
requesting an
inquiry or a
new
trial.
But the public
and press have
a right to
know what the
US and defense
are arguing to
the Court.
Accordingly,
the redactions
should be
removed
forthwith, and
all other
relevant
still-sealed
or redacted
documents be
placed in the
public
docket
While
appreciating
that the Court
docketed
before denying
Inner City
Press'
November 12
request for a
call-in line,
Dkt. 451, this
is a request
that this
opposition to
sealing be
docketed as
took place in
US v.
Avenatti,
19-cr-374
(JMF), Dkt 85,
here."
Inner
City Press opposed
and opposes
the continued
secrecy. And
see DC op-ed here
Inner City Press
covered the trial, and all the
comes before and after it;
#CourtCaseCast and song I,
Song
2, Song
3, fifth song,
Nov
27 songDec
4 song and Dec
11 song (YouTube
demonetized it) and Dec
18 song (no ads) and Dec
24 song (also no ads -
demonetized by YouTube) and
now Jan 8 on chatty juror from
the Carlyle Group, not
monetized, here
(support here)
On October 22 the
draft jury questionnaire was
unsealed and Inner City Press
has immediately published it
on its DocumentCloud here,
including "Have you or a
family member ever supported,
lobbied, petitioned,
protested, or worked in
any other manner for or
against any laws, regulations,
or organizations relating to
sex trafficking, sex crimes
against minors, sex abuse or
sexual harassment?" Photo here.
After the death of Jeffrey
Epstein in the MCC prison, on
July 2 Acting US Attorney for
the SDNY Audrey Strauss
announced and unsealed in
indictment of Maxwell on
charges including sex
trafficking and perjury.
Inner City Press went to her
press conference at the US
Attorney's Office and asked,
Doesn't charging Maxwell with
perjury undercut any ability
to use testimony from her
against other, bigger
wrong-doers? Periscope here
at 23:07.
Strauss
replied that it is not
impossible to use a perjurer's
testimony. But how often does
it work?
At 3:30 pm
on July 2 Maxwell appeared in
the U.S. District Court for
the District of New Hampsire,
before Magistriate Judge Andrea
K. Johnstone.
Inner City
Press live
tweeted it
here.
(Also
live tweeted
bail denial of
July 14, here.)
In
the July 3 media coverage of
Maxwell, media all of the
world used a video and stills
from it of Maxwell speaking in
front of a blue curtain, like
here.
What they
did not mention is something
Inner City Press has been
asking the UN about, as under
UNSG Antonio Guterres with his
own sexual exploitation issues
(exclusive video
and audio)
it got roughed up and banned
from the UN: Ghislaine Maxwell
had a ghoulish United Nations
press conference, under the
banner of the "Terramar
Project," here.
On July 5,
after some crowd-sourcing,
Inner City Press reported on
another Ghislaine Maxwell use
of the United Nations,
facilitated by Italy's
Permanent Representative to
the UN, UN official Nikhil
Seth and Amir Dossal,
who also let into the UN and
in one case took money from
convicted UN briber Ng Lap
Seng, and Patrick Ho of CEFC
China Energy, also linked to
UN Secretary General Antonio
Guterres.
At the
Ghislaine Maxwell UN event,
the UN Deputy Secretary
General was directly involved.
List of (some of)
the participants on Patreon here.
Inner City
Press has published a phone of
Maxwell in the UN with Dossal,
here. But the connection runs
deeper: Dossal with "25 years
of UN involvement" was on
Terrarmar's board of
directors, one of only five
directors, only three not
related to Maxwell by blood
and name.
The directors:
Ghislaine Maxwell, Christine
Malina-Maxwell, Steven Haft,
Christine Dennison and... Amir
Dossal. Inner City Press is
publishing this full 990 on
Patreon here.
Dossal has
operated through the UN Office
of Partnership, with Antonio
Guterres and his deputy Amina
J. Mohammed, here.
And the links to
the world of UN bribery,
including Antonio Guterres
through the Gulbenkian
Foundation, runs deeper. More
to follow.
Antonio Guterres
claims he has zero tolerance
for sexual exploitation, but
covers it up and even
participate in it. He should
be forced to resign - and/or
have immunity waived.
Terramar
has been dissolved, even
though Maxwell's former
fundraiser / director of
development Brian Yurasits
still lists the URL on his
(protected) Twitter profile,
also here.
But now
Inner City Press has begun to
inquire into Ghislaine
Maxwell's other United Nations
connections, starting with
this photograph of another
day's (or at least another
outfit's) presentation in the
UN, here.
While co-conspirator Antonio
Guterres has had Inner City
Press banned from any entry
into the UN for two years and
a day, this appears to be in
the UN Economic and Social
Council (ECOSOC) chamber.
We'll have more on this, and
on Epstein and the UN - and
UNSC President Norway. Watch
this site.
The case
is US v. Maxwell, 20-cr-330
(Nathan).
***
Your
support means a lot. As little as $5 a month
helps keep us going and grants you access to
exclusive bonus material on our Patreon
page. Click
here to become a patron.
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
SDNY Press Room 480, front cubicle
500 Pearl Street, NY NY 10007 USA
Mail: Box 20047, Dag
Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2022 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for