UN
Contradicts
Claim No
Mission
Involved in
Samsung TVs to
UNCA
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
December 10 --
The day before
the UN refused
to disclose
how
much it is
paying France
under a
non-public
"letter of
assist"
for airfield
services in
northern Mali,
Inner City
Press asked it
about a
donation of
Samsung
televisions.
Inner
City Press had
been sent by a
whistleblower,
and published,
the
following from
the November
25 minutes of
the United
Nations
Correspondents
Association,
with which
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon
exclusively
partners (and
leaders
of which
tried to expel
Inner City
Press,
including for
its reporting
on Sri Lanka
and conflicts
of
interest)
"There
was discussion
about whether
or not UNCA
should receive
a donation
from Samsung
and whether or
not a Mission
was involved.
DPI was able
to clarify the
donation
information,
which does not
involve a
mission. This
note was
received: This
is to confirm
that once we
get the
donations from
Samsung to the
UN,
DPI will loan
a TV screen to
UNCA to
replace one of
your old
ones."
This
turns out not
to be
accurate,
specifically
the statement
that the
donation "does
not involve a
mission."
In
fact, as the
UN put in its
written answer
26 hours later
to Inner
City Press'
December 9
question:
"The
new Samsung
sets in the
UNCA room were
donated by
Samsung to the
Permanent
Mission of the
Republic of
Korea to the
United
Nations. The
Mission then
donated them
to the
Department of
Public
Information
(DPI) and DPI
is loaning
them to UNCA."
It
is false,
then, that the
donation does
not "involve"
a
mission. In
fact, the
South Korea
mission got
the TVs from
Samsung,
gave them to
the UN which
then loaned
them to UNCA.
The South
Korean
mission is
right in the
middle.
A
defender of
the dubious
deal has
written to
Inner City
Press claiming
that despite
the minutes
not reflecting
any vote, one
was in fact
taken. But was
it based on
the false
information
included in
the
minutes? Who
voted how?
Even the list
of those
voting is not
included
in the
minutes.
Here
is what Inner
City Press asked
the UN on
December 9:
Inner
City Press: is
there a
comprehensive
place to go to
see what
donations the
UN receives
from
corporations?
In particular,
I’m
asking about
what I
understand to
be a donation
of television
screens
or sets from
Samsung and I
wanted to
know, what are
the rule
applicable to
these
donations? Is
the UN aware
of pretty
serious
organizing
drive in South
Korea about
occupational
diseases at
Samsung? What
are the rules
applicable and
is there a
database of
such
contributions?
Spokesperson
Martin
Nesirky: I’ll
check,
Matthew.
Twenty
six hours
later, after
insisting to
Inner City
Press that
even the
amount it pays
to France in
Mali under a
letter of
assist it now
acknowledges
but will not
make public,
the UN sent
this to Inner
City
Press:
Subject:
In
response to
your question
yesterday on
corporate
donations to
the
UN
From: UN
Spokesperson -
Do Not Reply
[at] un.org
Date: Tue,
Dec 10, 2013
at 2:55 PM
To:
Matthew.Lee
[at]
innercitypress.com
In
response to
your question
yesterday on
corporate
donations to
the UN,
here is what
the Office of
Legal Affairs
and
Controller's
Office can
say:
In
accordance
with the
Financial
Regulations
and Rules of
the United
Nations, the
UN can and
does accept
voluntary
contributions,
in cash
and in kind,
from
governments,
from
non-governmental
entities
(e.g.,
associations,
corporations,
including
those
for-profit and
not-for-profit),
and
individuals,
provided that
the purposes
for
which the
contributions
are made are
consistent
with the
policies,
aims and
activities of
the United
Nations, and
provided
further that
the acceptance
of voluntary
contributions
that directly
or indirectly
involve
additional
financial
liability for
the United
Nations
require
approval of
the General
Assembly (see
Financial
Regulation
3.12 and
Financial Rule
103.4).
Normally,
the
Controller
signs all the
agreements for
voluntary
contributions
after ensuring
that there is
no additional
financial
liability and
that the
envisaged
activity to be
funded from
the
contribution
is in
line with the
programmatic
mandated
activity of
the
Organization.
However, this
authority is
also delegated
to several
responsible
officials in
offices away
from
Headquarters,
for their
respective
jurisdictions,
subject to
adherence to
the financial
regulations
and
rules.
Direct
cash
contributions
to the United
Nations from
corporations
are
extremely
rare. In-kind
contributions
of goods and
services are
more
prevalent and
are usually
made in
response to a
natural
disaster,
such as in the
aftermath of
the earthquake
in Haiti. The
new Samsung
sets in the
UNCA room were
donated by
Samsung to the
Permanent
Mission of the
Republic of
Korea to the
United
Nations. The
Mission
then donated
them to the
Department of
Public
Information
(DPI) and
DPI is loaning
them to UNCA.
The
United Nations
is not in a
position to
disclose
information on
the
contribution
of individual
donors in view
of
confidentiality
requirements
provided in
some of the
contribution
agreements.
However, the
volume of
contributions,
including
contributions
for
specified and
non-specified
purposes, are
reported on
the website of
the UN System
Chief
Executives
Board. The
following link
http://www.unsceb.org/content/statistics
provides very
useful
information
not only for
the United
Nations but
also the
entire UN
system
organizations.
The
answer is
appreciated
and we will
report on it
more. But we
highlight:
"The new
Samsung sets
in the UNCA
room were
donated
by Samsung to
the Permanent
Mission of the
Republic of
Korea to the
United
Nations. The
Mission then
donated them
to the
Department of
Public
Information
(DPI) and DPI
is loaning
them to UNCA."
What
then of UNCA's
leadership's
claim that the
donation "does
not
involve a
mission"?
a
re-coronation
of Pamela Falk
of CBS as the
2014 president
of UNCA,now
known as the
UN Censorship
Alliance, is
set for next
week.
A second
midnight
defense has
been mounted,
that Falk has
not "done
anything" to
anyone, or
even spoken
badly. Well,
the UNCA
trolls are
attributable
to her,
including
under command
responsibility.
In
2013, she was
asked to reign
in those UNCA
"leaders" who
used the
organization
to try to get
the
investigative
Press thrown
out of the UN,
as they
descended into
anonymous
trolling
social media
accounts,
counterfeiting
the new Free
UN Coalition
for Access
and
then Inner
City Press.
Falk's
reaction in an
on
the record
meeting
was to demand
that she not
be
written about,
despite having
sought this
position, and
putting
herself
forward at
every
opportunity to
ask softball
questions the
answers to
which are most
often not
published
anywhere. Audio here,
here
and
here.
The
United Nations
Correspondents
Association
election also
involves
indicters and
purported
judges, and
the Reuters
successor to the
scribe who
spied (click
here for that).
That spying
for the UN was
done by UNCA
first vice
president and
has not been
addressed or
acted on in
any way. Such
an
organization
is in no
position to
preach on
ethics,
journalistic
or any other
kind.
Now
this UNCA is
poised to
raise money,
$250 a plate,
for an event
Ban
Ki-moon is set
to attend,
after fielding
softball
questions two
days
earlier from
his hosts (or
censors). Can
you say,
conflict of
interest? And
this is
another way
that senior UN
officials
remain
unaccountable.
Watch this
site.
Watch
this site.