On
Somalia UNSC Calls for Funding
of AMISOM With Burundi Troops
From Civil Society
By Matthew
Russell Lee, Video
UNITED NATIONS,
July 30 – Even with Ethiopia
now calling for the removal of
UN sanctions on Eritrea, the
idea was removed from the UN
Security Council's 10 July
2018 Press Statement, below.
On July 30 the UN Security
Council met about the Mission
in Somalia, AMISOM, and
Somalia Eritrea sanctions -
but Inner City Press remains
banned from entering the UN
for the 27th day in a row, by
UN Secretary General Antonio
Guterres, his Global
Communicator Alison Smale and
spokesman Stephane Dujarric,
all three of them on vacation.
Fox
News story here,
GAP blogs I
and II. The resulting AMISOM
resolution
was extraordinary
for calling,
in Paragraph
30, for
funding for a
deadly (and
sometimes
rapist)
peacekeeping
mission,
including Burundian
troops charged
with human
rights
violations,
from "civil
society." From
the text of
Paragraph 30:
"30. Welcomes
the support of
the
international
community for
peace and stability
in So alia, in
particular the
European Union
for its
substantial
contribution in
supporting
AMISOM, as
well as
support from
other
bilateral
partners for
both
AMISOM and the
Somali
security
institutions
and forces,
emphasises the
importance of
new
contributions,
including from
new and
existing
donors from
the
international community,
the African
Union Peace
Fund, the
private
sector, civil
society and
other donations,
in order to
share the
financial
burden of
supporting
AMISOM."
We'll have
more on this
- whether or
not Guterres'
and Smale's
ghoulish Press
ban continues.
The UK's
Karen Pierce,
who will
become
President of
the Security
Council in two
days on August
1 (after a
Twitter
Q&A at 11
am on July 31,
watch this
site) on
Eritrea said
"It's
something the
Council needs
to discuss. I
think the
developments
are very
positive.
They're very
welcome, and
at some point
that will need
to be
reflected in
the coming
months on
sanctions. But
the Council
hasn't had a
full
discussion of
that yet, so
it's something
we need to
talk about." This with
Inner City
Press banned
and the UK
doing nothing
about it - in
fact,
the formal banner is
the UK's own
Alison Smale,
on vacation,
who never
responded to
or acknowledged a
single one of
Inner City
Press' seven
e-mail
including one
on
June
25 after
an improper ouster
by a UN Lieutenant
with retaliatory
animus,
requesting
protection.
After the July
30 meeting,
Sweden's Olof
B. Skoog
who oversaw or at
least aceepted
Press
censorship for
28 of the 31
days of his
Council presidency
read out these
Press Elements:
"The members
of the
Security
Council
welcomed the
first visit to
the Horn of
Africa by the
Chair of the
Sanctions
Committee for
Somalia and
Eritrea since
2010 in May.
The members of
the Security
Council noted
that the Chair
was not able
to visit
Eritrea during
his visit.
The members of
the Security
Council
welcomed the
continued
commitment of
the Federal
Government of
Somalia to
political and
security
reforms, and
to improving
weapons and
ammunition
management in
order to
comply fully
with the terms
of the partial
lifting of the
arms embargo.
The members of
the Security
Council looked
forward to
further
progress in
this regard,
and reiterated
their
readiness to
support this
process
including
through the
Sanctions
Committee and
the Somalia
and Eritrea
Monitoring
Group.
They strongly
commended the
historic
signing of the
Joint
Declaration of
Peace and
Friendship by
the leaders of
Eritrea and
Ethiopia on 9
July, and the
commitment by
both parties
to jointly
endeavour to
ensure
regional
peace,
development
and
cooperation.
The members of
the Security
Council
supported and
encouraged
Ethiopia in
line with the
commitment
made by the
Prime Minister
of Ethiopia to
help in
normalizing
relations
between
Eritrea and
Djibouti in
the same
spirit that
helped
facilitate the
historic
agreement
between
Ethiopia and
Eritrea.
The members of
the Security
Council
further
welcomed the
announcement
that Eritrea
and Somalia
would work
together to
foster
regional peace
and stability.
The members of
the Security
Council
reiterated
their
readiness to
support the
region in
these
efforts." Inner
City Press, thanks
to Guterres
and Smale with
many assists, could
not ask any questions.
We'll have
more on this.
On
July 27, US
Vice President
Mike Pence
issued this
read out: "The
Vice President
met today with
Ethiopian
Prime Minister
Dr. Abiy
Ahmed. The
Vice President
reaffirmed the
United States’
longstanding
partnership
with the
people of
Ethiopia and
applauded the
historic
reform efforts
by Prime
Minister Abiy,
including
improving
respect for
human rights,
reforming the
business
environment,
and making
peace with
Eritrea. The
Vice President
encouraged
continued
Ethiopian
leadership in
resolving
regional
conflicts in
the Horn of
Africa, as
well as
strengthening
U.S.-Ethiopia
trade and
investment.
The two
leaders
underscored
their
countries’
shared values
and their
commitment to
building an
even stronger
partnership in
the days
ahead."
On July 12, hours before his
belated press conference
arranged to be without press,
Guterres rather than OCHA head
Lowcock bragged about and took
credit for public money
directed to Ethiopia: "The
UN’s Central Emergency
Response Fund (CERF) released
today US$15 million to
urgently scale up humanitarian
assistance to people affected
by escalating inter-communal
violence in Ethiopia.
Historical tensions between
communities in southern
Ethiopia escalated in April
2018 and led to large-scale
displacements, damage of
properties and loss of
life. Close to one
million men, women and
children are currently being
sheltered with already food
insecure relatives or residing
in cramped public buildings
without adequate food and
water and substandard
sanitation and hygiene
facilities. “Under the
leadership of Dr. Abiy Ahmed,
new measures to bring unity
and reconciliation have
spurred great enthusiasm
within the country and high
international praise,” said UN
Secretary-General António
Guterres. “However, the impact
of inter-communal tensions
presents a challenge for the
new leadership. Nearly one
million people are displaced
and require urgent help,
especially during this rainy
season. It is critical to act
immediately and that is why
CERF is releasing $15 million
to enable urgent aid." In the
past, such announcements were
done by OCHA. But Guterres
needs a win, and so wants
"better" press coverage that
he has allowed the roughing
up, and now has banned, the
Press.
Fox News story
here,
GAP blogs I
and II. It
is easy to impose sanctions,
at least on country like
Eritrea, but very hard to take
them off even when the
original reasons, support for
Al Shabaab in Somalia, is
gone. Cote d'Ivoire on July 10
carried the water of Djibouti;
others including the penholder
the UK have their own reasons.
The about-face of Ethiopia -
which hasn't changed its UN
Ambassador despite the changes
in Addis Ababa - didn't move
the needle. Meanwhile Inner
City Press, which exposed the
use of the UN's Panel of
Experts to call for regime
change, remains banned from
even entering the UN.
Fox
News story here
("UN roughs
up, ejects,
bans reporter
from
headquarters:
Caught on
tape");
petition to
Guterres here;
GAP blogs I
and II (“Harassment
of US
Journalist
Intensifies at
the UN”). The
UN under
Antonio "Winds
of Change"
Guterres is
corrupt.
And it is hard to know the
UK's reasons, not only in
light of the telling chaos of
Boris Johnson's resignation,
but due to secrecy. The UK
denied Inner City Press'
request under the Freedom of
Information Act 2000 for
documents, and banned it from
its Mission's "background
briefing," ostensibly finding
tape recorder holders for
Japanese media which write
more about US rappers than the
UN to be more "international
media" that Inner City Press.
The P2 are a joke. Back on 14
November 2017 before the
Security Council voted again
on Somalia and Eritrea
sanctions, Inner City Press
asked the penholder on the
resolution, the UK's
then-Ambassador Matthew
Rycroft, if there is any
evidence of Eritrea supporting
Al Shabaab and if not, why not
at least separate the two
sanctions regimes. Rycroft
acknowledged there is no
evidence, but said discussions
on separating the two hadn't
been successful. Video here.
Fromthe UK transcript: Inner
City Press: On the Eritrea
sanctions, is there any
evidence that Eritrea has been
supporting Al Shabab? And if
there’s not, why aren’t there
two separate sanctions
regimes? Does the UK favour
that? Amb Rycroft: "We did
explore that actually with our
Council colleagues and there
wasn’t the appetite on the
Security Council to do that. I
think there has been progress
on the Al Shabab issue.
There’s no evidence at the
moment that the Eritrean
authorities have been
supporting Al Shabab, and we
very much welcome that. But as
you know, there are other
aspects to why there is a
sanctions regime on Eritrea,
and what we urge the
authorities there to do is to
engage with the monitoring
group, to engage with the
chair of the sanctions
committee, so that those
people can come back with that
positive evidence which they
say is there, and that would
help change the dynamic in the
Security Council." Later on
the morning of November 14,
after four abstentions from
the combined sanctions, Inner
City Press was informed by a
well-placed wag that the UK
was not opposed to splitting
the two: "the UK would rather
get 15-0 votes for Somalia
then all these abstentions
because of the Eritrea issue."
We hope to have more on this.
Back in May 2017, Rycroft said
"six months ago, the Security
Council was quite divided on
whether there should be
sanctions or not on Eritrea.
Before the next decision on
the sanctions regime on
Eritrea, coming up in
November, we are going to do a
review today of whether there
should be a sanctions regime.
We, as penholder on that
issue, are seeking to find a
way to unite the Security
Council so that there can be
some specific measures in a
roadmap that the authorities
of Eritrea would need to meet
in order to lift the sanctions
regime. Our national position
is that the conditions are not
yet right to lift the
sanctions. But that if Eritrea
did some of the things which
we will set out today then we
would look at it on the basis
of the evidence."
When
the UN Special Rapporteur on the
situation of human rights in the
State of Eritrea Sheila
Keetharuth held a press
conference at the UN on October
28, Inner City Press went to ask
her if she considered the impact
of sanctions on Eritrea.
Video here. She
answered only in terms of arms
embargo, they said she simply
chose not to look at the issue.
On November 10, when Somalia
Eritrea sanctions were voted on,
five countries abstained:
Angola, China, Egypt, Russia and
Venezuela. Eritrea's charge
d'affaires made a statement,
which we've
published on Scribd, here.
Before the vote, Inner City
Press asked UK Ambassador
Matthew Rycroft a question; he
spoke about the Somalia Eritrea
sanctions helping to limit
support to Al Shabaab. Video
here. But the current lack
of evidence of Eritrean support
to Al Shabaab has been
repeatedly cited. And there are
new reports calling
the SEMG and its former
officials into question, here.
We'll have more on this.
By contrast to
Keetharuth, the Rapporteur on
the Democratic People Republic
of Korea Tomas Ojea Quintana
answered detailed questions from
Inner City Press about sanctions
including unilateral sanctions
on coal sales, for example. Is
there no consistency between UN
Special Rapporteurs? Video
here.
There were only three
journalists asking questions at
the October 28 press conference
- and yet Inner City Press was
in 2016 ousted and evicted, and
it is still under Antonio
Guterres restricted to a minder.
Petition
here.
***
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
Past
(and future?) UN Office: S-303, UN, NY 10017 USA
For now: Box 20047,
Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other,
earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in
the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright
2006-2017 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
for
|