By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS, July
11 -- After
another Al
Shabaab attack
in Mogadishu,
the UN
Security
Council got a
briefing on
July 11 from
its envoy
Nicholas Kay,
then issued
the following
statement:
Press
Statement on
Somalia
On
11 July the
Security
Council
received a
briefing from
the Special
Representative
of the
Secretary-General,
Mr Nicholas
Kay, on the
security
situation in
Mogadishu.
The members of
the Security
Council
condemned in
the strongest
terms the
recent Al
Shabaab
attacks in
Mogadishu
against Villa
Somalia,
Parliament and
members of
Parliament in
the last week.
The members of
the Security
Council
expressed
their
condolences to
the families
of the victims
and wished a
speedy
recovery to
those injured.
The members of
the Security
Council paid
tribute to
both AMISOM
and the Somali
National
Security
Forces for
their
effective
response to
the attack
against Villa
Somalia. The
members of the
Security
Council
underlined the
urgent need to
support the
Somali
National
Security
Forces, in
order for it
to be able to
assume full
responsibility
for security
in Mogadishu
and
beyond.
In that
context
members of the
Security
Council
encouraged
Member States
to make
uncaveated
contributions
to the United
Nations Trust
Fund to
provide
support to the
Somali
National Army,
as authorized
in resolution
2124.
The members of
the Security
Council
reaffirmed
that terrorism
in all its
forms and
manifestations
constitutes
one of the
most serious
threats to
international
peace and
security, and
that any acts
of terrorism
are criminal
and
unjustifiable
regardless of
their
motivation,
wherever and
whenever and
by whomsoever
committed.
The members of
the Security
Council
reiterated
their
determination
to combat all
forms of
terrorism, in
accordance
with their
responsibilities
under the
Charter of the
United
Nations.
The members of
the Security
Council
underlined the
need to bring
perpetrators,
organizers,
financiers and
sponsors of
these
reprehensible
acts of
terrorism to
justice and
urged all
States, in
accordance
with their
obligations
under
international
law and
relevant
Security
Council
resolutions,
to cooperate
actively with
the Somali
authorities in
this regard.
The members of
the Security
Council
reminded
States that
they must
ensure that
measures taken
to combat
terrorism
comply with
all their
obligations
under
international
law, in
particular
international
human rights,
refugee and
humanitarian
law.
The members of
the Security
Council
reiterated
their resolve
to continue to
stand by the
people and
Government of
Somalia, in
the face of
deplorable
terrorist
attacks, as
they seek to
establish
peace and
prosperity
across their
country.
Back on May 12
in an advance
copy of the
UN's report on
Somalia, to be
issued as
S/2014/330,
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon says
he is
"concerned
about the
potential for
confrontation
between
Puntland and
'Somaliland.'
I call on both
sides to avoid
escalating
tensions."
Many note that
Somaliland,
without the
quotation
marks Ban puts
around it, has
been more
peaceful than
Mogadishu for
some time -
and that the
UN system
raised
tensions by,
for example,
handing
Somaliland's
airspace to
Mogadishu.
Ban's report
also says he
remains
"concerned
about the
continued
export of
Somali
charcoal" and
encourages
"the Security
Council
Committee on
Somalia and
Eritrea to
list the
responsible
individuals
and entities."
These advance
copies have
been known to
be changed
before "final"
release, in a
process for
which a description,
and then proposals
for reform,
were provided
here
and then here.
In
this advance
copy, Ban
"strongly
recommend[s]
to the Council
an extension
of the mandate
of UNSOM for
one year to 3
June 2015."
When
on April 23
UNSOM envoy
Nicholas Kay
along with
AMISOM head
Mahamat Saleh
Annadif took
questions at
the UN, Inner
City Press
asked them
about the new
Ugandan guard
unit, about
the Somalia
Eritrea
Monitoring
Group and
about
Somaliland
including its
disputed
airspace. Video
here from
Minute 14:23.
Kay
said, "at the
moment we're
absolutely
clear
obviously on
the
international
legal position
vis-a-vis
Somaliland,
it's not a
recognized
state by
anyone. But
they have a
very strong
sense of their
own statehood
and
aspirations to
independence."
Kay
referred to
the
Turkey-facilitated
talks between
Somaliland and
the Somali
government in
Mogadishi,
including
about
airspace. He
said that UN
funds and
programs
operate in
Somaliland.
But UNSOM does
not:
Somaliland
points to the
mandate it was
given by the
Security
Council.
On the
Ugandan guard
unit, Kay said
they will
protect the UN
but work with
AMISOM. But in
March, AMISOM
spokesperson
Ali Aden
Houmed was
quoted by
Voice of
America
that "we do
not have the
fact of what
these forces
are and they
are not part
of us... UN
and Uganda had
been
conducting 'a
secret
negotiation.'"
Neither Kay
nor Mahamat
Saleh Annadif
addressed
this.
On
sanctions,
after Kay
recounted
improvements
in reporting
and
"information"
that are
underway,
Inner City
Press asked if
the Somali
letter
requesting the
ouster of SEMG
coordinator
Chopra has
been
withdrawn. Kay
said he has
not seen the
letter. Well here it is:
Inner City
Press exclusively
obtained,
reported
and published
it. Has it
been
withdrawn?
Footnotes:
Particularly
in light of
media freedom
issues in
Somalia -- and
in Somaliland,
on which the Free UN Coalition for Access has
worked --
we note that
the UN on
April 23
automatically
gave the first
question to
the UN
Correspondents
Association,
a
group which
has tried to
get the
investigative
Press thrown out of
the UN.
But
the question
by UNCA's
president
included how
many Burundi
troops are
there -- no
mention of the
UN's own
warning about
the
distribution
of weapons by
Burundi's
government to
its youth wing
-- and in
mistaking the
US Institute
of Peace,
where Kay
spoke this
week, with the
International
Peace
Institute,
most recently
reviewed here
and here.
In
April UNCA or
the UN's
Censorship
Alliance has
tried to privatize
access
to the
incoming South
Korean
presidency of
the Security
Council in
May,
positioning
itself as
middle-man
even after
FUNCA's
inquiry
and RSVP
find that the
statement an
event is for
UNCA members
only, or
now only
through UNCA,
is false.
Preaching
press freedom
from this UN
is difficult.
Watch this
site.