Srebrenica
Draft Fails,
With Four
Abstention
& Russia's
Veto, Final
Text Here
By Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS, July
8 -- When the
draft
resolution to
commemorate
the 20th
anniversary of
Srebrenica was
put up for a
vote in the UN
Security
Council on
July 8, after
having been
two times
postponed on
July 7, both
Russia's
Vitaly Churkin
and China's
Liu Jieyi
urged that a
vote not be
held. Deputy
Permanent
Representative
Peter Wilson
of the UK, the
sponsor of the
resolution,
said that a
vote should be
taken.
The resolution
then failed,
with ten in
favor, Russia
casting a veto
against, and
four countries
abstaining:
China,
Nigeria,
Angola and
Venezuela.
Inner City
Press has
put the failed
draft
resolution
online here.
Before
the vote,
Russia's
Ambassador
Churkin told
the other
members of the
Security
Council that
“when the
delegation of
Bosnia and
Herzegovina
first
approached us
with the need
to commemorate
the 20th
anniversary of
the tragedy in
Srebrenica we
agreed that
this to be
done solemnly,
given the
particular
sensitivity of
the topic for
people in
Bosnia
Herzegovina
and in the
region on the
whole. We were
saying that
what we need
to do is to
underscore the
positive in
the road
covered and
look into the
future. That
is exactly
what in the
beginning was
being said by
the United
Kingdom
delegation,
when they said
they are ready
to prepare a
draft
resolution for
the Security
Council.
However, the
implementation
of the
initiative has
shown that
this is
following a
different
direction. The
draft
submitted by
the United
Kingdom turned
out to be not
constructive,
confrontational,
and
politically
motivated. It
contained
distortions,
as a result of
which the
blame for the
past is placed
basically on
one people.
This approach,
according to
which you
single out one
party for a
war crime, is
not legitimate
and can result
in even
greater
division
within the
Bosnian
society. From
the very
beginning, we
tried to make
sure that the
document is
valid in its
nature. We
proposed an
alternative
option, aimed
on forward
looking logic.
However, our
key statements
were ignored.”
China's
Ambassador Liu
Jieyi then
said,
“regarding the
draft
resolution to
commemorate
Srebrenica
event, at this
moment Council
members still
have great
concerns. To
force a vote
on the draft
resolution
when major
differences
still remain
is not in
conformity
with national
reconciliation
within Bosnia
and
Herzegovina
and in the
region at
large. It will
also affect
the unity of
the Council
members. China
believes that
the Council
members can
well continue
their exchange
of views on
the matter of
the draft
resolution and
should refrain
from hasty
actions.”
In a
statement
issued after
the vote by
the UK,
Foreign
Secretary
Philip Hammond
said, “We are
disappointed
that our
Resolution to
commemorate
the 20th
anniversary of
Srebrenica was
vetoed today.
We had three
goals: to
commemorate
the victims of
the genocide
in Srebrenica
and victims on
all sides
during the
conflict in
Bosnia
Herzegovina;
to appeal for
justice for
all and
reconciliation;
and to note
the lessons
for the UN, of
these tragic
events. The
Resolution did
not point
fingers of
blame nor seek
to reopen
painful
divisions. The
failure to
adopt this
Resolution is
a snub to the
families of
the victims
and the
survivors of
Srebrenica.
True
reconciliation
requires
facing up to
the realities
of the past by
all sides and
determination
to learn the
lessons for
the future. We
owe it to all
those who lost
their lives in
the war to
work together
to help build
a safe and
prosperous
Bosnia
Herzegovina.”
* * *
These
reports
are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for Sept 26, 2011 New Yorker on Inner City
Press at UN
Click
for
BloggingHeads.tv re Libya, Sri Lanka, UN
Corruption
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-303,
UN, NY 10017 USA
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest service,
and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2015 Inner City Press,
Inc. To request reprint or other permission,
e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
|