By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS, June
10 -- With
Navi Pillay
slated to
leave as UN
High
Commissioner
on Human
Rights on
August 31, on
June 10 in a
final opening
statement to
the Human
Rights Council
she said of
Sri Lanka, "My
Office has now
put in place a
staff team
that will be
supported by
several
experts and
Special
Procedures
mandate
holders, to
conduct the
comprehensive
investigation
mandated by
this Council
in order to
advance
accountability,
and thus
reconciliation.
I encourage
the Government
to take this
opportunity to
cooperate with
a credible
truth-seeking
process."
But the
Rajapaksa
government has
already
indicated it
will not
cooperate. In
fact, it has
made threats
to go after
anyone who
does
cooperate.
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon, for
whom many say
inaction on
Sri Lanka has
been a low
point of his
tenure, has
nominated
Jordan's
Prince Zeid as
Pillay's
successor. As
Inner City
Press
reported, Zeid
to his credit
was troubled
by the
inclusion of
controversial
military
figure
Shavendra
Silva on Ban's
and Herve
Ladsous'
Senior
Advisory Group
on
Peacekeeping
Operations.
Silva remains
a figure
within the UN,
texting in Sri
Lanka's seat
in the General
Assembly. How
will Zeid
proceed? Why
isn't there an
at least
semi-meaningful
confirmation
process? We'll
be watching.
The
UN has
entirely
stonewalled
Press
questions
about the new
White Flag
killings
report and the
light it sheds
on current UN
official Vijay
Nambiar and
former UN
official, now
Sri Lankan
Ambassador
Palitha
Kohona.
Now
Erik Solheim
of Norway has
given an
interview and
said:
Solheim:
On
17 May, 2009,
the Norwegians
and others
received calls
by Pulidevan
and Nadesan
who wanted to
surrender. We
told them it
was too late
for us to
arrange
anything and
advised them
to hoist a
white flag. On
18 May, we
were informed
they were
killed.
Q:
However,
Dr. Palitha
Kohona
declared,
after the war,
that the LTTE
senior
militants shot
and killed
Prabhakran and
his immediate
members as
they did not
want anyone to
surrender to
government
troops. Isn't
this a
possibility?
Solheim:
You
will have a
huge
difficulty
finding any
other person
believing this
story.
In the
UN, however,
when Inner
City Press
reported on
the background
to Kohona
getting the
Rajapaksa
government's
denial of war
crimes, “Lies
Agreed To,”
screened in
the Dag
Hammarjkold
Library
auditorium,
the reaction
from the
then-president
and executive
committee of
the United
Nations
Correspondents
Association
are summarized
here. One
wag wondered
whether the
2009 Bloodbath
on the Beach
has now been
echoed as
Blowhards on
the Beach, here.
In Sri
Lanka now the
Rajapaksa
government blocks
websites it
doesn't like.
The UNCA board
asked that
Inner City
Press articles
be removed
from the
internet. This
was refused.
One UNCA board
member claimed
to Google
that his “for
the record”
complaint to
the UN trying
to get Inner
City Press
thrown out was
in fact
private and “copyrighted.”
Here is a
response from
the Electronic
Frontier
Foundation.
This got it
banned from
Google's
Search, under
the US Digital
Millennium
Copyright Act,
which
threatens to
be globalized
through the
Trans Pacific
Partnership.
Who said there
is not
censorship in
the UN, and in
the United
States?
Now
the new Free
UN Coalition
for Access
opposes all of
this, and attacks
on media work both
inside the UN
and further
afield.
Solheim has
said he is
willing to
testify;
outgoing UN
High
Commissioner
for Human
Rights Navi
Pillay's said
to be eying
Sandra Beidas
to head the
probe. Watch
this site.