As Sri
Lanka Bans
Investigators,
Ban's UN As
"Reconciliation"
Ground Cover?
By Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
September 16
-- While the
UN Human
Rights Council
panel says it
will be
investigating
Sri Lanka war
crimes, the
government of
Mahinda
Rajapaksa has
said it will
no allow those
investigators
in.
Now
Inner City
Press hears
that UN
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon's own
Department of
Political
Affairs may be
providing
ground-cover
to Rajapaksa,
by assigning a
DPA staffer to
help
Rajapaksa's
own
"reconciliation
bureau" which
is presented
as an
alternative to
the voted-on
outside
investigation.
Inner City
Press on
September 16
directly asked
Sri Lanka's
Ambassador to
the UN Palitha
Kohona if UN
DPA will be
working with
the
government. He
smiled and
said, "watch
this space."
When the UN's
Oscar
Fernandez
Taranco, who
just left DPA
for UN
Peacebuilding,
was in Colombo
this summer,
he was asked
to support
this
reconciliation
bureau.
The bureau is
to be headed
by S.B.
Divaratne,
until recently
secretary to
the
Presidential
Task Force for
Resettlement,
Development
and Security -
Northern
Province.
Before that,
he was known
for
restricting
food and aid
to Tamils
during the
final stages
in 2009. This
is the
reconciliation
Ban's UN would
work with?
The
UN's
Department of
Political
Affairs is
headed by
Jeffrey
Feltman,
formerly an
official of
the US
government,
which this
week praised
the UN taking
over the
peacekeeping
mission in
Central
African
Republic. That
mission, as
Inner City
Press
reported,
includes
helicopters
from the Sri
Lankan Army,
despite the
UN's
investigation.
Looking
further into
this on
September 16,
Inner City
Press found at
UN reception
not only
Kohona, but
also the UN
Correspondents
Association
president who
screened
in the UN for
UNCA "Lies
Agreed To,"
after having
accepted money
from Kohona as
rent:
Giampaolo
Pioli. This is
the UN.
Back on August
27 Inner City
Press asked UN
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric about
the UN HRC
inquiry into Sri
Lanka and what
precedents or
procedures the
UN has for
protecting
witnesses,
those giving
information to
this inquiry?
Video
here.
Dujarric said
he would look
into
precedents -
but none have
been provided
since.
Already, when
Inner City
Press and
others raised
concerns that
the email
submission
procedures for
the inquiry
does not
involve
encryption,
nothing
has been
done. It still
should be.
Background:
After Sri
Lanka's
Minister of
"Defense and
Urban
Development"
issued an order
banning all
non-governmental
organizations
from press
conferences,
workshops,
training for
journalists,
and
dissemination
of press
releases which
is beyond
their
mandate," and
the UN
declined
comment or
passed the
buck, the US
and now the
human rights
group FIDH
have expressed
concern.
The
Observatory
for the
Protection of
Human Rights
Defenders, a
joint
programme of
the World
Organisation
Against
Torture (OMCT)
and the
International
Federation for
Human Rights
said, "The
Observatory is
concerned by
these attempts
by the Sri
Lankan
Government to
curtail the
freedom of
association,
assembly, and
expression of
human rights
defenders ,
which seem to
be aimed at
undermining
the legitimacy
of their
peaceful
activities.
The
Observatory
calls upon the
authorities of
Sri Lanka to
withdraw the
above-mentioned
notice
immediately
and to put an
immediate end
to the
harassment
against all
human rights
defenders."
On July
7, Inner
City
Press
asked UN
Deputy
Spokesperson
Farhan Haq
about it. Video here, on Inner City Press'
YouTube
channel.
Inner City
Press asked,
since UN envoy
Oscar
Fernandez
Taranco was
recently in
Sri Lanka, had
he spoken to
the Rajapaksa
government
about this
crack-down, or
did he have
any comment
now?
Haq replied,
"We'll have to
study what
this
particular
injunction
was... we'll
have to
evaluate
that."
But 24 hours
later on July
8, after lead
UN Spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric had
already
belatedly
begun the
day's noon
briefing --
and after 5 pm
in Geneva --
the
Spokesperson's
Office sent
Inner City
Press this:
Date:
Tue,
Jul 8, 2014 at
12:18 PM
From: UN
Spokesperson -
Do Not Reply
[at] un.org
Subject: Your
question on
Sri Lanka.
To:
Matthew.Lee
[at]
innercitypress.com
Regarding
Sri
Lanka, please
kindly direct
your question
from
yesterday's
noon briefing
to OHCHR.
So this
was the result
of the UN
Secretariat's
"evaluation"
-- to pass the
buck to Navi
Pillay's
office?
Meanwhile
media in Sri
Lanka had
reported that
Haq's office
would be
making a
comment; a
press freedom
organization
there
consulted by
the Free
UN Coalition
for Access
complained the
order would
chill the
freedom to
report. What
was the
purpose of the
UN's Oscar
Fernandez
Tarando's trip
to Sri Lanka?
What does
Ban's "Rights
Up Front"
policy,
announced
after systemic
failure in Sri
Lanka, really
mean?
After
UN official
Oscar
Fernandez
Taranco
visited Sri
Lanka but has
refused to
take Press
questions upon
his return to
New York,
Inner City
Press asked
UN spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric on
June 25 about
a protest,
video
here:
Inner
City
Press: There’s
a protest
scheduled for
today at 1
p.m. on 47th
Street of
mostly people
from Sri Lanka
and elsewhere
about the
violence
there. And
they’ve said
that they
intend to hand
a letter to
the
Secretariat,
seeking action
against the
action there.
I wanted to
know: is this
going to be
possible? Is
Mr. [Oscar
Fernandez-]
Taranco...
it’s great
that Mr.
Šimonovic will
brief on
Burundi. It
seems like
it’s a kind of
a similar
situation. And
is the UN
aware of this?
And what has
been the
reaction to
the upswing in
violence in
Sri Lanka?
Spokesman
Dujarric:
I think we’ve
spoken about
this from this
podium. We’ve
condemned the
violence that
we’ve seen
recently. And
obviously, the
Secretary-General
fully backs
the efforts of
the High
Commissioner
for Human
Rights. As for
the
demonstration,
I was unaware
of it. If I
have any
information, I
will let you
know.
Inner
City
Press: That
panel is about
war crimes at
the end of the
conflict on
both sides,
whereas this
is something
that’s
actually
taking place
currently.
That’s why I’m
sort of
asking, like,
did Mr.
Taranco deal
with this
issue while he
was there?
Spokesman
Dujarric:
As I said, I
shared with
you what I had
on Mr.
Taranco’s
visit.
The protest
took place:
see Inner
City Press tweeted
photo here.
In a previous
protest by Sri
Lankan Tamils,
the UN sent a
lower level
functionary
who told the
protesters the
letter would
be rejected if
they told the
Press about
it. Dujarric
said he would
check.
The
UN has
essentially
stonewalled
Press
questions
about the new
White Flag
killings
report and the
light it sheds
on current UN
official Vijay
Nambiar and
former UN
official, now
Sri Lankan
Ambassador
Palitha
Kohona.
It was about a
past financial
relationship
between Kohona
and the
president of
the UN
Correspondents
Association,
who then
agreed to an
UNCA screening
of a Rajapaksa
government
movie denying
war crimes
that UNCA
tried to
censor.
When
Inner City
Press reported
on the
background to
Kohona getting
the Rajapaksa
government's
denial of war
crimes, “Lies
Agreed To,”
screened in
the Dag
Hammarjkold
Library
auditorium,
the reaction
from the
then-president
and executive
committee of
the United
Nations
Correspondents
Association
are summarized
here.
Now
the new Free
UN Coalition
for Access
opposes all of
this, and attacks
on media work both
inside the UN
both further
afield and
as close at
47th Street,
west of First
Avenue. Watch
this site.
* * *
These
reports
are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for Sept 26, 2011 New Yorker on Inner City
Press at UN
Click
for
BloggingHeads.tv re Libya, Sri Lanka, UN
Corruption
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-303,
UN, NY 10017 USA
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest service,
and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2014 Inner City Press,
Inc. To request reprint or other permission,
e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
|