In
Sri
Lanka, Pillay
Notes Attacks
on Media, But
Dubious
UN Takes
Seriously
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
August 31 --
As Navi Pillay
wrapped up her
visit to Sri
Lanka
today, she
read out a
prepared
statement,
three
paragraphs we
will focus on
here.
She
acknowledged
what Inner
City Press and
other
reported
mid-way
through her
trip, "namely
the harassment
and
intimidation
of a number of
human rights
defenders, at
least two
priests,
journalists,
and many
ordinary
citizens...
people in
villages and
settlements in
the Mullaitivu
area were
visited by
police or
military
officers [and
were]
subsequently
questioned."
This
treatment is
not limited to
witnesses; it
is often
focused on
journalists.
Pillay
recounted that
"more than 30
journalists
are
believed to
have been
killed since
2005, and
several more –
including the
cartoonist Prageeth
Ekneligoda
- have
disappeared.
Many
others have
fled the
country.
Newspaper and
TV offices
have been
vandalized or
subjected to
arson attacks
– some, such
as the
Jaffna-based
paper Uthayan,
on multiple
occasions.. I
have called
for
the right to
Information
Act to be
adopted like
many of its
neighbors
in SAARC."
The
intimidation
of the media
and of
complaining
witnesses is
major, and
will undermine
or call into
question
whatever oral
and then
written
report Pillay
issues about
the trip.
After
mentioning
this
intimidation,
surveillance
and harassment
more than
halfway
through
her statement,
Pillay makes
this claim:
"the United
Nations
takes the
issue of
reprisals
against people
because they
have talked
to UN
officials as
an extremely
serious
matter."
Not
only is this
often not true
-- the UN
cracks down on
its own
whistleblowers,
and not only
doesn't
provide
protection to
those in
it who are
targeted, the
UN as time
assists in the
targeting,
ignoring the
rights of free
speech and
free
association.
A
UN system
whistleblower
who exposed UN
corruption in
North Korea
was
not only
fired, false
information
about him was
leaked by the
UN to
the New York
Times. More
recently the
UN's Kosovo whistleblower
James
Wasserstrom,
even when he
litigated and
won a
judgment, was
not even
compensated
for his costs,
and Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon has
appealed.
As
regards Sri
Lanka, when
Inner City
Press covered
Ban's May 2009
trip
to the island
(which turned
into a
"victory tour"
of the
North), and
published a quote from
the chief of
the UN Office
for the
Coordination
of
Humanitarian
Affairs John
Holmes from a
clearly on
the record
session,
Holmes
response was
to say "I will
never
talk to you
again" and for
his staff to
file a
complaint with
UN
media
accreditation
trying to get
Inner City
Press thrown
out of the
UN.
This
complaining to
UN Media
Accreditation
was used in
2012 by the
UN's
Censorship
Alliance,
after Inner
City Press
reported on
the
background to
UNCA's
screening, in
the UN, of the
Rajapaksa
government's
film denying
war crimes. (Click
here for an
outside
report on that.)
UNCA
Executive
Committee
members from Voice of
America,
Reuters and
AFP
among others
participated
in the
campaign; as since
shown, Reuters
UN
bureau chief
Louis
Charbonneau
handed the
chief of UN
Media
Accreditation
Stephane
Dujarric an anti-Press
internal UNCA
document,
three
minutes after
promising not
to do so.
Story
here,
audio
here, document
here.
Nothing has
been done to
address this.
Rather,
after
Inner City
Press quit
UNCA and
co-founded the
new Free
UN
Coalition for
Access,
the UN Department
of Public
Information's
response has
been to again
threaten to
suspend or
withdraw
Inner City
Press'
accreditation,
this time for
merely hanging
a FUNCA sign
on the door of
its shared
office,
while
UNCA
has five signs
and
continues
functioning as
the UN's
Cowardice
Association,
putting other
journalists at
risk.
When
Pillay's
office was
contacted
about this,
their response
was simply
to note that
accreditation
was extended
(albeit with
inappropriate
finger-waggling
about, among
other things,
how to cover
Ban and his
UN
Peacekeeping
chief Herve
Ladsous.)
So does the UN
take these
things
seriously? Not
on this
evidence.
Pillay
is to report
to the Human
Rights Council
in late
September.
Also, as first
reported by
Inner City
Press, Ban is
to have something
to say about
the Sri Lanka
(UN) lessons
learnt report
that is
finished but
is so far
being
withheld.
Watch
this site.