Sri
Lanka's
Rajapaksa Says
US Going Soft,
State Dept
Disagrees
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
October 2 --
After Sri
Lankan
president
Mahinda
Rajapaksa's
September 24
speech to the
UN General
Assembly
attacking the
UN Human
Rights Council
inquiry into
war crimes
(while
praising
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon's
visit in May
2009 right
after the
UN-dubbed
"bloodbath on
the beach"),
on October 1
the country's
Daily Mirror reported:
"Rajapaksa
is reported to
have told the
Cabinet
meeting that
his
discussions
with US
Secretary of
State John
Kerry had made
him realize
that the US
had softened
its stance on
Sri Lanka."
But on October
2 Kerry's (and
the US State
Department's)
spokesperson
Jen Psaki said
this is false.
Psaki said she
saw the story
and
“the
only thing
that was right
was that the
Secretary did
speak with the
Sri Lankan
President on
the margin of
the UN General
Assembly. He
did
so with the
express
purpose of
conveying that
US policy with
regard
to Sri Lanka
has not
changed, and
it certainly
has not
softened. We
would like our
relationship
with Sri Lanka
to achieve its
full
potential.
That will only
happen if Sri
Lanka builds
enduing peace
and prosperity
for all of its
diverse ethnic
and religious
communities.
That's why the
Secretary made
clear to the
President
that Sri Lanka
needed to take
meaningful
steps to act
like a country
that is no
longer at war
but instead is
now building a
future that
includes all
of its
citizens.”
So
much for
Rajapaksa's
spin.
In his
September 24
UNGA speech,
Rajapaksa
called Sri
Lanka an
"unfortunate
victim of
ill-conceived
agendas of
some in the
Human Rights
Council." He
bragged about
the "visit of
UN Secretary
General
to Sri Lanka,
just a week
after the
conclusion of
the conflict."
(In fairness
we are using
the quote from
the written
statement;
Rajapaksa
actually
called Ban
"Secretary
General TO Sri
Lanka,"
perhaps a
Freudian
slip.)
Rajapaksa
bragged about
heading the
Commonwealth,
but on the way
into the UN on
September 24,
the Permanent
Representative
of a
Commonwealth
country told
Inner City
Press Sri
Lanka heading
the
Commonwealth
had been a
mistake.
In his
conclusion,
Rajapaksa used
a quote from
the Buddha; in
the Sri Lanka
(government)
context it was
hard not to
think of the
extremist BBS
monks. One
reader has
tweeted that
it's as unfair
as blaming all
Christians for
Christian
extremists;
despite
government
links to BBS,
we think it's
worth
including this
position
here.)
Earlier
on September
24 on 47th
Street there
was a
protection of
Rajapaksa's
visit, tweeted
photo here.
Back on
August, while
the UN says it
will be
investigating
Sri Lanka war
crimes, and
the government
of Mahinda
Rajapaksa has
said it will
no allow the
investigators
in,
Inner City
Press asked UN
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric what
precedents or
procedures the
UN has for
protecting
witnesses,
those giving
information to
this inquiry?
Video
here.
Dujarric said
he would look
into
precedents,
and we'll look
forward to
that. But
already, when
Inner City
Press and
others raised
concerns that
the email
submission
procedures for
the inquiry
does not
involve
encryption,
nothing has
yet been done.
It still
should be.
Footnote: What the
State
Department
spokesperson
said on
October 2 was
in response to
a question,
we'll say it,
from Reuters.
As
we've noted
(and could further
update)
Reuters has its
own history on
Sri Lanka and
even attacking
independent
media for investigative
reporting
about Sri
Lankan
diplomacy (or
"buy-plomacy").
But unlike
Reuters, at
least at the UN,
we note when
we use an
answer to
another media's
question.
We'll have
more on this.
* * *
These
reports
are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for Sept 26, 2011 New Yorker on Inner City
Press at UN
Click
for
BloggingHeads.tv re Libya, Sri Lanka, UN
Corruption
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-303,
UN, NY 10017 USA
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest service,
and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2014 Inner City Press,
Inc. To request reprint or other permission,
e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
|