By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
October 11 --
After Inner
City Press exclusively
published
the UN's
internal
report on its
"systemic
failure" in
Sri
Lanka in 2009,
on Friday
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon's
associate
spokesperson
Farhan Haq
said that the
UN had called
for "safe
zones."
Inner City
Press asked if
this was the
notorious "No
Fire Zone" in
which tens of
thousands were
killed, which
even
the UN's John
Holmes called
the Bloodbath
on the Beach.
Video
here,
from Minute
25:27.
Haq
replied of the
idea of "safe
zones" and
"days for
halting"
conflict that
"many of those
concepts did
not work
out or be
implemented in
the way we
would have
wanted them to
be."
You
don't say. But
did the UN
call for a
ceasefire? No.
Did it say
anything about
the weapons
bought or used
by the Sri
Lankan
government?
No.
Now
that Inner
City Press has
published the
internal
report, with
its
call for the
Deputy
Secretary
General to
take issues to
the Security
Council, when
will it be
implemented?
Inner City
Press asked,
and Haq
said, "this is
something
we're going to
be in dialogue
with
member states
about." Video
here from
Minute 6:07.
Haq
said the
Secretariat
would be
briefing
NGOs and "the
media" - when?
Now
that the
report has
been obtained
and published,
it's time for
the UN
to speak out
more.
Since
the slaughter,
the UN has
accepted one
of the most
involved
military
figures, Shavendra
Silva, on the
UN Senior
Advisory Group
on
Peacekeeping
Operations;
this month,
Silva's
putative boss
Palitha
Kohona,
also involved,
took over the
chair of the
UN General
Assembly's
Sixth (Legal)
Committee.
So
what was
learned from
the cited 1999
Independent
Inquiry on UN
Action
in
Rwanda and
the 1999
review on the
fall of
Srebrenica?
Syria
is cited in,
and explains,
this "Plan of
Action to
strengthen
the UN’s role
in protecting
people in
crises." The
report
says: "Today
we are
witnessing the
agony of the
Syrian people.
That conflict
is a test -
not just of
Member States’
will to fulfil
their
responsibilities,
but of the
UN’s ability
to use all the
tools at its
disposal to
make sure that
people are
protected."
Again,
this may
explain the
report: while
the Western P3
members of the
Security
Council, the
US, France and
UK, did not
much or at all
push
Ban Ki-moon to
"do something"
about the
slaughter in
Sri
Lanka -- the UK is
holding its
Commonwealth
Heads of
Government
Meeting there
-- they are pushing,
and hard, on
the issue of
Syria
and ousting
Bashar al
Assad. So,
now a UN
report and
plan for
"Rights
Up Front."
What next?
The
plan says the
UN will "hold
accountable
staff,
particularly
at
senior
levels." But
if the UN
can't even
admit and
apologize for
bringing
cholera to
Haiti,
what does
accountability
mean?
If
Ban's UN
allows its
head of
peacekeeping
Herve Ladsous
to openly
refuse
to answer
Press
questions
about mass
rape by his
partners
in
the Congolese
Army,
where is the
accountability?
Now that farce
has
been reported
this week in
the UK New
Statesman,
here.
This
comes after
the UN's
Censorship
Alliance
tried to oust
Inner City
Press for
its Sri Lanka
reporting,
then spied
against it to
the UN, click
here for that;
it is the new
Free
UN Coalition
for Access,
despite
threats from
the UN,
now working to
further open
the UN.
Watch
this site.