On
Sri
Lanka,
UN's Explanation of Non-Release Shifts, 3 Weeks
After Panel Finished Report
By
Matthew
Russell
Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
April
20 -- The UN's story about their delay in releasing
the Panel of Experts' report on Sri Lanka got even more convoluted on
April 20.
Inner
City Press
asked Secretary General Ban Ki-moon's acting Deputy Spokesman Farhan
Haq to explain the delay between the Panel's
sign off date on the
report as obtained and published by Inner City Press (but not The
Island), March 31, and the April 12 turn off to Ban, and April 13 to
Sri Lanka.
The
UN's Haq said,
“I won't have a comment on the time frames.”
Then
he tried to
explain the delay by referring to Ban Ki-moon's travels -- for
example to Hungary and now Russia, where Haq has declined to say if
Sri Lanka will be discussed. Haq said, “The panel wanted to
present to S-G... He has had a number of travels.”
Inner
City Press
asked if anyone in the UN -- for example, Ban's senior adviser Vijay
Nambair, whose role in the so called white flag killings of
surrendees at the end of the conflict has been described in a filing
with the International Criminal Court -- saw the report between its
March 31 sign off date and April 12.
Haq
did not say
no, instead choosing to re-focus on Ban Ki-moon not having gotten it
until “Monday.” (Actually, according to the UN it was Tuesday,
April 12 -- Inner City Press reported on April 11 it would be the
next day, April 12).
But
then Haq spoke
about the UN's senior advisers -- no mention of Ban -- getting a
response together. Nambiar, it seems clear, has not been recused.
Ban, with Kohona looking on, with Silva, 196 pages & 36 hours not
shown
The
UN tried to
explain the delayed release -- after having told General Shavendra
Silva that Sri Lanka had 24 then 36 hours -- as waiting for the
government's response.
But
then Haq
says there is no need to wait. The fact remains: the report was signed
off on by the Panel three
weeks ago, and Ban has allowed Sri Lanka to control its leaked
release and to call for mass protests. Watch this site.
* * *
UN
Report
Was
Ready March 31 But Was Delayed for Sri Lanka, Kohona Says Don't
Release, Silva Lobbies
By
Matthew
Russell
Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
April
19 -- The scanned portion of the UN Panel of Experts
report on Sri Lanka war crimes leaked, presumptively by the
government, to The Island newspaper has been obtained by Inner City
Press and is being put online here.
It
shows that the
Panel's three members signed off on the report on March 31, 2011. Why
was it only on April 12 that it was handed to Ban Ki-moon, who on
April 13 gave it
to Sri Lankan Deputy Permanent Representative to the
UN General Shavendra Silva?
Inner
City Press
spoke both with Silva and with Permanent Representative Palitha
Kohona on the evening of April 19, arriving uninvited at a reception
at Kohona's residence. Despite statements by Secretary General Ban
Ki-moon's spokesmen that the report would be released, Kohona argued
that it should not be made available to the public.
Kohona
emphasized,
as it seems his government did to Ban Ki-moon, that
because April 13 onward was a holiday in Sri Lanka, the UN should not
release the full report. Kohona said that Monday was a lunar holiday,
and the UN could not release the report -- giving a new meaning to
Ban Ki-MOON.
Those
days were used to leak portions of the report to
The Island newspaper, with President Mahinda Rajapaksa calling for
mass protests against the UN report on May 1.
At
Kohona's
reception, the Permanent Representative of Egypt -- Maged Abdelaziz,
the same one as under Hosni Mubarak -- arrived and chatted with Silva
and Kohona, Egypt, as head of the Non Aligned Movement, pressured Ban
Ki-moon against any real investigation of war crimes in Sri Lanka.
Abdelaziz
left early, as did Inner City Press. Silva said he had two
other events to attend -- part of a campaign about and against the
Panel of Experts report. We'll have more on this.
* * *
On
Sri
Lanka,
UN Gave 196 Pages to Silva, Asked 24 Then 36 Hours,
Got Played
By
Matthew
Russell
Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
April
19 -- On Sri
Lanka, with the UN Secretariat in seeming
paralysis holding back the war crimes Panel of Experts' report five
full days after portions were leaked, presumptively by the
government, to The Island newspaper, sources have described the
process to Inner City Press.
The
report, they
say, is 196 pages long. On April 11, Inner City Press learned that it
would be handed to Ban Ki-moon on April 12. After it was, it was also
provided -- on hard copy only -- to Sri Lanka's Deputy Permanent
Representative, General Shavendra Silva, who is himself implicated in
war crimes in the final stages of the conflict.
The
UN told
Shavendra Silva that Ban would be releasing the report in 24 hours,
sources tell Inner City Press. Silva responded that the Sri Lankan
government wanted or needed “a little more time.” The UN replied
that it would give 36 hours, tops.
But
the 36 hours
came and went. And by then a scan of the hard copy had been provided
to The Island, a newspapers with agrees with President Mahinda
Rajapaksa. The Island ran it, with typos as identified by Inner City
Press.
Inexplicable
to
many, Ban and the UN Secretariat even then did not release the
report. They held it over the weekend, and did not release it either
Monday or Tuesday. They have, many say, undermined the report.
The
Experts, too,
have done their part. Their report as excerpted says that all
international staff left an area, then has international staff
witnessing the shelling of a medical facility. This will be fodder
for the government's response. But the government of Rajapaksa has
already responded, with a call for mass protests against the UN
report on May 1.
Why
did Ban do
this? Why did he never call for a ceasefire? Why did he send Nambiar
as his envoy, and still allow him to be involved after his role in
the so-called white flag killings of surrenderees? What will Ban
discuss with Russia on his upcoming visit? How might this all be used
to assure a second term as Secretary General? Watch this site.
Footnote:
beyond
misleading
about the meeting of Attorney General Mohan Peiris
with Ban's now invisible panel, it's reported that during that secret
session, the UN agreed to give Sri Lanka some extra weeks before the
filing of the report. It was extended to April 12, the day before the
New Year in Sri Lanka, when all of the above then happened. One
couldn't have done more to undermine a war crimes report.
* * *
Click
here
for an Inner City Press YouTube channel video, mostly UN Headquarters
footage, about civilian
deaths
in Sri Lanka.
Click here for Inner City
Press' March 27 UN debate
Click here for Inner City
Press March 12 UN (and AIG
bailout) debate
Click here for Inner City
Press' Feb .26 UN debate
Click
here
for Feb.
12
debate
on
Sri
Lanka http://bloggingheads.tv/diavlogs/17772?in=11:33&out=32:56
Click here for Inner City Press' Jan.
16, 2009 debate about Gaza
Click here for Inner City Press'
review-of-2008 UN Top Ten debate
Click here for Inner
City Press' December 24 debate on UN budget, Niger
Click here from Inner City Press'
December 12 debate on UN double standards
Click here for Inner
City Press' November 25 debate on Somalia, politics
and this October 17 debate, on
Security Council and Obama and the UN.
* * *
These
reports are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for a Reuters
AlertNet piece by this correspondent
about Uganda's Lord's Resistance Army. Click
here
for an earlier Reuters AlertNet piece about the Somali
National
Reconciliation Congress, and the UN's $200,000 contribution from an
undefined trust fund. Video
Analysis
here
Feedback: Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com
UN
Office:
S-453A,
UN,
NY
10017
USA
Tel:
212-963-1439
Reporter's
mobile
(and
weekends):
718-716-3540
Other,
earlier
Inner
City
Press
are
listed
here,
and
some are available
in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright
2006-08
Inner
City
Press,
Inc.
To
request
reprint
or
other
permission,
e-contact
Editorial
[at]
innercitypress.com
-
|