On
Sri
Lanka, UN Reneges on Releasing Report “This Week,” 3 More Days
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
April 21 -- After the UN said
it would release its Panel of
Experts' report on Sri Lanka “this week,” at 6:20 pm the evening
before the Easter holiday UN acting deputy spokesman Farhan Haq
backtracked and announced that it would not be released this week. He
referred to “after the Easter holiday,” but he had also said
“this week.”
The
expectation
had been that the long delayed report, on which Sri Lanka's Rajapaksa
government has already called protests and begun to solicit
signatures for a petition of opposition, would finally be released at
the April 21 noon briefing.
But
Farhan Haq
remained on the phone half an hour into the briefing. When he
arrived, Inner City Press asked:
Inner
City
Press: Yesterday you said, 'We’re expecting a response from
the Government of Sri Lanka. That doesn’t need to tie our hands. As I
have said repeatedly, we will put it out this week.' So what
changed?
Acting
Deputy
Spokesperson Haq: That hasn’t changed; the week is still
happening.
Inner
City
Press: Yeah, but tomorrow is Easter. It’s Easter holiday.
Acting
Deputy
Spokesperson: Tomorrow is not Easter. Tomorrow is Good
Friday.
Inner
City
Press: I understand; the UN is closed tomorrow. So why would
you put out a report when the UN is closed?
Acting
Deputy
Spokesperson: We’ll put out a report as soon as we can. We
are also, like I said, in discussions and we’re trying to give the
fair opportunity — which is a reasonable thing — to allow for
people the right of response. At the same time, that doesn’t bind
our hands. I have made it clear: we will put out the report and we
will put it out in full, and without amendment.
Inner
City
Press: Does this week mean tomorrow? Or are you counting the
weekend?
Acting
Deputy
Spokesperson: I can’t… It could mean later today. We’ll
keep you posted on when we put this out.
Again
Haq said
“this week,” that nothing had changed, that the UN hadn't allowed
Sri Lanka to bind the UN's hand. Then six hours later he announced
that the report would not be released on Thursday, and not at least
for the three days after that.
Ban and Nambiar, Pascoe and Sri Lanka report still not shown
Inner
City Press
asked
Inner
City
Press: Can you confirm that yesterday there was a meeting in the
North Lawn Building by the secretariat of the Panel and UN agencies,
very much anticipating that it would be released today? And if you
do confirm, that’s one. And two is, sort of, what changed? On 12
April or 13, was it Mr. [Vijay] Nambiar who handed in to Shavendra,
General Shavendra Silva? And did he say, “you have a chance to
respond?” Why would you allow them at the last second to sort of…
has something changed between then and now that you would now put
this off today?
Acting
Deputy
Spokesperson Haq: The discussions have been going on for some
time, and they continue to be going on. Like I said, we are working
in good faith to accord to the Member State involved the rights to
which they reasonably can be seen to exercise. At the same time,
this is a very serious issue. It is very important that the report
comes out, and we do intend to put this out. Yes, we have briefed
the relevant agencies about some of what they can expect. At the
same time, we have made it… we’ve been very clear about not
putting out bits of the report. We haven’t leaked the report. We’ve
been basically working, like I said, in good faith to put
this out at the appropriate time. And we will put this out at the
appropriate time.
Haq
turned on to
other questions. Finally Inner City Press noted it had “more
questions on Sri Lanka, including the ones I e-mailed you.” These
questions, posed in the morning of April 21, have not been
acknowledged or answered
“please
state the role of Mr. Nambiar in reviewing the report, please
disclose how much was spent by the UN in preparing the report, please
state whether the Panel or any member traveled to Sri Lanka and if
not, why not, and please deny or confirm and describe any meeting by
any Sri Lanka government official since the Panel's work began.”
Watch
this site.
* * *
On
Sri
Lanka,
As UN Further Delays Release of Report, Pascoe Tells Press
He Didn't Know - So Nambiar In Charge?
By
Matthew
Russell
Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
April
21 -- In a loss of nerve that sadly is not surprising,
the UN Secretariat on Thursday delayed its noon briefing in the expectation
that
it would belatedly release its Panel of Experts'
report on war crimes in Sri Lanka -- and then did not release the
report.
Secretary
General
Ban Ki-moon's acting Deputy Spokesman Farhan Haq came in half an hour
late and said that he “still expects” the report's release, but
it did not happen at the briefing. He said Sri Lanka is being given
another chance to submit a response.
Inner
City Press
asked about Haq's statement just the previous day, April 20, that
while the UN was “expecting that there will be a response from the
Government of Sri Lanka... That doesn’t need to tie our hands down
regarding when we are going to put out this report. As we have said
repeatedly, we’ll put it out this week.”
Haq
said it is
only Thursday. But Friday is a UN holiday (and UN staff get “early
release” on Thursday). In any event, was it true that the UN's
hands weren't tied down?
After
asking more
questions at the “noon” briefing, Inner City Press ran to the
Security Council and caught up with the head of Ban's Department of
Political Affairs, Lynn Pascoe, coming out of the morning's meeting
on the Middle East.
Inner
City Press
told Pascoe that the Sri Lanka report had not, in fact, been
released.
“You've
told me
something I didn't know,” Pascoe told Inner City Press. “I've
been busy.”
Why
was it not
released?
“I'll
find
out,”
Pascoe said, leaving.
It
seems clear
that Ban's chief political adviser wasn't told that the report
wouldn't be released. Ban is traveling to Russia. So who made the
decision?
Sources
tell Inner
City Press of the involvement, still allowed by Ban, of Vijay
Nambiar, whose role in the so called white flag murders of
surrenderees in Sri Lanka has been described in a filing to the
International Criminal Court.
This
UN sinks lower
and lower. Inner City Press asked Haq if the Panel of Experts will
hold a press conference and answer questions, as was done by Ban's
Panel on the murder of Benazir Bhutto of Pakistan.
The
Sri Lanka panel
has disbanded, Haq said. Watch this site.
* * *
* * *
On
Sri
Lanka,
UN's
Explanation
of Non-Release Shifts, 3 Weeks
After Panel Finished Report
By
Matthew
Russell
Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
April
20
--
The UN's story about their delay in releasing
the Panel of Experts' report on Sri Lanka got even more convoluted on
April 20.
Inner
City
Press
asked
Secretary General Ban Ki-moon's acting Deputy Spokesman Farhan
Haq to explain the delay between the Panel's
sign off date on the
report as obtained and published by Inner City Press (but not The
Island), March 31, and the April 12 turn off to Ban, and April 13 to
Sri Lanka.
The
UN's
Haq
said,
“I won't have a comment on the time frames.”
Then
he
tried
to
explain the delay by referring to Ban Ki-moon's travels -- for
example to Hungary and now Russia, where Haq has declined to say if
Sri Lanka will be discussed. Haq said, “The panel wanted to
present to S-G... He has had a number of travels.”
Inner
City
Press
asked
if anyone in the UN -- for example, Ban's senior adviser Vijay
Nambair, whose role in the so called white flag killings of
surrendees at the end of the conflict has been described in a filing
with the International Criminal Court -- saw the report between its
March 31 sign off date and April 12.
Haq
did
not
say
no, instead choosing to re-focus on Ban Ki-moon not having gotten it
until “Monday.” (Actually, according to the UN it was Tuesday,
April 12 -- Inner City Press reported on April 11 it would be the
next day, April 12).
But
then
Haq
spoke
about the UN's senior advisers -- no mention of Ban -- getting a
response together. Nambiar, it seems clear, has not been recused.
The
UN
tried
to
explain the delayed release -- after having told General Shavendra
Silva that Sri Lanka had 24 then 36 hours -- as waiting for the
government's response.
But
then
Haq
says
there is no need to wait. The fact remains: the report was signed
off on by the Panel three
weeks ago, and Ban has allowed Sri Lanka to control its leaked
release and to call for mass protests. Watch this site.
* * *
On
Sri
Lanka,
UN
Gave
196 Pages to Silva, Asked 24 Then 36 Hours,
Got Played
By
Matthew
Russell
Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
April
19
--
On Sri
Lanka,
with the UN Secretariat in seeming
paralysis holding back the war crimes Panel of Experts' report five
full days after portions were leaked, presumptively by the
government, to The Island newspaper, sources have described the
process to Inner City Press.
The
report,
they
say,
is 196 pages long. On April 11, Inner City Press learned that it
would be handed to Ban Ki-moon on April 12. After it was, it was also
provided -- on hard copy only -- to Sri Lanka's Deputy Permanent
Representative, General Shavendra Silva, who is himself implicated in
war crimes in the final stages of the conflict.
The
UN
told
Shavendra
Silva that Ban would be releasing the report in 24 hours,
sources tell Inner City Press. Silva responded that the Sri Lankan
government wanted or needed “a little more time.” The UN replied
that it would give 36 hours, tops.
But
the
36
hours
came and went. And by then a scan of the hard copy had been provided
to The Island, a newspapers with agrees with President Mahinda
Rajapaksa. The Island ran it, with typos as identified by Inner City
Press.
Inexplicable
to
many,
Ban
and the UN Secretariat even then did not release the
report. They held it over the weekend, and did not release it either
Monday or Tuesday. They have, many say, undermined the report.
The
Experts,
too,
have
done their part. Their report as excerpted says that all
international staff left an area, then has international staff
witnessing the shelling of a medical facility. This will be fodder
for the government's response. But the government of Rajapaksa has
already responded, with a call for mass protests against the UN
report on May 1.
Why
did
Ban
do
this? Why did he never call for a ceasefire? Why did he send Nambiar
as his envoy, and still allow him to be involved after his role in
the so-called white flag killings of surrenderees? What will Ban
discuss with Russia on his upcoming visit? How might this all be used
to assure a second term as Secretary General? Watch this site.
Footnote:
beyond
misleading
about
the
meeting of Attorney General Mohan Peiris
with Ban's now invisible panel, it's reported that during that secret
session, the UN agreed to give Sri Lanka some extra weeks before the
filing of the report. It was extended to April 12, the day before the
New Year in Sri Lanka, when all of the above then happened. One
couldn't have done more to undermine a war crimes report.
* * *
Click
here
for an Inner City Press YouTube channel video, mostly UN Headquarters
footage, about civilian
deaths
in Sri Lanka.
Click here for Inner City
Press' March 27 UN debate
Click here for Inner City
Press March 12 UN (and AIG
bailout) debate
Click here for Inner City
Press' Feb .26 UN debate
Click
here
for Feb.
12
debate
on
Sri
Lanka http://bloggingheads.tv/diavlogs/17772?in=11:33&out=32:56
Click here for Inner City Press' Jan.
16, 2009 debate about Gaza
Click here for Inner City Press'
review-of-2008 UN Top Ten debate
Click here for Inner
City Press' December 24 debate on UN budget, Niger
Click here from Inner City Press'
December 12 debate on UN double standards
Click here for Inner
City Press' November 25 debate on Somalia, politics
and this October 17 debate, on
Security Council and Obama and the UN.
* * *
These
reports are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for a Reuters
AlertNet piece by this correspondent
about Uganda's Lord's Resistance Army. Click
here
for an earlier Reuters AlertNet piece about the Somali
National
Reconciliation Congress, and the UN's $200,000 contribution from an
undefined trust fund. Video
Analysis
here
Feedback: Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com
UN
Office:
S-453A,
UN,
NY
10017
USA
Tel:
212-963-1439
Reporter's
mobile
(and
weekends):
718-716-3540
Other,
earlier
Inner
City
Press
are
listed
here,
and
some are available
in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright
2006-08
Inner
City
Press,
Inc.
To
request
reprint
or
other
permission,
e-contact
Editorial
[at]
innercitypress.com
-
|