By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
August 6 --
After six Nuer
aid workers
were killed in
Maban County,
South Sudan,
the UN
Security
Council, as
well as Ban
Ki-moon and
the US State
Department,
issued
statements of
outrage.
The
Security
Council's statement,
issued at 9 pm
on August 6,
called on "the
Government of
South Sudan to
immediately
take steps to
ensure the
safety of all
civilians, to
swiftly
investigate
these
incidents, and
to effectively
bring the
perpetrators
of these
heinous acts
to justice,
and to fully
respect
international
human rights
law and
international
humanitarian
law."
Meanwhile
South Sudan
president
Salva Kiir was
in Washington
at the US'
Africa Summit.
At the Security
Council Inner
City Press asked
Council
president Mark
Lyall Grant if
the Council
will meet Riek
Machar during
its now
disclosed trip
to South Sudan
and the
region. Lyall
Grant said
both sides will
be talked to,
but did not
want to give
details.
Nor did the
UN. When Inner
City Press
asked Ban's deputy
spokesperson
Farhan Haq to
confirm that
the aid
workers needed
to be
evacuated were
all Nuer, Haq
refused. Who
does this
serve?
Hilde
Johnson has
left left as
UN envoy to
South Sudan.
On June 30
when Johnson
gave her last
UN press
briefing on
June 30, Inner
City Press
asked her who
used cluster
bombs in this
stage of the
conflict,
and about
having in 2012
told Inner
City Press
that militia
leader Peter
Gadet leading
“disarmament”
was OK. Gadet
is now under
US sanctions.
Johnson
dodged
on the cluster
bombs,
that UN
Peacekeeping's
UNMAS had made
a report “to
New York” --
still
confidential
-- and that
she couldn't
go beyond what
UNMAS has said
publicly:
nothing.
UN
Peacekeeping
under Herve
Ladsous
routinely
refuses Press
questions and
refuses to
provide the
most basic
answers, such
as about
flying
sanctioned
FDLR leader
Rumuli in the
DR Congo. It
seems to have
spread to
Hilde Johnson,
even as she
leaves.
On Gadet,
Johnson
recounted that
he was a
militia leader
brought in by
Salva Kiir's
“Big Tent”
strategy,
which she said
was
“unavoidable”
and brought
peace. Well,
it didn't
bring peace:
was it
unavoidable?
Doesn't the UN
usually
pretend to
speak for
accountability?
Or not any
more, under
Ladsous?
Inner
City Press had
hand raised to
ask another
question,
about press
freedom.
But Ban
Ki-moon's
spokesman gave
some media but
not other a
second round.
For this
reason,
setting aside
the first
question to
UNCA, in this
case Pamela
Falk, is
UNacceptable.
When all
questions
can't be
asked, no one
should
automatically
get the first
question. Will
it even be
reported on?
Watch this
site.