After
Bor, S. Sudan
Wants Review
of UN Mandate
& SOFA,
Now Obama
Sanctions?
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
April 20
-- With the
death-count
from the
killings at the
UN
Peacekeeping
facility in
Bor not yet
fixed, South
Sudan's
foreign
minister
Barnaba Marial
Benjamin on
April 18 said
the UN has
been told its
Status of
Forces
Agreement and
mandate will
be re-negotiated
- and by
implication possibly
ended.
Will this trigger
the sanctions
threatened by
the US even
before Bor?
The UN
Department of
Peacekeeping
Operations has
or is supposed
to have SOFAs
everywhere it
operates.
For context,
the SOFA for
the UN's Abyei
mission was unsigned
for a long
time, even as
four Ethiopian
peacekeepers
were killed by
landmines but
weren't
evacuated in
the more
straight
forward way.
DPKO chief Herve
Ladsous repeatedly
refused to
answer Press
questions
about this. Compilation here.
On the other
hand, in Haiti
the claims
commission
provided for
in the SOFA was
never established,
now an issue
in litigation
about the UN
bringing
cholera to Haiti.
Again, Ladsous
refuses to
answer Press
questions.
Since in South
Sudan, it is
deputy Toby
Lanzer doing
the talking
and not Hilde
Johnson, perhaps
someone in
DPKO other
than Ladsous
can answer
Press questions?
Ladsous has
for example
gone
semi-public
that South
Sudan was
blocking an
unspecified
national
contingent of
peacekeepers
he wanted to
send there.
While Ladsous
refused to
answer, multiple
sources told
Inner City
Press it concerned
Morocco
soldiers that
South Sudan
said it wouldn't
accept due to
adherence to
the African
Union position
on Western Sahara.
That Ladsous
is a former
French diplomat,
the fourth Frenchman
in a row atop
DPKO, makes
the refusal to
answer, now
aped by the
French Mission
to the UN,
trigger more
rather than
less inquiry.
This new SOFA
talk comes as
South Sudan's
information
minister on
April 18 cast
blame on the
UN. He said
that the UN
should not
have fired
bullets in the
air, it
stirred up the
youth.
On April 17,
UN spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric told
the press at
the day's noon
briefing, "the
UN Mission in
South Sudan
gave us more
details on the
attack on its
base in
Bor. It
says that the
assailants — a
mob of armed
civilians —
came to the
base under the
guise of
peaceful
demonstrators
intending to
present a
petition to
UNMISS.
The armed mob
forced entry
onto the site
and opened
fire on the
internally
displaced
persons
sheltering
inside the
base."
On April 18 in
Juba, South
Sudan's
Information
Minister --
about whom
Inner City
Press has
previously
sought comment
from the UN,
without anything
of substance
being offered
-- said that
IDPs
celebrating
rebels
recapturing
Bentiu
provoked the
youth to
protest, and
that the UN
angered them
by firing in
the air.
Back on April
3, US President
Barack Obama
threatened sanctions
with regard to
South Sudan.
Are they
triggered now?
If not now,
when?
Obama's Press
Secretary Jay
Carney said
"both the
Government of
South Sudan
and Riek
Machar’s
rebels must
immediately
engage in and
follow through
on the
inclusive
peace process
led by the
Intergovernmental
Authority on
Development."
One issue has
been that
while Uganda
intervened on
the side of
the
government, it
is also part
of the
ostensible
mediator,
IGAD. Obama's
Executive
Order refers
to "international
security
presences" and
"other
peacekeeping
operations" -
does either
term encompass
the Uganda
forces?
Back on March
25, returning
from South
Sudan and
Darfur John
Ging, the
Operations
Director of
the UN Office
for the
Coordination
of
Humanitarian
Affairs and
his
Emergencies
colleague
Yasmin Haque
spoke movingly
of the need to
reduce the
number of
checkpoints on
aid convoys in
South Sudan.
Inner
City Press
asked Ging if
this increased
checking
wasn't a
result of what
even the UN
has said was a
mistake, the trucking
rather than
flying of
weapons to the
Ghanian
peacekeepers
in Bentiu.
Ging
acknowledged
that this was
the
government's
rationale for
the checks but
said, "We do
not accept
it."
Time
did not permit
but there is
an obvious
follow up
question: if
the UN wants
to put the
arms-shipment
scandal behind
it, shouldn't
it be more
transparent?
It has said
its probe is
finished, but
no written
report has
been made
public.
UN
Peacekeeping
chief Herve
Ladsous,
speaking to
the Security
Council on
March 19,
chose instead
to complain
of a
"vilification
of the UN"
including in
"media
articles."
Inner
City Press
asked Ging and
Haque if they
had witnessed
such
vilification
during their
trip to South
Sudan. No,
Ging said,
this was not
directed at
the UN's
humanitarian
side. So it's
either limited
to UN
Peacekeeping
of Ladsous and
Hilde Johnson,
or Ladsous has
a lower
threshold of
getting angry
at media
coverage.
At the
third
question,
Inner City
Press on
behalf of the
Free
UN Coalition
for Access
thanked Ging
for doing
Q&A when
he comes back
from trips,
and expressed
hope that this
becomes a
trend or
expectation. Ladsous
refuses to
answer Press
questions,
video
here - but
even Jeff
Feltman, back
today from
Ukraine, is
said not to
plan any press
availability.
Why not?
The
first question
was given to
Pamela Falk of
CBS as head of
the old UN
Correspondents
Association,
which rather
than push for
example for
Ladsous to
have to answer
has in fact come to his
defense,
grilling
Inner City
Press about an
article about
Ladsous until
Inner City
Press quit
UNCA (and
co-founded
FUNCA).
Now,
will Falk with
this automatic
first question
get a story
about South
Sudan onto
CBS? If not,
and even
leaving aside
UNCA becoming
the UN's
Censorship
Alliance, how
is this
automatic
first question
justified?
Having been
given the
first
question, she
left the
briefing room
while others
were still
waiting to
ask. There wa
a scheduled
stakeout by
the UN's
Lebanon envoy
Plumbley,
which Inner
City Press and
others
interested had
to miss.
UNmiss.
Inner
City Press
also asked
Ging about
Southern
Kordofan and
Blue Nile; he
said the UN
still has no
access to
opposition
held areas. He
cited Jebel
Marra in
Darfur.
Ladsous,
in Pakistan,
was quoted
that the
UNAMID mission
in Darfur will
shrink.
Inner
City Press
asked UN
deputy
spokesperson
Farhan Haq
about it and
was told that
if Pakistan's
number of
troops goes
does,
something will
be said. But
that wasn't
the question.
And while
Ladsous was
reportedly
seeking women
police and
peacekeepers
in Pakistan,
when
a woman who
served in
UNAMID in
Darfur was
disciplined
for it, UN
Peacekeeping
has no
comment, and
has it seemed
done nothing.
UNmiss.
The
briefing ended
with Ms Haque
saying that
more important
than "donor
fatigue" is
the fatigue of
children
without food
in South
Sudan. Now
that, is true.
Watch this
site.
* * *
These
reports
are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for Sept 26, 2011 New Yorker on Inner City
Press at UN
Click
for
BloggingHeads.tv re Libya, Sri Lanka, UN
Corruption
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-303,
UN, NY 10017 USA
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest service,
and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2014 Inner City Press,
Inc. To request reprint or other permission,
e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
|