UN
in S. Sudan
Confirms Akobo
Deaths 11
Hours After
India Told
Press, Why?
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
December 20,
updated --
India's
Permanent
Representative
to the UN
Asoke Mukerji
told the Press
on the
afternoon of
December 19 of
the killing of
two of his
country's
peacekeepers
in Akobo in
South Sudan. Click
here for
that Inner
City Press
story.
Mukerji asked
Inner City
Press if there
had been any
accountability
for the
previous
killing of
Indian
peacekeepers
in South
Sudan, and
called for
that in this
case.
The UN Department
of
Peacekeeping
Operations,
whose Herve
Ladsous'
spokesperson
stood to the
side while
Mukerji spoke
to the press,
never issued
anything
publicly on
December 19.
One of his or
Ladsous' favored
scribes
re-reported
what Mukerji
had said,
along with a
notation from
DPKO to take
the
information
with caution.
Eleven hours
later, the UN
Mission in
South Sudan
via its just
started
Twitter
account
said its
helicopter
flights had
confirmed the
death of two
Indian Battalion
soldiers, and
as Mukerji had
told the
Press, the
wounding of
another.
The question
arises: how
could the
Indian Mission
in New York
get this
information 11
hours before
DPKO? The UN
said its
communication
with its Akobo
base were
down.
Obviously,
India's
communications
weren't down.
What is wrong
with Ladsous'
DPKO, and the
UN more
generally?
Mukerji
reminded Inner
City Press of
the ruling of
the previous
UN
Legal Counsel
Patricia
O'Brien that
with the Force
Intervention
Brigade on the
Democratic
Republic of
the Congo -
and now with
peacekeepers
in Mali
shooting at
civilians and
co-housing
with
France's
Serval force
-- UN
peacekeepers
are becoming
combatants,
parties to
armed
conflict.
Murkerji
said that
troop
contributing
countries
should be told
this. This
would seem to
be the job of
Ladsous
(who says he
"has a policy"
of not
answering
Press
questions)
and of the
President of
the Security
Council.
This
month that is
France's Gerard
Araud, who
left a
December 19
Peacekeeping
seminar before
the moment of
silence, tweeted
by Inner
City Press,
for the Indian
peacekeepers.
Most recently
he refused to
answer
specific
questions
about
intermingling
with Serval
making UN
peacekeepers
combatants,
calling it
micro-management
and chiding
the
question.
Then the French
Mission to the
UN deleted the
question and
Araud's answer
from its
"transcript"
of Araud's
stakeout.
We
are still
endeavoring to
find out more
about the
killings in
South Sudan,
and for
accountability.
So far,
without any
assistance or
transparency
from Ladsous'
UN
Peacekeeping.
Watch this
site.
Update:
Forty minutes
after
publication of
the above, DPKO
through the UN
Spokesperson's
Office belated
e-mailed out
that "aerial
assessment"
confirmed
death of two
peacekeepers.
What -- UN has
no communications
like India
does? Watch
this site.