On
Sudan Ousters,
Now US Speaks,
Like UN Didn't
on UNFPA, Nor
UNHCR
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
December 30, more
here –
After Inner
City Press
received a
leaked copy of
Sudan UN
Development
Program
Country
Director
Yvonne Helle's
December 24
e-mail saying
she had been
ordered to
leave the
country, it reported
it and
asked UN
Spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric about
it at the UN's
noon briefing
on December
24. Story
here, video from UN noon briefing here.
Now on
December 30,
after a UN
Security
Council
consultations
from which
nothing came,
the US State
Department
through Office
of Press
Relations Director
Jeff Rathke, says:
"The
United States
deplores the
decision by
the Government
of Sudan to
expel two
senior United
Nations
officials and
calls on the
Government of
Sudan to
reverse the
decision.
The expulsions
of Mr. Ali
Al-Za’tari and
Ms. Yvonne
Helle, two
highly
regarded UN
professionals,
are
detrimental to
Sudan’s
relations with
the
international
community and
to the
protection and
well-being of
the people of
Sudan.
The United
States will
continue to
press the
Government of
Sudan to
desist from
actions that
hinder the
United
Nations’
ability to
meet its
humanitarian
and security
objectives in
Sudan."
Duly noted.
Not only did
the Security
Council
consultation
not result in
a Press
Statement or
even elements
to the press
-- no one spoke
afterward at
the UN
Security Council
stakeout.
Inner City
Press on behalf
of the Free
UN Coalition
for Access
asked the UN:
"This
is a request
that Deputy SG
Eliasson or
someone else
from the
Secretariat
hold a press
availability
on Sudan's
decision to
expel Yvonne
Helle (which I
asked about at
the December
24 noon
briefing) and
Ali
Al-Za'tari...
I understood
the DSG to say
he would not
be speaking
afterward
since it was
consultations.
But a media
availability
by the
Secretariat,
ideally the
DSG but
another if
necessary,
later this
afternoon is
being
requested,
including on
behalf of the
Free UN
Coalition for
Access."
UN Deputy
Spokesman
Farhan Haq
replied in the
negative:
"Regarding
your request
for a press
availability,
yes, the
Deputy
Secretary-General
said that he
would not
speak at the
stakeout,
given that the
Security
Council had
held
consultations.
The views he
expressed were
in keeping
with what we
have been
saying on
Sudan,
including in
the 25
December SG
statement:
'The
Secretary-General
condemns the
Government of
Sudan's
decision to
expel the
United Nations
Resident
Coordinator
and
Humanitarian
Coordinator
and the
Country
Director of
the United
Nations
Development
Programme. The
sanctioning of
United Nations
personnel sent
to Sudan to
carry out
their duties
in accordance
with the
United Nations
Charter is
unacceptable.
The
Secretary-General
calls on the
Government of
Sudan to
reverse its
decision
immediately
and urges it
to cooperate
fully with all
United Nations
entities
present in
Sudan.'"
On
December 27 UK
Minister for
Africa James
Duddridge
said: "I
condemn the
deeply
regrettable
decision by
the Government
of Sudan to
expel two
senior United
Nations
staff... It is
essential that
the Government
of Sudan
co-operate
with UN
missions and
agencies in
their country;
and I join
with the
Secretary
General in
calling on the
Government of
Sudan to
reverse this
decision."
Inner City
Press has asked,
why was
nothing said
when Sudan
expelled the
Country
Director of
the UN
Population
Fund UNFPA in
April? When
Sudan this
Fall chased a
UN aid
official out
of Darfur?
There have
been no public
explanation,
but Inner City
Press is
compiling a
picture --
call it
"Profiles in
Cowardice" --
from multiple
sources; watch
this site.
(Inner City
Press is told
by sources
that Sudan's
Permanent
Representative
exchanged
words with a
Security
Council
members PR on
December 30,
we hope to
have more on
this.)
For now we add
this: when
UNHCR the UN's
refugee agency
held a
staff planning
mtg in
Khartoum,
Sudan's
security
agency NISS
then refused
to let the
Darfur-based
international
staff return
to their
posts.
For
months they
sat in
Khartoum
waiting,
incidentally
spending large
amounts from UNHCR's
public budget.
Ultimately
many of the
international
staff were
simply moved,
quietly, to
other
countries.
And
why didn't the
UN system, the
UN Security
Council and
its members
speak at that
time, and in
April when
UNFPA's
Country
Director was
thrown out?
In April 2014,
Inner City
Press asked
UNFPA to
"Please
confirm or
deny that in
Sudan UNFPA
Representative
Pam Delargy
was told to
leave the
country on
April 7 and,
separately,
that she did
leave. And
anything else.
Please also
provide an
update on Mr.
Siddhart
Chatterjee as
UNFPA
Representative
in Kenya: date
of
commencement,
what work has
been done."
UNFPA replied
to Inner City
Press on April
9, "The United
Nations
Resident
Coordinator in
Khartoum,
Sudan was
notified by
the Government
of Sudan that
the UNFPA
Representative
had been
requested to
leave the
country at a
short notice.
A press
release by the
Sudanese
Government has
been issued to
this effect.
We regret this
decision and
are in
communication
with the
United Nations
Country Team
in Sudan to
seek further
clarification
on this
matter. We
hope that we
would very
soon be able
to continue
and
re-establish
normal
relationships
with the
Government of
Sudan."
Inner City
Press asked
this week
about the UN
system's
silence and
UNFPA replied,
"UNFPA now has
a new
representative
in Sudan, who
has assumed
her
responsibilities
three months
ago. I will
follow up with
our Khartoum
office
regarding your
second
question."
We'll have
more on this.
On December
24, tellingly
Dujarric had
no comment on
Helle being
thrown out of
Sudan, just as
the UN had
been silent on
the similar
ouster of the
UNPFA
country
director in
Sudan in April,
and a UN
aid officer
from Darfur in
the Fall, as
reported
by Inner City
Press.
The
UN Security
Council did
not speak on
April on the
UNFPA country
director's
ouster, much
less on the
departure of
OCHA's Darfur
official.
But now the
Security
Council has
scheduled
consultations
on these two
most recent
orders to
leave, on
December 30 --
the day AFTER
the deadline
for UNDP's
Yvonne Helle
to leave.
So are they
most focused
on Jordanian
Ali
Al-Za'tari,
even though HE
said nothing
about the
UNFPA ouster
in April, the
OCHA
departure, and
so quickly
accepted
Helle's
ouster? And
the briefer
for these
consultations
better not be
Herve Ladsous,
whose
firing has
been called
for by 123
NGOs and Sudan
experts for,
among other
things, being
too
accommodative
of Bashir and
rapes in
Sudan. We'll
see.
There's a lack
of
transparency.
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon at his
December
17 press
conference
rejected a
Press question
about the
cover up of
rapes in
Darfur by UN
Peacekeeping
under Herve
Ladsous, and
declined the
same question,
also from
Inner City
Press, at his
three-question
stakeout on
December 22.
(Two of the
picked
questions were
about North
Korea.)
Then on
December 25,
after Inner
City Press first
reported that
UN Resident
Coordinator
Ali Al Za'tari,
who had
docilely
accepted the
ouster of
Helle and of
the UNFPA
before that,
was himself
being thrown
out, Dujarric
at 1:32 pm
finally sent
Inner City
Press an e-mail
answering its
question from
noon on
December 24,
and written
questions
after that.
The UN had
“filed a
protest”
(Agence France
Presse, a defender
of Ladsous,
said this
quote was
“said to AFP.”
Note that
Inner City
Press has put
in questions
to UNFPA and
OCHA. We'lll
have more on
these.)
But this is
how the way
things work
gets
mystified:
coverage
belatedly
began, Ban
Ki-moon Stands
Up to Sudan.
Does he? Why
not comment on
the first
ouster order
by Sudan? Why
exclude then
dodge
questions
about the
cover up of
the Darfur
rapes by UN
Peacekeeping
under Herve
Ladsous?
As noted
late
yesterday, the
New York Times
piece from
40,000 feet
about Darfur
misleads by
casting UN
Peacekeeping
chief Herve
Ladsous as one
of the good
guys, and
omitting
mention of 132
non-governmental
organizations
and Sudan
experts having
written to Ban
to urge
him to fire
Ladsous for
under-performance
in Sudan, here.
But worse than
the NYT is Reuters,
which after
arriving late
to and without
given any
credit for the
story quotes
Ladsous that
the UN will
remain in
Darfur.
Really?
(Reuters UN
bureau chief
has said he
has a policy
of not
crediting
Inner City
Press, then censored
from Search
his “for the
record”
anti-Press
complaint to
the UN, here
via EFF's
ChillingEffects.org).
For the
record,
publications
such as Sudan
Tribune
and Radio
Tamazuj
credit Inner
City Press, here and here.
But it is
beyond
appropriation
– the timing
is important.
Al Jazeera,
for example, “reports”
that “A UN
spokesperson,
who spoke on
condition of
anoymity
because he was
not authorised
to speak to
the media,*
said Ali
Zaatari and
Yvonne Helle
were ordered
to leave on
Thursday.”
That's NOT
what happened.
Helle was
ordered out on
Wednesday,
December 24;
the UN said
nothing, even
when Inner
City Press
asked Ban
Ki-moon's
spokesman, on
UNTV, about
it. So then on
December 25 a
higher UN
official was
thrown out.
* -
What kind of
spokesperson
is "not
authorized to
speak to the
media"?
The UN's own
cover ups and
silences are
part of the
story. Watch
this site.