On
Syria at UN,
Doubts About
Ban Ki-moon
and His Role
Outside
G20 Report
Back
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
September 9 --
Outside the
G20 report
back meeting
in the UN
Monday
afternoon,
Inner City
Press asked a
range of
Ambassadors
including
Syria's about
the idea
of the UN of
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon
becoming a
collector of
chemical
weapons on
Syria.
From
the Syrian
side the first
question was
why the US
still hasn't
destroyed its
chemical
weapons
stockpiles.
Also
from that side
was the sense
that "Ban will
say anything
the
Americans tell
him to. He can
change a comma
or two, but
that's it."
Others
asked how the
UN could
collect
chemical
weapons from a
war zone,
given its
failures
elsewhere.
There was
reference to
UN
Peacekeeping's
Herve
Ladsous,
seen as operating
for France,
and
Robert Mood
who has
returned to
Norway where
he tweets
about programs
for retired
servicemembers.
"It would be
good to get
him back
involved," one
said.
There
was a big
picture theory
that went like
this: the US
was wary of
getting
involved but
Saudi and
Qatar and
Turkey "just
kept
trying,"
finally Turkey
making the
NATO pitch.
"Weapons
were given but
none that
could reach
Israel." Then
chemical
weapons - that
was the
trigger. And
here we are.
Watch this
site.
Footnote:
And
in the G20
report back,
Inner City
Press is
informed,
Syria did
not come up at
all. "Only
economic,"
several
Ambassadors
told Inner
City Press.
And so it goes
at the UN.
* * *
These
reports
are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for Sept 26, 2011 New Yorker on Inner City
Press at UN
Click
for
BloggingHeads.tv re Libya, Sri Lanka, UN
Corruption
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-303,
UN, NY 10017 USA
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest service,
and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2013 Inner City Press,
Inc. To request reprint or other permission,
e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
|