On
Syria, US
Sends Rice
While Turkey
& Jordan
to Brief, No
Lavrov
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
August 28. updated
-- So who's
coming for
France's
August 30
"closed
public
briefing" in
the UN
Security
Council on
Syria?
Yesterday
Inner City
Press reported
that Colombia
will send its
foreign
minister
Patricia
Holguin --
President
Santos has now
confirmed his
government's
negotiations
with the FARC
-- while Pakistan
would be
represented at
the Deputy
Permanent
Representative
level.
Now
we add:
Germany is
going in the
middle, to be
represented by
its
Permanent
Representative
Peter Wittig.
Some might say
he is almost
ministerial:
while as Inner
City Press exclusively
reported,
Germany
will chair the
budgetary
Fifth
Committee,
it has said it
will be at
the level of
Deputy
Permanent
Representative
Peter Berger
(who has
budget
experience, it
is noted.)
The
US, it's
confirmed to
Inner City
Press, will be
represented by
Susan
Rice. Since
she's in the
Cabinet, she
is considered
a minister.
Togo, it's
been said, is
sending a
minister.
Russia, it now
seems clear,
is not sending
Foreign
Minister
Lavrov, but
rather its
Permanent
Representative
Vitaly
Churkin. After
some refused
his invitation
to a New York
meeting of the
Action Group
on Syria, some
were surprised
he'd attend.
New
Joint Special
Representative
Lakhdar
Brahimi will
meet with
Security
Council
members on
August 29 in
the North Lawn
building -- it
is NOT
a formal
Security
Council
meeting, it's
been stress --
then
apparently
lunch with
ministers on
August 30.
At
the August 30
closed public
briefing, the
foreign
ministers of
Turkey
and Jordan,
neither a
member of the
Security
Council, will
give
briefings to
the Council.
Jordan's
Permanent
Representative
has been
active of late
in the North
Lawn building.
Inner
City Press is
now
told
that Lebanon
will come --
not the
foreign
minister --
and Iraq,
maybe: as
"neighbors."
But if that's
the rationale,
isn't there
another
neighbor?
Other
non-Council
members
can't speak,
which seems to
be the reason
for this
format. But as
one wag mused,
if Iran is
good enough
for Ban
Ki-moon, why
not this
debate? Watch
this site.