Inner City Press

Inner City Press -- Investigative Reporting From the Inner City to Wall Street to the United Nations

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis

Google
  Search innercitypress.com Search WWW (censored?)

In Other Media-eg AJE, FP, Georgia, NYT Azerbaijan, CSM Click here to contact us     .

,



Follow us on TWITTER

Home -

These reports are usually available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis

CONTRIBUTE

ICP on YouTube

BloggingHeads.tv

UN: Sri Lanka

VoA: NYCLU

Google, Asked at UN About Censorship, Moved to Censor the Questioner, Sources Say, Blaming UN - Update - Editorial

Support this work by buying this book

Click on cover for secure site orders

also includes "Toxic Credit in the Global Inner City"
 

 

 


Community
Reinvestment

Bank Beat

Freedom of Information
 

How to Contact Us



Syria "Informals" Set for 3pm on Saudi Draft Reviving What P3+1 Dropped

By Matthew Russell Lee

UNITED NATIONS, July 31 -- On Syria at the UN, there are constant echoes, reversions and delays.

  On Friday, Saudi Arabia's Permanent Representative told Inner City Press his draft resolution on Syria would be in the General Assembly on Monday, July 30.

  But when July 30 came, there was only a by invitation only meeting at the French Mission to the UN, described to Inner City Press by a participant. Now, more formal "informal consultations" on the Saudi (French?) draft are set for Tuesday, July 31 at 3 pm.

  And, they say, the vote is slated for Thursday, August 2.

  The draft itself revives a demand that France, Germany, the UK and US agreed to drop from the July 20 resolution extending the UN Mission in Syria for 30 days: that the Assad government must "withdraw its troops and heavy weapons to their barracks contrary to paragraph 2 of resolution 2042 (2012) and paragraph 2 of resolution 2043 (2012)."

  The "P3 + 1" agreed to drop this from an earlier UK draft about UNSMIS. When Inner City Press questioned each ambassador except France's -- this wasn't allowed -- about the omission, US Ambassador Susan Rice said to "ask the author."

  This is now the first "operative" paragraph of the General Assembly resolution:

"1. Condemns the Syrian authorities’ increasing use of heavy weapons, including indiscriminate shelling from tanks and helicopters, in population centres and failure to withdraw its troops and heavy weapons to their barracks contrary to paragraph 2 of resolution 2042 (2012) and paragraph 2 of resolution 2043 (2012)."

  The word "operative" is in quotation marks because the General Assembly does not have, even on paper, the power to bind UN member states.

  So the return to barracks demand was dropped from the resolution of the body which could demand it, only to re-appear as a non-binding paragraph condemn that it hasn't happened.

Some would say, given the state of fighting in Syria and the open arming of the rebels, that it is not realistic that the Assad government would order all its soldiers back to the barracks. Yes, some would say that. But it is easier to pass a General Assembly resolution. Watch this site.

Share |

* * *

These reports are usually also available through Google News and on Lexis-Nexis.

Click here for Sept 26, 2011 New Yorker on Inner City Press at UN

Click for  BloggingHeads.tv re Libya, Sri Lanka, UN Corruption

Feedback: Editorial [at] innercitypress.com

UN Office: S-253, UN, NY 10017 USA Tel: 212-963-1439

Reporter's mobile (and weekends): 718-716-3540

Google
  Search innercitypress.com  Search WWW (censored?)

Other, earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.

            Copyright 2006-2012 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com