On
Syria,
UNICEF's 1600
Death Count
Came From
Media, Not
OCHA
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
September 3 --
On Syria, the
UN announces
to the media
death figures
which are
derived, Inner
City Press has
learned, from
the media
itself.
Then these are
circularly
sourced to "UN
documents" and
given more
weight than
they should
be.
UNICEF on
August 31 and
September 2
offered Syria
casualty
figures it
refused to
explain,
but which went
out all over
the world.
After UNICEF's
Patrick
McCormick was
quoted
that "at
least 1,600
people were
killed in
Syria last
week"
and Reuters
said he was
"citing a U.N.
document,"
Inner
City Press
early on
September 2 asked
McCormick,
which
document? And
how was the
data
collected?
McCormick
replied to
Inner City
Press, "call
OCHA" -- the
UN's Office
for the
Coordination
of
Humanitarian
Affairs.
After three
separate
inquiries with
OCHA, and
McCormick
refusing to
respond to
follow-up
questions,
Inner City
Press has just
been informed
by OCHA's
spokesman in
Geneva that
"The
estimated
figure of
1,600 persons
was arrived at
from UNICEF's
own
internal
monitoring of
different
media sources.
The
figure does
not come from
OCHA."
The key phrase
here is "media
sources" --
UNICEF took
the number
from news
reports,
despite the
adjective
"different"
and the
reference to
"internal
monitoring OF
media
sources."
Essentially,
UNICEF reads
reports on the
Internet.
But where do
these news
reports come
from?
Increasingly,
Western wire
services take
their casualty
figures from
"non-governmental
organizations"
or, more
accurately,
"activists."
Sometimes, at
least, the
sourcing is
disclosed as
such.
But by
laundering the
activists
figures
through the UN
system, as
UNICEF has
done, the
figures take
on the veneer
of
objectivity.
Reuters'
report said
that McCormick
has "citing a
UN document."
Inner City
Press
repeatedly
checked, and
fourd on OCHA's
ReliefWeb site
a UNICEF
report stating
that "a record
death toll of
1,600 persons
was reported."
So it appeared
even then that
UNICEF's
McCormick was
quoting a
UNICEF report.
But,
tellingly,
UNICEF's
spokesman
McCormick
could or would
not explain
UNICEF's own
numbers. Why
else pass the
buck to OCHA?
This
seemed strange
anyway: in
2009 OCHA
refused to
release very
specific
casualty
figures --
2,683 --
it had
collected in
Sri Lanka.
At the time,
the UN told
Inner City
Press it is not in the
business of
counting the
dead --
Inner City
Press thought
and thinks the
UN should at
least do this,
where it can.
But in a
credible and
transparent
way.
Inner City
Press
immediately on
September 2
did try to
contact OCHA.
But OCHA's
lead
spokesperson
is away, as
was one of the
two
referred-to
replacements.
The other did
not initially
respond. Nor
did McCormick,
to follow-ups.
Inner
City Press
asked OCHA:
Hi,
I'm sorry to
bother you on
a Sunday, but
when I asked
UNICEF for the
source of its
figure of
1,600 killed
last week in
Syria, I was
told
to "call
OCHA." I
checked
ReliefWeb and
found a UNICEF
report where
it's stated "A
record death
toll of 1,600
persons
was reported."
Press
question on
deadline, I'm
sorry to say,
since this
figure is
going
out all over
the world:
reported by
whom? Where do
the figures
come
from? Does the
figure cited
include
military
deaths? Deaths
among
armed groups?
Seems
important to
answer this,
especially
since the UN
system in
other
contexts has
said it does
not have
access (in
Syria at least
since
UNSMIS left)
and / or does
not count the
dead (I was
told this
regarding Sri
Lanka in 2009
-- I thought
and think that
UN should at
least do this,
where it can.
But in a
credible and
transparent
way.
Does
OCHA has
casualty
figures beyond
the
above-quoted
(but
unsourced)
UNICEF report?
The
next day, OCHA
replied:
Subject:
Re:
I was told to
"call OCHA"
about UNICEF's
statement of
1,600 killed
in Syria last
week: reported
by whom?
Thanks
From:
Jens Laerke
[at] un.org
To: Matthew
Russell Lee
[at]
InnerCityPress.com
Date: Mon, Sep
3, 2012 at
4:48 AM
Dear
Matthew
At
a media
briefing in
Geneva last
Friday, a
UNICEF
spokesperson
gave an
estimated
figure for the
number of
deaths in
Syria over the
previous
week.
The
estimated
figure of
1,600 persons
was arrived at
from UNICEF's
own
internal
monitoring of
different
media sources.
The
figure does
not come from
OCHA.
Hope
this helps, Best
regards
Jens
Laerke,
Spokesperson
& Public
Information
Officer OCHA
Geneva
Inner
City Press' initial
questioning
was picked up
by the UK
Guardian,
as was the
above-quoted
OCHA response.
Still
UNICEF's
number
continues to
proliferate. Voice
of America at
2 pm on
September 2
dutifully
quoted
McCormick on
the numbers
for UNICEF,
headed by
Anthony Lake.
Click
here for
Washington
Post;
UNICEF's
one-week 1600
death count
has since been
in, among
others,
Canada's big
newspapers,
GlobalPost,
IBT, Slate,
the Huffington
Post, the
Daily Beast -
and in the
UN's host
city, New York
Post and New
York Daily
News.
Since
then, the
Jamaica
Observer, VOA-affiliated
Radio Free
Europe / Radio
Liberty,
San Francisco
Chronicle,
Pittsburgh
Post Gazette,
Detroit Free
Press, South
China Morning
Post, and
more.
More
doubts should
have been
raised: in
Syria in 2012,
the UN's
mission has
left after UN
Peacekeeping
chief
Herve Ladsous
said that even
observers in
armored cars
can't get
around. How
would OCHA
have collected
figures of the
type it
refused
to release in
Sri Lanka in
2009, and why
would it
(well, UNICEF)
release them
about Syria in
2012?
Despite
OCHA's belated
response to
Inner City
Press after
UNICEF's, in
context,
deception
play, will
this be like
the Inner City
Press exposed
but never
corrected claim
that new UN
envoy Lakhdar
Brahimi is a
"Nobel Peace
laureate"?
Click here for
that. And
watch this
site.