On
Syria, UNSC P3 Draft Fails,
With Russia Veto & Bolivia No,
China and
Two Others
Abstain
By Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED NATIONS,
April 12 – After some surmised
that the UN Security Council's
three draft resolutions were,
along with twenty planes,
among the things destroyed by
the US Tomahawk missiles last
week, the Security Council
voted on a revised draft on
April 12 just after 3 pm. The
resolution failed, with Russia
(veto) and Bolivia against,
and China, Kazakhstan and
Ethiopia abstaining. UK
Ambassador Matthew Rycroft
said there'll be a push on
April 13 at the OPCW; Russia's
Safronkov also cited that
meeting. Prior to the vote,
Inner City Press put questions
to UN Syria envoy Staffan de
Mistura. We'll have more on
this. On April 11, Ukraine's
Ambassador Yelchenko emerged
from the Council's meeting
about Haiti and told the press
about the draft. Inner City
Press asked if the Assad
government turning over flight
logs was still in the draft;
yes. Here it is: "Recalling
the Protocol for the
Prohibition of the Use in War
of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or
other Gases, and of
Bacteriological Methods of
Warfare, and the Convention on
the Prohibition of the
Development, Production,
Stockpiling and Use of
Chemical Weapons and on their
Destruction (CWC) ratified by
the Syrian Arab Republic on 14
September 2013, and the
Council’s resolutions 1540
(2004), 2118 (2013), 2209
(2015), 2235 (2015), 2314
(2016), and 2319 (2016),
Expressing its horror at the
reported use of chemical
weapons in the Khan Shaykhun
area of southern Idlib in the
Syrian Arab Republic on 4
April 2017 causing large-scale
loss of life and injuries,
affirming that the use of
chemical weapons constitutes a
serious violation of
international law, and
stressing that those
responsible for any use of
chemical weapons must be held
accountable,
Noting the Organisation for
the Prohibition of Chemical
Weapons (OPCW) has announced,
in addition to its ongoing
investigation, that its Fact
Finding Mission (FFM) is in
the process of gathering and
analysing information on this
incident from all available
sources and will report to the
OPCW Executive Council,
Recalling that in resolution
2118 (2013) the Council
decided that the Syrian Arab
Republic shall not use,
develop, produce, otherwise
acquire, stockpile or retain
chemical weapons or transfer,
directly or indirectly,
chemical weapons, to other
States or non-State actors and
underscored that no party in
Syria should use, develop
produce acquire, stockpile,
retain or transfer chemical
weapons,
Recalling the report by the
Director General of the OPCW
(EC-82/DG18 dated 6 July 2016)
that the OPCW Technical
Secretariat is not able to
resolve all identified gaps,
inconsistencies and
discrepancies in Syria’s
declaration, and therefore
cannot fully verify that Syria
has submitted a declaration
that can be considered
accurate and complete in
accordance with the CWC or
OPCW Executive decision
EC-M-33/DEC.1 dated 27
December 2013 or resolution
2118;
Recalling its determination
that the use of chemical
weapons in the Syria Arab
Republic represents a threat
to international peace and
security,
1. Condemns in the strongest
terms the reported use of
chemical weapons in the Syrian
Arab Republic, in particular
the attack on Khan Shaykhun
reported on 4 April 2017,
expresses its outrage that
individuals continue to be
killed and injured by chemical
weapons in the Syrian Arab
Republic, and expresses its
determination that those
responsible must be held
accountable;
2. Expresses its full support
to the OPCW Fact Finding
Mission, demands that all
parties provide delay-free and
safe access to any sites
deemed relevant by the OPCW
FFM, and, as applicable, by
the JIM, to the reported
incident in Khan Shaykhun,
including the site of the
reported incident on April 4,
in accordance with resolution
2118, and requests that the
FFM report the results of its
investigation as soon as
possible;
3. Requests that the Secretary
General make the necessary
arrangements for the UN-OPCW
Joint Investigative Mechanism
to liaise closely with the
Fact Finding Mission to
expeditiously investigate any
incident the FFM determines
involved or likely involved
the use of chemicals as
weapons in order to identify
those involved in accordance
with the provisions of
paragraph 5 of its Resolution
2235;
4. Recalls that in its
resolutions 2118 and 2235 it
decided that the Syrian Arab
Republic and all parties in
Syria shall cooperate fully
with the OPCW and the United
Nations including the Joint
Investigation Mechanism;
5. Emphasizes that this
includes the obligation upon
the Syrian Arab Republic of
complying with the relevant
recommendations of the OPCW
and the UN, including the JIM,
by accepting personnel
designated by the OPCW or the
United Nations, by providing
for and ensuring the security
of activities undertaken by
these personnel, by providing
these personnel with immediate
and unfettered access and the
right to inspect, in
discharging their
functions, any and all sites,
and by allowing immediate and
unfettered access to
individuals that the OPCW has
grounds to believe to be of
importance of the purpose of
its mandate, and specifically
that this includes the
obligations upon the Syrian
Arab Republic to provide the
JIM and FFM with the following
and take the following steps:
(a) flight plans, flight logs,
and any other information on
air operations, including all
flight plans or flight logs
filed on April 4 2017;
(b) names of all individuals
in command of any helicopter
squadrons;
(c) arrange meetings requested
including with generals or
other officers, within no more
than five days of the date on
which such meeting is
requested;
(d) immediately provide access
to relevant air bases from
which the JIM or the FFM
believe attacks involving
chemicals as weapons may have
been launched
6. Requests the
Secretary-General to report on
whether the information and
access described in paragraph
5 has been provided in his
reports to the Security
Council every 30 days pursuant
to paragraph 12 of resolution
2118.
7. Recalls its decision in
response to violations of
resolution 2118 to impose
measures under Chapter VII of
the United Nations charter."
Also on
April 11, Bolivia's Ambassador
said he'd be looking to see
what comes out of US Secretary
of State Rex Tillerson's
meeting on April 12 with his
Russian counterpart Lavrov. In
the UN Security Council's open
meeting on April 7 after the
US airstrikes on Syria, when
Syria spoke last, French
Ambassador Francois Delattre
walked out of the chamber and
left. Before that, US
Ambassador Nikki Haley spoke,
as fast transcribed below by
Inner City Press. On April 8,
US President Donald Trump
wrote to the US Congress:
"Dear Mr. Speaker:
(Dear Mr. President:) At
approximately 8:40 p.m.
Eastern Daylight Time on April
6, 2017, at my direction,
United States military forces
in the Mediterranean Sea,
operating beyond the
territorial sea of any state,
struck the Shayrat military
airfield in Syria.
United States intelligence
indicates that Syrian military
forces operating from this
airfield were responsible for
the chemical weapons attack on
Syrian civilians in southern
Idlib Province, Syria, that
occurred on April 4. I
directed this action in order
to degrade the Syrian
military's ability to conduct
further chemical weapons
attacks and to dissuade the
Syrian regime from using or
proliferating chemical
weapons, thereby promoting the
stability of the region and
averting a worsening of the
region's current humanitarian
catastrophe.
I acted in the vital national
security and foreign policy
interests of the United
States, pursuant to my
constitutional authority to
conduct foreign relations and
as Commander in Chief and
Chief Executive. The
United States will take
additional action, as
necessary and appropriate, to
further its important national
interests.
I am providing this report as
part of my efforts to keep the
Congress fully informed,
consistent with the War Powers
Resolution (Public Law
93-148). I appreciate
the support of the Congress in
this action.
Sincerely,DONALD J. TRUMP"
At the UN
noon briefing on April 7,
Inner City Press asked UN
spokesman Stephane Dujarric
about UN envoy Staffan de
Mistura saying he is
"operational focused" - what
does it mean? From the UN
transcript:
Inner City Press:
Staffan de Mistura has this
quote where he says he's fully
and operationally focused on
the situation. Can you
unpack that a little
bit? Like, does it, was
he informed of this? Was
he… has he had a dialogue with
either the United States or
anyone else…?
Spokesman: I'm not
aware…
Inner City Press: What
does it mean to be
operationally focused?
Spokesman: I'm not
aware, I'm not aware that he
was, that he was
informed. I don't
believe anybody in the UN was
informed. But I, as I
said, I'm just not aware that
he was informed. Obviously, I
think the events of the last
few days are likely to have an
impact on, on his
efforts. And so, I
think, like all of us, with
the Secretary-General or his
envoy, we are focused and
refocused on trying to get
the, make sure the political
process and the Geneva talks
stay on, on track. And,
you know, the
Secretary-General's belief
that there is no other option
but a political option
remains, and he's asking
everybody to recommit to the
Geneva talks.
Here's
Inner City Press' fast
transcript of NIkki Haley:
"For six years the world has
watched as the Syrian
government has terrorized its
own people…it has broken
international law, committed
criminal acts that shocked the
conscience of all humanity.
The JIM has found beyond a
doubt that the Syrian regime
has used chemical weapons
against its own people
multiple times. On Tuesday the
Syrian government launched
another attack.
Assad thought he could get
away with this.
That changed last night. When
the international community
fails to act collectively,
there are times when states
are forced to take their own
action. The US will not stand
by when chemical weapons are
used. Our military destroyed
the airfield from which the
airstrike took place. We were
totally justified in doing so.
The moral stain of the Assad
regime could no longer go
unanswered. It was time to
act…Assad must never use
chemical weapons again.
While the Syrian regime is
responsible, it is not the
only guilty party. Iran bears
a heavy responsibility. It has
propped up and shielded
Syria’s dictator for years.
The Russian government also
bears responsibility. Russia
has stood beside Assad. Russia
made it known, as it has 7
times before, that it would
use its veto again. Further
delay would only have
strengthened Assad. We were
not going to allow that.
Russia is supposed to be a
guarantor of removal of
chemical weapons from Syria.
Obviously that has not
happened.
It could be that Russia is
knowingly allowing chemical
weapons to remain in Syria; it
could be Russia has been
incompetent; or it could be
that the Assad regime is
playing Russia for fools.
The world is waiting for
Russia to reconsider its
alliance with Assad.
Now we must move to a new
phases: a drive to a political
solution to this horrible
conflict. We expect the Assad
regime and its allies to take
the process seriously. We
expect the Council to speak
loudly and forcefully. The US
took a very measured step last
night. We are prepared to do
more. But we hope that will
not be necessary. "
Just
before US airstrikes on Syria,
the UN Security Council ended
its Syria meeting past 8 pm on
April 6. Video by Inner City
Press here.
After the strikes, with 58 and
59 missiles reported hitting
their targets, Bolivia
requested a Security Council
meeting. The US as Council
President for April scheduled
the meeting for 11:30 am but
made it open. Ambassador Nikki
Haley said, "This morning,
Bolivia requested an emergency
UN Security Council meeting to
discuss the events in Syria.
It asked for the discussion to
be held in closed session. The
United States, as president of
the Council this month,
decided the session would be
held in the open. Any country
that chooses to defend the
atrocities of the Syrian
regime will have to do so in
full public view, for all the
world to hear.”
As he left
the UNSC on the night of April
6, Uruguay's Ambassador said,
We never give up. Sweden's
Ambassador Olof Skoog, who
earlier hearkened back to Hans
Blix in 2003, said we continue
to work. Source told Inner
City Press that Sweden's role
has led to push-back against
it. In some instances Sweden
takes a line such as on
women's rights; in others it
backs down, as to Morocco
about Western Sahara, after a
threat to ban Ikea. We'll see.
The vote on the
Syria chemical weapons deaths
was against postponed on the
evening April 6, according
first to a UK Mission
official, with now three
drafts in the mix. After the
deaths by chemical weapons in
Syria, an open UN Security
Council meeting was held on
April 5. On the way in,
Ambassadors including from the
UK, Sweden and France spoke, video
here. On April 6,
excluded from the process,
both the P3 and Russian drafts
below, Elected Ten members of
the Council met inside the
Council -- the glass door to
the stakeout was improperly
locked by the UN Secretariat
-- and afterward Inner City
Press reported
and talked with several. One
said the goal was to avoid a
veto; another said it was to
avoid exclusion from the
process after being elected to
the Security Council. Later,
after the door was opened,
Sweden's Olof Skoog said, "I
was here with Hans Blix in
2003, of course I'm worried."
Inner City Press looped
video here, YouTube here. Others distinguish the two
cases. Here is the E10 draft,
which largely drops Operative
Paragraph 5 and its content:
"Recalling the Protocol for
the Prohibition of the Use in
War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous
or other Gases, and of
Bacteriological Methods of
Warfare, and the Convention on
the Prohibition of the
Development, Production,
Stockpiling and Use of
Chemical Weapons and on their
Destruction (CWC) ratified by
the Syrian Arab Republic on 14
September 2013, and the
Council’s resolutions 1540
(2004), 2118 (2013), 2209
(2015), 2235 (2015), 2314
(2016), and 2319 (2016),
Expressing its horror at the
reported use of chemical
weapons in the Khan Shaykhun
area of southern Idlib in the
Syrian Arab Republic on 4
April 2017 causing large-scale
loss of life and injuries,
affirming that the use of
chemical weapons constitutes a
serious violation of
international law, and
stressing that those
responsible for any use of
chemical weapons must be held
accountable,
Noting the Organization for
the Prohibition of Chemical
Weapons (OPCW) has announced,
in addition to its ongoing
investigation, that its Fact
Finding Mission (FFM) is in
the process of gathering and
analyzing information on this
incident from all available
sources and will report to the
OPCW Executive Council,
Recalling that in resolution
2118 (2013) the Council
decided that the Syrian Arab
Republic shall not use,
develop, produce, otherwise
acquire, stockpile or retain
chemical weapons or transfer,
directly or indirectly,
chemical weapons, to other
States or non-State actors and
underscored that no party in
Syria should use, develop
produce acquire, stockpile,
retain or transfer chemical
weapons,
Recalling its determination
that the use of chemical
weapons in the Syria Arab
Republic represents a threat
to international peace and
security,
1. Condemns in the strongest
terms the reported use of
chemical weapons in the Syrian
Arab Republic, in particular
the attack on Khan Shaykhun
reported on 4 April 2017,
expresses its outrage that
individuals continue to be
killed and injured by chemical
weapons in the Syrian Arab
Republic, and expresses its
determination that those
responsible must be held
accountable;
2. Expresses its full support
to the OPCW Fact Finding
Mission, demands that all
parties provide delay-free and
safe access to any sites
deemed relevant by the OPCW
FFM, and, as applicable, by
the JIM, to the reported
incident in Khan Shaykhun in
accordance with resolution
2118, and requests that the
FFM report the results of its
investigation as soon as
possible;
3. Requests that the Secretary
General make the necessary
arrangements for the UN-OPCW
Joint Investigative Mechanism
to liaise closely with the
Fact Finding Mission to
expeditiously investigate any
incident the FFM determines
involved or likely involved
the use of chemicals as
weapons in order to identify
those involved in accordance
with the provisions of
paragraph 5 of its Resolution
2235;
4. Recalls that in its
resolutions 2118 and 2235 it
decided that the Syrian Arab
Republic and all parties in
Syria shall cooperate fully
with the OPCW and the United
Nations including the Joint
Investigation Mechanism;
5. Emphasizes that this
includes the obligation upon
the Syrian Arab Republic of
complying with their relevant
recommendations, by accepting
personnel designated by the
OPCW or the United Nations, by
providing for and ensuring the
security of activities
undertaken by these personnel,
by providing these personnel
with immediate and unfettered
access to and the right to
inspect, in discharging their
functions, any and all sites,
and by allowing immediate and
unfettered access to
individuals that the OPCW has
grounds to believe to be of
importance for the purpose of
its mandate, and decides that
all parties in Syria shall
cooperate fully in this
regard; [op. 7 of op. 2118]
6. Requests the
Secretary-General to report on
whether the information and
access described in paragraph
5 has been provided in his
reports to the Security
Council every 30 days pursuant
to paragraph 12 of resolution
2118.
7. Recalls its decision in
response to violations of
resolution 2118 to impose
measures under Chapter VII of
the United Nations charter. "
Again,
Operative Paragraph 5 is out.
But here's the Russian draft,
with as telegraphed "balanced
geographical
representation,"
here: "Recalling
the Protocol for the
Prohibition of the Use in War
of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or
other Gases, and of
Bacteriological Methods of
Warfare, and the Convention on
the Prohibition of the
Development, Production,
Stockpiling and Use of
Chemical Weapons and on their
Destruction (CWC) ratified by
the Syrian Arab Republic on 14
September 2013, and the
Council's resolutions 1540
(2004), 2118 (2013), 2209
(2015), 2235 (2015), 2314
(2016), and 2319 (2016),
Expressing its
deep concern regarding the
alleged incident with the
chemical weapons in the Khan
Shaykhun area of southern
Idlib in the Syrian Arab
Republic on 4 April 2017
reportedly causing large-scale
loss of life and injuries,
affirming that the use of
chemical weapons constitutes a
serious violation of
international law, and
stressing that those
responsible for any use of
chemical weapons must be held
accountable,
Recalling that in
resolution 2118 (2013) the
Council decided that the
Syrian Arab Republic shall not
use, develop, produce,
otherwise acquire, stockpile
or retain chemical weapons or
transfer, directly or
indirectly, chemical weapons,
to other States or non-State
actors and underscored that no
party in Syria should use,
develop, produce, acquire,
stockpile, retain or transfer
chemical weapons,
1.Requests the
joint FFM and the JIM
investigative team to visit as
soon as possible the site of
the alleged incident in Khan
Shaykhun and adjacent
territories to conduct
full-scale investigation using
the whole spectrum of relevant
methods, including the
alternative information
collection efforts and
investigative skills, as was
strongly recommended for such
cases in the 4th and 5th JIM’s
reports (para. 49 and para .
11 respectively).
2. Demands all parties
in the Syrian Arab Republic to
secure in accordance with the
resolution 2118 (2013) without
any delay free and safe access
for the joint FFM and JIM team
to the site of the incident
and adjacent areas;
3. Requests the
Director-General of the OPCW
Technical Secretariat and the
head of the OPCW-UN Joint
Investigative Mechanism (JIM)
to forward through the United
Nations Secretary-General to
the Council for its
consideration their proposals
on the personal composition of
the joint team to be
dispatched to the Idlib
Governorate of the Syrian Arab
Republic based on the
principle of a broad-based and
balanced geographical
representation;
4. Decides that the
report of the joint FFM and
JIM team should include all
the evidences collected at the
site of the incident and be
provided to the Council for
consideration;
5. Decides to
remain actively seized of the
matter."
Earlier on April
6, a finalized draft had "gone
into blue," with the sponsors
saying there'll be a vote
later in the day, after a 4:30
pm Peacekeeping review
session, at around 7 pm. But
Russia has requested another
consultation, at 3 pm. Here's
where is stands: "Recalling
the Protocol for the
Prohibition of the Use in War
of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or
other Gases, and of
Bacteriological Methods of
Warfare, and the Convention on
the Prohibition of the
Development, Production,
Stockpiling and Use of
Chemical Weapons and on their
Destruction (CWC) ratified by
the Syrian Arab Republic on 14
September 2013, and the
Council’s resolutions 1540
(2004), 2118 (2013), 2209
(2015), 2235 (2015), 2314
(2016), and 2319 (2016),
Expressing its horror at the
reported use of chemical
weapons in the Khan Shaykhun
area of southern Idlib in the
Syrian Arab Republic on 4
April 2017 causing large-scale
loss of life and injuries,
affirming that the use of
chemical weapons constitutes a
serious violation of
international law, and
stressing that those
responsible for any use of
chemical weapons must be held
accountable,
Noting the Organization for
the Prohibition of Chemical
Weapons (OPCW) has announced,
in addition to its ongoing
investigation, that its Fact
Finding Mission (FFM) is in
the process of gathering and
analyzing information on this
incident from all available
sources and will report to the
OPCW Executive Council,
Recalling that in resolution
2118 (2013) the Council
decided that the Syrian Arab
Republic shall not use,
develop, produce, otherwise
acquire, stockpile or retain
chemical weapons or transfer,
directly or indirectly,
chemical weapons, to other
States or non-State actors and
underscored that no party in
Syria should use, develop
produce acquire, stockpile,
retain or transfer chemical
weapons,
Recalling its determination
that the use of chemical
weapons in the Syria Arab
Republic represents a threat
to international peace and
security,
1. Condemns in the strongest
terms the reported use of
chemical weapons in the Syrian
Arab Republic, in particular
the attack on Khan Shaykhun
reported on 4 April 2017,
expresses its outrage that
individuals continue to be
killed and injured by chemical
weapons in the Syrian Arab
Republic, and expresses its
determination that those
responsible must be held
accountable;
2. Expresses its full support
to the OPCW Fact Finding
Mission, demands that all
parties provide delay-free and
safe access to any sites
deemed relevant by the OPCW
FFM, and, as applicable, by
the JIM, to the reported
incident in Khan Shaykhun in
accordance with resolution
2118, and requests that the
FFM report the results of its
investigation as soon as
possible;
3. Requests that the Secretary
General make the necessary
arrangements for the UN-OPCW
Joint Investigative Mechanism
to liaise closely with the
Fact Finding Mission to
expeditiously investigate any
incident the FFM determines
involved or likely involved
the use of chemicals as
weapons in order to identify
those involved in accordance
with the provisions of
paragraph 5 of its Resolution
2235;
4. Recalls that in its
resolutions 2118 and 2235 it
decided that the Syrian Arab
Republic and all parties in
Syria shall cooperate fully
with the OPCW and the United
Nations including the Joint
Investigation Mechanism;
5. Emphasizes that this
includes the obligation upon
the Syrian Arab Republic to
provide the JIM and FFM with
the following and take the
following steps:
(a) flight plans, flight logs,
and any other information on
air operations, including all
flight plans or flight logs
filed on April 4 2017;
(b) names of all individuals
in command of any helicopter
squadrons;
(c) arrange meetings requested
including with generals or
other officers, within no more
than five days of the date on
which such meeting is
requested;
(d) immediately provide access
to relevant air bases from
which the JIM or the FFM
believe attacks involving
chemicals as weapons may have
been launched
6. Requests the
Secretary-General to report on
whether the information and
access described in paragraph
5 has been provided in his
reports to the Security
Council every 30 days pursuant
to paragraph 12 of resolution
2118.
7. Recalls its decision in
response to violations of
resolution 2118 to impose
measures under Chapter VII of
the United Nations charter."
At the April 5 meeting, no
vote was taken on the "P-3"
draft resolution, which Inner
City Press published below.
Russia in the meeting
identified things that would
"have" to go in any draft they
would agree to, including a
geographic balance in
investigators. Then US
Ambassador Nikki Haley spoke,
fast-transcribed below by
Inner City Press, after two
paragraphs from the Mission:
"“There is an obvious truth
here that must be spoken. The
truth is that Assad, Russia,
and Iran have no interest in
peace. The illegitimate Syrian
government, led by a man with
no conscience, has committed
untold atrocities against his
people for more than six
years. Assad has made it clear
that he doesn’t want to take
part in a meaningful political
process. Iran has reinforced
Assad’s military, and Russia
has shielded Assad from UN
sanctions. If Russia has the
influence in Syria that it
claims to have, we need to see
them use it. We need to see
them put an end to these
horrific acts. How many more
children have to die before
Russia cares?...“When the
United Nations consistently
fails in its duty to act
collectively, there are times
in the life of states that we
are compelled to take our own
action. For the sake of the
victims, I hope the rest of
the Council is finally willing
to do the same.”
Inner City Press
fast transcription: "In the
life of the UN there are times
we are compelled to do more
than just talk….
Yesterday’s attack bears all
the hallmarks of the Assad
regime’s use of chemical
weapons. We know that
yesterday’s attack was a new
low, even for the barbaric
Assad regime.
Evidence…indicates Assad is
using even more lethal
chemicals than before…leaving
men, women, the elderly and
children gasping for their
very last breath. As docs and
nurses rushed to help, a
second round of bombs rained
down.
Just a few weeks ago…Russia
chose to close their eyes to
the barbarity. Russia cannot
escape responsibility for
this. If Russia had been
fulfilling its
responsibilities, there
wouldn’t be any chemical
weapons left for the Assad
regime to use.
If nothing is done these
attacks will continue.
We regularly repeat
tired talking points in
support of a peace
process….Russia uses the same
false narrative to deflect
attention from their allies in
Damascus…Russia attempts to
place blame on others….Assad,
Russia and Iran have no
interest in peace. The
illegitimate Syrian gov…has
committed untold atrocities
for more than 6 years.
Iran has reinforced Assad’s
military, and Russia has
shielded Assad from UN
sanctions. If Russia has the
influence in Syria that it
claims to have, we need to see
them use it. How many more
children need to die before
Russia cares?
If we are not able to enforce
resolutions preventing the use
of chemical weapons, what does
that say for our chances to
end the Syrian conflict?
When the UN consistently fails
in its duty, there are times
we are compelled to take our
own action. For the sake of
the victims, I hope the rest
of the Council is ready to do
the same. The world needs to
see the effect of chemical
weapons and the fact that they
will not be tolerated."
Also in
the meeting, Uruguay's
Ambassador quoted Marlon
Brando, "The horror, the
horror." Back on April 4, the
Ambassadors of the UK then
Sweden called for an emergency
Council meeting. Inner City
Press video
here. With the meeting
then set for April 5, the
night before the United
States, UK and France
circulated a draft resolution:
"Recalling the Protocol for
the Prohibition of the Use in
War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous
or other Gases, and of
Bacteriological Methods of
Warfare, and the Convention on
the Prohibition of the
Development, Production,
Stockpiling and Use of
Chemical Weapons and on their
Destruction (CWC) ratified by
the Syrian Arab Republic on 14
September 2013, and the
Council’s resolutions 1540
(2004), 2118 (2013), 2209
(2015), 2235 (2015), 2314
(2016), and 2319 (2016),
Expressing its horror at
the reported use of chemical
weapons in the Khan Shaykhun
area of southern Idlib in the
Syrian Arab Republic on 4
April 2017 causing large-scale
loss of life and injuries,
affirming that the use of
chemical weapons constitutes a
serious violation of
international law, and
stressing that those
responsible for any use of
chemical weapons must be held
accountable,
Noting the Organization for
the Prohibition of Chemical
Weapons (OPCW) has announced,
in addition to its ongoing
investigation, that its Fact
Finding Mission (FFM) is in
the process of gathering and
analysing information on this
incident from all available
sources and will report to the
OPCW Executive Council,
Recalling that in
resolution 2118 (2013) the
Council decided that the
Syrian Arab Republic shall not
use, develop, produce,
otherwise acquire, stockpile
or retain chemical weapons or
transfer, directly or
indirectly, chemical weapons,
to other States or non-State
actors and underscored that no
party in Syria should use,
develop produce acquire,
stockpile, retain or transfer
chemical weapons,
Determining that the use
of chemical weapons in the
Syria Arab Republic represents
a threat to international
peace and security,
1. Condemns in the strongest
terms and use of chemical
weapons in the Syrian Arab
Republic, in particular the
attack on Khan Shaykhun
reported on 4 April 2017,
expresses its outrage that
individuals continue to be
killed and injured by chemical
weapons in the Syrian Arab
Republic, and expresses its
determination that those
responsible must be held
accountable;
2. Expresses its full
support to the OPCW Fact
Finding Mission investigation
and requests that it report
the results of its
investigation as soon as
possible;
3. Recalls paragraph 9
of resolution 2235 (2015),
which requested the FFM to
collaborate with the JIM to
provide full access to all the
information and evidence
obtained or prepared by the
FFM, and stresses that the JIM
should begin to fulfill its
mandate alongside the FFM as
it seeks to determine whether
the incident on April 4 2017
involved the use of chemicals
as weapons;
4. Recalls that in its
resolutions 2118 and 2235 it
decided that the Syrian Arab
Republic and all parties in
Syria shall cooperate fully
with the OPCW and the United
Nations including the Joint
Investigation Mechanism;
5. Emphasizes that this
includes the obligation upon
the Syrian Arab Republic to
provide the JIM and FFM with
the following:
(a) flight plans, flight
logs, and any other
information on air operations,
including all flight plans or
flight logs filed on April 4
2017;
(b) names of all
individuals in command of any
helicopter squadrons;
(c) arrange meetings
requested including with
generals or other officers,
within no more than five days
of the date on which such
meeting is requested;
(d) immediately provide
access to relevant air bases
from which the JIM or the FFM
believe attacks involving
chemicals as weapons may have
been launched
6. Requests the
Secretary-General to report on
whether the information and
access described in paragraph
5 has been provided in his
reports to the Security
Council every 30 days pursuant
to paragraph 12 of resolution
2118.
7. Recalls its decision
in response to violations of
resolution 2118 to impose
measures under Chapter VII of
the United Nations charter."
Inner City Press will cover
the meeting(s).
As
de Mistura trudges on with a
short term UN extension, he
did not say if he is applying
to head the UN Development
Program, and thus to move on
from his Syria post. Inner
City Press first
reported that - and the
interest of Sigrid
Kaag, who blocks Inner
City Press on Twitter, deemed
fine by the UN's
holdover Deputy Spokesman
Farhan Haq.
On March 8,
before the US' April
presidency of the Security
Council, US Ambassador Nikki
Haley was asked of Iran
involvement in talks. She
paused, then said there are
some not at the table who
should be. Watch this site.
In Geneva
for the Syria talks as in New
York, the UN made a point of
telling those with "temporary
accreditation" that they could
not get into the building
after 7 pm, even with a
stakeout scheduled for 6:30
pm. The Free
UN Coalition for Access
(FUNCA)
objects to the UN's two-tier
system for correspondents,
which in New York meant for
example that Inner City Press
which covered Peru's
President's meeting with
Antonio Guterres was Banned
from the area of the UN where
he spoke to the media
afterward. (But see this
Periscope). Ban
Censorship in 2017.
Even before
February 25, multiple UN
sources sounded a dissonant
note to Inner City Press.
As
exclusively reported
February 2, the sources had
told Inner City Press that de
Mistura is in fact angling to
replace Helen Clark atop the
UN Development Program or
UNDP. (The UN Spokesperson's
office, as usual, is in
untransparent denial mode.
Also in the mix are, among
others, David Miliband,
Segolene Royal and Bert
Koenders - or even Sigrid "The
Blocker" Kaag).
Inner City
Press first reported from its
sources that seeking to
replace de Mistura as UN Syria
envoy is Sigrid Kaag, long
time envoy in Lebanon. (We'd
ask Kaag to confirm or deny,
but again it turns out Kaag blocks
Inner City Press on Twitter, click
here to view: strange,
for a publicly paid UN
official.) We'll have more on
this.
When de Mistura
took questions on January 31,
Inner City Press asked him
among other things if the
Trump administration's
proposal for safe zones in
Syria (and Yemen) had been
discussed. Video here.
No, de
Mistura said, US Ambassador to
the UN Nikki Haley hadn't
raised it. Some wondered if
that reflects the irrelevance
to which the UN has sunk.
We'll see.
***
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-303,
UN, NY 10017 USA
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other,
earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available in
the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright
2006-2017 Inner City Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
for
|
,
