On
FSA Child
Soldiers, Amos
Says Use
Leverage, US
Left
UNanswered,
Until Now
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
February 13, updated
Feb 14 below
-- Amid
reports that
the US already
provides or is
ready to
provide aid to
armed groups
in Syria like
the Free
Syrian Army
(FSA), on
January 29
Inner City
Press first
highlighted
and then on
January 30
first asked
the US Mission
to the UN
about a
finding in the
UN's
then-unpublished
report on
Children and
Armed Conflict
in Syria:
"Throughout
the
reporting
period, the
United Nations
received
consistent
reports of
recruitment
and use of
children by
FSA-affiliated
groups." (Now
final, here,
Para 12).
The US
has cited the
recruitment
and use of
child soldiers
to suspend US
aid to armies
of governments
which had
previously
been receiving
it.
Inner City
Press asked,
and continues
to ask,
how could the
US provide aid
to a non-state
group which
even the UN
has found
using child
soldiers?
On February
13, Inner City
Press was able
to put this
question to
the UN's
humanitarian
chief Valerie
Amos, but not
to US
Ambassador
Samantha Power
who spoke just
after Amos.
Amos said "in
terms of
recruiting
children into
armed groups,
we see
culpability on
all the sides
to the
conflict, and
therefore
anyone who has
any kind of
influence with
those groups
needs to be
making it
clear that
this is not
acceptable." Video
here, from
Minute 10:11.
Given US
statements
about the Free
Syrian Army, clearly
the US has
influence and
leverage. So
will the US
use the leverage?
Can it legally
not?
At the Security
Council stakeout
after Amos
took five
questions,
including
Inner City
Press'
question on FSA
child
soldiers,
Ambassador
Power took
three: Al Arabiya,
Associated
Press and the
New York Times.
Inner City
Press said, "Question
on child
soldiers?" and
there was some
reaction which
we won't try
to interpret.
(The video
is now online
here,
at end, also
from Minute
10:11). But
the question had
still not been
answered, as
specifically
regards the
FSA child
soldiers and
the US 2008
Child Soldiers
Protection
Act.
Update:
on
February 14,
the following
was received
from US
Mission deputy
spokesperson
Tony Deaton:
"We
are deeply
disturbed by
the contents
of this report
and strongly
condemn the
mistreatment
and torture of
children in
any conflict.
We
equally
condemn the
use of child
soldiers in
Syria and
around the
world. The use
of children in
armed conflict
is morally
reprehensible,
and the United
States in no
way supports
or condones
this activity.
We vet
recipients of
our assistance
to the
moderate
opposition and
work
diligently to
prevent
assistance
from falling
into the hands
of groups that
recruit or use
children in
combat or
employ terror
tactics."
While
we
will continue
to pursue how
the 2008 Child
Soldiers
Prevention Act
applies after
the FSA
finding in the
UN report, we
appreciate the
US
response and
publish it in
full.
Back on
February 4,
the UK Mission
to the UN
provided this
response to
Inner City
Press:
"The
UK absolutely
condemns the
use of child
soldiers in
all cases, and
strongly
supports
international
efforts to
stop the use
of child
soldiers. We
urge all
parties in the
Syrian
conflict to
release any
children held
in detention.
"Armed
conflict
affects
millions of
lives around
the world, and
children are
among those
most
vulnerable to
the effects of
conflict. The
only way to
secure the
long-term
future of
Syria’s
children is to
find a
political
solution to
the crisis.
"We
have made
clear our
absolute
condemnation
of the use of
child
soldiers. As
noted in this
report, the
use of child
soldiers by
the opposition
is not
systematic and
is limited to
certain
elements. We
have provided
training to
the Supreme
Military
Council of the
Syrian
opposition on
the law of
armed
conflict, and
will continue
to work with
them to help
ensure that
they meet
their
obligations
under
international
law."
As
Inner City
Press noted,
that might be
OK for the
United Kingdom
-- but what
about the US,
including in
light of the 2008 Child
Soldiers
Prevention Act,
which provides
for example:
It is
the sense of
Congress that—
(1)
the United
States
Government
should condemn
the
conscription,
forced
recruitment,
or use of
children by
governments,
paramilitaries,
or other
organizations;
(2)
the United
States
Government
should support
and, to the
extent
practicable,
lead efforts
to establish
and uphold
international
standards
designed to
end the abuse
of human
rights
described in
paragraph (1);
There are
prohibitions
on funding
which can only
be overridden
for formal,
public
findings in a
waiver by the
President.
Given all
this, Inner
City Press on
February 4
again asked
two
spokespeople
for the US
Mission to the
UN its January
30 question:
"could the US
provide aid to
a non-state
group, the FSA
and its
affiliates,
which the UN
has found
using child
soldiers?"
Now we add:
(in)
consistent
with the Child
Soldiers
Prevention Act
of 2008.
The
report, now
issued as a
document of
the UN
Security
Council under
the symbol
S/2014/31,
goes on to
recount:
"Boys
aged 12 to 17
were trained,
armed, and
used as
combatants or
to man
checkpoints.
For instance,
a 15 year-old
boy reported
being
recruited in
April 2012 by
the FSA in
Tall Kalakh
(Tartus
governate),
and
participation
in military
operations....
Also
indicative was
the case of a
16 year-old
boy from Homs
who reportedly
joined the FSA
as a
combatant. In
March 2013,
his family
reported to
the United
Nations that
he was still
fighting with
the group."
And
is
this boy still
fighting with
the FSA? There
is more to be
said about
this UN
report, but as
to the US and
the recent
report it is
or is moving
toward aiding
the armed FSA,
what steps
will be taken
on this UN
report? Specifically,
by the US,
including in
light of what
Valerie Amos
said on February
13 about using
leverage?
Watch this
site.
* * *
These
reports
are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for Sept 26, 2011 New Yorker on Inner City
Press at UN
Click
for
BloggingHeads.tv re Libya, Sri Lanka, UN
Corruption
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-303,
UN, NY 10017 USA
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest service,
and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2014 Inner City Press,
Inc. To request reprint or other permission,
e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
|