On
Tanzania Inner City Press
Asked UN Guterres About Abuse
of Burundi Refugees and Press
Guterres Supports
By Matthew
Russell Lee, CJR,
Video,
Filing
UNITED NATIONS
GATE, March 3– Amid much news
in Tanzania, in February 2018
Inner City Press asked the UN
about the government killing
of NIT university student
Akwilina Anwiline and the
subsequent calling in of the
Chadema opposition party.
After a few days of
questioning the UN expressed
concern and said it was
watching closing. Then
nothing. On March 1, banned
Inner City Press asked
Guterres, his deputy Amina J.
Mohammed, Alison Smale and
spokesman Stephane Dujarric
"March 1-1: What is the SG's
comment and action on NGO
reports that Tanzania harasses
Burundian refugees in the hope
that they will return
home? March 1-3: Also on
Tanzania, what is the SG's
comment and action if any on
that Tanzania has suspended a
leading newspaper and its
website for a week accusing it
of falsely reporting currency
exchange rates. The
action against The Citizen
newspaper follows growing
complaints by opposition
supporters and civil society
groups at what they say are
moves to stifle dissent and
create obstacles for
journalists and rights
activists?" Two days later,
nothing - no answer at all,
despite Smale's promise
to UNSR David Kaye, and
Dujarric's on
camera promise. This is
today's UN. In January 2019,
Tanzanian President John
Magufuli has urged his
government's ministers to
"take advantage" of refugee
crises and make money by
selling food to international
aid organizations. Will
Guterres, who claims to be for
refugees (while staying silent
on the refoulement of 47 from
Nigeria to Cameroon), say
anything about this use of his
UN? Tanzania hosts / harvests
around 300,000 refugees,
mainly from Burundi and
Democratic Republic of Congo,
largely in three camps in the
north-west of the country.
Speaking in Dar es Salaam,
Magufuli celebrated the
signing of a contract to
deliver 36,000 tons of maize
to the UN World Food Program
(WFP) for around $9.1
million. "These funds
are allocated to help our
refugee friends from other
countries in conflict, it is
our duty to take advantage of
them," said Magufuli in
Swahili, to laughter in the
room. "We must take
advantage of their problems.
They fight at home and we get
the money." Inner City Press
in writing asked Guterres, his
Deputy Amina J. Mohammed and
Spokesman Stephane Dujarric
who promised
answers, "January 8-6: On
Tanzania and refugees, what is
the SG's comment and action on
that Tanzanian President John
Magufuli on January 4 urged
his ministers to “take
advantage” of refugee crises
and make money by selling food
to international aid
organisations. The
country hosts around 300 000
refugees, mainly from Burundi
and Democratic Republic of
Congo (DRC), largely in three
camps in the north-west of the
country, according to the
Norwegian Refugee
Council. Speaking in Dar
es Salaam, Magufuli celebrated
the signing of a contract to
deliver 36 000 tons of maize
to the UN World Food Program
(WFP) for around $9.1
million. “These funds
are allocated to help our
refugee friends from other
countries in conflict, it is
our duty to take advantage of
them,” said Magufuli in
Swahili, to laughter in the
room. “We must take
advantage of their problems.
They fight at home and we get
the money.” But there was no
answer, even five days later.
Telling, the state media of
China, from whose CEFC China
Energy Guterres is covering
up, put out this on January
13: "Tanzania on Sunday vowed
to continue strengthening its
relationship with the United
Nations High Commissioner for
Refugees (UNHCR) as it grants
asylum to refugees from
neighbouring countries.
Home Affairs Minister Kangi
Lugola made the pledge when he
met with UNHCR representative
to Tanzania, Chansa
Kapaya. The two
discussed issues related to
refugees as well as how
Tanzania will continue to host
asylum-seekers in
collaboration with the UN
refugee agency and in
accordance with the laws and
regulations. Lugola
asserted that Tanzania will
hardly succeed in
accommodating refugees without
the cooperation of the UN
refugee agency. "Some
refugees have started to
voluntarily return to Burundi
hence the need to work closely
with the UNHCR to ensure their
safe return," Lugola said,
adding that his ministry has
been in regular meetings with
the agency to accomplish the
mission. Kapaya
commended the Tanzanian
government for being
supportive to the agency."
Yeah. This is what Guterres'
system of refugees and
festering conflicts he does
nothing about, in Burundi and
Cameroon and elsewhere, has
come to. This and Guterres'
roughing up and banning of the
Press which asks about it and
his under-performance. On 3
July 2018 Guterres' UN
Security roughed
up Inner City Press and
has banned
it since, making the ban permanent
on August 17 but with the UN's
Alison Smale promising
to still answer written
questions. In Tanzania like at
the UN things are (getting)
worse. On October 3,
Inner City Press asked
Guterres' spokesmen and his
Deputy Amina J. Mohammaed: "
October 3-1: On Tanzania what
is the SG's and separately
DSG's comment and action on
the new law “which means
anyone questioning the
government's official
statistics faces a fine and at
least three years in prison”?
More than six hours later,
nothing - despite the on
camera commitment by
lead spokesman Stephane
Dujarric that such written
questions would be answered.
We'll have more on this. On
September 20 Inner City Press
asked Guterres' spokesman
Stephane Dujarric "September
20-1: On Tanzania, what is the
SG's comment and action on
that Tanzania's main
opposition party on Wednesday
said it would boycott the
electoral process until
further notice after
by-elections that it said had
been wrecked by
"militarization" by the
authorities. Freeman Mbowe,
president of the Chadema
party, told a press
conference, 'We can no longer
take part in elections of this
kind. Democracy is being taken
hostage'?" But six hours
later, not a word of answer
from Dujarric or his deputy.
The UN of Antonio Guterres is
corrupt. Previously: Esther
Matiko, Tarime Urban
Legislator, was arrested by
police. Link to video here.
Will the UN, as on Tanzania's
threatened refoulement of
refugees to Burundi, remain in
silent cover up mode? The John
Magufuli government moved to
charge bloggers and all online
news sites and streamers $924,
and to face fines of $2,200 if
they "cause annoyance." It's
the Electronic and Postal
Communications (Online
Content) Regulations 2018, here.
When Inner City Press asked
the UN on April 20, it was
told "different countries have
different press regulations."
Here now is the
application form, from the
Tanzania Communications
Regulators Authority whose slogan
is "leveling the playing
field," photo here.
Now in June the Tanzania
Communications Regulatory
Authority (TCRA) issued a
directive ordering
unregistered websites to
comply with the country's
Electronic and Postal
Communications (Online
Content) Regulations or cease
publication. Those which don't
register by June 15 face
penalties. Jamii
Forums, for
only one,
already
suspended
operations. The
regulations let the government
reprive online users of
anonymity, requiring websites
to "have in place mechanisms
to identify" those who
interact on their forums, and
mandate that internet cafes
keep user logs for up to 12
months. Additionally, the
regulations allow the
government to force websites
to take down "prohibited"
content, broadly defined to
include material that "causes
annoyance." At today's UN of
Antonio Guterres and his
Global Communicator Alison
Smale, they don't charge money
- they just, for online
journalism that causes annoyance,
throw the journalist in the
street (audio here),
throw its laptop on the
ground, and award
its work space to a state
media (in this case, Egypt's
Akhbar al Yom, former UN
Correspondents Association
president Sanaa Youssef) who
never asks questions and
rarely comes in. Back on April
20, Inner City Press asked SG
Antonio Guterres' deputy
spokesman Farhan Haq about it.
UN transcript here:
Inner City Press: I've been
wanting to ask you this this
week. [The United
Republic of] Tanzania has
announced that, going forward,
they've enacted a new law on
electronic communications that
to establish a blog in
Tanzania, you must pay the
Government $930, and that if
the blog is found to be
annoying to Government
officials, people can be fined
$2,200. I guess my
question is… there is a
country team there. What
do they think of a law that…
that… that places these type
of high costs and restrictions
on the freedom of expression?
Deputy Spokesman: Well,
different countries have
different press
regulations. This would
be a case where it would be up
to our human rights
counterparts in Geneva to
study what the existing
regulations are and to
determine whether they're fair
or not. Have a good
weekend, everyone." The UN
knows all about trying to silence
the press. Back on March 27
Inner City Press asked again,
about a new development - the
detention of Chadema leader
Freeman Mbowe and others - and
the UN spokesman Farhan Haq
repeated the same old
statement, not updated,
claiming to be watching
closely. Video here.
From the UN's transcript:
Inner City Press: in [United
Republic of] Tanzania, the…
the national Chairman of the
main opposition party has been
arrested by the
Government. And I know
that, in the past, maybe it
was you or Stéphane — I can't
remember — has had some
statements on Tanzania.
Does… what does the UN think
of this locking up the main
opposition figure?
Spokesman: I believe
we've… yes, I think we have
expressed our concerns about
this some time back. I
would just refer you…
Inner City Press: I
think this arrest is pretty
new, not to…
Spokesman: Yes, but
we've… but we had a wider
concern about the situation
that we expressed at the time,
which I'm trying to find
here. Oh, yes. We
are following closely
developments in Tanzania, and
we would call on the
authorities there to respect
freedom of expression and of
peaceful assembly." Following?
Inner City Press on February
20 at the UN noon briefing put
a question about it to the
spokesman for UN Secretary
General Antonio Guterres, who
spo a lot about preventative
diplomacy. But the spokesman,
Stephane Dujarric, said only,
"I had not seen those reports.
I'll have to look into it and
get back to you." Video here.
Now on February 27, Inner City
Press asked again, UN
transcript here:
Inner City Press: I hope this
question has been asked.
In [United Republic of]
Tanzania, an opposition
parliamentarian, Mr. [Joseph]
Mbilinyi, has been sentenced
to five months in prison for
defaming President [John]
Magufuli. And I know
that you'd said back on 22
February that the UN is
calling for freedom of
expression. Do you view
the jailing of
parliamentarians for being
critical of the President as
consistent with that?
Spokesman: "I don't have
the details of that particular
case, but, clearly, people
should have the freedom to
express themselves in speaking
about anything, including
their political leaders." the
UN is like a broken record
that does nothing (except
protect itself with immunity
and censorship). Inner City
Press asked Dujarric again at
the February 21 UN briefing,
video here
(at end), UN transcript here:
Inner City Press: You said
yesterday that you were
unaware of this killing of the
university student and the
subsequent calling in of
opposition parties and sort of
blaming them for what… and I
guess I just wanted to know,
there… there are many groups
in… in [United Republic of]
Tanzania they're saying things
are getting increasingly
repressive. What is the
UN's position on this?
Spokesman: I don't have
any language on Tanzania at
this point." The next day,
without Dujarric or Guterres
releasing anything, Inner City
Press asked again, video here,
UN transcript here:
Inner City Press: I want
to ask you again about
Tanzania and then about
Guinea. But in… you'd
said yesterday that you had no
language. Do you… is
that looking down…
Spokesman: I do have
something… Inner City Press:
Ah, language emerges.
Spokesman: Language has
emerged on Tanzania. And
I can tell you that we're
following closely developments
in Tanzania, including the sad
news of recent deaths of a
local leader in Chadema, the
main Tanzania opposition
party, and of a university
student who was travelling in
a bus nearby a march by
members of Chadema as they
were being dispersed by the
police. First, we would
like to express our
condolences to the families of
the deceased and call on
authorities to respect freedom
of expression and the right of
peaceful assembly." So they
wouldn't have released even
this unless asked again. Fear
of being declared persona non
grata again, failure of
commitment. This too: it seems
obvious that journalists
should not be serving up the
"delicacies" of those they
purport to be covering. But at
the UN, as with content
neutral accreditation and
access rules, that is thrown
out the window. This month the
UN Correspondents Association
is partnering with Kazakhstan,
whose new media law is called
repressive and draconian, to
distribute "national
delicacies" every Tuesday and
Thursday. Photo here.
On January 5, Inner City Press
asked the UN Spokesman Farhan
Haq, UN transcript here:
Inner City Press: I actually
have a different kind of press
freedom question. I
wanted to ask you. In
[the United Republic of]
Tanzania, the Government has fined
a number of TV stations for
simply reporting on a report
by the legal Human Rights
Centre about irregularities in
an election and human rights
abuses, and I'm
wondering. I know it's
one of the countries where the
UN has a, you know, a country
team, et cetera. Is the
UN aware of that? Do
they have any comment on the
open fining of stations simply
for… for reporting on human
rights issues? Deputy
Spokesman: "I don't have
anything in particular on
this, but we'll ask with our
country team about that."
Seven hours later, nothing.
And no response from the UN
Department of Public
Information, whose chief
Alison Smale was asked the
simplest of questions. No
answer, even as she suddenly
promotes Kazakhstan stories.
More on this to follow.
It's that
Kazakhstan is president of the
Security Council this month,
and UNCA is selling the
correspondents it charges a
hundred dollars to access, or
the illusion of access,
however it might appear. In
November it was espresso served
up by Italy, the country of
UNCA's long time landlord
president Giampaolo Pioli.
Now, it's Kazakhstan. A new
and peculiarly UN tradition,
of sycophantry, is born. And
the Free
UN Coalition for Access
opposes it. We are certainly
open to hearing from the
Kazazh Mission its side of the
story. How lawless, some
even say racist, is today's UN
and its Department of Public
Information? Kiswahili jobs
and funds that the General
Assembly specified to DPI must
be returned and retained are
nevertheless being eliminated
or "stolen," DPI
whistleblowers have complained
to Inner City Press. DPI chief
Alison Smale has refused to
answer Press questions; after
Inner City Press published the
story it was discussed in the
UN African Group meeting, and
is the subject of a note
verbale complaint this week.
This goes to the top: Smale in
November 2017 to the UN
Communication Group insisted
that everything must go
digital. (Inner City Press is
publishing the leaked 12-page
minutes here.)
On January 26, Secretary
General Antonio Guterrs' Youth
Envoy said that Guterres
personally told her the UN is
too analog and must go
digital. Video here.
Now, despite the General
Assembly specifically ordering
the the funds allocated for
Kiswahili Radio be restored to
that use, Smale's (and
ultimately Guterres' DPI has
refused, the staff now
ostensibly free to speak to
the press say. Inner City
Press asked again, having
received no response at all
from Smale, on January 29.
From the UN transcript:
Inner City Press: the budget
resolution that was passed
says that resources for
Kiswahili radio in particular
should be reallocated back to
where they were supposed to
be. My understanding is
that this was raised now in
the Africa group, and there's
a note verbale coming to
him. Is it DPI's
[Department of Public
Information] position that
they complied with that
resolution that…? Deputy
Spokesman: Yes.
We've checked with our DPI
colleagues. Yes, they
have complied with the
resolution. There's a
certain amount of detail about
how they provide Kiswahili and
Portuguese services, but the
bottom line is, yes, they have
been working with Member
States and working within the
framework of the resolution.
Inner City Press: Are there
Kiswahili-speaking staffers
that are being let go 1
February and losing their visa
and returning to Tanzania?
Deputy Spokesman: I
believe that there was one
case of someone who had…
actually whose contract had
ended at the end of last year
and then got a one-month
extension, in other words for
the month of January, and that
has now ended. So, that
is a case where the previous
contract simply had gone to
its limit. Inner City Press:
But, is that post actually
being filled? My
understanding is that it's
not, that you're basically
going to have one of the few
Kiswahili things empty. Deputy
Spokesman: DPI is trying
to fulfil all of the language
functions within the range of
the number of posts it has and
the budget it has. And
with that, Brenden, come on
up." The word used by
whistleblowers is "fired."
Then, from the PGA Spokesman's
summary: "The Spokesperson was
asked what would happen if
there was disagreement over
whether the Secretariat was
fulfilling mandates outlined
in the United Nations’
recently adopted budget – and
whether there was a role for
the President in that regard.
The Spokesperson replied that
it was up to the
Secretary-General to provide
periodic performance reports,
which would focus on financial
aspects, to the General
Assembly. When the reporter
referred to a specific budget
line that referred to posts in
the Department of Public
Information, the Spokesperson
responded that it would be
premature to comment on
whether this line was being
complied with; he added that
it would not be up to the
President to weigh in on such
a specific staffing matter
within the Secretariat. Asked
when exactly the Secretariat
would report on its compliance
with the budget that had been
adopted by the General
Assembly in December 2017, the
Spokesperson later added that
the first performance report
would be expected at the end
of 2018, and the second by the
end of 2019." Inner City Press
replied: "the issue of whether
Para 167 of the UNGA budget
resolution is being violated,
as whistleblowing staff have
said, will not be resolved by
this schedule of reporting."
The results is not only the
loss of employment and US
visas for Africans, but they
say a steep decline in the
provision of information in
Kiswahili. One account which
was "merged into" DPI's
non-Africa specific account
had a drop off in followers
from 255,000 to 90,000. But,
the sources say, Under
Secretary General Alison
Smale's DPI has misled
Secretary General Antonio
Guterres, who Smale so often
cites for her anti-staff
moves, telling him the overall
account is up to 3 million.
"It's a fraud," one source
said. "And it's a real
'sh*ithole' disrespect to
Kenya and Tanzania and
countries like it, by the UN."
Others have noted the irony,
as Guterres flew off to the
African Union summit in Addis
Ababa, avoiding Donald Trump
in Davos. Inner City Press has
sought a response, including
to the below, directly from
Alison Smale, the former NYT
Berlin editor who previously
ignored detailed written
questions in September
2017 when she arrived to take
over DPI as Guterres' "Global
Communicator." In November,
according to the UNCG minutes,
she said among other things
"We need to make sure we are
set up with our platforms and
our resources to take
advantage of the rapidly
evolving ways in which the
global public, and
particularly the young, are
consuming information. This
means more social media." Then
the Kiswahili radio resources
were shifted, despite the GA
resolution, to social media.
Inner City Press asked Smale,
"beyond the questions asked to
date in the UN noon briefings,
I would like you to explain
DPI's compliance with the most
recent budget resolution's
Paragraph 167, to explain what
has happened to the Kiswahili
(and Portuguese) posts, and
more generally to state what
you are doing about the
complaints raised to Inner
City Press by DPI staff,"
below. The cited Paragraph
167, adopted by the UN Fifth
(Budget) Committee at 2 am on
Christmas Eve with Inner City
Press the only media bothering
to cover it, but still
restricted, reads: "167.
Requests the Secretary-General
to ensure that the two posts
from the Kiswahili Radio Unit
and the two posts from the
Portuguese Radio Unit are
deployed for the purposes
originally approved." The UN
Secretariat reportedly tried
to get the paragraph out,
first by negotiation and then
by stealth; now DPI officials
are said to refer to it as
"bullsh*t," another "sh*thole"
echo. January 25, with no
response as before from Smale,
Inner City Press asked UN
Spokesman Stephane Dujarric,
UN transcript here:
Inner City Press: in the 2
a.m. Christmas Eve
budget resolution, there was a
paragraph that remained
in. There was some
contention about it, and I
think the Secretariat tried to
have it removed, but Member
States wanted it in. And
it said, request the
Secretary-General to ensure
the two posts from Kiswahili
radio unit and two posts from
the Portuguese radio unit are
deployed for the purposes
originally approved. And
having reported at the time,
the Member States were
concerned that these resources
had been shifted to non
Kiswahili or Portuguese social
media. And I learned
from whistleblowers, those
affected, who believe they can
now speak to the press freely,
as you've said from this
podium, that, in fact, the
posts have not been returned
and that the approach of the
Department of Public
Information (DPI), who I've
also written to before you say
that, they've been very
dismissive of… of this General
Assembly resolution.
And, in fact, I've heard that
the Facebook page of… of the
Kiswahili — they get very
specific about it — has
declined in followers from
255,000 to 90,000. So,
the feeling is that this is a
disrespect for the language of
a region that the
Secretary-General is about to
visit. And I wonder if
you can get an answer of
whether this has been complied
with and why people from that
unit are being let go 1
February. Spokesman:
Okay. I can't speak to a
specific case of people being
let go. I don't know if
that's true or not true.
I'm not going to start talking
about people's employment
without knowing more.
What I do know is that we have
full respect for the General
Assembly resolution, for the
budget that was passed.
And, of course, it is the
responsibility of the
Secretariat to implement those
resolutions. So, that's
not a… that's just a statement
of fact. The work that
the Kiswahili unit does, that
other language units does,
whether it's Portuguese or any
of the six languages, is
extremely important in our
efforts to do… to communicate
in as many languages as
possible. Whether it's
communicating through radio,
through web, through social
media, that is a very
important… it goes at the
heart of how we try to work
and how we try to
communicate. And we have
to be able to communicate in
not only different languages
but through many different
media, whether so-called
traditional or so-called new
media. And the
Department of Public
Information will continue to
do that with, of course, the
respect of the… that they have
to follow in terms of the
General Assembly resolutions.
Inner City Press: That's a
direct quote from the
resolution. It says,
ensure that they are done as
originally approved. So,
clearly there was a feeling
that it wasn't taking
place. Since then…
What's the status?
Spokesman: I feel I've
answered the question. I
feel I've answered that
question. Okay.
Thank you." No thanks.
Questions have also been
raised separately to Guterres
and his Deputy Amina J.
Mohammed. We'll have more on
this, and on Guterres' UN's
inaction on Cameroon and
Tanzania, and mis-steps in
Kenya, the undisclosed sending
of Obasanjo and Fore's
UNICEF's strange youth
empowerment move, Inner City
Press' coverage of which was
picked up by the Star
and Standard.
***
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
Past (and future?)
UN Office: S-303,
UN, NY 10017 USA
For now: Box 20047,
Dag Hammarskjold Station NY NY 10017
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest
service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2019 Inner City
Press, Inc. To request reprint or other
permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com for
|