After
Turkey Downs
Jet, Letter
to UNSC &
Ban, His
If-Asked
Comment Here
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS, November
24
-- After
Turkey down a
Russian jet,
it wrote a
letter to the
Security
Council on
November 24
but did not
ask for a Council
meeting. Inner
City Press
put Turkey's
letter online
here.
At the
November 24 UN
noon briefing,
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon's
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric did
not include
the shoot-down
in any of his
may opening
items. When
asked, he said
"The
Secretary
General is
very much
aware and has
been watching
the situation.
He’s clearly
seriously
concerned
about the
downing of the
Russian
military jet
by Turkish air
force earlier
today. The
Secretary
General urges
all relevant
parties to
take urgent
measures with
a view to
de-escalate
the tensions,
and he hopes
that a
credible and
thorough
review of the
incident will
clarify the
events and
help prevent
future
recurrences.
And also I
think, just to
reiterate what
the Secretary
General has
said a number
of times, that
he urges all
those who are
engaged in
military
activities in
Syria,
especially in
air campaigns,
to maximize
operational
measures to
avoid
unintended
consequences
and of course,
most
important, to
do whatever
they can to
avoid civilian
casualties and
to protect
civilians. The
Secretary
General
believes
today’s
worrying
developments
once again
underscores
the importance
of
international
unity and
cooperation in
international
action against
violent
extremists in
the region as
well as the
urgent need to
agree to a
solution to
the tragic
events in
Syria."
Dujarric said
he had not
seen Turkey's
letter. Inner
City Press
said it was
cc-ed to Ban,
now embeds
here
The
President of
the Council
for November,
the UK's
Matthew
Rycroft, spoke
on his way in
at 10 am,
Inner City
Press Periscope
video here. He
said, as
fast
transcribed by
InnerCityPro.com:
RYCROFT:
We’re
extremely
concerned
about the
incident of
the Russian
downed jet.
We’ve been in
close touch
with our
Turkish
opposite
numbers from
the Prime
Minister down.
It’s very
important that
we learn the
lessons of
this in terms
of
de-confliction.
I call on
everyone
involved to
de-escalate
and to be
measured in
their response
Q: Have
Russians or
Turks
contacted you
about raising
it in the
Council?
A: We’ve been
in touch with
both of those
countries and
many others.
Currently no
country has
called for a
meeting of the
SC.
Q: Can the
Council do
anything to
tell the
Russians to
stop violating
airspace of
neighboring
countries?
A: The UK
defends
Turkey’s right
to protect its
own airspace.
If we have a
discussion I’m
sure we won’t
be alone in
making that
point.
Q: No letter
from Turkey?
A: There has
been a letter
from Turkey.
It sets out
the facts. It
doesn’t call
for any
particular
action.
Q: When did
you receive
the letter
A: In the last
hour.
Q: Do these
events
indicate that
de-confliction
goes against
what you’re
trying to
avoid?
A: These
events
demonstrate
the importance
of
de-confliction,
having a
carefully
coordinated
coalition
against ISIL.
Stepping back
from the
detail for
for the
moment, we
have a shared
interest with
all of the
countries in
the region. We
are all trying
our hardest to
defeat ISIL.
Q: Does it
complicate
diplomacy?
A: Diplomacy
is complicated
at the best of
times. It is a
thing we need
to respond to
in a measured,
calm, careful
way.
Last week after
France circulated in
the UN
Security
Council the
post-Paris
Attacks
resolution repeatedly
talked about
by French
President
Francois
Hollande, it
immediately
on November 19
put it "in
blue" for
voting, which
took place after
some delay at
5:30 pm on
November
20. The
vote was 15-0.
Afterward,
Inner City
Press managed
to ask French
Ambassador
Francois
Delattre about
the inclusion
at Russia's
request of a
reference to
the UN
Charter, and
if France
thinks there
is a right to
individual
self-defense,
as already
asserts in
Syria, in the
UN Charter.
Delattre said
the Charter is
important and
France
complies with
it. Video
here.
Inner City
Press asked UK
Ambassador
Matthew
Rycroft,
President of
the Security
Council for
November,
about the
delay in
voting on the
resolution
from 3pm to 4
pm to 5:30 pm
-- he said
that was
negotiation --
and about the
inclusion of a
reference to
Vienna I in
the final
version.
Russia's
Churkin in the
Council said,
“The
preambular
section,
clarified by
us, clearly
states now
that the
documents
adopted by the
international
support group
for Syria on
30 October and
14 November
are a packet
on the basis
of which, in
addition to
the Geneva
communiqué of
2012, should
be used to
settle the
Syrian
crisis;”
another
Permanent
Representative,
not on the
Council, told
Inner City
Press this
“makes Assad a
party.”
Rycroft
acknowledged
that the
reference had
been added,
but said he
viewed this as
listing all
the relevant
documents; he
said the
Geneva
Communique is
the most
important. Video here. He highlighted that
the resolution
was passed
only a week
after the
Paris attacks.
Earlier,
Inner City Press awas
told, not by
France, of
"and the UN
Charter" being
added to
Operative
Paragraph 5,
thusly in
capitals:
"5.
Calls upon
Member States
that have the
capacity to do
so to take all
necessary
measures, in
compliance
with
international
law, in
particular
international
human rights,
refugee and
humanitarian
law, AND THE
UN CHARTER, on
the territory
under the
control of
ISIL also
known as
Da’esh, in
Syria and
Iraq, to
redouble and
coordinate
their efforts
to prevent and
suppress
terrorist acts
committed
specifically
by ISIL also
known as
Da’esh as well
as ANF, and
all other
individuals,
groups,
undertakings,
and entities
associated
with Al Qaeda,
and other
terrorist
groups, as
designated by
the United
Nations
Security
Council, and
as may further
be agreed by
the ISSG and
endorsed by
the UN
Security
Council,
pursuant the
Vienna
Communique of
14 November,
and to
eradicate the
safe haven
they have
established
over
significant
parts of Iraq
and Syria."
And here is
the final:
When 3
o'clock came,
while UNTV was
at the
Security
Council
stakeout,
there was no
vote. Exiting
the Council
were the
Permanent
Representatives
of Jordan, New
Zealand and
Spain, along
with Staffan
de Mistura and
UN OCHA's
Stephen
O'Brien: an
UNrelated
humanitarian
meeting.
Other
diplomats
milled around;
there were
complaints
against the
French
mission. One
said, I
shouldn't be
learning this
from (your)
Twitter. Inner
City Press
tweeted this
"some angry
diplomats mill
around, one
says,
Shouldn't have
to get info on
this from
Twitter, ou
son les
Francais?" The
French Mission
spokesman
replied with a
spelling
correction and
the time:
".@innercitypress
it's actually
spelled "oů
sont les
Français", but
nevermind. We
are here :
vote on French
res ag Daesh
scheduled at
5.30pm."
Inner
City Press
replied, "No
cedille on my
keyboard, but
thanks for
update - now,
similar info
on #Burundi?
#Penholder "
We'll see.
In the
morning when
French
Ambassador
Francois
Delattre
entered the
Security
Council for a
regularly
scheduled
meeting about
Peacekeeping
Operations
featuring
Herve Ladsous,
the fourth
Frenchman in a
row atop UN
Peacekeeping,
Delattre spoke
about the
French draft
resolution. Periscope video here.
As fast
transcribed by
InnerCityPro.com:
“We
hope for a
vote the
sooner the
better, I
cannot tell
you when
exactly, but
it is one week
after the
attacks...
There is no
reason frankly
there is only
good spirit
and good vibes
so to speak
around the
table... I am
cautious by
nature, the
mood is really
good.
“We
try to have
something that
can unite
everyone at
the Security
Council the
Russians
included. We
think we
should not
waste time, we
have a good
partnership
with
Ambassador
Churkin with
all the other
ambassadors...
it's a
question of
the last mile,
I will tell
you more as
soon as I
know.”
Inner City
Press and
others asked
about Mali and
the attack on
the Radisson
Hotel there.
Delattre said,
“We are
closely
watching the
situation with
great concern
of course but
no particular
comment at
this stage.”
No comment?
Shouldn't a
terrorist
attack in
sub-Saharan
Africa be
added to the
French draft?
Some say the
vote might be
as early at 1
pm.
Update:
the French
mission
spokesperson
doled this out
later to
favored
correspondents
Update II:
UNTV says 3
pm:
"3:00pm
LIVE
Security
Council 7564th
meeting:
Adoption:
Resolution on
counterterrorism"
Russian
Ambassador Vitaly
Churkin on
Thursday afternoon
told reporters
he saw
nothing
"offensive in
it," that a
couple of
days could
have improved
it but that
perhaps both
resolutions
could be
adopted,citing
9/11/01 as a
precedent.
On
his way into
the Security
Council's
regularly
scheduled
meeting on
Kosovo,
Churkin
stopped and
told the press
that “Theirs
is much more
narrow draft,
ours is
broader, more
fundamental so
basically I
don't see much
of a
contradiction.
We're studying
it. I don't
[see] anything
particularly
offensive.
This is a good
draft, we are
looking at it.
Maybe if they
took a day or
two more to
work on it
they could
have improved
a thing or
two.”
On if both
draft
resolutions
could be
adopted,
Churkin said,
“I think they
could, because
if you think
back to events
after 9/11,
first there
was a short
draft then a
couple of
weeks later
there was a
more
comprehensive
draft.”
The day
before on
November
18 after Russia
circulated its
resolution,
French Permanent
Representative
Francois Delattre
came out to
talk to the media,
not on UNTV
but by the
steps. He
said, as fast
transcribed by
InnerCityPro:
"Russia
requested this
meeting on the
issue of
terrorism, and
introduced
once again
this September
30th draft
resolution...
I repeated our
total
determination
to fight
Daesh, a fight
which requires
a united
response from
the whole
international
community. As
you know
French
President
Francois
Hollande
announced that
the Security
Council must
adopt as soon
as possible a
resolution on
the fight
against Daesh.
We are
actively
working to
prepare a text
that will be
short, strong,
and focused on
the fight
against our
common enemy,
Daesh. Short,
strong, and
focused on the
fight against
Daesh. And in
this respect
we consider
the Russian
proposal is a
contribution
that will be
carefully
studied.
"I
think we have
two different
texts here.
The text we
have in mind,
and that we
are working on
very closely,
strongly,
following
President
Hollande’s
statement, is
a text that is
strong, short,
that is
Daesh-centered,
and that has
one goal after
the tragic
Paris attack,
which is to
make sure that
the
international
community is
united,
finally
united, in the
fight against
Daesh. We all
know the
threat. The
threat is
still here. So
this is our
political
responsibility
asa the
Security
Council to
have this text
adopted, not
for long, or
endless
negotiations
about the
niceties, but
one, simple,
clear
political
message. We
need, and this
is our
responsibility,
to have a text
which all key
actors of the
international
community can
unite in order
to act, and to
act together."
Together?
" On
November 17 UN
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon's
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric
announced that
Ban would sign
the condolence
book at the
French Mission
to the UN that
afternoon.
After 2
pm, the UN
emailed out
“*SG PHOTO-OP
ADDED*” so
Inner City
Press went to
the French
Mission to
cover it.
In the lobby
of 245 East
47th Street,
also known as
One Dag, the
security
officer said
he would call
upstairs to
French
Mission, on
the 44th
floor, and get
the OK. The
guard handed
the photo to
Inner City
Press, which
explained why
it was here,
that the UN
has announced
this photo-op.
The guard took
the phone
back. Video
here.
“They say no,”
the guard
said. France
24 was
upstairs, and
others who did
not even
report on it.
Inner City
Press waited
in the lobby,
exchanging
pleasantries
with a half
dozen
diplomats
including the
Permanent
Representative
of Palau;
passers-by in
the One Dag
lobby included
the Permanent
Representative
of a country
France has
criticized
for,
ironically,
freedom of the
press. Video
here.
Ban Ki-moon
and French
Ambassador
Francois
Delattre came
down, accompanied
by Ban's
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric. The
UN convoy
pulled out
onto Second
Avenue. Later
Dujarric's
office would
send out Ban's
remarks -- Ban
refused the
only question
asked -- and
UNTV would
distribute
video of Ban
and Mrs. Ban
signing, even
shots of the
French
hand-picked
scribes in
attendance.
Would Charlie
Hebdo have
made the cut?
On
November 18,
Inner City
Press asked UN
Spokesman
Dujarric:
Inner
City Press:
You announced
yesterday at
this signing
of the
condolence
book at the
French Mission
by the
Secretary-General.
So I wanted to
know, it
seemed like I
tried to go to
your
office.
You weren't
there. I
went to MALU
[Media
Accreditation
and Liaison
Unit].
It seems like
it's a UN
thing, so I
went to cover
it, but I was
unable to
cover it when
they called
upstairs from
the
downstairs…
Spokesman
Dujarric:
If it's a UN
thing, if it
happens in the
UN.
Inner City
Press:
Right.
Is it the
Secretary-General's
position where
space exists
for his
outside events
that UN
journalists
should be able
to cover it or
not?