Inner
City Press /
FUNCA: you
were asked
before about
the VICE News
staff, two of
whom were
released.
I wanted to
know if you
have any
further
thoughts on
the third
continued the
Dutch
journalist
that's now
threatened
with
deportation,
Frederike
Geerdink, on
the same ?
Spokesman:
I'm not aware
of the
situation with
the Dutch
journalist.
Obviously, we
would hope,
we'll try to
get more
details of
what's going
on with the
VICE
journalist.
But, we'd
hoped that he
would either
be released or
face an open
and
transparent
judicial
process.
Hasn't heard
of the case?
After
three Vice
News
journalists
were arrested
in Turkey on
terrorism
charges, for
merely
reporting on a
conflict,
Inner City
Press on
September 1
asked UN
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon's
spokesman
Stephane
Dujarric about
the arrests,
and he said
Ban's was
still "trying
to harvest
more details."
Audio
here, video here and embedded below.
Dujarric
repeated it on
September 2.
On September 3
after the two
British
journalists
were released
but the Iraqi,
a translator
or "fixer,"
was still
being held,
Inner City
Press asked
Dujarric
again, video
here, transcript here:
Inner
City Press:
the last two
days, you've
been asked
about the case
of Turkey
locking up
these two
British VICE
News
journalists
and their
Iraqi
translator.
You said that
you were
harvesting
more
facts.
The two
British
journalists
have been
released.
The Iraqi
translator
remains
detained.
Have you
harvested the
facts
necessary --
Spokesman:
Obviously,
we've seen the
release of the
two VICE News
journalists,
which is
obviously
good. We
hope that the
person who's
with them is
also offered
due process,
and we
continue to
look into the
facts.
Inner City
Press: it
seemed like
it's basic
that
journalists
covering a
conflict have
to speak with
both
sides. I
don't know if
you found
different, but
the basis of
the charges
against all
three was
simply that
they reported
on the other
side
Spokesman:
As I said, it
is vital that
journalists be
able to do
their work
freely,
especially in
war zones.
So, Ban and
his allies
managed to not
make any
comment,
beyond a wan
call for "due
process"
rather than
release. We'll
have more on
this.
What's so
complicated?
Journalists
actually
covering a
conflict need
to speak with
both or all
sides, and
shouldn't be
charged with
terrorism for
doing so.
ICP: there
have been
these arrests
in Turkey of
journalists
from VICE
News, two
journalists
and their
translator,
and there's
also been a
raid of a
company called
Koza-Ipek
Media in
Ankara.
I wanted to
know, what
does the
Secretary-General
and the
Secretariat
think of these
arrests of
journalists
reporting on
conflict?
UN Spox: Were
obviously
aware of the
issue
regarding Vice
News. Were
looking into
it. The
reports as
they stand are
troubling.
Were trying
to harvest
more details
before
expressing an
opinion. I
think the
Secretary
General has
come out
rather
forcefully,
notably in the
last few days,
on the
situation of
the Al Jazeera
journalists
and others in
Egypt, and
that there is
a need for
governments to
ensure that
journalists
are able to
work freely. I
would say
especially in
zones of
conflicts,
where the
risks of
journalists
are already
high enough as
they are.
Inner City
Press: The US
Department of
Defense put
out a handbook
requiring
journalists to
register. Does
the
Secretariat
A: Listen, I
havent seen
the Department
of Defense
book that
youre
referring to.
Obviously I
think it also
helps for
policies to be
put in place
for
journalists to
ensure the
safety of
journalists,
theres always
an equilibrium
that needs to
be found, and
Im sure
theres a
healthy
dialogue
between the
department of
defense and
the
accredited
journalists at
the Pentagon,
and I will not
get into it.
The Vice News
journalists at
issue are Jake
Hanrahan,
Philip
Pendlebury and
translator
Mohamed Ismail
Rasool. In
Ankara,
Koza-Ipek
Media has also
been raided;
Inner City
Press asked
the UN about
that too.
We note that
the UN will
hold its World
Humanitarian
Summit in
Turkey in 2016
-- Ban spoke
about it
earlier on
September 1 -
and even has a
Turkey-sponsored
"Turkish
Lounge" next
to the
Security
Council, in an
area that use
to be
journalist
work-space.
Those who
would
supposedly
speak on this
at the UN have
been muted.
But the
question has
been asked,
and the Free
UN Coalition
for Access,
see below,
will follow
up.
Three
day before on
August 29,
amid news that
Egypt imposed
prison
sentences on
Al Jazeera
journalists
Mohammed
Fahmy, Baher
Mohamed and
Peter Greste,
at 5 pm in New
York while the
UN had still
said nothing
at all, the US
State
Department said it
was
disappointed.
Then at 10:30
pm in New
York, 5 and a
half hours
after the US,
the UN's
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon issued
a canned
statement,
"recalling"
his own
earlier canned
statement -
this from an
organization
which allowed
its head of
Peacekeeping
to use Ban's
guards to
eject the
Press from an
open meeting,
and refused to
answer this
week about the
torching of a
radio station
in Burkina
Faso. Now Ban
is "harvesting
facts" on the
charges
against the
Vice News
journalist.
How long will
that take?
So far
the UN has remained
silent, just
as it refused
to answer
Press
questions
about the
burning-down
of a radio
station in
Burkina Faso,
as raised
by the Free UN
Coalition for
Access (FUNCA).
Ban Ki-moon
didn't explain
his silence
while in
Ethiopia for
the recent
African Union
summit about
the terrorism
trial of that
country's Zone
9 Bloggers.
On February
12, 2015
across First
Avenue from
the UN there
was a panel
discussion on
protection of
journalists at
the
International
Peace
Institute. Al
Jazeera's
Gabriel
Elizondo
spoke.
Inner
City Press ran
across First
Avenue and
posed a
question: does
the UN system
do for
independent
journalists
and bloggers
what it does
for corporate
or state
media?
The panelist
who answered
was David
Kaye, UN
Special
Rapporteur on
the Promotion
and Protection
of the Right
to Freedom of
Opinion and
Expression.
Kaye said, "As
an independent
journalist,
it's good to
see you here.
From different
perspectives,
I think that's
right.
Sometimes the
UN can do so
loudly and
publicly. Some
situation
might call for
a little bit
more of a
quieter
engagement."
Rapporteur
Kaye said that
"from the
OHCHR
perspective,
we have
different
tools. Our
first tool is
to communicate
with
governments on
the quiet
side, send
them
allegation
letters or
urgent
appeals, Zone
9 Bloggers
being a good
exampe of
that.
If we don't
get a
response, to
issue press
releases, to
call out bad
behavior. I
agree with the
tenor or your
comment -- we
should be out
there calling
out the bad
behavior at
the moment
that it
happens,
quietly or
more publicly.
Article 19 is
not written to
protect only
journalists,
it protects
everyone's
right to seek,
receive and
impart
information."
The
other
panelists were
Bård Glad
Pedersen,
Deputy
Minister of
Foreign
Affairs of
Norway, Agnes
Callamard,
Director of
the Global
Freedom of
Expression and
Information
Project at
Columbia
University and
former
Executive
Director of
Article 19,
Matthew
Rosenberg,
Foreign
Correspondent
of the New
York Times
(with
interesting
stories of
Afghanistan
but who
declined to
discuss the
NYT's coverage
of Iraq before
the US
invasion) and
Judith Matloff
of Columbia
University
Graduate
School of
Journalism.
There will be
video.