On
Fleeing E. Ukraine
into Russia,
Amos Says 10s
of 1000s, Ging
Said More
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
August 24 --
When UN
humanitarian
chief Valerie
Amos visited
Eastern
Ukraine, her
agency on
August 24 put
out a press
release
saying that
Amos
visited an
internally
displacement
persons'
center in
Krasnyi Lyman
and “met women
who had fled
the fighting
with their
families.” The
UN OCHA
statement on
Sunday said
that “since
March this
year, around
200,000 people
have fled
their homes in
search of
safety
within Ukraine
and tens of
thousands have
fled to
neighboring
countries.”
What does
"tens of
thousands"
mean -- and
why is it so
different from
what OCHA
official John
Ging told the
UN Security
Council on
August 5? In
that Council
session, Ging
said
“since
the start of
the year
168,677
Ukrainians are
registered as
having crossed
into Russia,
with nearly
60,000 of
these having
applied for
refugee status
and a further
115,952 having
applied for
other forms of
legal stay.”
Ging on August
5 acknowledged
that “this is
not the full
picture as
many
Ukrainians
that have fled
their homes do
not register
with Ukrainian
authorities or
officially
apply for
assistance.
The Russian
authorities
and UNHCR are
reporting that
740,000 people
have crossed
the border
since the
start of the
year.”
While technically
both 740,000
and 168,677
are made up of
"tens of
thousands,"
there is a striking
disparity
between what
Ging told the
Security
Council on
August 5, and
the OCHA's
August 24
press release
on Amos' visit
to Krasnyi
Lyman.
What explains
it?
Back on August
24 just as an
emergency but
closed-door
meeting of the
Security
Council about
Ukraine began,
and after the
US,
UN Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon issued
this
statement:
The
Secretary-General
follows with
deep concern
reports that a
Russian aid
convoy has
crossed the
border into
Ukraine
without the
permission of
the Ukrainian
authorities.
While
recognising
the
deteriorating
humanitarian
situation, any
unilateral
action has the
potential of
exacerbating
an already
dangerous
situation in
eastern
Ukraine.
Once
again,
the
Secretary-General
urges all
sides, in
particular
Ukraine and
the Russian
Federation, to
continue to
work together,
in
coordination
with the
international
community, to
ensure that
humanitarian
assistance
reaches the
most affected
areas. He
reiterates
that all sides
should
continue to
exercise
maximum
restraint and
avoid
escalation.
In
this
regard, he is
encouraged by
the
announcement
from President
Petro
Poroshenko
that Ukraine
will do
everything
possible to
prevent more
serious
consequences
as a result of
the convoy
moving into
Ukrainian
territory.
How
was this
statement
formulated? By
whom? Inner
City Press
asked: What is
the position
of the UN's
humanitarian
chief Valerie
Amos, who has
elsewhere
called for
cross-border
aid?
At the Churkin
presser, Inner
City Press
asked about
the draft
press
statement
Russia
proposed on
August 21.
Churkin
said that the
“indefatigable”
Lithuanian
delegation
“sent in
amendments”
that dropped
references to
Russia and
included
references to
the European
Union and
dropped the
reference to a
ceasefire.
Then, Churkin
said, the US
delegations
send in
amendments
dropping the
ceasefire and
blaming the
separatists.
Inner City
Press also
asked about a
report by CNN
from Eastern
Ukraine in
which
correspondent
Diana Magney
asked why
Russia was
sending salt
if there are
salt mines in
Eastern
Ukraine.
Churkin said,
"You can mine
salt if you
are not
shelled.
If you are
hiding in your
cellars,
mining salt is
problematic."
Later the
Voice of
America's
correspondent
asked about
accusations
that the
convoy was
only to
support the
rebels.
"With baby
food?" Churkin
asked.
"Rebels have
babies too,"
the Voice of
America
correspondent
said. The
implication
seemed to be
that starving
children based
on the
positions
taken by their
parents would
be okay. We'll
have more on
this - for
now, click
here.
Back on July
30 when
Ukraine's
Permanent
Representative
to the UN
Yuriy Sergeyev
held a UN
press
conference on
July 30, Inner
City Press
asked him
about the
Human Right
Watch report
his government
is using Grad
rockets,
killing at
least 16
civilians
between July
12 and 21 near
Donetsk.
Sergeyev
responded
first about
the UN's (or
Ivan
Simonovic's)
report, then
emphasized
that Russian
media is
saying Ukraine
is using
ballistic
missiles.
Inner City
Press repeated
the question,
emphasizing it
concerns Human
Rights Watch's
report, not
the UN's, and
not Russian
media.
Sergeyev
provided
essentially
the same
answer.
Here
is the HRW
report, online.
Inner City
Press also
asked about
the status of
the
International
Monetary Fund
program, after
the downing of
MH17. Sergeyev
said Ukraine
has met with
the IMF's
Christine
Lagarde and
"will" get the
next tranche
of the program
in late
August.
But won't
there be an
Executive
Board meeting?
After
Russian
foreign
minister and
US Secretary
of State John
Kerry spoke by
phone on July
27, the US
State
Department
issued two
read-outs, or
a readout in
two stages.
The second, an
"additional
point" by a
Senior State
Department
Official, was
that Kerry
"underlined
our support
for a mutual
cease fire
verified by
the OSCE and
reaffirmed our
strong support
for the
international
investigation
to show the
facts of
MH17."
Inner City
Press on July
30 asked
Sergeyev for
Ukraine's
position on
this. Sergeyev
cited as
"pre-conditions"
the closing of
the border
with Russia,
and the
release of all
hostages.
Procedurally,
Ukraine set
aside the
first question
at its press
conference
saying,
"Pamela,
traditionally
you open our
session."
Using this UN
Correspondents
Association
set-aside, Pam
Falk of CBS
asked about
rebels mining
the MH17 site.
Her UNCA
sidekick asked
about "Russian
propaganda."
And so it went
until, fifth,
the new Free
UN Coalition
for Access
asked about
HRW's report.
This is how
it's working,
with the UN's
Censorship
Alliance. In
this context,
the Free UN
Coalition for
Access is
against the
automatic
setting-aside
of questions.