On
Ukraine Aid, UNSC's
Syria Resolution
Cited as Precedent
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
August 22 --
After Russian
trucks crossed
the border
into Ukraine
after a week's
delay at the
border, on August
22 at the UN
Ukraine's
acting ambassador
Oleksandr
Pavlichenko
called it a
“blatant
violation of
international
law" - but
then took only
two questions.
Russian
Ambassador
Vitaly Churkin
took many
questions,
below. At the
stakeout,
Inner City
Press asked
Churkin to
compare the
Council's aid
consultations
on Ukraine and
Syria (click
here for
Inner City
Press story on
Syria).
Churkin
replied that
“I don't want
to make any
direct
connections
[but]
important
legal ground
was broken
when we
adopted
assistance
without the
permission of
the
government. We
were fortunate
enough to work
it out with
the Syrian
government,
they
acquiesced in
some of the
arrangements.
But it was a
legal point of
departure.”
Similarly,
UK Ambassador
Mark Lyall
Grant,
President of
the UN Security
Council for
August, and
Lithuania's
Ambassador
Raimonda
Murmokaité
both took
questions
after the
day's
result-less
Council
meeting.
Inner City
Press asked
Lyall Grant
about the
previous day's
draft
statement:
Inner
City Press:
The Press
Statement that
was proposed
yesterday that
called for a
ceasefire for
the aid to be
delivered. As
President of
the Council,
why do you
think that it
wasn’t
adopted?
What’s the
UK’s position
on the idea of
just a limited
ceasefire so
that aid from
whichever side
can get in.
What was the
problem with
the Press
Statement from
your point of
view.
Amb Lyall
Grant: We did
not comment on
the Press
Statement as
the United
Kingdom, but a
number of
Members of the
Council did
suggest
amendments to
the Press
Statement
which the
Russian
Federation
said were
unacceptable
and they
therefore
withdrew the
Press
Statement.
At Churkin's
press
conference,
Inner City
Press asked
about the
draft.
Churkin
said that the
“indefatigable”
Lithuanian
delegation
“sent in
amendments”
that dropped
references to
Russia and
include
reference to
the
European Union
and dropped
the reference
to a
ceasefire.
Then,
Churkin said,
the US
delegation
send in
amendments
dropping the
ceasefire and
blaming the
separatists.
Inner
City Press
asked
Lithuania's
Ambassador
Murmokaité
about her
amendments.
She replied
that not only
Russia has
been offering
aid -- that
would explain
the proposed
shift to EU --
and, asked
again about
the ceasefire,
she said that
the
separatists
had used
Poroshenko's
"unilateral"
ceasefires to
reground and
down
helicopters.
First "we need
proof it
works," she
said.
There are, of
course, gruesome
photographs of
the effects of
Poroshenko's
forces'
shelling --
and Lithuania
did agree to
the resolution
calling for a
ceasefire
around the
MH17 site,
despite the
stated
concerns. But
the responses,
and opportunity
to ask the
questions,
were
appreciated.
Earlier on
August 22, the
Voice of
America's UN bureau
chief asked
Churkin about
accusations
that the
convoy was
only to
support the
rebels.
"With baby
food?" Churkin
asked.
"Rebels have
babies too,"
the Voice of America
correspondent
said. The
implication
seemed to be
that starving
children based
on the
positions
taken by their
parents would
be okay. We'll
have more on
this - for
now, click
here.
On August
5, then the UN
Security
Council held a
meeting on
Ukraine and
the
humanitarian
situation, the
UN's John Ging
rattled off UN
estimates of
deaths (1367,
both civilians
and
combatants)
and those
fleeing into
Russia (168,
677 this year,
according to
the UN).
This
comes after
many at the UN
have been
dismissive
that there is
a humanitarian
crisis in
Ukraine. Now
that it is
acknowledged,
at least by
Ging's OCHA,
there is
another
strategy.
France's
representative,
for example,
said all of
this is caused
by the
separatists.
As to
civilians,
this smacks of
blaming at the
victim, and
stands in
stark contrast
to statements
on Syria, for
example. These
comparisons
will continue.
Earlier,
in the morning
of August 5 as
reported by
Inner City
Press, Churkin
said there was
"some
resistance"
from the UK
Presidency of
the Council,
but that 5 pm
should be
doable.
Inner City
Press asked UK
president of
the Council
for August
Mark Lyall
Grant about
the
"resistance."
He said there
had been no
formal request
but Ambasador
Churkin had
spoken to him;
the question
was whether
there would be
a UN briefer
ready from the
Office for the
Coordination
of
Humanitarian
Affairs.
There was:
John Ging,
recently heard
from on Yemen
and Gaza.
Back on July
30 when
Ukraine's
Permanent
Representative
to the UN
Yuriy Sergeyev
held a UN
press
conference on
July 30, Inner
City Press
asked him
about the
Human Right
Watch report
his government
is using Grad
rockets,
killing at
least 16
civilians
between July
12 and 21 near
Donetsk.
Sergeyev
responded
first about
the UN's (or
Ivan
Simonovic's)
report, then
emphasized
that Russian
media is
saying Ukraine
is using
ballistic
missiles.
Inner City
Press repeated
the question,
emphasizing it
concerns Human
Rights Watch's
report, not
the UN's, and
not Russian
media.
Sergeyev
provided
essentially
the same
answer.
Here
is the HRW
report, online.
Inner City
Press also
asked about
the status of
the
International
Monetary Fund
program, after
the downing of
MH17. Sergeyev
said Ukraine
has met with
the IMF's
Christine
Lagarde and
"will" get the
next tranche
of the program
in late
August.
But won't
there be an
Executive
Board meeting?
After
Russian
foreign
minister and
US Secretary
of State John
Kerry spoke by
phone on July
27, the US
State
Department
issued two
read-outs, or
a readout in
two stages.
The second, an
"additional
point" by a
Senior State
Department
Official, was
that Kerry
"underlined
our support
for a mutual
cease fire
verified by
the OSCE and
reaffirmed our
strong support
for the
international
investigation
to show the
facts of
MH17."
Inner City
Press on July
30 asked
Sergeyev for
Ukraine's
position on
this. Sergeyev
cited as
"pre-conditions"
the closing of
the border
with Russia,
and the
release of all
hostages.
Back on July
28 Inner City
Press asked
Russia's
Ambassador to
the UN Vitaly
Churkin about
this read-out:
does the US
support a
ceasefire?
“I
supposed he
said they
did,” Churkin
replied. “What
their message
is in private
to the
Ukrainians is
a different
story... There
was a phone
converation
between Vice
President
Biden and
President
Poroshenko
[then] they
went up
another stage
in escalating
the conflict
after that and
immediately.”
Procedurally,
Ukraine set
aside the
first question
at its press
conference
saying,
"Pamela,
traditionally
you open our
session."
Using this UN
Correspondents
Association
set-aside, Pam
Falk of CBS
asked about
rebels mining
the MH17 site.
Her UNCA
sidekick asked
about "Russian
propaganda."
And so it went
until, fifth,
the new Free
UN Coalition
for Access
asked about
HRW's report.
This is how
it's working,
with the UN's
Censorship
Alliance. In
this context,
the Free UN
Coalition for
Access is
against the
automatic
setting-aside
of questions.