On
Ukraine,
Corker Slams
Kerry,
Menendez
Fluffs IMF, French
Mistral in Q
By
Matthew
Russell Lee,
Inner City
Press Follow
Up
UNITED
NATIONS, March
16 -- Even as
the Crimea
referendum
vote was
taking place,
US Senators
returned from
a whirlwind
trip to Kyiv
to appear on
the US Sunday
morning
television
shows.
Senator Bob
Corker R-TN
said that the
Obama administration
created a
"permissive"
atmosphere
that led to
this; he
slammed
Secretary of
State John
Kerry's "wishy-washiness"
and gifts with
Sergey Lavrov.
Also on Fox
News Sunday,
Senator Bob
Menendez D-NJ
insisted that
for the International
Monetary Fund
to help
Ukraine, the
long-stalled
reforms must
be passed by
Congress.
But when Inner
City Press put
this question
directly to
IMF
spokesperson
Gerry Rice on
March 13, Rice
declined to
confirm the
connection.
See video here,
at from Minute
12:05.
Over on CBS'
Face the
Nation, former
US National
Security Adviser
Tom Donilon
bragged how
sanctions on
Iran showed
what could be
done to pressure
Russia.
But on NBC's
Meet the
Press, Senator
Jeff Flake R-AZ
said it's
going to be
difficult to
"reverse"
Crimea with
economic
sanctions.
On Ukraine, on
March 15 after
the UN
Security
Council vote
on a
US-drafted
resolution
calling the Crimea
refendum
invalid failed
with Russia
vetoing and
China abstaining,
Urkaine's Yuriy
Sergeyov told
the press
there are
Russian troops
on the
mainland.
He said there
will be more
action next
week, mentioning
a debate on
"revitalization,"
presumably of
the UN General
Assembly,
aimed at the
UN Security
Council veto
system.
Little
mentioned in
Saturday's
proceedings is
that the US
vetos
resolutions on
Israel, in
settlements
for example,
and votes
against
non-binding
resolution in
the General
Assembly about
the embargo on
Cuba, for
example.
Sergeyev is deft,
but he refused
to answer a
question about
how the
expansion of
NATO impacts
on this.
"Don't provoke
me," he said.
The Free
UN Coalition
for Access
objects to speakers
at the UN
picking which
questions to
answer. There
are worse
cases: France's
Gerard Araud
for example refused
to answer on
his country's
sale of
Mistral
warships to
Russia. Herve
Ladsous of UN
Peacekeeping
went so far as
to direct his
spokesman to
grab the UN
microphone so
a question
couldn't be
asked. Video here and here.
Inner
City Press: on
Ukraine, one
question
that’s come up
is, in terms
of
sanctions is
France has
this big deal
where it’s
selling
Mistral
warships to
Russia, and
it’s said that
it’s going
forward. What
does the
United States
think of that
sale of
military
hardware?
MS.
HARF: Well,
decisions
about these
kind of sales
are obviously
a
matter for
each sovereign
state to take
into account
including a
host
of factors –
obviously,
international
law, regional
stability. We
would hope
that any
country would
exercise
judgment and
restraint
when it comes
to
transferring
military
equipment that
could
exacerbate
tensions in
any conflict
region. In
general, I
think that
certainly
applies here.
Video
here, from
Minute 20:13.
"OP5
Declares that
this
referendum can
have no
validity, and
cannot form
the basis for
any alteration
of the status
of Crimea; and
calls upon
all States,
international
organizations
and
specialized
agencies not
to recognize
any alteration
of the status
of Crimea on
the basis of
this
referendum and
to refrain
from any
action or
dealing that
might
be interpreted
as recognizing
any such
altered
status"
So, the Crimea
resolution
scheduled for
March 16 would
have no
validity. But,
as Russian
foreign
minister
Lavrov asked
in London on
March 14,
couldn't the
same be said
of the
French-organized
referendum
splitting
Mayotte from
the Cosmoros?
Inner City
Press asked US
State
Department
deputy
spokesperson
Marie Harf
about both the
resolution and
the Mayotte
analogy on
March 14. From
the US
transcript:
Inner
City Press: on
Ukraine,
there’s talk
of the
Security
Council
resolution –
seems pretty
clear that
Russia would
veto it, but
there’s some
discussion of
trying – is it
the U.S.’s
intention to
try to get a
vote on a
resolution
declaring the
referendum
illegal before
Sunday?
And
also, Lavrov
mentioned, and
also Churkin
as well, this
example of
Mayotte. They
used – I mean,
they’ve come
up with
different
examples –
Kosovo and
others – but
one in
particular.
Both of them
raised an
island of
Comoros where
France
organized an
referendum to
break Comoros
off – to break
Mayotte off
from Comoros,
and said that
this wasn’t
authorized by
the UN or the
African Union.
So I just
wondered – I
mean, maybe
you’ll slap it
down, but
what’s the
response to
their
argument?
MS.
HARF: Well, in
general, I
think that
it’s very
clear under
Ukraine’s
constitution
that governs
Ukraine how
this kind of
referendum
legally could
take place.
And that would
involve a
country-wide
referendum,
basically
relying on the
premise that
any decisions
about
Ukraine’s
territory need
to be made by
all of the
people of
Ukraine. So
setting aside
any
comparisons,
there are very
clear rules in
Ukraine’s
constitution,
which is in
effect, that
lay out how
this kind of
referendum
could take
place. That’s
not what we
see here. So
any
comparisons
aside, they
just don’t
have relevancy
here.
On the
first
question, I
don’t have
anything on a
potential
Security
Council
resolution.
We’ve been
very clear
that there
will be costs.
I don’t have
anything to
outline for
you in terms
of what that
might look
like, but we
as the United
States,
independently,
have a number
of tools at
our disposal
that we can
use if and
when we need
to make clear
those costs
with this
referendum
going forward.
Video
here from
Minute 18:34.
Back
on March 13
when Churkin
took the
Council floor
he had a
flourish of
analogies: the
US Declaration
of
Independence,
the Falkland
(or Malvinas)
Islands,
Puerto Rico,
and the
recognition by
some of Kosovo
without even a
referendum, he
said, only an
act of the
legislature.
Churkin said
that France
organized a
referendum to
break Mayotte
away from the
Comoros, in
violation of
UN resolution
and using
their veto, he
said. Click
here for some
background.
Would French
Amabassador
Gerard Araud
respond?
Of late at the
UN, his
spokesperson
Frederic Jung
has called
only on
friendly
journalists;
Araud refused
for example to
answer why
France is
still selling
Mistral
warships to
Russia, and
claimed that
Navi Pillay
has not
reported that
France put
Muslims at
risk in the
Central
African
Republic. The
jokes, some
say, are
getting stale.
Speaking after
former US, now
UN official
Jeffrey
Feltman,
Yatsenyuk said
if Russia
persists, no
country will
ever again
give up
nuclear
weapons, as
Ukraine did.
Yatsenyuk
shifted into
Russian to
speak directly
to Ambassador
Vitaly
Churkin, just
as Ambassador
Sergeyev has
done.
But Russia
wasn't listed
to speak and
reply until
the 14th of 17
slots. After
Luxembourg as
Council
President for
March, the
next three
speakers were
the US, UK and
France.
US Ambassador
Samantha Power
cited the
draft UNSC
resolution,
but didn't
opine if China
might abstain
rather than
join Russia in
a veto.
When French
Ambassador
Gerard Araud
spoke, the
question in
the air which
he refused to
answer is why
France is
going forward
with the sale
of Mistral
warships to
Russia. Rather
than answer
it, Araud made
stale jokes
about Kosovo.
While in
Washington,
Yatsenyuk said
he knows the
International
Monetary Fund
program is
"not the sweet
candy." Inner
City Press
covers the IMF
and can only
say: ask
Greece.
Asked about
allowing any
referendum in
Crimea,
Yatsenyuk said
the
legislature in
Kyiv would
have to permit
it; he said
there could be
dialogue about
increased
autonomy from
Crimea, on
taxes and
language
rights.
He was asked
about Jihadis
going to
Crimea and he
answered about
the Tatars. He
bragged that a
deputy prime
minister in
the new
government
"represents
the Jewish
community."
But what about
Right Sector?
The US State
Department
announced for
example that
the Department
of Defense
will be giving
Meals Ready to
Eat or MREs to
the Ukrainian
Armed Forces.
Over on
Capitol Hill,
the US Senate
Foreign
Relations
Committee
marked-up the
"Support for
the
Sovereignty,
Integrity,
Democracy, and
Economic
Stability of
Ukraine Act of
2014."
Absent on jury
duty, Senator
Marco Rubio
had a proposed
amendment
about the G8
and not
invading your
neighbor read
out; it was
agreed to.
Senator Rand
Paul proposed
an amendment
to remove loan
guarantees and
the
International
Monetary Fund
from the bill.
He said the
loans would go
to back Russia
back and noted
that the
proposed IMF
reforms would
raise Russia's
power in the
IMF from 2.5%
to 2.71%
Senator Bob
Menendez
replied that
the IMF
wouldn't give
a dime unlesss
Ukraine
commits to
changes. Can
you say,
austerity?
Paul's
amendment
failed.
Senator John
McCain
proposed
giving the
President the
power to
sanction
"corrupt
officials" in
Russia. This
amendment
passed.
Senator John
Barrosso
R-Wyoming
tried to add
the export of
liquified
natural gas to
Ukraine.
Menendez
replied that
Turkey would
block any
import of LNG
into the Black
Sea. Others
also opposed
Barrosso's
proposal,
calling it out
of order and
subject to the
jurisdiction
of the Banking
and Energy
Committees. So
it goes in
Washington.
On
March 11, the
US House of
Representatives
went late with
speeches
denouncing
Russia.
The
longest was by
Rep. Steve
King (R-Iowa),
who recounted
on the House
floor history
from 1941, how
only because
Hitler had to
turn back to
put down the
revolution in
Yugoslavia did
he not conquer
Russia but got
stopped the
month after.
Rep
Carolyn
Maloney,
Democrat of
New York, said
that
Yanukovych had
"a golden
toilet." That
Internet image
has widely
been
discredited,
but who's
counting? She
promoted an
event at "Four
Freedoms" park
at the tip of
Roosevelt
Island.
US President
Barack Obama
was in
Manhattan at
$32,000 a
plate
fundraisers,
one including
Mayor Bill De
Blasio. Then
Obama flew
back to New
York, where he
will meet
Ukraine's
Yatsenyuk on
March 12 at
2:45 pm.
UN Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon, on
the other
hand, is
slated
according to
Bill De
Blasio's
scheduled to
meet with De
Blasio at 2 pm
at City Hall.
It is not in
the UN's Media
Alert, as was
repeatedly
requested by
the Free
UN Coalition
for Access
(whose member Luiz
Rampelotto
took this
photo on
March 12 of
Ban, his head
of protocol
and US
political guru
Bob Orr).
Earlier on
March 11 in
the US House
of
Representatives
in DC, Ohio
Democrat Marcy
Kaptur
recounted the
suffering of
Ukraine
including
under the
Nazis;
California
Republican Ed
Royce called
for adoption
of H.R. 499
before
Yatsenyuk's
arrival.
But there was
a call for
yeas and nays
to be counted,
and debate
shifted to a
religious
exemption for
Obamacare.
(Obama himself
was headed to
New York to
raise money.)
The US
announced that
Tomicah
Tillemann,
Senior Advisor
to the
Secretary of
State for
Civil Society
and Emerging
Democracies
will travel to
Geneva,
Switzerland,
March 11-12,
to represent
the United
States at the
12th meeting
of the
Governing
Council of the
Community of
Democracies...
The meeting
will address a
broad range of
issues related
to democracy
including the
status of
freedom of
association in
the world,
challenges
facing human
rights
defenders, and
current
developments
in Ukraine.
Governing
Council
members will
recognize
Moldova’s
graduation
from the
Community’s
Democracy
Partnership
Task Force.
While
in
Geneva, Dr.
Tillemann will
participate in
a number of
events hosted
by the CD’s
working
groups. These
include an
introductory
meeting of the
new Freedom of
Expression
Working Group
and a panel
discussion on
lessons
learned from
Ukraine.
Amid all this,
there was some
off-camera
grumbling not
only about
impacted
countries'
unwillingness
to impose
sanctions, but
in particular
about France's
continued sale
of weaponry to
Russia.
On March 10
when France's
Permanent
Representative
to the UN
Gerard Araud
came to the
Security
Council stakeout
to say how
concerned he
is, Inner City
Press three
times asked
about the
warship sale.
But Araud
refused to
answer.
Araud's
spokesperson
Frederic Jung
calls first on
Agence France
Presse, which
did not ask
the question
about the
warships. This
is France's or
Araud's deal:
hard questions
result in
banishment; when
Araud doesn't
like a story
or a quote, he
threatens to
sue. There
was walk of (a
lack of)
freedom of the
press in
Crimea.
No, Lyall
Grant
answered. From
the UK Mission
transcript:
Inner
City Press:
Question on
Ukraine.
Do you think
there will be
any opposition
to
Yatseniuk?
He has said
publicly that
he’s going to
address the
Council on the
13th.
How do you
think that
could play
out? And
also the US
has said that
it has asked a
series of
questions to
Russia and
basically it
said that it
won’t travel
there until
these
questions are
answered.
I wondered did
this come up
in the Council
and does it
bear any
relation, this
process of
putting
questions to
Mr Lavrov and
the process
inside the
Council?
Amb
Lyall Grant:
On the
question of
putting
questions to
Mr Lavrov was
not raised
today.
Nor indeed was
a possible
visit by Mr
Yatseniuk the
Prime Minister
of
Ukraine.
But the Prime
Minister is
coming to the
United States
this
week. We
understand
that he does
want to
address the
Security
Council and we
would fully
support that
and we hope
that all
member states
would support
it.
Some
wonder of the
relation
between the
two processes,
and of the
relevance.
Lyall Grant
added that the
UK would
support
Ukraine's
Yatsenyuk
addressing the
Security
Council.
Inner
City Press
asked
Luxembourg's
Sylvie Lucas
about
Yatsenyuk's
statement he
"will" address
the Council on
March 13. She
replied, We
will react
when we
receive such a
request.
The US has
announced that
Ukraine's
Arseniy
Yatsenyuk will
meet with
President
Barack Obama
on March 12;
he has added
he will
address the UN
Security
Council on
March 13.
But if UNSC
Permanent Five
member Russia
does not
recognize
Yatsenyuk, can
he? On Syria,
France and
others
declared that
Ahmad al Jarba
is the sole
legitimate
representative
of the Syrian
people. But he
was confined
to a Friends
of Syria
meeting down
the hall from
the Security
Council, and
before that a
faux
"UN briefing"
with the UN's
Gulf &
Western media
club.
Yuriy Sergeyev
has addressed
the Security
Council at
least four
times in the
last ten days.
But he was
Ukraine's
Ambassador
under
Yanukovych: he
is
automatically
recognized.
With Yatsenuk,
it may be
different.
When the UN
Security
Council was
debating
Abkhazia and
South Ossetia,
the US
problematized
their
representatives
getting visas
to come
address the
UN. The US can
and will let
in Yatsenyuk,
into the
country - but
will Russia,
into the UN
Security
Council?
On March 7
with little
fanfare,
Ukraine's
Ambassador
Sergeyev went
into basement
Conference
Room 3.
Outside the
sign simply
said, "GRULAC:
Grulac meeting
[Closed]."
GRULAC is the
Latin American
and Caribbean
Group at the
UN. Sergeyev
told Inner
City Press he
is trying to
brief each
regional
group. But why
have it
closed?
Throughout the
day the rumor
grew that
there would be
another
emergency
meeting on
Saturday, if
only to
further raise
the profile of
the issues. At
Friday's noon
briefing,
Inner City
Press asked
the departing
Nesirky again
about the leaked
EU - Estonia
audio that the
same snipers
shot
protesters and
police.
Nesirky again
declined to
comment on the
audio, saying
it may or may
not be
authentic
(Estonia has
said it is).
But he said
these seemed
like the type
of issues on
which the UN's
Ivan Simonovic
will conduct
"fact
finding."
We'll see.
In terms of
fact finding:
in Crimea, how
long was UN
envoy Robert
Serry held? By
whom?
A day after UN
Deputy
Secretary
General Jan
Eliasson told
the media
Serry was
threatened and
told to leave
Crimea, got in
his car which
could not
move, then
walked to his
hotel, the
story was
contradicted,
or
exaggerated.
Inner City
Press asked
Ukraine's
Ambassador
Yuriy Sergeyev
about Serry.
Sergeyev, at
the UNTV
stakeout, said
that
"Russian...
kept him a
long time."
Sergeyev added
that Russians
now come into
Crimea
pretending to
be tourists,
for example
from
Kazakhstan. He
told a Russian
reporter that
the only
movement of
displaced
people is to
Western
Ukraine.
Inner City
Press asked
Sergeyev about
the sanctions
announced by
the US in the
morning, and
how things are
going with the
IMF. Sergeyev
said his
government is
getting "good
signals" from
the IMF, and
that the
sanctions
announcements
also "send
signals." Then
he went into
the UN
Security
Council, where
a meeting for
members only,
convened by
the UK, was
taking place.
Four hours
after the US
announced
Ukraine
related
sanctions,
Inner City
Press asked UN
spokesperson
Martin Nesirky
if the UN had
any comment on
what some of
its member
states,
including
Russia, call
unhelpful and
even illegal
"unilateral"
sanctions.
No, Nesirky
said, no
comment on the
actions of
individual
countries in
this regard.
But of course,
the UN
Secretariat
does have
comments on
actions by
Russia.
Nesirky
was asked if
the UN
considers
Crimea under
occupation. He
replied that
UN envoy
Robert Serry
felt a certain
presence
there. One wag
- this
one -
asked,
poltergeist?
Pressed,
Nesirky
referred the
press to
Serry's
interview with
"Wolf Blitzer
on CNN." To
some it
seemed, while
the UN said
Serry would
have no press
availability
today, the UN
was proud to
get Serry - on
CNN.
Inner City
Press asked
Nesirky to
confirm
Serry's quotes
to UAA, that
he probably
wouldn't go
back to Crimea
and would
leave Ukraine
on Saturday.
Nesirky said
he'd check.
The UN's Jan
Eliasson is
slated to
brief the
Security
Council by
video at 2:30,
in a meeting
Inner City
Press, as
early at 7 am,
was told was
requested by
the UK. We'll
be there.
It was before
8 am in
Washington on
March 6 when
the White
House
announced an
"Executive
Order that
authorizes
sanctions on
individuals
and entities
responsible
for activities
undermining
democratic
processes or
institutions
in Ukraine;
threatening
the peace,
security,
stability,
sovereignty,
or territorial
integrity of
Ukraine;
contributing
to the
misappropriation
of state
assets of
Ukraine; or
purporting to
assert
governmental
authority over
any part of
Ukraine
without
authorization
from the
Ukrainian
government in
Kyiv."
How this last
criterion
would have
applied, say,
to South Sudan
or Kosovo is
not clear. The
White House
held a
background
call at 8:30
am, on which a
Senior
Administration
Official said
they can also
target
"derivatives"
- those
providing
material
support.
Another added
the "OSCE team
is on the
ground" (see
below).
Meanwhile the
UN on the
morning of
March 6
announced that
while its
envoy Robert
Serry,
threatened in
Crimea the day
before, will
be in Kyiv,
but no press
availabilities.
On March 5,
the
Organization
for Security
and
Co-operation
in Europe
announced it
is sending 40
unarmed
military
personnel to
Ukraine, from
twenty one
countries.
Inner City
Press asked
the OSCE to
update, beyond
the 18
countries in
its press
release, which
were the three
"new"
contributors
of personnel.
The
answer came:
Austria,
Iceland and
Italy.
Based on a
quote from
Paris, Inner
City Press has
asked the OSCE
if it has any
comment on
Russian
foreign
minister
Sergey Lavrov
saying its
steps "do not
help create an
atmosphere of
dialogue"?
As of this
writing an
hour after the
question, no
reply.
The other 18
OSCE
contributors
are: Canada,
Czech
Republic,
Denmark,
Estonia,
Finland,
France,
Germany,
Hungary,
Ireland,
Latvia,
Lithuania,
Norway,
Poland,
Slovakia,
Sweden,
Turkey, United
Kingdom, and
the United
States.
On Estonia
(and Ukraine)
more leaked
audio has
emerged on
YouTube, in
what we're
calling
Kwikileaks, of
the EU's
Catherine
Ashton and
Estonia's
Foreign
Minister Urmas
Paet. Click
here for audio,
particularly
from Minute
8:30.
After both
speak of a
prospective
new Ukrainian
Health
Minister,
Olga, Paet
says:
"Olga
said
all evidence
shows the
people killed
by snipers,
among police
and people
from the
streets, that
they were the
same snipers
killing people
from both
sides."
Paet says the
new coalition
does not want
to
investigate;
Ashton says
"We do want to
investigate"
-- but where
is the
investigation?
In Freetown,
UN Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon said:
"let
me add one
[thing] which
I had
forgotten to
mention about
the situation
in Ukraine. I
have decided
to dispatch
the Assistant
Secretary-General
for Human
Rights, Mr.
Ivan
Simonovic, to
Ukraine to
visit Kiev and
the eastern
part of
Ukraine,
including
Crimea, to see
and monitor
the human
rights
situation
there. This is
what I wanted
to add to the
AP
correspondent."
Crimea is in
the south --
but will
Simonovic
investigate
what Estonia's
foreign
minister told
Ashton about
the same
snipers killed
police and the
people in the
street?
In New York
the UN
announced that
its Deputy
Secretary
General Jan
Eliasson will
call into a
briefing late
Wednesday
morning. Inner
City Press
asks, why not
Robert Serry,
who's gone to
Crimea, and
who features
in the last
set of leaked
audio?
Tuesday night at a
$32,000 a
plate DSCC
fundraiser at
the Virginia
home of former
US Senator
Chuck Robb,
Barack Obama
said
"I’ll
be happy to
give you more
details of
what’s
happening in
Ukraine. The
essence of it
is, is we have
a country that
has been in a
difficult
situation for
quite some
time, that had
a President
that was
closely
associated
with the
Russians, who
a large
segment of the
Ukrainian
population did
not feel was
representing
them well, although
he had been
democratically
elected.
You had a
crisis inside
of Ukraine as
a consequence
of his
decision not
to sign an
agreement that
would have
oriented their
economy a
little more
towards the
West. That got
out of control
and we got
involved only
to prevent
initially from
bloodshed
occurring
inside the
country and
succeeded in
doing that.
But,
ultimately, a
deal that was
brokered for a
power-sharing
arrangement in
an election
led to him
fleeing and we
now have a
situation in
which the
Russians I
think are
engaging in a
fundamental
breach of
international
law in sending
troops into
the country to
try to force
the hands of
the Ukrainian
people. We may
be able to
deescalate
over the next
several days
and weeks, but
it’s a serious
situation and
we’re spending
a lot of time
on it."
One key phrase
was, "he had
been
democratically
elected."
At the UN on
March 3 after
the third
Ukraine
meeting of the
UN Security
Council in
four days, at
which US
Ambassador
Samantha Power
said OSCE
monitors are
heading to
Kyiv tonight,
Read Admiral
John Kirby,
the US
Pentagon's
Press
Secretary, put
out this
statement:
"Although
the
Department of
Defense finds
value in the
military-to-military
relationship
with the
Russian
Federation we
have developed
over the past
few years to
increase
transparency,
build
understanding,
and reduce the
risk of
military
miscalculation
we have, in
light of
recent events
in Ukraine,
put on hold
all
military-to-military
engagements
between the
United States
and Russia.
This includes
exercises,
bilateral
meetings, port
visits and
planning
conferences.
The
Defense
Department is
closely
monitoring the
situation and
remains in
close contact
with the State
Department and
interagency,
along with our
Allies,
Partners and
NATO. We call
on Russia to
deescalate the
crisis in
Ukraine and
for Russian
forces in
Crimea to
return to
their bases,
as required
under the
agreements
governing the
Russia Black
Sea Fleet.
Some
media outlets
are
speculating on
possible ship
movements in
the region.
There has been
no change to
our military
posture in
Europe or the
Mediterranean;
our Navy units
continue to
conduct
routine,
previously
planned
operations and
exercises with
allies and
partners in
the region."
Earlier on
Monday,
Russia's
Vitaly Churkin
came out to
answer
questions.
Inner City
Press asked
him of
supporting the
mission to
Ukraine by UN
Deputy
Secretary
General Jan
Eliasson, a
former Swedish
foreign
minster, while
questioning
that of Robert
Serry.
Churkin
replied that
he had spoken
with Eliasson
before he left
for Kyev. It
is unclear if
Eliasson will
get to Crimea.
But some note
that unlike
Serry, who
appears in
leaked audio
with former US
now UN
official Jeff
Feltman
"getting" Ban
to send him to
Ukraine,
Eliasson
strives to
bridge various
gaps.
UK Ambassador
Lyall Grant
came out, and
Inner City
Press asked
him if the UK
is moving
toward
sanctions as
the US says it
is. He
politely
declined to
answer this
non-UN
question.
From
the UK Mission
transcript:
Inner
City Press: G8
and sanctions?
There’s a lot
of talk from
the US side of
looking at
financial
sanctions on
individuals in
Russia and
there’s talk
of not only
not going to
this
preparatory
meeting for
the Sochi G8
but to have
Russia
essentially
excluded from
the G8 and to
go back to a
G7. What’s the
UK position on
that and at
what point
would that
become
something that
you would be
looking at?
Amb
Lyall Grant:
Those issues
are being
discussed
elsewhere. I
want to focus
today on the
UN aspects of
this.
Ukraine's
Yuriy Sergeyev
held a long
and surreal
stakeout.
Inner City
Press asked
him to explain
the dispute
about how many
troops Russia
can have in
Crimea. He
said 11,000
including
2,000 marines,
that Russia
had reiterated
this again in
December and
was now
committing
"aggression."
France's
Gerard Araud,
as has become
his pattern,
took only two
questions: one
in French, the
second from
France 24.
After four and
a half years
at the UN -
his figure, in
the Council --
he is becoming
more each day
like Herve
Ladsous, the
fourth
Frenchman in a
row atop UN
Peacekeeping.
The
stakeouts
ended with the
Moldovan
Permanent
Representative.
Inner City
Press asked
him about US
Secretary of
State John
Kerry's
statement that
Russia is
pressuring
Moldova. He
spoke of
troops on high
alert, and
another
autonomous
region now
threatening
not to
participate in
elections.
Inner City
Press asked
him about the
size of the
OSCE mission
Samanatha
Power referred
to. He said
he's
participated
in three OSCE
mission; he
mentioned
sizes between
10 and two or
three
thousand. So
what is being
referred to
here? We'll
have more on
this.
To this view,
Africa and
Latin America
are
unknowable.
But is this
appropriate
for an
incoming UN
Spokesperson?
For somehow
whose been in
charge of UN
Media
Accreditation?
On the IMF,
Sergeyev said
the Fund's
team will be
"on the
ground" early
next week. He
was asked
about
austerity but
dodged it; he
said that the
key is that
money doesn't
"disappear" as
he said that
from Russia
did.
While standing
at the
stakeout, a
supporter of
the ICC
tweeted at
Inner City
Press if
Sergeyev
raised it in
the Council.
Inner City
Press asked
about the ICC
and the
extradition
request to
Russia.
Sergeyev said
the ICC is
complex and
that he favors
a Ukrainian
process first.
On the IMF,
how fast could
post
Yanukovych
Ukraine get US
money or loan
guarantees?
Back on the
afternoon of
February 26
came this on
the record
statement by
State
Department
Spokesperson
Jen Psaki:
"The
United States
is continuing
to consider a
range of
options,
including loan
guarantees, to
support
Ukraine
economically.
But no
decision has
been made and
the next step
is the
formation of a
multi-party,
technical
government.
Once that
government is
formed we will
begin to take
immediate
steps, in
coordination
with
multilateral
and bilateral
partners, that
could
compliment an
IMF package,
to support
Ukraine."
There was a
lot of chatter
about a $1
billion US
loan
guarantee,
including from
a roundtable
by Secretary
of State John
Kerry held
after he did
an interview
with Andrea
Mitchell. Oh,
This Town or
#ThisTown. So
which is it?
Two hours
after his
February 25
cancellation,
in Washington,
journalists
Inner City
Press knows
from covering
the
International
Monetary Fund
took the short
walk to the US
State
Department's
briefing to
ask about
pre-conditions.
Follow the
money.
From
Foggy Bottom
to Turtle Bay,
the view is
different --
in the case of
the UN, often
marginal and
self-serving.
For example,
Ban Ki-moon
gave no
read-out of
his beginning
of the year
call with the
president of
his native
South Korea.