At
UN,
As Amos On
Leave from
House of
Lords, Co-Brit
Williams Goes
for DPA of Ban
Ki-moon,
Waiving UN
Charter?
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
August 17, updated
Aug 18
-- The UN has
among its high
officials at
least two
members of the
UK House of
Lords, Inner
City Press has
learned:
humanitarian
chief Valerie
Amos and
Lebanon envoy
Michael
Williams, who
sources say
may be seeking
an even higher
post.
The
UN charter
clearly
prohibits a UN
official
serving any
government or
other interest
other than the
UN. Under Ban Ki-moon,
this has in
effect been
waived for
example for
Ban's envoy to
Libya
Al-Khatib,
who remains a
Senator in
Jordan.
Al-Khatib has
told Inner
City Press
he is not paid
by the UN;
other sources
said a
different
"fix" or
loophole had
been found for
Amos and
Williams.
On
August 16,
Inner City
Press asked
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon's
acting deputy
spokesman
Farhan Haq to
"please
describe the
UN's thinking
and position
on whether the
UK titles /
honors of
Michael
Williams and
Valerie Amos
may violate
the letter or
spirit of the
UN charter."
Haq's
written answer
-- he
had canceled
the day's noon
briefing,
apparently on
the argument
that with Ban
working from
home, there
was less or no
UN news --
strangely
addressed only
one of the
two: "No, they
do not.
Michael
Williams is on
a leave of
absence from
the House of
Lords while he
is working for
the UN."
But
why not
answer as to
Amos? See
below. On
August 17,
Amos appeared
in the UN
briefing room
to talk about
Somalia, Syria
and Sudan. As
the
penultimate
question, Haq
called on
Inner City
Press, which
after Sudan
asked Amos,
since Haq had
declined to
answer, about
her service in
the House of
Lords.
"Yes,
I am formally
a member of
the House of
Lords," she
said, adding
"they have
something
called Leave
of Absence and
I have take
it, I think
I'd have to
given three
months notice
to go back." Video
here, from
Minute 28:50.
Afterward
Inner City
Press asked
Amos'
spokesperson
to provide the
date on which
Amos went on
leave from the
House of
Lords. At
press time, it
has not been
provided. [But
see update
below.]
It
is understood
that when the
UN Office of
Legal Affairs
questioned
Michael
Williams about
his recent
peerage and
membership in
the House of
Lords, the
case of
Valerie Amos
was brought up
and cited to.
The "on leave"
loophole has
been opened.
Other
sources say
that Williams,
always genial
with the
press, is
under
consideration
by the UK
Foreign Office
to be
nominated at a
UK candidate
to replace
American Lynn
Pascoe as the
head of the UN
Department of
Political
Affairs.
As
Inner City
Press
exclusively
reported,
Pascoe has
told other
high US
officials he
wants to leave
the post. The
only question
is whether the
Obama
administration
would like to
put another
American at
DPA, or take
over the UN
Department of
Management
(with Patrick
Kennedy,
sources say)
and perhaps
also Ban's
chief of staff
position.
Amos and Haq,
who answered
only as to
Williams, see
below
If
Michael
Williams, or
any other
Brit, took
back the
Department of
Political
Affairs for
the UK, it
seems clear
that Amos
would have to
go as head
humanitarian,
since not even
a Permanent
Five country
is supposed to
control two of
the top Under
Secretary
General
positions.
(Ban's
spokesman Haq
strange
answering of
the Press only
as to Williams
and not Amos
can be seen in
this light.)
So
is it Williams
versus Amos,
Lord versus
Baroness? Both
are associated
with the Labor
party -- Amos
waits with Ban
Ki-moon when
Tony Blair
visits the UN
-- and
officials of
Foreign Office
under
Conservative
David Cameron
are apparently
nonplussed by
the idea of
nominating
Williams.
We'll see.
Update
of
August 18: the
next day this
came in from
Ms. -- or
should we say
Baroness --
Amos' office:
"Sorry
I
didn't manage
to confirm
what Valerie
told you
yesterday
until now,
re her leave
of absence
from the House
of Lords. As
Valerie
stated,
-
She took a
leave of
absence from
the House of
Lords
-
This was done
when the offer
from UN was
accepted
-
VA notified
the Clerk of
the House of
Lords as per
standard HoL
procedure
-
This is also
to ensure that
absentees
aren't
included in
the numbers
for voting."
* *
*
UN
Claim of
Canceled
Briefings in
Past Augusts
Disproved, Cut
Under Ban
Ki-moon,
Dodging on
Sudan &
Mismanagement
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
August 16 --
When the UN
on Friday,
August 12
announced it
would on
Monday start
cutting daily
noon briefings
by 40%,
despite events
in Syria,
Sudan and
Libya, and
Inner City
Press
asked if this
was an attempt
to cut costs,
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon's
acting deputy
spokesman
Farhan Haq
replied, "I
have been here
as a
Spokesperson
for 12 years,
and every
summer...there
are times when
we cut back on
briefings." Transcript
here.
The claim that
this cut back
takes place
"every year"
was repeated,
along with
Inner City
Press'
question to
Haq, "How did
you decide to
say that
journalists
here want less
information
rather than
more?"
Beyond
the fact that
the (Arab)
Summer of 2011
might be
different than
past summers,
what with Ban
Ki-moon
supposedly
coordinating
military
action in
Libya under
Security
Council
resolution
1973, Inner
City Press has
gone back to
the UN's
archive of
noon briefing
transcripts
for the past
ten years
and found that
only in 2009,
under Ban's
previous
spokesperson
Michele
Montas, were
some briefings
canceled in
August. See
links below
and online here.
Under
Kofi Annan,
since at least
2001, daily
briefings were
held in
August, by his
spokemen Fred
Eckhard and
Stephane
Dujarric, who
is still with
the UN. Then
under Ban
Ki-moon and
Montas, in
2009,
briefings in
August were
reduced to
Monday,
Wednesday and
Friday.
Even
in 2010, under
Montas'
successor
Martin
Nesirky,
briefings were
held daily in
August. Now in
2011, with
Nesirky out
from now until
the end of
August, his
deputy Farhan
Haq announced
on August 13
that briefings
would be
reduced -- and
said it had
always been
this way. But
see archived
daily
briefings links,
and below.
And
so on August
16, as rebels
closed in on
Tripoli
assisted by
NATO's -- Ban
Ki-moon's? --
air strikes
and the news
was full of
war crimes in
Southern
Kordofan amid
inaction by UN
peacekeepers
and of killing
in Syria,
there was no
noon briefing.
Inner City
Press
submitted some
questions to
Haq by e-mail,
copying
Nesirky.
On
whether Ban's
post-Gaddafi
adviser on
Libya Ian
Martin could
brief the
press and how
large his UN
funded team
is, there was
no answer.
Likewise on a
briefing by
departing UN
Controller Jun
Yamazaki, no
answer, not
even a date by
which the UN's
top budget
official will
leave. (His
job has
already be
advertised in
The
Economist.) No
answer on a
question about
top UN
humanitarian
Valerie Amos.
Ban,
Haq, Pascoe
& Kim,
Nesirky not
shown, Q&A
reduction not
admitted
On
a question
about Darfur
in Sudan, Haq
said only
"check with
DPKO." On a
job Ban
Ki-moon gave
out to Samuel
Koo while in
South Korea,
Haq said ask
UNEP -- Inner
City Press
has, and there
has been no
answer. And so
it goes at the
UN -- but
note, unlike
Haq's claim
that it has
always been
this way, it
has not. It is
getting worse.