In
DC,
UN Funding
Questioned, As
Pascoe Lame
Ducks on
Palestine,
Ban Dodges on
Haiti &
Ladsous, Goes
Social
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
WASHINGTON*
DC,
September 13,
updated
-- With UN
Peacekeepers
in Haiti
charged with
sexual
abuse and
fathering
children with
under-aged
Haitian girls
and little
transparency
about how
public money
is spent, on
consultants
and
flying part
time envoys
around, on
Capitol Hill
today Congress
members are
putting
forward their
bill
to make
funding of the
UN a
la carte, i.e.
based on
performance.
According
to the
sponsors, the
bill includes
"opposition to
new or
expanded
peacekeeping
missions until
reforms are
instituted,
including the
adoption of a
universal code
of conduct."
And see
updated bill
summary, here,
esp. Title X.
This comes as
Haitian
elected
officials move
to strip the
UN of its
immunity after
Uruguayan UN
peacekeepers
engaged sexual
abuse, and
barely pay
child
support for
their
offspring with
under-aged
Haitian girls.
At
the UN on
September 12
Inner City
Press posed
the question
to Secretary
General
Ban Ki-moon's
spokesman
Martin
Nesirky: "I
wanted to ask
here at
Headquarters,
is it the UN’s
position that
the payment of
child
support after
sex by
peacekeepers
with underage
people in the
countries in
which they are
serving, is
sufficient, is
that a lack of
impunity?"
Nesirky
did not
answer at the
time, but
after Inner
City Press
left the UN
and New
York inserted
into the
transcript
"that the
investigation
had in
fact concluded
and that the
issue of
financial
support for
the mother
and the child
by the soldier
involved was
one of the
outcomes of
this
process,
independent of
whatever other
punishment is
meted out."
But
as appears to
be the case
with Sri
Lankan
peacekeepers
merely
"repatriated"
after
documentation
of sexual
abuse of
minors in
Haiti, there
appears
to have been,
nor that there
will be, any
additional
punishment.
Even
in this
context many
have mocked
the idea of
conditions on
UN
peacekeeping
and political
missions and a
la carte
funding. The
UN
seems to be
going on as
ever, with
simultaneous
canned social
media
responses from
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon at
#AskTheSG and
some in
the UN
Correspondents'
Association
saying they'll
"urgently"
meet on a
draft
statement to
journalists
about what
they should
publish, and
who
and what they
should use as
sources, explicitly
in response to
complaints
from a particular
country's
mission to the
UN.
(That
would be France,
which has
controlled UN
Peacekeeping
during all
this, and
whose new DPKO
head Herve
Ladsous was
chief of staff
to French
minister
Aliot-Marie as
she flew Air
Ben Ali to
Tunisia --
none of which
Ban seems to
have reviewed
or yet
answered for.)
Ban previously
in DC, new
climate and
DPKO head not
shown
But
given the
make-up in
Congress, and
President
Barack Obama's
recent move
rightward on
issues ranging
from the
environment,
where he
kiboshed the
proposed
ozone rules,
and tax cuts,
complacency at
and around the
UN may be
misguided.
For
now the
speakers in
favor of the
legislation, H.R. 2829,
are all
Republicans,
including
Illeana
Ros-Lehtinen,
Dan Burton,
Peter Roskam
of Illinois,
Steve Chabot
and Jean
Schmidt of
Ohio, Scott
Garret of New
Jersey,
Michael Grimm
of New York,
and Robert
Dold and Allen
West of
Florida.
But
already the US
Mission to the
UN's new
Ambassador on
Management is
criticized a
proposed 3%
pay raise at
the UN -- only
for
Professional
level staff,
Inner City
Press notes,
and not the
General
Service staff
that would
need it more
-- and has
called for
more
transparency
at the UN
Development
Program.
Simultaneously,
sources
tell Inner
City Press,
the
Administration
is taking a
hard
look at their
main American
Under
Secretary
General Lynn
Pascoe of
the Department
of Political
Affairs.
Wikileaks has
released a
cable
summarizing a
US Ambassador
Rice meeting
with Pascoe at
which he
claimed credit
for working
with the
government of
Zimbabwe. Rice
asked
pointedly
about the
wisdom of
throwing
Robert Mugabe
a
lifeline.
Since
then, Inner
City Press has
told, Rice has
indicated that
meeting with
Pascoe is
not for her,
and largely
left it to
deputy
Rosemary
DiCarlo. Now
DPA
sources say
Pascoe is a
lame duck. At
a press
briefing at
the UN on
September 12,
Pascoe
repeatedly
(lame) ducked
and weaved
past
questions
about the
request for
state status
by Palestine,
another
topic at
Tuesday's
Capitol Hill
hearing. Watch
this site.
From
the UN's
transcript of
its September
12, 2011 noon
briefing:
Question:
I wanted to
ask you, all
these
developments
in Haiti while
you were
away about,
multiple
allegations
various kinds
of abuse. A
senator
there, Senator
Latortue is
putting
forward a bill
to say that
the
UN’s immunity
should be
limited to
within the
scope of its
mandate
and that
otherwise
including UN
peacekeepers
and UN staff
should be
subject to the
Haitian
justice
system. I
wanted to
know, what the
UN
thinks of that
type of a
proposal. Is a
country within
its rights
to, as part of
the
status-of-forces
agreement or
otherwise,
hold
peacekeepers
subject to the
justice of the
country in
which they are
operating?
Spokesperson
Nesirky:
Well, the
Mission, like
any other
Mission,
operates under
Security
Council
resolution
that governs
its work and,
therefore, any
adjustments to
that would
need to be
discussed by
the Security
Council. But
the question
of impunity
there or
anywhere else
is
obviously
crucial. And
we know you
will have
heard what has
been
said in recent
days and weeks
on this topic;
the
allegations in
Haiti
as you know,
they are being
looked into
and taken
extremely
seriously.
Inner
City
Press: I know
that the
allegations
with the male,
Uruguay is
looking into
it very
closely. There
seems to be no
dispute that
several
Uruguayan
peacekeepers
have left
behind
children with
underage women
in that area
of Haiti. I
just wanted to
make sure I
didn’t
misunderstand
it; it seems
to be saying
that the UN
system
thought that
the payment of
child support
was a
sufficient
response. It
seemed…
Spokesperson:
“It” being
who?
Inner
City
Press: Say
again?
Spokesperson:
“It” being
who?
Inner
City
Press: It was
said from this
podium and it
was said by
MINUSTAH,
so I wanted to
ask here at
Headquarters,
is it the UN’s
position
that the
payment of
child support
after sex by
peacekeepers
with
underage
people in the
countries in
which they are
serving, is
sufficient, is
that a lack of
impunity?
Spokesperson
Nesirky:
I need to
check on that,
Matthew, I
need to check
on
precisely what
was said where
and when.
[The
Spokesperson
later stated
that the
investigation
had in fact
concluded and
that the issue
of financial
support for
the mother and
the child by
the soldier
involved was
one of the
outcomes of
this
process,
independent of
whatever other
punishment is
meted out. The
soldier had
acknowledged
the
relationship
in the course
of the
investigation.]
*
- with
reporting from
Washington DC.