False
Mediator,
UN Pours Gas
on Fires in
Field As With
Press,
Emboldens
Partners
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
March 16 --
The UN often
says it will
get involved
to
mediate, to
try to make
peace. But it
rarely does.
Often the UN
pretends to be
impartial but
actually takes
sides, usually
the wrong
side.
Increasingly
the UN is not
an honest
broker. It
pours gasoline
on a fire and
then it walks
away.
In
the Congo, for
example, the
UN has become
so aligned
with the
Joseph
Kabila
government
that it
covered up,
then once
exposed allows
three
or more
strikes for,
at least 126
rapes in
Minova by the
Congolese
Army which
UN
Peacekeeping
under Herve
Ladsous
supports.
In
Sri Lanka in
2009, the UN
had figures of
the number of
civilians the
government was
killing in the
North - but it
hid the
numbers, and
when exposed
claimed that
it was all
about saving
people, not
counting the
dead.
But the UN
saved no one.
And recently
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon
accepted a
whitewash
report about
Sri Lanka,
and
went ahead to praise
it without
releasing the
report.
Smaller
scale,
the UN's
Department of
Public
Information on
February 21
sent
Inner City
Press an
invitation to
a meeting the
next day with
the old
UN
Correspondents
Association,
to supposedly
improve the
climate in
the UN press
corps.
The
climate was
poisoned in September
2011 when Tim
Witcher of AFP
asked
UNCA to
censure
Inner City
Press for
accurate
reporting on
how Ban
accepted
Ladsous, and
UNCA screened
a movie
denying
another about
Sri Lanka war
crimes,
without
showing the
film in chief.
Click here
for that.
But
DPI's February
22 meeting, at
which for
obvious
reasons Inner
City
Press said
openly, “you
are on the
record,”
did not
improve the
climate: quite
the opposite.
DPI allowed
UNCA president
Pamela Falk
to scream that
Inner City
Press is a
“mugger,” and
shout, “you
call yourself
a journalist?”
Falk's
first vice
president,
Louis
Charbonneau of
Reuters, was
allowed to
refuse
to answer
questions
about his role
in the 2012
UNCA move to
throw Inner
City Press out
of the UN, and
to tell Inner
City Press,
"the
fundamental
problem is
your website."
DPI,
whose Media
Accreditation
boss Stephane
Dujarric was
in attendance,
did not say
anything about
these attacks.
But when Inner
City Press
three full
days later
reported on
that, using
verbatim
quotes and
audio, what
was the UN's
response?
Dujarric
sent
Inner City
Press a
letter
accusing its
report of
violating some
rule. What
rule? Dujarric
claimed that
all sides
understood
that the
meeting would
not be
reported or
recorded. But
that is false:
Inner
City Press
said clearly,
on tape, “you
are on the
record,” and
Falk said
“he's going to
write this
up.” Here
is the audio,
which has been
provided to
DPI. Another
attendee
confirmed that
Inner City
Press said it
was recording.
But
then the UN
threw or
drizzled
gasoline upon
the fire. Dujarric
refused to
substantiate
his complaint
letter.
Eighteen days
after a
request for
such went by.
After
a time,
Reuters and
AFP feeling
emboldened
struck again.
They cut
into a
conversation
between Inner
City Press and
another
reported,
Witcher
hissing about
“lies and
distortions.”
Then after
Inner
City Press
replied,
“Lapdog,”
Witcher and
Michelle
Nichols of
Reuters, who
began the
conversation
cut-in, went
and filed
false
complaints
with UN
Security.
Inner
City Press once
informed - and
asked to
respond in
writing -
requested a
copy of the
complaint.
The request
was made March
11 to
the Department
of “Safety and
Security,”
whose Officer
James
twice demanded
a response
while saying,
you will never
get a copy of
the complaint.
On
March 15 Inner
City Press and
the new and
needed Free
UN Coalition
for Access
wrote
to the head of
DPI to ask for
a copy of the
complaint, for
due process
rules and on
other matters.
The
response came
from Dujarric,
he of the
false
complaint, saying he
stands behind
his letter,
and not
mentioning the
request for
due
process rules.
Next it was
said Dujarric
is going out
of town --
then ten hours
later,
without any
response on
rules, that
DPI has yet to
receive the
complaints
from the
Department of
Safety and
Security.
Thus
the UN invites
those who
challenge or
criticize it
to set-up
meetings, then
lies about
what happens,
emboldens
other false
complainer
then stands
and washes its
hands, leave
town.
It is
unacceptable
at every
level, and
must and will
be
energetically
opposed. Watch
this
site.