UN Peacekeeping Gives CISCO Access to Its Cairo Meetings,
Roots of No-Bid Contracting
Byline:
Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at
the UN: News Analysis
UNITED NATIONS,
May 19 -- A U.S.-based computer company with, already, $90
million in UN business was allowed exclusive access to a recent
Peacekeeping
Information Technology conference in Egypt, rather than being referred
for
performance review or investigation, it has emerged.
In
what some attendees call a junket, UN peacekeeping's Department of
Field
Support earlier this month held a conference about information
technology in
Cairo, Egypt. Sources told Inner City Press they were surprised and
troubled at
the high-profile presence including as a provider of entertainment at
the
intra-UN meeting of the large
contractor, CISCO, via its global account manager to the U.N., David
Andemicael.
Such corporate access would not be allowed, at least under the rules,
by the
UN's Procurement Division. So why does UN Peacekeeping -- or its
Department of
Field Support -- allow it?
Inner
City Press sent this question to DFS's information technology chief
Rudy
Sanchez as well as to the new head of DFS, Susana Malcorra. The first
day
passed without response. But on May 20, DFS spokesman Nick Birnback
provided a
lengthy response:
"Hi Matthew, Ms. Malcorra
asked me to get back to you on your queries of yesterday. The United
Nations
Secretariat has a direct contractual agreement with CISCO Systems. This
agreement was developed in compliance with United Nations Financial and
Procurement rules and regulations and has been in place since February
2004.
The Secretariat has standardized the use of CISCO products and
technology for
Network equipment used in field mission’s Local Area Networks (LANs)
and the
DFS Wide Area Network (WAN). Field mission Information and
Communications
Technology (ICT) personnel indicated that one of the most pressing
technical
issues was network performance related to the transmission of voice,
video and
data over mission LANs and the WAN, and the optimization of CISCO
technologies
currently in use.
CISCO representatives were
therefore invited to the conference to provide technical briefings to
the UN
participants on the utilization of CISCO technologies that would
mitigate
performance degradation associated with the high-latency, low-bandwidth
infrastructure in use in field operations. CISCO engineers also
provided
technical briefings on how their equipment could best be leveraged in
support
of field ICT operations. CISCO representatives only participated only
in this
phase of the conference.
While there were no other non-UN
participants in attendance this year, major UN contractors/technical
service
providers have participated on an issue-specific basis in previous
conferences.
"
This
answer, while appreciated, raises more questions. Sources tell Inner
City Press
that CISCO's "network performance," now proffered as the rationale
for its exclusive access to decision-makers, is a performance issue,
which
should have been referred to the Procurement Division. What CISCO
provides,
they say, is often incompatible with UN Peacekeeping missions.
UN and Cisco's John Chambers and wine: Cairo access
and paryting not shown
How
long has CISCO worked for the UN? Since at least 1992, Inner City Press
is
told, beginning with routers costing (then) $30,000. But CISCO was soon
made
the UN de facto standard, so that other contractors could not compete.
It has
been, in essence, no-bid ever since, culminating in being invited to UN
Peacekeeping's own information technology conference. It is credible
that CISCO
will be subjected to legitimate competition for UN contracts going
forward?
What do the powers that be at the UN have to say about this?
Footnotes: it's
now said that the acting chief of
the Procurement Division, Paul Buades, may not in fact get the post,
that
"an Australian from UNOPS" is now in line, and even Buades' Ukrainian
deputy is on the rocks, his partying picture circulating through
capitals of
the countries for but not in which the UN buys millions of dollars of
goods.
Meanwhile, the UN
has erroneously jumped the gun on
promising Spain that its Peacekeeping Information Technology unit will
be in
Valencia -- without Budget Committee approval of any kind. Hopefully
that
Committee will look into Valencia, and also into this. We'll see.
Finally,
insiders describe a trend in which information technology staffers of
UN
Peacekeeping now Department of Field Suppport leaves and go to work
with the
companies which contract with the UN. Where are the safeguards?
Partying with CISCO...
* * *
These reports are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click
here for a Reuters
AlertNet piece by this correspondent
about Uganda's Lord's Resistance Army. Click
here
for an earlier Reuters AlertNet piece about the Somali National
Reconciliation Congress, and the UN's $200,000 contribution from an
undefined trust fund. Video
Analysis here
Feedback: Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-453A, UN, NY 10017 USA
Tel: 212-963-1439
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other,
earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available
in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright
2006-08 Inner City Press, Inc. To request
reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com -
|