As
UN Denied
Haiti Cholera,
It Ignores
Questions of Censorship,
Ladsous
Abuse
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
March 16 --
This UN thinks
it can simply
ignore or
dismiss
questions that
are raised.
In
the big
picture,
there's the UN
saying nothing
for 15 months
about
the legal
complaint that
it brought
cholera to
Haiti, killing
at
least 5,000
people so far.
Then after 15
months, the UN
tersely said
the claims
were “not
receivable.”
Since
then Inner
City Press has
asked
a half dozen times
for the legal
reasoning or
basis of the
ruling. But
the UN
has refused to
answer.
In
the smaller
picture, Inner
City Press for
the Free
UN Coalition
for
Access
posed nine
questions or
issues to the
chief of the
Department
of Public
Information.
Several had to
do with the
non-responses
and
insufficient
responses of
his
subordinate,
Media
Acceditation
and
UNTV boss
Stephane
Dujarric.
But
all nine
issues were
re-referred to
Dujarric. Of
the nine
issues,
Dujarric
denied two,
dodged two,
deferred on
two and
entirely
ignored
three others.
Welcome to the
UN.
FUNCA
asked, as the
New
York Civil
Liberties
Union did on
July 5, 2012,
that the UN
state or adopt
due process
rules for
journalists.
Dujarric, like
the chief of
DPI to whom
the NYCLU
wrote, ignored
the
request.
For
Dujarric, this
may be
understandable,
since of his
own proved-false
February
27 complained,
he after 18
days of
silence
said “the
letter
stands.” Is
that like,
“not
receivable”?
It is
unacceptable.
Inner
City Press
reported that
photographs
taken of a
visiting UN
“partner,”
Beyonce, were
ordered to be
deleted inside
the UN's
own Studio H.
Dujarric
response was
to quietly
raise the
issue with
Aramark, which
is the UN's
cafeteria
contractor.
This does not
address the forced
deletion of
photos in the
UN's Studio H,
but
Dujarric
insists,
falsely,
that the issue
raised by
FUNCA has been
addressed.
Likewise
after
UN
Peacekeeping
boss Herve
Ladsous had
his spokesman
seize the
UNTV
microphone on
December 18 (video) to try to avoid an Inner
City Press
question about
the 126 rapes
in Minova by
the Congolese
Army Ladsous
partners with,
all Dujarric
did was speak
quietly to the
spokesman.
Now
on March 15
Dujarric
writes on “the
issue of the
handling of
the
microphone by
one of the
DPKO
spokespeople.
As I told you,
it was an
honest mistake
and he has
been told not
to do it again
(and has
not).”
What
has happened,
among other
things, is the
Greek
foreign
minster's
entourage
telling UNTV
to stop
recording and
telling
journalists
not
to take photos
at the
stakeout.
DPI has
refused to
answer on this
issue, raised
by FUNCA on
February 22
and since.
As
to Ladsous,
his DPKO on
March 7 gave a
half-answer
to friendly
scribes other
than Inner
City Press to
a question
Inner City
Press
repeatedly
asked Ladsous,
and put
to Ban Ki-moon
on March 5,
about
the Minova
rapes.
Here's
#LADSOUS2013
short films 1,
2
(finacial),
3
(Too Late)
Inner
City Press has
asked the
chief of DPI
“to be
informed if it
is
DPI's role, or
whose role it
is, to ensure
that such
mis-direction
and favoritism
in the
provision of
information
and answers by
the UN
does not
continue.”
The
chief of DPI
referred the
question to
Dujarric, who
answered:
“Regarding
your
concern about
wanting more
information
about UN
activities, as
you
know, this
department has
made a
sustained
effort to
increase the
number of
briefings by
senior UN
officials from
both
headquarters
and
the field.”
While
some of the
referenced
"brown bag"
sessions are
appreciated,
this
does not
respond to
what Ladsous
has done. When
Inner City
Press
verbally
expressed its
opinion, Tim
Witcher of AFP
hissed “lies
and
distortions,”
and Inner City
Press replied,
“Lapdog.”
Now Inner
City Press is
being asked to
respond to a
complaint
filed by
Witcher
and Michele
Nichols of
Reuters, no copy or
even summary
of which has
been provided
to Inner City
Press.
On
this, Dujarric
wrote back at
5 am Saturday
New York time,
from his
“Roman Tablet”
no less, to
say the DPI
has “yet to
receive the
complaints
from DSS,” the
Department of
Safety and
Security.
So
what ARE the
rules? Inner
City Press for
FUNCA replied
-- from its Russian
Pancake,
as the saying
goes --
but that's for
a forthcoming
story: the
pall cast on
freedom of the
press by all
this will be
energetically
opposed. Watch
this site.