UN
Has
No Comment on
Ethiopia
Jailings,
Congo
Crackdown,
Sheltered
Bissau
Putschist
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
December 27 --
With the UN's
need and one
would think
desire
for
information
from war
zones, when a
country
arrests and
imprisons
journalists
trying to
shine light on
otherwise
under-reported
conflicts, one
would expect
the UN to say
something.
But
in the case of
the two
Swedish
journalists
charged,
convicted and
now sentenced
to
11 years in
Ethiopia for
covering the
Ogaden
conflict,
Johan Persson
and Martin
Schibbye, the
UN's
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon has
had nothing to
say.
On
December
21,
Inner City
Press asked
Ban's
spokesman
Martin Nesirky
about the case,
but was told
that it "is
not
necessarily
something that
the
Secretary-General
himself would
comment on.
But, it may be
that
there is a
comment from
somewhere else
within the UN
system. Let me
find out."
Six
days later,
having gotten
back no
comment or
response,
Inner City
Press raised
the case
again, along
with two other
questions
submitted at
noon on
December 27:
"In
Ethiopia,
now the EU has
joined others
in denouncing
the 11 year
sentences for
two
journalists
who were
covering the
war in Ogaden.
Now does the
UN have any
comment,
despite or
more
appropriately
because the
Secretary
General put
Ethiopia's
leader atop
one of his
Sustainable
Development
panels? When
did the S-G
last speak
with
Meles Zenawi?
Did the S-G
raise this
issue?"
At
5:15 pm on
December 27,
Ban Ki-moon's
spokesperson's
office told
Inner City
Press, "On the
Swedish
journalists,
we don't have
any
comment at the
moment but if
that changes
we'll let you
know."
A
nearly
identical
response was
given to Inner
City Press'
question on
the
Democratic
Republic of
the Congo, on
the looting of
the
headquarters
of opposition
figure Etienne
Tshisekedi:
"we've asked
and should we
receive an
update we'll
let you know."
(c) UN Photo
Ban Ki-moon
& Meles
Zenawi, jailed
journalists
not seen or
commented on
Silence
by the UN
about the
dubious
election in
the DRC has
been a
pattern.
Inner City
Press also asked
about it on
December 21:
Inner
City
Press: MONUSCO
had said that
there should
be some, you
know,
inquiry into
the way the
elections were
held. At least
my
understanding
is that they
said that
there were
things that
should be
looked at.
Now, the
Supreme Court
has, without
any changes,
upheld
the results
and Joseph
Kabila has
been
re-inaugurated,
and I wonder
if MONUSCO
thinks that
things were
sufficiently
looked at
before
those two
events took
place.
Spokesperson
Nesirky: Well,
as we have
said on a
number of
occasions, it
is important
that
election
disputes
should be
settled
through
peaceful
means, and
through
established
institutions.
And in
addition, the
Mission has
also strongly
urged the
independent
national
electoral
commission to
undertake a
really
rigorous
review of
those issues
that were
identified by
observer
missions. And
that review
should be with
the
full
participation
of witnesses
and observers,
including
foreign
observer
groups. So, I
think that’s
where we are
with that. As
you well know,
I have already
said — and the
Mission has
said —
that it noted
with deep
concern the
findings of
these various
observer
missions
relating to
the
irregularities
in the
management of
the results
process. So,
if I have
anything
further, then
I would
let you know.
And in the
meantime —
just to
reiterate that
it is
really
important for
those parties,
or all parties
and political
actors, to
desist from
incitement to
violence and
confrontation
and
to essentially
exercise
restraint in
what is
obviously a
complex
situation at
the moment.
Inner
City
Press: it’s
kind of an
obvious
follow-up, but
I just mean,
even if the
electoral
commission
looks into it,
he has already
been
inaugurated
and the
Supreme Court
already signed
off on it. So,
I
mean, I
understand the
UN can’t
really stop
either of the
two
things, but
did these seem
inconsistent
with the call
to look into
these things,
or is it just
to look into
them after
those two
events
have…? Do you
see what I
mean?
Spokesperson:
Yeah, I
understand
what you are
saying
Matthew, and
the Mission is
obviously
following what
is going on in
the country.
And if I have
anything
further, I
will let you
know. The
bottom line
here, at the
moment, is
that it is
still
incumbent on
the
authorities to
ensure —
and by the
authorities
here I mean
the electoral
commission —
to
look into and
review the
findings of
the observer
missions from
different
quarters. And
that is
important not
just for the
here and
now, but for
the future.
So
in the face of
an election
widely
reported as
polluted by
fraud, the UN
says that an
investigation
of it can be
"for the
future." Some
note
that they did
not say that
in Cote
d'Ivoire....
The
only one of
Inner City
Press' three
December 27
questions that
the UN did
answer,
at least
indirectly,
concerned
Guinea-Bissau.
Inner City
Press asked:
"On
Guinea-Bissau
and the coup
d'etat
attempt there,
please
provide not
only Mr.
Mutaboba's but
also the
Secretariat's
comments
on events,
including the
actions and
arrest of navy
chief Rear Adm
Jose Americo
Bubo Na Tchuto
- particularly
because the UN
Mission
there
sheltered him,
a declared
drug kingpin."
Three
hours after
this question
was submitted,
Ban Ki-moon's
spokesperson's
office
issued a
statement on
Guinea-Bissau,
stating in
part that
"The
Secretary-General
condemns the
use of force
to settle
differences in
Guinea-Bissau.
The primacy of
the lawful
civilian
authorities
according to
the
constitution
must be
respected. The
Secretary-General
also
encourages the
authorities of
Guinea-Bissau
to
respect due
process in the
investigation
of the
reported
events. The
Secretary-General
is following
the situation
in
Guinea-Bissau
and
reaffirms the
support of the
United Nations
to the
peacebuilding
process in the
country."
This
of course
does not
address the
UN's special
role with
regard to Rear
Adm Jose
Americo Bubo
Na Tchuto, a
declared drug
kingpin
sheltered by
the UN
Mission there.
At 5:15 pm on
December 27,
Ban Ki-moon's
spokesperson's
office told
Inner City
Press, "On
Guinea-Bissau,
you will have
seen the
statement we
issued. We
don't have
anything
further." And
so it goes at
this UN. Watch
this site.