As
Zelaya Reappears in Honduras, Chavez Mulls UN Trip, Karzai Cancels,
-Sources
By
Matthew Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS, September 21, updated -- In Tegucigalpa, ousted Honduras
President
Manuel Zelaya has reappeared, confirmed by his
UN Ambassador Arturo Reina and Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez. The
de facto
Micheletti government and the country's Supreme Court have
said Zelaya would be arrested upon his return.
Immediately
questions began about how Zelaya got into the country, and as initially
reported, into the
UN building. Inner City Press asked two separate UN spokespeople
in New York for confirmation, but no response was received. Subsequent
reports put Zeleya in the Brazilian Embassy, creating a legal obstacle
to arrest.
The
day before its
General Assembly session begins with a high level meeting on climate
change, the UN was essentially closed. Inner City Press was told by
sources in UN Protocol that Hugo Chavez,
who had been scheduled to speak Thursday to the Assembly and press,
had canceled his appearance. But it appears he is, in fact, still
coming.
It is noted that at the UN Development Program, for example, Honduras'
UN
Ambassador has said that all funding for the November election in
Honduras is being stopped. UNDP insiders say that two of the agency's
five regional burueas have senior Nicaraguan officials (including the
deputy director of UNDP's RBAP,
embroiled in the Alan Doss daughter nepotism scandal.)
Zelaya with UN's Ban, UN role in Z's return not yet clear
By
contrast, the
UN Secretariat's Department
of Political Affairs' director for Latin
America Oscar Fernandez Taranco last week told Inner City Press it
is
continuing technical assistance for a November election, which would
be run under Micheletti.
During
Zelaya's fly-over of Tegucigalpa, the UN General Assembly President
Miguel d-Escoto Brockmann was along for the ride in the plane supplied
by Hugo Chavez and the Citgo oil company. There was talk of UN
humanitarian and refugee aid to Zelaya's supporters who went to the
Nigaraguan border to meet him. A UN accompanied assessment mission to
that border was carried out, but whether aid was ever provided has
never been clarified. Watch this space.
Footnote: Inner City
Press is also informed that embattled Afghan President Hamid Karzai has
canceled his appearances at the UN and at the G-20 meeting in
Pittsburgh, as reports emerge that one quarter of more of the votes in
Afghanistan were fraudulent....
* * *
UN
Says It Still Helps Honduran Election, Democracy Day Study and Video,
Karzai To Win?
By
Matthew Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS, September 15 -- While the Ambassador of Honduras to the UN
representing ousted president Mel Zelaya has been quoted
that the UN
will be stopping planned funding of the November election in Honduras,
UN Assistant Secretary General Oscar Fernandez-Taranco told
the Press on Tuesday that UN technical assistance will continue.
Inner
City Press
asked Fernandez-Taranco, at a Democracy Day news conference, about
the UN's approach to Honduras as well as Sri Lanka. Fernandez-Taranco
said that in Honduras, "the UN has been providing assistance"
to the Independent Electoral Tribunal since November 2008, and
continues providing assistance. Video here,
from Minute 42:40.
Off
camera, Inner
City Press asked Fernandez-Taranco about the Honduran Ambassador's
quote, about UNDP cutting funding. We are in discussions,
Fernandez-Taranco said, adding that no "written request" to
cut UN assistance has been received. This contradicts the reported
comments of Honduran ambassador Jorge Arturo Reina...
Fernandez-Taranco
at UN, continued assistance to Honduran election not shown
Fernandez-Taranco's
comments came at a press conference about a WorldPublicOpinion.org
study of the public's view of political tolerance in 24 countries.
Notably, North Korea and Myanmar were not included. China was, but
WPO's Steve Kull said that in China the question about the views of
opposition parties was omitted. Four countries were surveyed for
views of the exclusion of indigenous people: the US, Mexico, Chile and
Argentina.
Kull
called these the
countries with significant indigenous populations, excluding from
this list India and Indonesia, among others. This group always
reports happy results: everyone loves the UN, there is an emerging
consensus for apple pie.
Footnote:
the US Mission to the UN held a reception, also to celebrate
Democracy Day, to promote a "Democracy Challenge" video
contest. As reporter grumbled that the the invitation's lunch -- or
was it "launch"? -- was mere finger food, the master of
ceremonies mocked elections in Iran and Afghanistan.
He said it will
be a demonstration of democracy, people voting on the Internet to
choose the winning video. But can they vote multiple times? Will Hamid
Karzai's video escape a run off?
* * *
IMF
Still Murky on Honduras and SDR Use, Critique on Georgia, Serbia,
Hungary and Latvia
By
Matthew Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS, September 10 -- The International Monetary Fund through
spokesman David Hawley repeated on Thursday that despite its recent
allocation to Honduras of $168 million in Special Drawing Rights,
"the regime in de facto control is not able to use [the
allocation] until a decision is made if the Fund will deal with"
the regime as the government of Honduras.
But Hawley also said that
he has "no details on how individual countries have used the
allocation," and when asked if countries have to disclose if
they convert SDRs into hard currency, he said, I'll have to get back
to you. So still the IMF's approach to Honduras, as well as other
countries with coups and de facto regimes, remains unclear.
At
the IMF's
regular press briefing on September 10, Inner City Press submitted
three questions, including "Please clarify the conditions under
which a government of Honduras could access the SDRs voted to the
country on August 28? Could the Micheletti government never do so? Or
after a new election" without UN observers?
Mr. Hawley
read the
first part of the question out loud, and then flipped through a
binder to repeat a line the IMF e-mailed to the Press on Sunday. Left
unanswered is who will make the decision about the Honduran
government and its right to the allocated SDRs, when the decision
will be made, and in light of Hawley's other answers, how any
decision, including the current supposed prohibition, would be
policed.
The
President the
UN General Assembly, which passed a resolution on Honduras after the
coup, says that no country or body like the IMF can recognize the
Micheletti government, or send observers to an election it organizes.
Does the IMF mean that its executive board could decide, tomorrow, to
recognize Micheletti? Or that to recognize a government elected in a
Micheleti organized election?
Honduras protest -- pro Micheletti, a reader notes
-- IMF conditions not shown
Earlier
this week,
UNCTAD released a report criticizing the IMF at length. Inner City
Press submitted this question:
"While
the IMF says that "conditionality" is a thing of the past,
this week's UNCTAD report criticizes the IMF for imposing
"restrictive financial policies" on Latvia, Serbia, Georgia
and Hungary. What is the IMF's response?"
While
Hawley for
some reason declined to even read this question out, during the
briefing he said he and the IMF have no response to the UNCTAD
report. This is more than a little strange. During the briefing, as
simply one example, Hawley described how in connection with an IMF
package for Ukraine, gas prices to consumers had to be raised. Labor
unions are fighting it, he said, but the authorities are litigating
to get the gas price rises in place and the IMF is monitoring it.
On
September 8, Inner City Press posed questions about the IMF to Heiner
Flassbeck from the UN Conference on Trade and Development, video here.
Flassbeck laughed when told of the IMF's denials of conditionality. For
this and other reasons, it would seem the IMF would have a response.
Watch this site.
Footnote:
Caroline Atkinson, who has presided over the IMF's past four or five
press briefings, was said to be in Turkey, a country for which the
IMF is considering a package. Based on Thursday's briefing by Mr.
Hawley, it seems that while Ms. Atkinson is at least willing to
extemporize IMF responses to question for which there is no
"if-asked" ready in her binder, Mr. Hawley declines live
questions for which no written answer is ready, and edits out or
censors questions submitted electronically if he does not want to
answer them. We'll see.
As
Honduras' Post-Coup Central Bank Brags of IMF Funding, IMF Continues
Its Spin
By
Matthew Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS, September 6 -- The International Monetary Fund, which in
July told Inner City Press it had no
program in Honduras and
therefore, even after the coup, there was "no issue," is
now under fire for its allocation of Special Drawing Rights to the
country. The Honduran
Central Bank has put out a press release
bragging that
"At
the initiative of the twenty industrialized and emerging countries
(G-20), presided by the Prime Minister of England, Gordon Brown, the
International Monetary Fund injects liquidity into the world economy
and Honduras augments its international reserves by $150.1 million."
In
response, on a
Sunday when the IMF is closed Monday for U.S. Labor Day, the IMF told
the press
"The
IMF recently approved a global allocation of US$ 250 billion in IMF
Special Drawing Rights to supplement all of the Fund's 186 member
countries' foreign exchange reserves. It does not constitute aid
money. In the specific case of Honduras,
the present regime in de facto control is not able to use these SDRs
until a decision is made on whether the Fund will deal with that
regime as the government of Honduras."
But
back in July,
when Inner City Press asked IMF spokespeople Caroline Aktinson and
William Murray, they replied that there was no issue, that no
decision had to be made. At the IMF's July 16 briefing, Inner
City Press asked if the expulsion of Manuel Zelaya from Honduras has
given
rise to any changes or discussions within the IMF. Ms. Atkinson
responded that "we have followed the normal international
practice." She said that "we don't have any program with
Honduras."
Protest in Honduras, spin at IMF
But
the IMF in June opened up a Technical Assistance Center for Central
America,
Panama, and the Dominican Republic (CAPTAC-DR) in Guatemala City. IMF
Deputy Managing Director Takatoshi Kato was quoted that "this
center is an example of strong regional cooperation in Central
America, Panama and the Dominican Republic... A region with almost 40
million people has significant economic potential. The Fund is proud
to be a partner in the effort to promote regional economic growth and
development, and hopes that CAPTAC-DR will serve as an engine to push
forward the objective of a more economically cohesive region.” The
latest regional technical assistance center will serve Costa Rica,
the Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras,
Nicaragua,
and Panama.
When Inner City Press raised this in July and asked, "is there
no change in IMF stance toward Honduras?" the IMF's response was that
"On Honduras, we have no financial program there. It's not an issue per
se."
So the IMF has a
center which spend money to serve Honduras. Clearly the IMF likes to as
long as possible dodge
questions and, some say, accountability.
Footnote: At the UN, it is the position of the
supporters of Zelaya that the General Assembly resolution prohibits any
member state from sending observers to an election held by the coup
leaders. Watch this site.
IMF
Says on Sri Lanka, Int'l "Views Will Be Considered," Spends
on Honduras But Dodges Question
By
Matthew Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS, July 16 -- When the International Monetary Fund's Executive
Board finally meets on Sri Lanka's application for a $1.9 billion
loan, IMF spokeswoman Caroline Atkinson told the Press on Thursday,
"all of the international community's views will be considered."
The question posed, by Inner City Press, asked the IMF to respond to
reports that "funds spent in the North are 'the jailer of these
people and 'looks like internment.' What safeguards would be in
place?" Ms. Atkinson's answer, referring to what she called the
IMF's "good discussion with the authorities," did not
mention any safeguards. Briefing at Minute 17:18.
United
Kingdom
officials have made statements, which they have not retracted, that Sri
Lanka's application for an IMF loan is "not moving,"
that the conditions are not right.
While the US
position has
vacillated, the Obama administration's close attention to media
probably means that the New
York Times front page story of July 13,
and the next
day's editorial, makes less likely for now U.S. support
for a $1.9 billion loan to Sri Lanka, whose military budget is $1.6
billion.
This in Honduras -- but could be Sri Lanka, IMF
answers not shown
Inner
City Press
also asked if the expulsion of Manuel Zelaya from Honduras has given
rise to any changes or discussions within the IMF. Ms. Atkinson
responded that "we have followed the normal international
practice." She said that "we don't have any program with
Honduras."
But
the IMF last
month opened up a Technical Assistance Center for Central America,
Panama, and the Dominican Republic (CAPTAC-DR) in Guatemala City. IMF
Deputy Managing Director Takatoshi Kato was quoted that "this
center is an example of strong regional cooperation in Central
America, Panama and the Dominican Republic... A region with almost 40
million people has significant economic potential. The Fund is proud
to be a partner in the effort to promote regional economic growth and
development, and hopes that CAPTAC-DR will serve as an engine to push
forward the objective of a more economically cohesive region.” The
latest regional technical assistance center will serve Costa Rica,
the Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras,
Nicaragua,
and Panama.
So the IMF has a
center which spend money to serve Honduras. Clearly, as in the case
of Sri Lanka for the last four months, the IMF likes to dodge
questions and, some say, accountability. But in light of the
CAPTAC-DR, it cannot so easily dodge the question of Honduras. The
World Bank has spoken
to the question. When will the IMF?
Footnote:
Inner City Press also asked the IMF, "What is the IMF's response
to the UN General Assembly's outcome document with its criticism of
the IMF and geographical balance, etc? And please deny that you pick
and choose and censor questions submitted online about pending IMF
loan applications - like Sri Lanka." The former has yet to be
answered; there has been one round of back and forth (without
substantive answer) on the latter. We will continue to pursue this.
* * *
On
Sri Lanka, IMF Said Ready to Lend, Dodges Ethnic Cleansing, Where
Are Obama, UK?
Byline:
Matthew Russell Lee of Inner City Press at the UN: News Analysis
UNITED
NATIONS, May 20 – With the Red Cross blocked from access in Sri
Lanka to the wounded and dying, with NGOs increasingly barred from
the UN-financed camps for IDPs, in Washington the International
Monetary Fund said Thursday that it looks forward to presenting for
approval to its Board Sri Lanka's request for a $1.9 billion loan.
The statement was made by the IMF's director of external relations
Caroline Atkinson. Inner City Press online asked a follow-up during
the Fund's biweekly press briefing, which Ms. Atkinson re-stated:
please state whether as the Sri Lankan government says the proceeds
of any IMF loan would support re-housing in the north, which some
would described as ethnic cleansing?
The
IMF's Ms. Atkinson responded, “Perhaps it's just helpful to clarify
that when the IMF lends, it is not for specific projects. We lend to
support a country's finances. We make a loan to the Central Bank to
support reserves. Any other question?”
On March 12,
Inner City Press went to the IMF in Washington and asked Ms.
Atkinson's colleague David Hawley what safeguards were being
considered to ensure that the proceeds of any IMF loan to Sri Lanka
wouldn't be enable war or ethnic relocation. Mr. Hawley said that
things were at an early stage. Later, French
Ambassador to the UN
Jean-Maurice Ripert told Inner City Press that “the Americans are
trying to play with the loan.”
The U.S. subsequently confirmed
this, receiving human rights credit for raising the issue. The UK has
as well. After a contrary
statement by the UK Ambassador to the UN, in
response to Inner City Press' question at the UN Security
Council stakeout, UK Foreign Minister David Miliband said he didn't
think conditions for an IMF loan to Sri Lanka were right. Are they
now?
IMF's Dominque Strauss-Kahn and Ms. Atkinson,
ready to lend to Sri Lanka
Now, after two
weeks ago refusing to take the question at their briefing, the IMF
says that while there is still no access to the killing zone
in the North, while doctors who reported on the war as well as
offering treatment are detained and interrogated, it wants to present
the loan for approval by its Board within weeks.
What happened, some
ask, to the ostensible US and UK opposition? At the US State
Department this week, the Obama Administration appeared to waver or
move on from it previous position, both on the loan and as stated by
the President following Time magazine's diagnosis that Barack Obama
was failing the Sri Lanka test.
The
IMF's implicit argument that it is not supporting what a government
does on the ground by lending to its Central Bank is specious. In
fact, many experts on Sri Lanka note that the government's military
offensive in the North was assisted not only by aid after the
tsunami, but even more by the proceeds, to the Central Bank, of debt
forgiveness. Now during the current crisis the IMF wants to make a
loan to the Sri Lankan Central Bank. Ms. Atkinson alluded to, but did
not give an explanation as requested by Inner City Press, of a
“larger facility” being discussed.
Victor's
justice, victor's loans, some call it, as they call the UN's Ban
Ki-moon's impending visit to Sri Lanka a sort of victory tour. Inner
City Press leaves today on the UN trip. Watch this site.
Click here
for an Inner City Press YouTube channel video, mostly UN Headquarters
footage, about civilian
deaths
in Sri Lanka.
Click here for Inner City
Press' March 27 UN debate
Click here for Inner City
Press March 12 UN (and AIG
bailout) debate
Click here for Inner City
Press' Feb 26 UN debate
Click
here
for Feb.
12 debate on Sri Lanka http://bloggingheads.tv/diavlogs/17772?in=11:33&out=32:56
Click here for Inner City Press' Jan.
16, 2009 debate about Gaza
Click here for Inner City Press'
review-of-2008 UN Top Ten debate
Click here for Inner
City Press' December 24 debate on UN budget, Niger
Click here from Inner City Press'
December 12 debate on UN double standards
Click here for Inner
City Press' November 25 debate on Somalia, politics
and this October 17 debate, on
Security Council and Obama and the UN.
* * *
These
reports are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for a Reuters
AlertNet piece by this correspondent
about Uganda's Lord's Resistance Army. Click
here
for an earlier Reuters AlertNet piece about the Somali
National
Reconciliation Congress, and the UN's $200,000 contribution from an
undefined trust fund. Video
Analysis here
Feedback: Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com
UN
Office: S-453A, UN, NY 10017
USA
Tel: 212-963-1439
Reporter's
mobile (and
weekends):
718-716-3540
Other,
earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available
in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright
2006-08 Inner City Press, Inc. To request
reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com -
|