At UN, Ban's Justice
Delayed May be Justice Denied,
Ms. Migiro's Ruling May Predict the Future
Byline:
Matthew Russell Lee of
Inner City Press at the UN: News Analysis
UNITED NATIONS,
November 19 -- As the UN's Secretary
General Ban Ki-moon travels the globe, most recently inaugurating
Tuesday in
Geneva a $25
million ceiling paid for in part by international cooperation
funds from Spain's government, criticism of his performance at
headquarters is
growing. He was charged, for example, with setting up by the end of
this year a
new Justice System for the UN.
But his
delay
has been detailed and decried in a
recent report of the UN's Advisory Committee on Administrative and
Budgetary
Questions. ACABQ "was informed that the Secretariat was behind schedule
in
the preparatory work related to the implementation... None of the 30
posts
authorized for the Office of Administration of Justice have been
filled."
A
recent
example of the UN's broken justice system involves the classification
of several
dozen UN staff in Publishing and related fields. In a decision which
while
labeled "Confidential" Inner City Press has obtained and is putting
online here, the staff members won three months' back pay,
based in part on a unanimous finding that their due process rights had
been
violated. But in a November 6, 2008
letter annexed to
the decision, Ban's Deputy Asha Rose Migiro tells the staff to go and
appeal
the decision, that Ban Ki-moon won't pay.
Since the
current system of justice, such as it is, is scheduled to sunset on
December
31, Inner City Press at Wednesday's UN noon briefing asked Ban's Deputy
Spokesperson Marie Okabe what his plan is for justice after December
31. Ms. Okabe said she would look into it.
But it
is this inattention to even hard deadlines set by the General Assembly
for
which the Ban administration is increasingly criticized.
At
an event
Tuesday night in the UN's Delegates' Dining Room, three separate
Permanent
Representatives criticized Ban to Inner City Press. "He's never
here," one said, referring to his and his Deputy's frequent travel.
"What
difference does it makes?" asked another. A third predicted even more
acrimonious
relations between the General Assembly and Ban starting January 1, the
scheduled starting date not only for the new justice system, but also
for Sudan
to head the Group of 77 and China.
Not having
any answer from Ban's Spokesperson's office, Inner City Press asked
insiders in
the GA's Fifth (Budget) Committee. They too were exasperated with Ban's
performance, but an attempt was under way to raft an interim solution,
under
which the existing Administrative Tribunal could be continued despite
the retirement
of two judges and disqualification of two others. In
the foreign press, judges from Australia
and Ohio
are being pushed. But from Ban and his Team, nothing.
Asha Rose Migiro: stand up for your rights, just not
at the UN
A main rub
in the un-formed justice system is the need for "specific
performance" -- that is, for a judge to be able to tell the UN it must
for
example give a whistleblower back his or her job. Mere money damages in
such
cases are not enough of a deterrent.
Again,
an example of the need for justice improvements including
specific performance involves Joint Appeals
Board ruling 2007-057 in which the staff members won three months'
back pay,
based in part on a unanimous finding that their due process rights had
been
violated. But in her November 6, 2008
letter, Ban's Deputy Asha Rose
Migiro tells the staff to go and
appeal
the decision, that Ban Ki-moon won't pay.
That is, the UN is lawless,
none of
it is binding.
Some
of
those impacted by Ms. Migiro's decisions are saying she may not
continue past
February. Some further say that the U.S. may suggest a replacement,
perhaps
giving up Lynn Pascoe's Department of Political Affairs slot in return.
It's
Obama time™. But where's the justice?
Update: at
deadline, it
was decided that the UN
Fifth (Budget) Committee on November 20 will hear Team Ban called
"incompetent," along with a threat to move under the Agreement with
the Host Country to allow the UN to be sued in national courts, and not
only
its convoluted and now lapsing internal system. Watch this site.
Click here for Inner City
Press Nov. 7 debate on the war in Congo
Watch this site, and this Oct. 2 debate, on
UN, bailout, MDGs
and this October 17 debate, on
Security Council and Obama and the UN.
* * *
These
reports are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click
here
for a Reuters
AlertNet piece by this correspondent
about Uganda's Lord's Resistance Army. Click
here
for an earlier Reuters AlertNet piece about the Somali
National
Reconciliation Congress, and the UN's $200,000 contribution from an
undefined trust fund. Video
Analysis here
Feedback: Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-453A, UN, NY 10017
USA
Tel: 212-963-1439
Reporter's mobile (and
weekends):
718-716-3540
Other,
earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available
in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright
2006-08 Inner City Press, Inc. To request
reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com -
|