At
UN, Screening
of Rajapaksa's
Response to
"Killing
Fields of Sri
Lanka," Itself
Neven Shown in
Ban Ki-moon's
UN
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
September 2 --
After the
bloody final
stage of
conflict in
Sri Lanka in
2009,
alongside
stalled action
at the UN and
its Human
Rights
Council, a
documentary
was made. This
"Killing
Fields" film
about Sri
Lanka has
still
apparenlty not
been seen by
UN Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon.
Nor was it
ever screened
inside the UN,
but
rather across
First Avenue
in what's
called the
Church Center.
But
tellingly,
this notice
reached Inner
City Press on
September 1
"inviting
all
UN
Correspondents
to attend the
screening of
the
documentary
'Lies Agreed
Upon,' on
Tuesday,
September 6th
at 2:00pm in
the Dag
Hammarskjold
Auditorium.
Ambassador
Dr.Palitha
Kohona and
Ambassador
Major General
Shavendra
Silva of the
Permanent
Mission of Sri
Lanka
will be
present for a
Q&A
session
following the
screening. Sri
Lankan
Authorities
state 'This
video directly
challenges the
assertions
contained in
the CH-4
video, Sri
Lanka's
Killing
Fields.'"
While
there is more
to report on
this strange
screening,
what most
obviously
jumps out is
that a
screening
inside the UN
is being given
to a response
film
which "
directly
challenges the
assertions
contained in"
another film
which was
never shown
inside the UN.
This
might be seen
as propaganda,
or as
indicative of
Ban Ki-moon's
UN. Inner City
Press has five
times asked if
Ban had taken
the time to
see "Killing
Fields," which
is critical of
the
performance of
the UN and Ban
himself in the
final stages
of the Sri
Lanka
conflict.
UN's
Ban &
Rajapaksa,
Killing Fields
not seen, but
rebuttal to be
screened
Ban's
now
departed
deputy
spokesman
Farhan Haq
belatedly
replied that
Ban had
been given a
DVD copy which
he would watch
when he had
time. But this
has apparently
still not
occurred,
by contrast to
a screening
for
Ban, his
family and
staff of the
film "The
Whistleblower"
which
criticizes the
UN under Ban's
predecessor
Kofi Annan.
The
Whistleblower
was shown in
the UN, unlike
"Killing
Fields," which
because the
request
conflicted
with Ban
Ki-moon's
re-appointment
in the General
Assembly was
not screened
inside the UN,
and moved
across the
street.
In
fairness
Ban is now
away from New
York, headed
to Australia
-- where he
may
hear Sri Lanka
concerns --
New Zealand
and Kiribati.
So those who
unilaterally
scheduled for
a screening in
the UN of the
Rajapaksa
government's
rebuttal to a
film that
itself was
never shown in
the US
may wish to
explain
themselves.
Watch this
site.
* * *
At
UN
on Sri Lanka,
Ban Ki-moon
Didn't Even
Submit Panel
Report to
Geneva, "Could
Still Happen"
- But When?
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
August 15,
updated with
transcript --
Asked about an
editorial
accusing UN
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon of
being "lax" on
countries such
as Sri Lanka,
Ban's acting
deputy
spokesman
Farhan Haq on
Monday
countered that
Ban had "on
his own
authority
appointed a
Panel of
Experts" on
Sri Lanka.
Inner
City Press
asked if
Ban had even
transmitted
the Panel's
report to the
Human Rights
Council,
and if he
finds it
unfortunate
that the Human
Rights Council
did not take
up or act on
the detailed
report.
Haq
replied that
the Panel's
report has
"not been
formally
submitted by
Secretary
General at
this stage
although that
could still
happen in the
future."
Earlier
this month,
representatives
of a number of
member states
asked Inner
City Press why
Ban never
transmitted
the Panel's
report to the
Human Rights
Council. "This
sent a
message," one
representative
told Inner
City Press
with a shake
of the head,
"that Ban
doesn't really
want action on
his own
report."
The
representative
went on to
marvel that
Vijay Nambiar,
who was
involved in
the white flag
killing
described in
the Report,
has been
allowed to
play any role
in the review
and (in)
action on the
Report.
Ban & his
Special
Adviser
Nambiar,
Report to
Geneva not
shown
Now
some in the
Ban
administration
imply that the
report has
been held
back. For
leverage or
due to a lack
of commitment?
One Ban
administration
representative
told Inner
City Press, on
condition of
anonymity due
to fear of
retaliation
and firing,
that if Ban
has any
leverage, he
would use it
for "more
pressing"
topics than
Sri Lanka.
Meanwhile
Ban's Office
of the
Spokesman is
reducing
question and
answers by 40%
by canceling
noon
briefings;
lead spokesman
Martin Nesirky
will only
return on
August 29, if
then. Ban has
returned from
South Korea,
but will try
to take this
week off.
An
article
in the
Canadian press
about the cut
back in
question and
answer time
quoted
Inner City
Press asking
Haq "How did
you decide to
say that
journalists
here want less
information
rather than
more?" and an
unnamed UN
official that
the "coming
week looks to
be pretty
calm." Watch
this site.