At
UN,
Ahtisaari Says Whatever ICJ Rules, Kosovo Is Independent, Rule of
Law?
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
June 22 -- The UN invited Martti Ahtisaari to speak in its
new building on June 22. Inner City Press asked him for his views on
the implementation of his plan for Kosovo,
the legality of which is
now being weighed in the International Court of Justice. Video here,
from Minute 10:56.
Ahtisaari
expressed
satisfaction that Kosovo has joined the International
Monetary Fund and World Bank, saying that their funding will be
necessary to mine "energy resources" and tackle
unemployment.
But
in
conclusion, Ahtisaari said it is important that "everyone
understand that whatever happens in the international court, Kosovo
is an independent state and will remain an independent state."
What
then is the
purpose of the ICJ, its its possible ruling are dismissed in advance
by one such as Martti Ahtisaari? One wonders what Serbia and Russia
will think of this. After Ahtisaari's comments, the stakeout was
declared over.
Ahtisaari and UN's Ban, first vs ICJ, latter vs. internal justice?
Also
lawless, the
UN earlier this year sent two top envoys, Ibrahim Gambari and Haile
Menkerios, to the inauguration celebration of Omar Al-Bashir, subject
to an arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court. Meanwhile
the Secretary General appeals virtually every ruling against him in
the UN's internal justice system. On June
17, Inner City Press asked:
Inner
City
Press: the Shabaan Shabaan USG case...how long do these appeals
take? What’s the status of that appeal? It was ordered that he
pay $20,000 to this allegedly wronged… Has that money been put in
escrow? How long, when does the UN anticipate a ruling on that
appeal?
Spokesperson:
We don’t comment on individual cases. If you want to know
precisely what the schedule is, you can ask the Registrar.
Inner
City
Press: And I wanted to know, because there is sort of growing, I
guess, misunderstanding from your point of view, of the
Secretary-General’s approach to the rule of law within the UN, this
seems like a topic on which Patricia O’Brien might want to give a
briefing, just to explain not individual cases, but what the thinking
is. See, normally when judges have said, “Please bring documents,”
I guess these articles are saying it’s kind of contemptuous not to
provide the documents at all, and then to wait for a ruling, and then
appeal it. Like it seems, and especially when there has been no
decision on any of the appeals yet. So I am just wondering, this is
a request that OLA, or Mr. Ban tomorrow, but that OLA explain how
this is consistent with the rule of law to simply ignore judges’
orders to produce evidence.
Spokesperson:
There is one fundamental point here, that this was an initiative of
the previous Secretary-General, and then it was further pushed by
this Secretary-General. So to suggest that somehow the
Secretary-General is ducking his responsibility is rather odd. As I
have said, he is fully committed to upholding the system of
administration of justice that is prescribed by the General Assembly.
* * *
At
UN,
Of Serbian Cell Phones in Kosovo and Transport Corruption,
Jeremic Runs
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
May 17 -- "Kosovo cannot tolerate any longer so much
lawlessness, " Skender Hyseni, Foreign Minister of Kosovo, told
the Press on Monday. Inner City Press has asked Hyseni about this
government's move last month to disable the repeaters of Telekom and
Telenor, two Serbia-based cell phone companies, from providing
service south of the Ibar River.
"Any
company
which
seeks a license will be duly considered and eventually
honored," Hyseni said. Video here,
from
Minute 2:50.
Who provides
cell service is a
politically charged issue. Currently, according to Hyseni, 68
countries recognize the unilateral declaration of independence of
Kosovo. He predicted the number will grow after the International
Court of Justice rules on Serbia's case, which he said will be soon.
The
Serbs argue
that regulating telecommunications should still be the responsibility
of the UN, under Resolution 1244. After a Security Council meeting
Monday about Kosovo, Russian Ambassador Vitaly Churkin came out
smiling. "Resolution 1244," he told the Press as he passed.
Inner
City
Press
asked Serbian Foreign Minister Vuk Jeremic to, like Hyseni, take
questions at the stakeout. Jeremic shook his head. "It was a
good session," he said, gesturing back at the Council. Last Kosovo
debate in January, Boris Tadic similarly declined to take questions.
Hyseni on May 17, Zennier in background, cell phone
regulation not seen
Jeremic
on
Monday might have been
asked about the mass grave recently found in Southern Serbia, or
whether Kovoso's participation in the upcoming EU - Wester Balkan
conference in Sarajevo connotes increased recognition of the UDI.
Perhaps he
would have wanted to call for the ouster of Kosovo
transportation minister Fatmir Limoj, whose office was recently
raided by EULEX. Hyseni when asked by Inner City Press declined to
speak on this, saying that the judiciary in Kosovo is independent,
and that questions of corruption should be kept separate from
"projects." Video here,
from
Minute 4:16.
But if the
alleged corruption was in the
procurement for the project, how can they be separate? Watch this
site.
* * *
At
UN,
Kosovo Debate Ends with a Flush and a Cough, Last One Turn the
Lights Out
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
January 22 -- When Kosovo
comes before the UN Security
Council these days, each time it is with more and more of a whimper.
Friday
Serbian President Boris Tadic, in the Chamber, spoke darkly of
a "final solution" being imposed on northern Kosovo. But he
declined to speak to the press when he emerged.
His
entourage
prepared to leave, then turned back into the UN. When the Press tried
to follow the entourage into the now empty Delegates' Lounge, a Serb
Mission staffer stood in the way. You cannot come in, she said, later
clarifying that Tadic was only using the bathroom. "Then he has
to leave, to come to our party then fly back to Belgrade."
Meanwhile,
Kosovo's
Skender Hyseni, after lowering the UN microphone to his
height, ridiculed Tadic's arguments. Inner City Press asked about
Tadic's statement that elections not called by the UN Mission, UNMIK,
are illegal. Hyseni said that the authorities in Belgrade have also
opposed any election called by UNMIK. Video here,
from
Minute 7:36.
Tadic in Council in 2009, flush out of press not yet shown
Inner
City
Press
asked about Tadic's remark that the International Civilian Office
under Peter Feith is trying to impose a "final solution."
Hyseni wouldn't repeat the phrase, calling it a "final
whatever," and saying it would be "irrational" to
comment on that. He said the ICO is a "European accredited
mission to Kosovo." Then, coughing, he left the stakeout. The
UN's Special Representative never appears, and no Council member came
and spoke to the Press.
Meanwhile,
while
the
case of Kosovo is pending in the International Court of Justice,
three more countries have recognized the unilateral declaration of
independence of Kosovo: New Zealand, Mauritania and Malawi.
As
Tadic put it,
that still means that 127 nations respect Serbia's territorial
integrity. But for how long? Especially when Serbia doesn't make its
case to the press? Minister Vuk Jeremic was there in the entourage,
fresh from profile in the Grey Lady, but didn't want to upstage his
President. But he shouldn't have let Hyseni upstage him either.
Strange diplomacy.
Footnote:
during
the Council debate, multiple references were made to whether
Serbs in northern Kosovo pay their electricity bills, and to whom.
The privatization of Kosovo Electricity, however, was not
discussed.... In the emptying UN, last one here, turn the lights out.
*
*
*
At
UN,
Serbia on Churches Paved Over, Kosovo Calls World Court Merely
Advisory
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
October 15 -- Even in the run up to the International Court
of Justice's proceeding on the legality of Kosovo's unilateral
declaration of independence, at the UN Security Council the issue has
lost its juice. As the Council on Thursday debated whether or not to
let Kosovo speak, the stakeout outside was as empty as for Nepal.
When the principals emerged, only the Kosovar spoke. Lamberto
Zannier, who cashes checks at the UN's envoy to Kosovo, did not speak
to the Press.
Vuk
Jeremic, when
he emerged, walked slowly by the stakeout. There was no other
reporter waiting other than Inner City Press. Further up the hall he
graciously stopped and answered three questions. Inner City Press
asked, what can the ICJ case actually change, on the ground?
Jeremic
said
it's
the biggest ICJ case in history, with 31 countries participating
including each of the Council's Permanent Five member. What about
cultural damage? Jeremic spoke of a church demolished, paved over and
turned into a park. It must be reversed, he said.
Zannier
in
his
testimony complained that until the eve of his flight to the Council
in New York, the Kosovo authorities refused to meet with him. Jeremic
afterwards told Inner City Press the meeting only took place between
the Kosovars were embarrassed. But what is the future of UNMIK?
Serb protests of Kosovo's UDI, whimper not shown
Inner
City
Press
asked Kosovo's representative if he wants the UN to leave. He spoke
highly of the EU and EULEX. And that may say it all.
Footnote:
that
Kosovo even spoke, inside the chamber, may create a precedent.
Others wondered by South Ossetia and Abkhazia can't do it. The answer
is the power of the U.S. as host country. They have to let in
representatives of any member state. But on the cusp states like
Kosovo and Abkhazia, they are not required and can choose. Some
power.
Click here for Inner City
Press March 12 UN debate
Click here for Inner City
Press' Feb 26 UN debate
Click
here
for Feb.
12
debate on Sri Lanka http://bloggingheads.tv/diavlogs/17772?in=11:33&out=32:56
Click here for Inner City Press' Jan.
16, 2009 debate about Gaza
Click here for Inner City Press'
review-of-2008 UN Top Ten debate
Click here for Inner
City Press' December 24 debate on UN budget, Niger
Click here from Inner City Press'
December 12 debate on UN double standards
Click here for Inner
City Press' November 25 debate on Somalia, politics
and this October 17 debate, on
Security Council and Obama and the UN.
* * *
These
reports are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for a Reuters
AlertNet piece by this correspondent
about Uganda's Lord's Resistance Army. Click
here
for an earlier Reuters AlertNet piece about the Somali
National
Reconciliation Congress, and the UN's $200,000 contribution from an
undefined trust fund. Video
Analysis
here
Feedback: Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com
UN
Office:
S-453A, UN, NY 10017
USA
Tel: 212-963-1439
Reporter's
mobile
(and
weekends):
718-716-3540
Other,
earlier
Inner City Press are listed here,
and some are available
in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright
2006-08
Inner City Press, Inc. To request
reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com -
|