UN's
Afghan
Selection
Colored by
Nepotism and
No-Show Jobs,
Karzai
Veto Threats
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
January 1 --
With the short
list for the
UN's top post
in
Afghanistan
reportedly
narrowed down
to three, UN
sources
confirm to
Inner City
Press that the
push is on to
get approval
for Staffan de
Mistura,
currently in a
virtually
no-show job
with the World
Food
Program.
What
many
in the UN
but few
outside it
talk about is
di
Mistura's
previous
choice of UN
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon's son
in law
Siddarth
Chatterjee as
his
deputy in Iraq,
and the role
they think
this plays in
de Mistura's
frontrunner
status.
While
Mr.
Ban has shown
discomfort
and anger
about any
questions
concerning the
fast
promotions his
son in law has
received since
he became
Secretary
General,
few
explanations
have been
given.
That UN
officials like
de
Mistura and
now Jan
Mattsson
of the UN
Office of
Project
Services,
where
Chatterjee has
been given a
D-1 position
that is
quietly being
upgraded to
D-2,
ingratiate
themselves
with UN
Headquarters
by
promoting the
Secretary
General's son
in law has
also not been
addressed.
Inner
City
Press,
which covered
both
of these
Chatterjee
promotions,
the latter
exclusively,
was chided by
Mr. Ban's
previous
Spokesperson
Michele
Montas to stop
asking about
Chatterjee in
the UN's noon
briefings,
but rather to
get answers
from Ban's
senior advisor
Kim Won-soo.
This
meeting
was
quickly
changed to be
"off the
record," and
then canceled.
South
Korea's
Deputy
Permanent
Representative
then took
Inner City
Press to lunch
and provided a
detailed
defense of the
promotions and
of Mr. Ban.
(Later, he
claimed the
lunch was only
about
September's
UN General
Debate.)
Chatterjee
himself
took
to calling and
making legal
threats to
journalists
who had
picked up on
Inner City
Press' reports
on his
promotions,
and getting
them
removed from
the Internet,
at least from
web sites
hosted in his
native India.
It is not
clear if
Chatterjee
made these
calls during
time he was
being paid by
UNOPS. It is
clear,
however, that
UNOPS
devoted
staff time to
media
strategies to
defend
Chatterjee's
promotions and
Chatterjee
himself,
work it hard
to imagine
being
done
if he was not
the UN
Secretary
General's son
in law.
In
the
week between
Christmas and
New Year,
Inner City
Press
submitted to
Mr. Ban's new
Spokesman
Martin Nesirky
questions
about Siddarth
Chatterjee,
including
about his
promotions,
qualifications
and fitness.
While on
the afternoon
of Christmas
Eve Mr.
Nesirky's
office
provided at
least
cursory
answers to
other
questions
asked,
including
referring
questions
about possible
nepotism by a
Ban appointee
to another
spokesperson,
the questions
about Ban's
son in law not
only were not
answered, they
were not
mentioned. But
they will not
go away. The
responses are
being sought
only in
fairness,
explicitly on
deadline.
Watch this
site.
UN's
Ban and de
Mistura, son
in law answers
and Karzai
veto not shown
The
other
two named
candidates are
Jean Marie
Guehenno,
strangely with
the backing of
the
New York
Times, and Ian
Martin,
currently in
an ill-defined
role with
the UN
Department of
Political
Affairs. What
the Times did
not
mention about
Mr. Guehenno,
in fairness,
is that after
he was
replaced by
fellow
Frenchman
Alain Le Roy,
he was given a
no show UN
Under
Secretary
General
position for
"Regional
Cooperation."
While
that
post
should have
involved
liaising
between the UN
and NATO, for
example,
or ECOWAS or
even the
Shanghai
Cooperation
Organization,
months into
the job
Guehenno
candidly
admitted to
Inner City
Press that he
had
done no work
at all. He was
shut in
writing a
book. How its
publication,
or the timing
of its
publication,
may be related
to the
current
campaigning
for the Kabul
post is not
clear.
Following
his
candor,
Guehenno
clammed up. At
a recent forum
about illegal
mining
in the Congo,
at which
questions
about the UN
Peacekeeping
Mission in
the Congo's
involvement
with rogue
Army units who
mine and
massacres,
Guehenno
explicitly
refused to
answer any
questions from
Inner City
Press. While
in the midst
of his
campaign for
Kabul he
perhaps felt
he had nothing
to gain, ham
handed
rebuffing of
the press
would not
make Guehenno
that different
front Kai
Eide, outgoing
in only one of
the word's two
senses.
Ironically,
Guehenno is
also mentioned
by human
rights groups
as a candidate
to
take over from
Alan Doss at
the UN Mission
in the Congo.
Doss
is
himself
embroiled in a
nepotism
scandal since
Inner City
Press
received and
published his
e-mail telling
the UN
Development
Program to
bend and break
UN rules and
give a job to
his daugther.
Mr. Ban five
months ago
promised an
investigation,
but some
attribute the
delay to
Ban's own
resistance to
nepotism
questions.
Doss may be
allowed to
serve out his
contract then
Guehenno, if
still
available, be
given the
Congo job.
Ian
Martin
appeared
to go a good
job in Nepal,
although it
appears now to
be
unraveling.
When Inner
City Press
asked him in a
UN hallway
about
Kabul, Martin
laughed. Later
he clarified
he was not
laughing with
Inner City
Press, only
laughing. And
laughter may
be one of the
many
things there
is not enough
of in Kabul.
Footnote:
Inner
City Press is
also told that
the U.S., not
wanting to be
upstaged in
Afghanistan,
has joined Ban
in pushing
President
Hamid
Karzai to
accept de
Mistura. But
Karzai, who
previously
vetoed the
proposal to
make Paddy
Ashdown a
"Super Envoy"
to
Afghanistan,
is near to
issuing a
similar veto
of di Mistura.
Watch
this site.
* * *
On
Sri
Lanka, UN
Won't Be
"Used" or
Speak on
Broken IDP
Promises or
Elections
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
December 31 --
As the Sri
Lankan
government of
Mahinda
Rajapaksa
reneges on its
commitment to
empty the
internally
displaced
person camps
into which it
herded Tamils
earlier this
year, the
United Nations
has had
nothing to
say.
Despite
statements
by
the UN and its
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon that
particular
attention will
be paid to Sri
Lanka, the UN
has in the
past week
repeatedly
refused to
answer
questions
about whether
it has been
asked to
provide
election
observers and
whether it
will.
At
the last
in-person
press briefing
of 2009, on
December 24,
Inner City
Press asked
Mr.
Ban's
spokesman
Martin Nesirky
about the UN's
vetting
of Sri Lankan
soldiers as
peacekeepers,
and that it's
"been
said
in Sri Lanka
that the
former
military head,
[Sarath]
Fonseka,may
be prosecuted
for having
said that
those seeking
to surrender
were
shot, and I’m
wondering
whether the
Secretary-General,
who said he
is concerned
about
political
openness, has
any, is
monitoring
that
and has any
comment on the
number two
presidential
candidate
being
threatened
with legal
prosecution."
The
UN
Spokesman,
rather
than
answering, chided
the
question:
Spokesperson:
Well,
it would
really help me
if you gave me
short, clear
questions
that I can
answer,
because this
was rather
long and it’s
difficult
for me to
unravel
exactly what
your point is.
Inner
City
Press:
peacekeepers
and Fonseka.
The question
is, is DPKO
going
to vet the 700
new
peacekeepers
who are coming
for
participation
in
war crimes?
And does the
SG have any
comment on the
number two
presidential
candidate
being
threatened
with legal
prosecution?
Spokesperson:
Okay,
so, on the
first one,
again I would
need to find
out more
details from
DPKO because I
do not know
that. And on
the second
one,
that’s not
something that
we can comment
on.
This
last
seemed
strange, since
Ban Ki-moon
following his
visit to Sri
Lanka in May,
including
being sung to
be interned
Tamil children
in the
Vavuniya
camp, has said
he will push
for inclusive
political
dialogue in
the
country. If
the main
opposition
candidate, or
his
supporters,
are
threatened
with arrest,
particularly
for blowing
the whistle on
their
country's
alleged war
crimes, how
can there be
inclusive
political
dialogue?
At
least
one
would assume
that the UN
would be able
to say whether
they will send
observers to
the election
set for late
January. On
December 28,
Inner
City Press
asked Ban's
Spokesperson's
Office, in
writing
Can
you
confirm or
deny that Sri
Lanka has
asked the UN
for election
observers? If
so, what is
the response
or when will a
response be
given? It is
reported that
the EU will
say "no," due
to the
short time
given for the
request. Does
the UN think
the time given
is short?
While
written
answers
were given to
other, non-Sri
Lanka
questions that
Inner City
Press posed --
for example,
about the UN's
use of
peacekeepers
from
Nepal -- Inner
City Press
visited the
Spokesperson's
Office. Mr.
Ban's Deputy
Spokesperson
said, on
December 28,
that she was
working
on getting an
answer to the
Sri Lankan
elections
question.
But
in
the three
days that
followed, no
answer was
forthcoming.
In the
interim, Inner
City Press
spoke with a
well placed
source in Mr.
Ban's office,
who
indicated that
a request was
received, but
that the UN
was not
inclined to
send observers
"to be used."
But
then shouldn't
the UN say
that on the
record?
This is the
worst of all
possible
worlds:
allowing an
already
questionable
election to
take place
without UN
observers,
without even
explaining why
the UN
decided, if
it has, not to
send
observers.
UN's
Ban and
Mahinda
Rajapaksa,
elections
observers and
full IDP
release not
shown
Finally,
on
December
30, Inner City
Press asked
the
Spokesperson's
Office in
writing, to
comment on
"that Sri
Lanka is
reneging on
its
commitment,
which the UN
publicly
welcomed, to
empty the IDP
camps."
More than 24
hours later,
when the UN
Spokesperson's
Office closed
for a three
day holiday,
no comment was
issued. The UN
praised the
Rajapaksa's
announcement,
but had
nothing to say
when it was
reneged
on, even when
asked.
Inner
City
Press
also on
December 30
asked Mr.
Ban's
Spokesperson
to respond to
a
published
critique that
"Ban
Ki-moon
has been too
eager to meet
with officials
without
ensuring he
gets something
in
return....There
was no
surprise when
he was given
nothing—he had
given up all
of his
leverage.
Also, he has
been
reluctant to
speak out. And
so, he is
fighting many
of these
battles
with one hand
tied behind
his back and
it is no
surprise that
he is
losing."
Again,
more
than
24 hours
later, there
has been no
response.
While some
find it a
fitting on, at
least on Sri
Lanka and
human rights,
to 2009, we
will
continue to
follow these
issues. Watch
this site.
* * *
UN
in
Guinea Bissau
Offers
Sanctuary to
Coup Leader,
Setting
Precedent?
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
December 29 --
When an
accused coup
leader shows
up
unannounced at
the UN asking
protection,
does he get
it? The answer
is yes. Monday
in Guinea
Bissau, former
Rear Admiral
Bubo Na Tchut
showed up at
the UN. The
government has
expressed
surprise that
he is
there, and
says it will
arrest him.
On
Tuesday
at
noon, Inner
City Press
asked the UN
whether the UN
knew in
advance he
would go
there, and
what the UN
will do in
response to
government's
position that
he should be
arrested.
The
UN
responded,
some hours
later, that
"he has asked
for
protection. We
have
been in
constant
contact with
the
authorities in
Guinea-Bissau
in an
effort to
resolve this
situation
peacefully and
in accordance
with
international
law."
Does
this
mean he
will go (back)
into exile?
What is the
UN's
responsibility
to turn
off an
indictee to a
host
government?
Or,
separately, to
the
International
Criminal
Court? This
could be a
test case, in
a country
where there UN
has an
extensive and
not
uncontroversial
role. Click here for a
previous Inner
City Press article about
Guinea Bissau.
UN's
Ban and Guinea
Bissau's prime
minister, coup
leader not
shown
For
now,
for the
record:
Subj:
Question
regarding
Guinea-Bissau
From:unspokesperson-donotreply
[at]
un.org
To:
Inner City
Press
Sent:
12/29/2009
4:52:19 P.M.
Eastern
Standard
Time
Regarding
your
question as
follows:
"please
confirm
the presence
in the UN
building in
Guinea Bissau
of accused
coup plotter
Admiral Jose
Americo Bubo
Na Tchute, and
state how he
got in,
whether the UN
knew in
advance he
would go
there, and
what
the UN will do
in response to
government's
position that
he should be
arrested."
Here
is
the response:
Former
Rear
Admiral Bubo
Na Tchuto
arrived
unannounced at
UN premises in
Bissau early
yesterday (28
Dec) and
remains there
at this time.
He
has asked for
protection. We
have been in
constant
contact with
the
authorities in
Guinea-Bissau
in an effort
to resolve
this situation
peacefully and
in accordance
with
international
law.
* * *
Lauding
Sudan,
UN Nods
Disapprovingly
at Ban's
Turkmeni-Plans,
State Media
Appearances
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
December 29 --
When state
media in the
hermit state
of
Turkmenistan
published what
it called the
New
Years
greeting of UN
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon,
complete with
his promise to
travel to
the country in
April 2010,
the UN had no
comment.
Inner
City
Press
on December 28
asked for
confirmation
of Mr. Ban's
now published
travel plans.
For security
reasons, Inner
City Press was
told, the UN
only announces
such plans a
week in
advance. But,
Inner City
Press
was told, most
media rely on
reports like
Turkmenistan's.
So is
the UN
saying
Turkmenistan's
state media
breeched
protocol by
publishing
Ban's missive?
To this, there
was no answer.
Therefore no
reason
to
seek comment
on the BBC's
December 28
pick-up from
Sudan's state
media SUNA,
"Sudanese
leader
receives
congratulatory
message
from UN chief"
--
Khartoum,
December,
28 (SUNA):
President of
the Republic,
Field Marshal
Umar
Al-Bashir,
received
Monday [28
December] a
written
message from
the
UN Secretary
General, Ban
Ki-moon,
congratulating
him on the
anniversary of
Sudan
Independence
Day.
The
UN Secretary
General
expressed the
UN adherence
to its noble
goals and
values as a
global
platform in
all fields,
pointing out
that the
contribution
of the member
states
and the
commitment of
the leaders to
the countries
to achieve
goals
will enable
the UN to
confront the
current
challenges and
establish a
peaceful world
where any one
will enjoy
justice and
well-being.
Source:
Suna news
agency
website,
Khartoum, in
English 28 Dec
09
How
many
other
leaders -- in
these cases,
an ICC
indicted war
criminal and
the
former dentist
of the Father
of all
Turkmen,
Turkmenbashi
-- got
holiday wishes
from Ban?
There was also
no answer to
this.
UN's
Ban and
Turkmenistan's
President, New
Years
greetings not
shown
And
so,
legitimization
in Khartoum
and springtime
for Ban
Ki-moon in
Ashkabat, a
capital formed
by the
demolition of
its former
residents'
houses,
largely by a
French
construction
firm. On this
we can rely?
Watch this
site.
28.12.09
12:08
TURKMENISTAN.RU
UN
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon to
visit
Turkmenistan
in April 2010
UN
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon will
visit
Turkmenistan
in April 2010.
This was
announced in
the
Secretary-General's
New Year
message of
congratulations
to President
of
Turkmenistan
Gurbanguly
Berdimuhamedov.
The
text
of the message
was published
in today's
central
press...
* * *
UN
Is
Silent as
Egypt Bans
Press From
Protest of UN
in Cairo, Gaza
Freedom March
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
December 28 --
As protesters
massed in
front of the
UN in
Cairo,
Egyptian
authorities
blocked the
press from
covering the
protest or
speaking to
the
protesters.
At
noon
in New
York, Inner
City Press
asked the
Office of the
Spokesperson
for
Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon, "does
the UN have
any comment on
Egyptian
authorities
barred the
press from
filming or
speaking with
people in
front of the
UN facilities
in Cairo
engaged in a
protest
regarding the
Gaza Freedom
March?"
Four
hours
later,
having heard
nothing back,
Inner City
Press went to
the
Spokesperson's
Office for an
answer to this
and other
questions. The
deputy
spokesperson
asked, which
UN building,
and indicated
that
there would be
no UN
response.
UN's
Ban and
Egypt's
Mubarak,
freedom of the
press to cover
protests at UN
not shown
Back
on
December
17, Inner City
Press asked an
organizer of
the Gaza
Freedom March
about Egyptian
policies, and
whether the UN
is going
enough. Video
here,
from Minute
28:30.
The response
was generally
that "the UN
should play a
stronger role"
(this included
in
Afghanistan,
another of
Inner City
Press'
questions).
Video here,
from Minute
40:50.
The
December
28 request for
comment, for
the record,
was not about
the
Gaza Freedom
March in
general -- the
UN has already
no commented
on
that -- but
about a host
government
interfering
with freedom
of the
press to cover
a protest in
front of the
UN. The
silence, then,
is
all the more
striking.
Watch this
site.
* * *
At
UN,
Final Night
Falls on
Budget, of
Scales,
Bahrain and
Human Rights,
Live Blogging
Budget from UN
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
December
23-24, updated
below
-- As the UN
budget process
moved into
what
should be its
final night,
Permanent
Representatives
milled around
basement
Conference
Room 8, amid
cigarette
smoke and
furniture set
to
be moved out
the next
morning.
Beyond
the
two
issues on
which Inner
City Press has
so far exclusively
reported
--
the requests
by Bahrain and
Bahamas to pay
less, and
India's
opposition
to upgrading a
human rights
post --
the issue was
when
and
how to review
the scales of
assessment.
The
130
developing
countries in
the Group of
77 demand no
review for the
next three
years. Western
countries and
other some
others, who
feel their ox
is
gored, are
pushing for
faster review.
Mexico's
delegation,
for example,
point out that
they pay "over
fifty
percent of
Latin
America," even
after
suffering
swine flu and
a
decrease in
tourism.
The
Group
of 77,
which fell
into some
disarray
during the
climate change
talks in
Copenhagen,
remains united
in the UN
Budget
committee.
They have
thrown their
weight behind
Bahrain and
the Bahamas,
who are
predicted
to prevail in
being dropped
in
peacekeeping
assessment
from Category
B to C, with a
7.5% discount.
Despite
India's
objections
that human
rights are
being
conflated with
supporting an
upgrade of a
post, it is
suggested to
Inner City
Press that
"India
will back
down."
President
of
the
General
Assembly Ali
Treki has
already met
with
Ambassadors,
then
retreated to
his second
floor office.
One of his
advisors
remains in
the basement,
glad handing
the chairman
and secretary
of the Budget
Committee.
There was talk
of Secretary
General Ban
Ki-moon, who
stayed
hidden
throughout the
first budget
vigil of his
Secretary
Generalship,
waiting in the
wings.
UN's
Ban and Treki
at another
meeting, this
year's
budget not yet
shown
For
the
U.S.
delegation,
beyond their
long time bow
tied
representative,
Alejandro
Wolff is in
the basement,
there's no
sign of Susan
Rice. Inner
City
Press asked
Ambassador
Rice earlier
on Wednesday
for the U.S.
view on
the budget, if
she is
satisfied with
her Mission's
level of
involvement,
and whether
like at least
her last two
predecessors
she
believes the
UN budget is
too piecemeal,
not
transparent
enough.
Ambassador
Rice
replied
that of course
she is
satisfied with
her Mission's
performance,
and that the
U.S. is very
involved in
making sure
Missions get
enough
resources. But
what about the
when to review
the
scales of
assessment?
More
fundamentally,
what about the
piecemeal
budget process
in which "add
ons" comprise
more than $1
billion? More
blogging to
follow: watch
this space.
Update of
7:27 p.m. --
the basement
is still full
of
Ambassadors,
but UN TV
keeps showing
live shots of
the empty
General
Assembly
chamber
upstairs, in
front of which
four Security
officers are
posted. In the
cafeteria, the
chairs and
tables are
being carted
away.
Some the
basement
furniture,
too, will be
on the move.
An African
Ambassador
stops to tell
Inner City
Press that
"the PGA would
be wise
to re-schedule
the plenary
for 10 a.m.
tomorrow."
Update
of
7:45 p.m. --
in the
Delegates
Lounge, Deputy
Permanent
Representatives
are lifting a
glass on the
last, or next
to last,
night of the
UN bar.
"They're at
the level of
Perm Reps down
there," one
tells Inner
City Press.
"Let them earn
their
money."
Update
of
8:10 p.m. --
even
countries'
Budget
Committee
experts are no
longer in the
loop. "My
Ambassador is
in there," one
tells
Inner City
Press,
gesturing at
the entrance
to Conference
Room 8.
"But I don't
know where
things stand."
In
the
interim,
Inner City
Press has dug
into who it
would be, who
would get the
upgrade to ASG
level from
D-2. It's
American
Jessica
Neuwirth, whom
Inner City
Press
questions on
camera in
April, vidoe here
from Minute
40:05. One UN
human rights
expert has
expressed
disgust at the
way
the
Secretariat
has tried to
upgrade the
post, a
promotion
through
the budget
process. Only
at the UN.
Update
of
8:26 p.m. --
an Inner City
Press source
emerging from
Conference
Room 8 says
they are
discussing the
scale of
assessments
for
peacekeeping,
with the U.S.,
Japan and EU
opposing the
G-77's push to
move Bahrain
and Bahamas
from
Classification
B to the
discounted C.
The
news: there is
a proposal to
abolish
Classification
C....
Update
of
9:21 p.m. --
the crowd
outside
Conference
Room 8 has
grown;
President of
the General
Assembly Ali
Treki has
descended
again, and
still to no
avail. Inner
City Press is
asked: why are
you the only
media here?
Later a camera
crew comes.
But they are
covering
neither
scale of
assessments
nor human
rights. They
are here, it
seems, by
mistake,
asking Treki
about the UN
tribunals for
Rwanda and
Yugoslavia.
Inner City
Press asks the
crew: did he
say anything
useful or
useable? No,
is the answer.
Will the
results in
Conference
Room 8 be any
better or more
authentic? Or
is this all
just theater?
Update
of
9:34 p.m. -- a
PGA staffer
tells Inner
City Press
that a deal is
near on
Bahrain and
Bahamas. He
calls it a
"transitional
arrangement"
from
Classification
B to C.
Classification
C, he
says, was set
up as a
compromise in
2000 under
then U.S.
Ambassador
Holbrooke, as
a way to "shut
up" Kuwait,
the Emirates
and
Singapore, so
Holbrooke
could bring
about some
other
reduction.
Another
diplomat
marvels at how
little the
U.S. Mission
says now.
"When Rice is
not in New
York, you
don't hear
anything," he
says. "The
others used to
be allowed to
talk. Now they
are not."
Ambassadors
strain in the
doorway of
Conference
Room 8. It is
untransparent,
but something
is afoot.
Update
of
9:42 p.m. --
in the corner
by Conference
Room 4, U.S.
deputy
Alejandro
Wolff speaks
with G-77
members.
Afterwards,
Inner City
Press is told
by G-77 that
Bahrain and
Bahamas will
be put into
Classification
C, with its
7.5% discount,
for three
years. What
about
the human
rights liaison
upgrade to
ASG? G-77's
chair in New
York
scoffs. Why
do we need
another
useless ASG?
We will vote
with India!
We'll see.
Update
of
9:47 p.m. -- a
crowd comes
out of
Conference
Room 8, with
shouts
of "Conference
Room 4! We'll
go to
Conference
Room 4!" It
is the Group
of 77, almost
77 of them
now, going to
plan strategy.
"It's
percolating,"
a G-77 member
in
Classifaction
C tells
Inner City
Press. "Like
the coffee."
Update
of
9:54 p.m. --
while the G-77
and EU
consult, Inner
City Press has
received the
following
predictions
from perhaps
the best
placed
source: India
will NOT call
for a vote on
the human
rights liaison
upgrade to
ASG, even
though "Navi
Pillay has not
made the case
for the
upgrade." The
argument has
become that
there are six
or
seven
"development"
USGs in New
York, and none
for human
rights.
Second
prediction:
Israel
WILL call for
a vote
opposing the
Goldstone
report follow
up.
But a Middle
Eastern source
says Israel
does not have
support from
the usual
places for
this.
Nonetheless, a
vote is
predicted.
Syria,
too,
is
predicted to
back down on
calling for a
vote on Roed
Larsen's
mandate. This
is perhaps
wishful
thinking by
the source. He
is
correct,
however, in
diagnosing
that
unresolved
political
issues rear
their head in
the budget's
eleventh hour.
Update
of
10:27 p.m. --
Finally, there
are numbers.
How much would
the
Permanent Five
members of the
Security
Council have
to pay, if
Bahrain and
Bahamas are
allowed to
shift down
from
Classification
B
to C?
$300,000, is
the answer
from one of
the P-5. 50%
or so to the
U.S., 15% each
to France and
the UK, the
rest Russia
and China.
"But
it's
the
principle of
the thing!"
the P-5, as
well as Japan
and others,
say. But
principle left
the station in
2000, which
the artibrary
Classification
C was set up
to solve some
other
political
problem.
UN
Controller
Jun
Yamasaki is
now down in
the basement.
Inner City
Press asks him
"what
for." He
agrees that
"the scales"
are up to the
member
states. But so
it is the ASG
upgrade? The
Goldstone
report follow
up?
Inner
City
Press
asks Israel's
representative:
will you call
for a vote?
They say you
are
threatening to
do so. He
replied, "It
is not a
threat. And
it is more
than a follow
up." And so
that train,
too, has left
the station.
Update
of
10:35 p.m. --
in this micro
issue, of
$150,000, stop
the presses.
Inner City
Press asks the
P in the P-5,
"if Bahrain
and Bahamas
are reduced,
does it cost
you $100,000
or $150,000?"
The answer
is, "It's not
sure that
Bahrain and
Bahama will be
reduced."
Could be a
long night.
Update
of
11:10 p.m. --
the word is,
Bahrain and
Bahamas will
get moved to
Classification
C, but not in
the
resolution.
Rather, they
will get a
letter of
guarantee from
the President
of the General
Assembly. On
the overall
scale of
assessments,
Russia has
made a new
proposal. But
G-77 is not
backing them
up: every
country for
themselves,
it's up to
you. Everyone
is eating
pizza and
waiting for
another
paragraph to
be
written.
Update
of
11:17 p.m. --
Russia, it's
said, has some
supporters,
including
Mexico and
Kazakhstan.
But not enough
supporters...
Update
of
11:38 p.m. --
amid talk of
an "agreed
scenario,"
Ambassadors
huddle in
front of
Conference
Room 7: Sudan
and
Singapore, the
U.S. and UK.
This is how
deals are cut
at the UN.
Update
of 11:59
p.m. -- from
within
Conference
Room 8, some
clapping. A
delegate
emerges and
tells Inner
City Press,
"It's done. In
45 minute,
committee
vote in
Conference
Room 3."
(After that,
there'll be a
wait for
translation
before the
full General
Assembly.)
But even as
typing this
up, Inner City
Press asks
Kazakhstan's
Ambassador:
are you
happy with how
the Russian
proposal has
been
addressed? No,
is the
answer. We
will be
putting it to
a vote. We are
not happy.
She is
eating La
Vache Qui Rie
cheese on
Breton
crackers. The
room is full
of smoke.
Update
of
12:10 a.m. --
Mexico
clarifies that
it previously
supported
Russia's one
year proposal,
but fell away
when Russia
changed it
into
a proposal
about market
exchange
rates. Now,
alongside
Kazakhstan and
some others,
Ukraine
(Mexico says)
is supporting
Russia's
position.
Hmm.
Ali
Treki
flashes
Inner City
Press a thumbs
up, it's done.
There will be
at least two
votes called
for. And there
is more to be
said, not only
about the
budget. But
budget first,
in this space,
when the Fifth
Committee
votes.
Update
of
12:45 a.m. --
Delegates
stand in line
in Conference
Room 3,
waiting to get
their copies
to vote on. A
European
representative,
saying "good
night" to
Inner City
Press,
explains that
her
mission works
the budget in
three shifts.
The skeleton
crew is coming
in for the
vote.
Inner
City
Press
asked the
Committee
chairman,
Peter Maurer
of
Switzerland,
how many
countries he
thinks will
vote along
with Russia. I
don't know, he
says. You will
see.
Update
of
1:09 a.m. --
finally, the
two scales of
assessment
resolutions
are
distributed.
The
peacekeeping
scale says, in
paragraph 16,
that the
GA "recognizes
the concerns
raised by
Member States,
including
Bahrain and
Bahamas,
regarding the
structure of
the levels."
Both have been
assured they
will get a
side letter
from the
President
of the General
Assembly.
Inner City
Press asked at
the document
window, but
where's the
Russian
amendment? The
response:
that's a
different
story. Still
the curtain
that covers
the voting
board has
not been drawn
back. But
Maurer has
gaveled the
meeting to
order.
Update
of
1:13 a.m. --
the first
items called
by Maurer are
the
international
criminal
tribunals for
Rwanda and the
former
Yugoslavia.
Jun Yamasaki
speaks on
changes in
rates of
exchange.
Update
of
1:22 a.m. --
Maurer asks
again and
again, are
there any
comments?
Are there any
objections? I
see none, it
is so decided.
Does any
delegation
wish to make a
statement
after the
adoption of
the draft
resolution?
Eritrea's seat
is empty. We
will be
writing about
their
speech outside
the Security
Council (much)
earlier
today.
And now
India is
taking the
floor.
Update
of
1:24 a.m. --
India says it
proposed to
maintain the
liaison at D-2
level. I would
like to keep
this on
record. "I
find it
difficult
to accept..
Human rights
and Human
Resources
management
tool... This
needs to be
understood...
We are moving
this
amendment...
this is not
about
nurturing
human
rights... this
is
budgetary....
without
prejudice to
our positions
on several
aspects to
human
rights...
Human rights
is one for the
GA... I need
to remain most
delegates
here... a job,
an assignment,
a protocol job
in the real
sense of the
term... why is
there a need
to upgrade...
cannot attend
meetings...
surely, simple
expeditious
answers, tell
the USG to
give all area
access pass...
Update
of
1:28 a.m. --
"India's
commitment to
multilateralism...
we
have been
participating....
fully aware
it's 1:30
a.m., one and
a
half hour
beyond when we
should have
completed our
work...
without
wishing to
make matter
divisive... I
wish to inform
you, we would
not
wish to press
for the
amendment we
had mentioned
earlier in the
day
today..."
And
so it is
adopted,
without
amendment.
There is
applause.
Update
of
1:36 a.m. --
now Israel is
calling
for a vote on
the
Goldstone
report.
A/64/7/L.3 of
ACABQ about
the Goldstone
report. "As a
matter of
principle...
we cannot
support...
established
with
predetermined
conditions."
In
favor
136, against
2, abstain 3.
Guatemala says
it made a
mistake,
wants to be
green.
The
U.S.
has voted in
favor of part
5... The U.S.
supports
creation of
expert on
Sudan, DPRK
and Myanmar...
Somalia... We
will not
reiterate
our views, it
does not
change our
view of the
report.
Update
of
1:45 a.m. -
now Russia is
speaking,
"despite all
efforts...
we have not
been able to
achieve a
consensus on
scale of
assessments
for the
regular
budget... this
draft does not
take into
account the
views of
Russia,
Belarus,
Kazakhstan,
Ukraine and
others...
fluxuations in
currency
rates,
over-estimates...
Russian
federation
is submitted
its own
amendment to
paragraph 6...
Update
of
1:49 a.m. --
this table is
the same as
Russia
distributed in
Room
5 on December
1.... Now
Kazakhstan is
taking the
floor,
excusing
Maurer for
calling her
"sir," "it's 2
a.m.," she
says. The mic
is not
working.
"Sabotage,"
Maurer jokes.
She begins in
Russian.
Update
of
1:52 a.m. --
she says Iraq
is given
special
treatment,
"that
is
understandable,"
why would poor
Kazakhstan as
a developing
country have
to pay this...
I propose that
the proposal
of the
Russian
federation, we
put it to a
vote today...
We support it,
the
amendment to
item 136..."
Update
of
1:55 a.m. --
Japan says the
agreement is
for scales to
remain the
same for three
years, with
review
"urgently."
Japan urges
opposition to
the Russian
amendment.
Update
of
1:59 a.m. --
Ukraine, which
Maurer called
"The Ukraine,"
says it
supports
Russia's
amendment not
because it
benefits
Ukraine,
but because
it's right.
Now Sweden, on
behalf of the
EU: "against
the
proposed
amendment by
the Russian
federation."
Update
of
2:04 a.m. --
Russia loses,
22-85-27.
Russia's
supporters
include
Nicaragua and
Venezuela,
Laos and
Mongolia ,
Serbia, Qatar,
Myanmar
and so forth.
Afterwards
Russia notes
that this is
not a
consensus
resolution.
Belarus
trashes the
Committee on
Contributions
as biased.
Update
of
2:07 a.m. --
looking back
at the
Goldstone
vote, now that
the voting
sheet has been
released, when
you take
away
Guatemala's
erroneous
vote, Israel
has only three
abstainers in
support, and
these are
surprising:
Cote d'Ivoire,
Cameroon and
Benin.
Say what?
Update
of
2:09 a.m. --
on scale,
Maurer reads
out it is the
understanding
of
the Committee
that Bahamas
and Bahrain
will be
treated as
Category C.
And there are
no comments --
except
Bahamas, which
wants to thank
its
supporters.
Update
of
2:13 a.m. --
Sweden says
the EU
accepted the
Chairman's
proposal
on the
peacekeeeping
scales -- that
is, the letter
from the PGA
to
Bahrain and
Bahamas.
Update
of
2:15 a.m. --
Maurer says
it's over,
come to the
GA. He thanks
the
bureau. "it's
not the moment
to get
philosophic...
to GA and then
sleep
before
daylight
starts."
Update
of
2:17 a.m. -
Mosves
congratulates
Paul, 17 years
serving the
5th
committee,
there is
applause. 35
minutes gap
before the GA.
Update
of
2:41 a.m. --
in the
Delegates
Lounge, there
are drinks and
congratulations.
Mosves says he
is the only
Committee
secretary
allowed
in to the most
sensitive
negotiations,
because he has
no position,
only
wants to help
them get where
they want to
go. Other
committees are
not
binding, he
said. In the
5th it must be
by consensus.
He tells a PGA
staffer, see I
brought it in
earlier than
last year,
when it was
8:01
a.m..
The staffer
later scoffs.
USG Angela
Kane has
headed off,
no need to
wait for the
GA. Will
Russia raises
its issue
again in the
GA? Inner City
Press is told
no. Israel
will,
yes. With only
three
abstainers?
Update
of
3:12 a.m. --
Ali Treki
gravels the
meeting to
order. In the
TV
booth, there
are no
headsets for
translation.
It sounds like
he is
singing.
Update
of
3:17 a.m. --
underneath TV
booth 14 there
are many empty
seats in
the GA.
Comoros, DRC,
Lesotho,
Paraguay...
Not voting in
the Budget
committee
earlier
tonight (or
this morning)
were, among
others,
Belize,
Botswana,
Burundi, Cape
Verde, Central
African
Republic and
Chad. The
Comoros, El
Salvador,
Equatorial
Guinea and
Eritrea....
and
on from there.
Update
of
3:34 a.m. --
after the
resolution
criticizing
Myanmar's
human
rights record
passes
86-23-39
(Norway asked
that it's vote
be changed
to yes), the
Solomon
Islands speaks
up to say that
due to
pressure it
is changing
its position
from that in
the 3d
Committee.
Another
change: on
Israel's vote,
the DPRK
(North Korea)
abstains, in
seeming
support of
Israel -- or
simply against
any human
rights mandate
anywhere.
Update
of
4:07 a.m. --
the Kazakhstan
Ambassador
brings it to a
close, be
well, be
happy, be
lucky!
The
voting screen
depicts a
green and
orange
Christmas
tree.
Update
of
4:14 a.m. --
the Japanese
delegates are
still at their
GA table,
talking on
their cell
phones.