The
Elders Slam
Opaque UNSG
Race, FUNCA
Says Look at
OCHA, UNCA
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
February 7 --
When Ban
Ki-moon was
selected as UN
Secretary
General in
2006 it was an
untransparent
process, with
secret ballots
in the
Security
Council.
Today both
processes were
criticized
by "The
Elders."
Appearing at
the Munich
Munich
Security
Conference, four
Elders
including
Ban's
predecessor
Kofi Annan
along with Gro
Harlem
Brundtland,
Martti
Ahtisaari and
Graça Machel
unveiled a UN
reform plan.
Beyond Security
Council reform,
they
specifically
criticized Secretary
General
selection
process for
lack of
transparency
and choice,
and suggested
a single seven
year term to
avoid simply
trying to get
re-elected.
To replace
Ban, the
Elders say
"we call on
the General
Assembly to
insist that
the Security
Council
recommend more
than one
candidate for
appointment as
the
Secretary-General
of the United
Nations, after
a timely,
equitable and
transparent
search for the
best qualified
candidates,
irrespective
of gender or
regional
origin. We
suggest that
the next
Secretary-General
be appointed
for a single,
non-renewable
term of seven
years, in
order to
strengthen his
or her
independence
and avoid the
perception
that he or she
is guided by
electoral
concerns."
Inner
City Press and
the Free
UN Coalition
for Access,
fighting for
transparency
including a Freedom
of Information
Act at the UN,
agree and
believe the
Elders should
have gone one
level down,
more timely,
and criticized
the ownership
of Under
Secretary
General
positions by
P3 Security
Council
members like
Peacekeeping
and France's
Herve Ladsous,
and the process
to replace
Valerie Amos
as OCHA, here.
Even further
down, the
under-performance
of Team Ban,
including for
example UN
Peacekeeping
chief Herve
Ladsous,
has been
enabled and
concealed by
what has
become the
UN's
Censorship
Alliance,
formally the
United Nations
Correspondents
Association.
On November 14
this
organization
in decline
formally
announced a
slate of six
officers --
all without
any
competition at
all. It was a
pure rubber
stamp, "yes,"
with the only
question being
turn-out. The
top post was
handed (back)
to Giampaolo
Pioli, who
engaged in
outright
censorship
while last
using the
position.
Pioli, who
had rented one
of his
Manhattan
apartments to
Palitha
Kohona, Sri
Lanka's
ambassador,
unilaterally
granted
Kohona's
request to use
UNCA to screen
inside the UN
a government
film denying
war crimes.
Then Pioli
demanded that
reporting of
these facts
must be
removed from
the Internet (compilation
of audio here)
or he would
use UNCA to
try to get
Inner City
Press thrown
out of the
UN.
Voice of
America,
then on the
UNCA Executive
Board, wrote a
letter
to the UN
asking that
Inner City
Press'
accreditation
be reviewed; a
Freedom of
Information
Act request
showed that
VOA said it
had the
support of Agence
France Presse
and
Reuters (which
they tried to
censor
its anti-Press
complaint to
the UN by
claiming it is
copyrighted,
here.)
Now in 2015
Pioli has
returned.
Reuters has on
the board its
current
correspondent
as well as its
retired UN
bureau chief.
Agence
France Presse,
which had been
off the UNCA
Executive
Committee
after having
used it to
complain about
Press
reporting on
Herve Ladsous,
wanted to
return but did
not make it;
it was handed
a seat on another
board
announced by
UNCA.
Only
News Agency of
Nigeria, which
ran in 2013,
did not run
this time: its
UN office
space was
taken away in
2014,
ostensibly due
to scarcity
when UNCA is
given a big
room that sits
empty and
locked most of
the time, then
opens for
events that
could and
should have
occurred in
the UN's Press
Briefing Room,
open and on
UNTV. This is
the UN's
Censorship
Alliance.
We'll have
more on this.
As
to the
Secretary
General's
race, an
earlier reform
letter's
signatories
included
Avaaz, Amnesty
International,
CIVICUS,
Equality Now,
FEMNET,
Forum-Asia,
Global Policy
Forum, Lawyers
Committee on
Nuclear
Policy, Social
Watch, Third
World Network,
Women’s
Environment
and
Development
Organization,
the World
Federalist
Movement-Institute
for Global
Policy and the
World
Federation of
United Nations
Associations.
The
new Free
UN Coalition
for Access,
formed in
response to
the decline in
media access
and
transparency
generally
under Ban
Ki-moon,
heartily
agrees with
the need to
reform and
improve the
Secretary
General
selection
process.
Candidates
so far
including
Helen Clark of
UNDP, who
virtually
never takes
press
questions
while in New
York, the
headquarters
of UNDP, amid
untransparent
layoffs,
and Irina
Bokova, the
Director
General of
UNESCO, an
agency which
on November 3
led
an event about
journalists at
which not a
single
question from
a journalist
was taken.
There's also
among others,
in this SG
race we will
closely cover,
a Latina trio,
Kristalina
Georgieva,
Miroslav
Lajcak, Kevin
Rudd, Dalia
Grybauskaite,
Vuk Jeremic,
Danilo Turk,
Jan Kubis -
that is,
unlike the
UN's
Censorship
Alliance, at
least there is
some
competition.
Tellingly,
after
September's
General
Assembly
debate week,
UNCA's “complaints”
to
Ban's
Secretariat
are to ask for
fewer events,
for a private
wi-fi network
for in-house
UN journalist
and not those
who cover to
cover the
week, and a
booklet
co-signed with
Ban.
UN
Censorship
Alliance
lunch, Feb 11,
2014 including
Pam Falk and
continuing
Kahraman
Haliscelik,
Sylviane
Zehil, Erol
Avdovic,
Bouchra
Benyoussef,
Seana Magee,
Nabil Abi
Saab, Evelyn
Leopold, Talal
Al-Haj,
Melissa Kent,
Michelle
Nichols,
Sangwon Yoon,
Valeria
Robecco,
Sherwin
Bryce-Pease,
Zhenqiu Gu UN
Photo/Eskinder
Debebe
And now
- the
2015 version,
here. No
improvements,
at the UN.
Meanwhile,
UNCA
makes no
mention of
restrictions
of access that
week such as
the French
mission
ordering all
non-French
journalists
out of the
UN's Press
Briefing Room,
and UN
Peacekeeping
chief Herve
Ladsous
physically
blocking the
Press' camera,
Vine
here.
The new Free
UN Coalition
for Access
has raised
these issues,
publicly,
in fliers
and in the
UN's Press
Briefing Room.
Tellingly, the
UN Secretariat
appears ready
to limit its
"interlocutors"
on media
access to the
very insiders
at UNCA who
have overseen
and promoted
the decline in
access. It's
the UN
Censorship
Alliance.
An
analogy that
some have now
made: it's one
thing that
Kurt Waldheim
was UN
Secretary
General once.
But what would
it say about
the UN if he
were to
return, after
a haitus, for
more time atop
the
organization?
Ban
Ki-moon,
meanwhile, is
appearing in
polls as
running for
president of
his native
South Korea in
2017. Inner
City Press asked
Ban's deputy
spokesperson
about it, who
said Ban is
“currently”
focused on his
current job.
This has been
repeated in
South Korea, here.
The UN is
being used;
the UN is in
further
decline; there
are moves
afoot to stem
the tide of
decay. Watch
this site.
* * *
These
reports
are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for Sept 26, 2011 New Yorker on Inner City
Press at UN
Click
for
BloggingHeads.tv re Libya, Sri Lanka, UN
Corruption
Feedback:
Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
UN Office: S-303,
UN, NY 10017 USA
Reporter's mobile (and weekends):
718-716-3540
Other, earlier Inner City Press are
listed here,
and some are available in the ProQuest service,
and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright 2006-2014 Inner City Press,
Inc. To request reprint or other permission,
e-contact Editorial [at] innercitypress.com
|