Sudan
Border Help
Stalled by
Money
Questions of
France &
US, UN
Kordofan
Inaction
By
Matthew
Russell Lee,
Exclusive
UNITED
NATIONS,
October 13 --
Even as
further
evidence of UN
inaction and
cover-up
regarding
murder in
Southern
Kordofan
emerges, the
UN Security
Council has
yet to vote to
modify the
mandate of the
peacekeeping
mission in
Abyei, UNISFA,
to allow its
Ethiopian
troops to
provide
protection
along the
contested
border outside
of Abyei. Why?
On
October 12
multiple
Council
sources told
Inner City
Press that in
closed door
consultations
on October 11,
two Permanent
members have
raised
questions
about the
costs of
allowing and
transporting
even just 300
peacekeepers
to act along
the long
border between
South and
north Sudan.
That
France is one
of these two
P5 members is
not
surprising:
they "played
cheapskate,"
as one major
troop
contributing
country put
it, during the
formation of
UNISFA, and
led the charge
in the UN's
budget
committee to
deny
peacekeepers a
long overdue
raise.
Asked
by Inner City
Press, a UK
spokesman
responded
that, "We have
not raised the
issue of the
additional
costs of these
proposed
further 300
peacekeepers
in the
Security
Council.
But as with
all proposed
force changes
for any PKO,
we’ll want to
look at costs
carefully, and
if approved,
continue to
monitor costs
and the
overall
effectiveness
of these
changes.”
So
the second
country, at
least to some
activists,
comes as a
surprise: the
United States.
Apologists for
this US
approach say,
predictably,
that it "not
just about the
money."
They say that
the US Mission
to the UN, led
by Susan Rice,
is frustrated
that not only
Khartoum but
also South
Sudan have yet
to remove
their troops
from Abyei as
agreed.
In
this view, not
"giving in" to
the rare joint
request of
South and
north Sudan
for these 300
plus
peacekeepers
-- and four
helicopters
and two jets,
Inner City
Press is told
-- is a way to
force them to
live up to
their
agreement to
leave Abyei.
With
the US current
focused the
alleged Iran
versus Saudi
Arabia plot
and other
issues
including
Palestine's
application to
the Security
Council for
full UN
membership,
which the US
opposes, it is
not clear if a
linkage
between
implementation
in Abyei and
agreeing to
assist along
with longer
contested
border can be
publicly
acknowledged
and defended.
Kadugli
killing fields
per SSP, UN
inaction &
improvement
not shown
Meanwhile,
in the wake of
the UN's
cover-up of
its Egyptian
peacekeepers'
inaction in
Southern
Kordofan
before the
UNMIS
mission's
mandate
expired on
July 9, a new
report
provides
additional
details about
murders by the
"Abu Tira"
Central
Reserve Police
organized by
Ahmed Haroun.
Haroun was and
is a war
criminal
indicted by
the
International
Criminal Court
whom the UN
flew back and
forth to Abyei
in a UN
helicopter.
Of this
incident, as
Inner
City Press
raised August
15 to the UN,
the UN's
initial report
stated
that
"29.
On
8 June, an
UNMIS
independent
contractor
(IC) was
pulled out of
a vehicle by
SAF in front
of the UNMIS
Kadugli Sector
IV Compound in
the presence
of several
witnesses,
while UN
peacekeepers
could not
intervene. He
was taken
around the
corner of the
compound and
gunshots were
heard. Later
he was
discovered
dead by UNMIS
personnel and
IDPs. Several
sources
confirmed that
the victim was
an active SPLM
member."
(Emphasis
added.)
When the
edited
version
was released,
this paragraph
appeared with
the key phrase
"while UN
peacekeepers
could not
intervene"
entirely
removed, as if
the Egyptian
UN
peacekeepers
had not been
there:
"17.
On
8 June, an
UNMIS
individual
contractor
(IC) was
pulled out of
a vehicle by
SAF in front
of the UNMIS
Kadugli Sector
IV compound in
the presence
of several
witnesses. He
was taken away
from the
vicinity of
the compound
and gunshots
were heard.
Later he was
discovered
dead by UNMIS
personnel and
IDPs. Several
sources
confirmed that
the victim was
an active SPLM
member."
Now,
the Sudan
Sentinel
Project early
on October 13
put out a
press release
including
"eyewitness
reports
of the
abduction and
murder of
Numeiri Philip
Kalo, a UN
independent
contractor
with Tri-Star
Fueling and a
Catholic
seminarian,
were
communicated
to SSP. One
witness
reported to
SSP that Abu
Tira abducted
Numeiri, a
Nuba man who
was an active
SPLM
supporter, on
8 June from
the east UNMIS
gate. They
reportedly put
him in an Abu
Tira Land
Cruiser, drove
around the
corner, shot
him with
automatic
weaponry, and
dumped his
bullet-riddled
body from the
moving vehicle
in front of
the CRP
compound.
Egyptian
peacekeepers,
among other
people,
reportedly
observed the
abduction and
murder."
The
UN Office of
the High
Commissioner
for Human
Rights report
which was
leaked and
then carefully
edited, as exclusively
reported
by Inner City
Press, played
down the
knowledge and
inaction of
the UN's
Egyptian
peacekeepers.
Back
in late
August, after
multiple
inquiries
by Inner City
Press, OHCHR
spokesman
Rupert
Colville in
Geneva replied
about this
edit:
"draft
para 29 /
final para 17:
original
phrase 'while
UN
peacekeepers
could not
intervene' is
ambiguous.
Does it mean
they were not
ABLE to? If so
was that for
circumstantial
reasons, or
because of
rules of
engagement? Or
does it mean
they chose not
to? After
checking with
the field, we
were unable to
establish the
precise
circumstances,
so the
reference was
deleted."
For UN
peacekeepers
to fail to act
during
killings,
important in
this instance
to no less
that the
Bishop of
Kadugli and
previously of
interest from
Srebrenica to
Rwanda, should
not be left
ambiguous --
but it should
definitely not
by deleted, by
the UN.
The
Office of the
High
Commissioner
for Human
Rights could
and should
have
determined
what were the
rules of
engagement for
these UN
peacekeepers,
and should
have addressed
the
allegations by
the Bishop of
Kadugli and
others that
the
peacekeepers
decided not to
act because
they sided
with Khartoum
and its
militias.
To
delete the
reference and
airbrush out
the
peacekeepers
is, in this
view, entirely
irresponsible.
Now what?
Watch this
site.