After
Sudan
Tripartite
Meeting, UN Paints A Happy Picture of Darfur, But
Questions Remain
By
Matthew
Russell
Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
September
27, 2010 -- Outside the meeting at the UN to
address Sudan restrictions on movements and humanitarian access,
Sudan's Permanent Representative told Inner City Press that
everything was going smoothly inside, no complaints.
Upon
exiting,
the
chief of the UN Department of Field Support Susana Malcorra also
painted a positive picture. Inner City Press asked about restrictions
on the use of helicopters, and about the UNAMID peacekeepers in
Darfur not getting to part of Jebal Marra since February, and not
getting to the Tarabat Market, where over 50 were killed, earlier
this month. Video
of Q &A here.
UNAMID
chief
Ibrahim
Gambari acknowledged that the response to Tarabat Market had
been too slow. But when Inner City Press asked if, going forward,
permission from the Sudanese authorities would still be required to
move, his answer wasn't clear. He said that Sudan could still cite
security as a basis to move allow movement.
UN's Malcorra, Gambari, Charpentier, a
Sudanese official UN Photo left unidentified
UN
Humanitarian
Coordinator Georg Charpentier talked about a meeting with Sudan's
Humanitarian Affairs minister, at which he said access was granted to
Jebel Marra.
Outgoing UN
Humanitarian chief John Holmes had spoken of
no access since February 2010. Equally at odds with that other UN
officials have told Inner City Press, Charpentier on Monday said on
camera that other than joint press releases, he has not shown his
press releases to Sudanese authorities. We'll see.
* * *
On
Sudan,
Obama
Non-Mention of ICC Used for Support of Bashir by OIC
By
Matthew
Russell
Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
September
27, 2010 -- The omissions
in
US President Obama's
speech at the UN's Sudan meeting on September 24 were noticed not
only by Sudan, whose Vice President Taha praised the new US approach,
but also by the wider Organization of the Islamic Conference.
Inner
City
Press
asked OIC Secretary General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu at his September 27
press conference about Paragraph 21 of the OIC's September 24
Communique, that
“21.
The Meeting expressed its full solidarity with the Sudan under the
leadership of H.E. President Omar Hassan Ahmed Al-Bashir and renewed
its unflinching support for the various endeavors to achieve genuine
national reconciliation, lasting peace and stability within the
context of a sovereign and united country. The Meeting reiterated the
OIC principled position on the International Criminal Court’s (ICC)
indictment against the President of the Sudan and warned of its
implications on the ongoing Darfur peace process in Doha.”
In
response,
Ihsanoglu insisted that the OIC or at least he himself believes in
accountability for the crimes in Darfur, but believe that the
International Criminal Court through “certain of its statements”
has set up the ICC “as a political party, a contender to the
government.”
“Even President
Obama,” Ihsanoglu continued, “did not mention the International
Criminal Court” in which speech at the September 24 meeting on
Sudan.
Obama and PGA Deiss, mention of ICC or Bashir not
shown, OIC notices
Inner
City
Press reported
that
day on Obama's failure to mention the name of Omar al
Bashir, indicted by the ICC for genocide and war crimes. Now the
OIC
is making much of Obama's failure to mention the ICC, as supporting
the OIC's statement of full solidarity with Bashir, and against the
indictments.
What
will
Obama or
his State Department say? Watch this site.
Footnote: beyond
Obama's omissions, it has been argued to Inner City Press that the US
was behind the opening up the September 24 meeting to the Press and
public, against push back from parties unnamed. Openness is all the good - duly noticed.
* * *
Obama
Does
Not
Mention
Bashir,
Whose VP Taha Praises Obama at UN Sudan
Meet
By
Matthew
Russell
Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
September
24
--
The open portion of the UN Sudan
meeting was
as surprising for what was not said as for what was. US President
Barack Obama in his ten minute speech did not once mention Sudanese
President Omar al Bashir, indicted by the International Criminal
Court for war crimes and genocide.
Sudan's
Vice
President
Ali
Osman
Taha on the other hand, or perhaps in
reciprocation, praised “the next direction and the emergent spirit
of the United States of America of positive and constructive
engagement.”
Inner
City
Press
was
allowed
in the meeting for the first four speakers, and got the
first copy of Taha's prepared speech. That the praise of Obama was in
the prepared text may imply that Taha and his government knew that
Bashir would not be mentioned.
Similarly,
after
US
Secretary
of
State Hillary Clinton met with Taha earlier in the week,
Inner City Press asked her spokesman PJ Crowley about Bashir, and
specifically whether he would require a meeting and photo op if the
UN Security Council visits the country as initially planned on
October 4 to 11, Crowley said Bashir “did not come up” in the
meeting.
After
being
asked
to
leave
Friday's Sudan meeting after Ban Ki-moon, Obama, Taha and
Salva Kiir spoke, Inner City Press asked a Security Council
Ambassador if any progress had been made on scheduling the Council
trip to Sudan, which members such as Austria and Mexico want.
No,
the Ambassador
said, maybe after the meeting. Asked by Inner City Press about Obama
not mentioning Bashir, the Ambassador nodded and added, “it will be
interesting to see how many of the African heads of state present
mention Bashir and how.” Yes, it will.
Rwanda's
Paul
Kagame
left
the
meeting after the first four speakers, as did Nick
Clegg of the UK. The EU's Catherine Ashton left while Salvia Kiir was
talking, after having sat near the back of the room typing on a
laptop. It is expected that top UN Peacekeeper Alain Le Roy will take
questions from the Press after the meeting is over and the Communique
is issued.
Obama, UN's Ban and Le Roy on Sept 24, Bashir not
shown, (c) M.R. Lee
Earlier
today
--
before
the
meeting -- Inner City Press published
a near final
draft
of the Communique. A reader has quickly written in:
"This
draft communiqué is the very embodiment of international
helplessness and lack of commitment to the cause of a just peace for
Sudan. In tone it barely rises to the level of mild exhortation. In
substance it is vacuous, or at least entirely redundant, given what
the UNSC and international actors of consequence have said
previously. And some of this is downright pernicious, e.g., the
celebration of the “Government of Sudan’s new strategy for
Darfur.” .. This “New Strategy” has been rejected by the rebel
groups, by the SPLM, and by Darfuri civil society; it has been
endorsed by Gration and Mbeki, and with this document, by the UN. It
is utterly shameless capitulation before a move that promises
explicitly to demote the peace process (Doha or elsewhere), and to
“domesticate” that process…such a “strategy” implemented
will be the peace of the dead.
Paragraph
12:
“In
this
context,
they took note of the Government of Sudan’s
new strategy for Darfur and the important role it could play towards
a comprehensive solution to the conflict in the region.”
More
like
a
'final
solution.'"
At
Friday's noon
briefing at the UN, Inner City Press asked Ban's spokesman Martin
Nesirky to describe the role of the UN Department of Peacekeeping
Operations and Department of Political Affairs in the Communique.
Nesirky, who should answer this question, has yet to. Watch this
site.
, 
