At
UN,
Trump Group Sponsors Kazakh Event, Program Confiscated,
Questions Cut Off
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
September 13 -- When in the UN on Monday night a war film
was screened, with a free spread of cheese cubes and white wine
outside, most took at face value the announcement that it was
sponsored by Kazakhstan's Mission to the UN. The film was “A World
Free of Nuclear Weapons.” The speakers included Norman Atkins, an
expert on Sudan from the UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations.
But little
noticed, on the last line of the program of the event, was the
notation “Sponsored by the Trump Group.” The back of the four
page program was an advertisement for “Acquilina, the only AAA Five
Diamond Resort on Miami Beach.”
How could a real
estate entrepreneur be allowed to sponsor an event in the UN? Inner
City Press asked the Under Secretary General of the Department of
Management Angela Kane. She said that when a member state asks to use
UN space, no check is made. After the fact, she said, a review can be
made.
Back in the
reception space in front of the Dag Hammarskjold Library auditorium,
all copies of the event program were confiscated.
UN's Ban and Kane, Fast Eddy Trump not shown
When Inner City
Press asked the representative of the Kazakh Mission what the
connection to the Trump Group was, the answer was: “personal.”
It was argued that
“Eddie” Trump of the Trump Group is not affiliated with the
better known Donald Trump. But what is the connection? “Stop
asking questions,” Inner City Press was told. For now, there is no
choice. Watch this site.
* * *
UN
Happy
Talk from Ban & Spokesman, No Sudan, No Sri Lanka or Congo
Accountability
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
September 13 -- Ban Ki-moon and his team, trying to
manipulate the media, will attempt to use the upcoming UN General
Debate to nail down a second term for “Mister Ban,” UN sources
observing Ban's recent behavior say.
On Monday, Ban and
his spokesman Martin Nesirky chose and answered questions, none of
them on such topics as the UN's inaction in Darfur, Myanmar, on the
rapes in the Congo, or corruption and dissension in Ban's own
administration.
Rather, Ban
positioned himself a something of a spiritual guru, opining on the
state of relations between Muslims and the West, telling the media
not to cover planned Koran burnings, which Ban said “cannot be
tolerated.”
But these are
issues over which the UN, and Ban in particular, have no power at
all. What about Sudan, where despite two $1 billion peacekeeping
missions, Darfurians are slaughtered without the UN coming to their
aid before they get permission from Khartoum?
How about Eastern
Congo, where hundreds of women were raped within short distances of
UN Peacekeepers? Ban's envoy to the Congo, Roger Meece, blatantly
misspoke to the UN press corps, saying that the first his Mission
heard of the rapes was August 12. Disproved by a July 30 e-mail sent
out by the UN, there has been no retraction, much less
accountability.
The only vaguely
pointed question Nesirky accepted for Ban on Monday concerned a
drunken toast by the director of DESU, Sha Zu Kang. “He has
apologized,” Ban said smugly. “Let us move on.”
But what about the
critique of Inga Britt Ahlenius? No questions on that, none of the
promised follow up briefing. At Ban's last press conference, he said
that the Ahlenius critiques, of corruption and weak leadership, were
“too small,” and would be the subject of a separate briefing -
which has yet to occur.
An issue which
seems to have entirely fallen off the table, with the Ban
administration's push, is the panel of experts on the war crimes in
Sri Lanka. Ban announced his panel in March, but its work -- and four
month time clock -- has yet to begin. No questions on that, no
answers: issue disappeared.
UN's Ban and Spokesman, Qs or As on Sudan, Sri
Lanka, corruption not shown
Ban's trip to
Rwanda is now viewed as an attempt to keep the issue of genocide in
the Congo under wraps until after the General Debate, at which Ban
will attempt to be omni-present in a highly controlled way, with
critique questions screened out by Nesirky.
Likewise, the top post in UN Women will be used
in this way, sources say: either Michelle Bachelet to ward off a
challenge for Ban's second term, or less likely now Rwanda's foreign
minister, in an attempt to forestall untimely hypocrisy criticism from
Rwanda. So it goes in Ban Ki-moon's UN.
Nesirky,
who has
loudly proclaimed that as to UN briefing there “are no rules, it is
my briefing,” may now say that he was attempting to spread
questions around. But given the UN's spending and responsibility in
Sudan, once no questions on the topic were asked, it was Nesirky's
job to allow such questions. He pointedly did not. Watch this site.
* * *
For
UN,
Is
Merely
Being There Enough, with Ban Under Fire for a 2d Term?
By
Matthew
Russell
Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
July
26
-- What has Ban Ki-moon accomplished as UN Secretary
General in Myanmar and Sudan, Inner City Press asked his spokesman
Monday, for the fourth day in a week.
“His record is
clear,” Spokesman Martin Nesirky replied. “From standing in front
of a still burning warehouse in Gaza, to visiting Haiti five days
after the earthquake, to visiting Darfur refugee camps... he has
achieved a huge amount.” Video here,
from
Minute
26:55.
But
the three
achievements listed were only “being there” -- celebrities have
traveled to Haiti, and to refugee camps in Darfur and elsewhere.
Meanwhile
reports on the UN's performance in Sudan are largely negative. Rubble
still fills Haiti's streets. And even the Goldstone response is late,
due to failure to translate. Myanmar, telling, was not even mentioned.
Is being there enough?
Seeking
the
Ban
Administration's
-- if not yet Ban Ki-moon's -- response to the
criticism being heaped upon his tenure, Inner City Press asked
Nesirky when he made a piece by a heretofore big UN supporter, “Good
Night, Ban Ki-moon.”
“We don't need
to comment on every piece,” Nesirky said, calling that piece a
“rehash.. a lot of what is in the piece has been seen before.” A
lot by not all: the piece mentions inaction on Sri Lanka:
“A
peacekeeping official pointed out that Ban had insisted on
behind-the-scenes diplomacy in Sri Lanka even as the government was
killing thousands of civilians in its campaign to erase the brutal
insurgency of the Tamil Tigers: "We're doing everything we can
to avoid saying anything at all about it. That's been our line on
practically everything. The SG is clear that his final consideration
is going to be the political costs of whether he should or shouldn't
speak." That's a very real calculation every secretary-general
must make. But, he added, "There's no sense that the
deliberations include, 'What should we do?'"”
Only
this
year,
Ban
after saying he would name a panel of experts on war crimes in Sri
Lanka, then delaying 90 days, has gone out of his way to limit the
scope of the panel to providing advice on “models of
accountability” to himself and the Rajapaksa government, if they
want it. The Rajapaksas have said they will deny visas to the group;
Ban through Nesirky has repeated declined to comment on the refusal
to cooperate.
UN's Ban on plane: he was there, cracked
windshield and direct responses not shown
Now
a brewing
fight is Ban's decision to bypass South African and other developing
world candidates to nominate a Canadian, Carman Lapoint-Young, as the
new head of the Office of Internal Oversight Services. Inner City
Press, which reported
exclusively on the move on the night of July
23, asked Nesirky for Ban's response to developing world countries
who say the post was meant for their regions.
Nesirky
once
again
declined
comment, except to say there is “very strong, overwhelming
support” for the nominee. Sort of like the overwhelming support for
a second term?
It
is time for Ban
Ki-moon to speak for himself on this controversy -- time for him to
“be there,” as it were. He will appear before the press Monday at
5:30. Before his appearance Friday at a reception for the press,
Inner City Press was repeatedly told not to ask about the
controversy, not to “hijack” the event. That cannot similarly be
asked on Monday evening. Watch this site.
, 
