As
War
Looms in Abyei, UN Spins About No Go Zones & Flying Haroun
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
March 14 -- With Khartoum reportedly revving up for a war on
Abyei, and the SPLM in Southern Sudan breaking off talks with them,
the UN is engaged in obfuscation and spin, calling its
flight of a
indicted war criminal to Abyei successful and refusing to
acknowledge
where it has agreed it will not go.
Last week and
again today, Inner City Press has asked the UN about its decision to
fly Ahmed Haroun, indicted by the International Criminal Court for
organizing nomadic tribes to burn villages in Darfur, into Abyei to
organize nomadic tribes.
The UN has
defended the flights by claiming that Haroun is making things in
Abyei better. But they are only getting worse, with nomadic tribes
burning down villages. Wasn't that was Haroun was indicted for in the
first place?
Menkerios (r) with Mbeki & Hillary
Clinton,
Haroun & Abyei answers not shown
On March 11, Inner
City Press asked UN Acting Deputy Spokesman Farhan Haq
Inner
City Press: I wanted to ask you on Sudan. There is, a document has
come out showing that the SPLM [Sudan People’s Liberation Movement]
or the southern military officials asked the UN not to go to these
regions in Jonglei State where they are fighting with forces of Mr.
[George] Athor, and seems pretty bad in the sense that the UN
document, as reported by AP, says in the no-go zones, there should be
no UN operations, land, air or both will be carried out in the no-go
areas. These are areas in which civilians are being killed by both
sides. I wonder if you could state what is UNMIS’s [United Nations
Mission in Sudan’s] rules of engagement when civilians are being
killed in the area in which they are spending a billion dollars for a
peacekeeping operation?
Acting
Deputy Spokesperson Haq: UNMIS is trying, actually, to get access to
this area. As our people on the ground have repeatedly said, we are
having problems with the various forces on the ground, including the
SPLM, but others as well. In terms of the freedom of movement of
UNMIS, we are working with the parties on the ground to make sure
that we have the freedom of movement to do our mandated tasks.
Inner
City Press: But is this document accurate, in which the UN missed,
the UN put out a document to, both NGOs as well, saying that there
should be no UN activity, not just by air but by all the means that I
listed in those areas, is that accurate?
Acting
Deputy Spokesperson: No, I don’t have any comment on that. You
can follow up with UNMIS if you want. But my basic point is that
UNMIS has been trying to get freedom of movement, and it has been
imploring all of the various parties on the ground to provide it with
the freedom of movement it needs to go about its work.
Then
over the weekend, the SPLM announced that it won't negotiate any more
with the NCP in Khartoum. Inner City Press on Monday asked Haq:
Inner
City Press: there was an announcement on Sunday that the Southern
Sudanese Government would stop negotiating with the North, including
on Abyei, because of, they are alleging that the North has funded the
Misseriya tribes. I wanted to know what UNMIS [United Nations
Mission in Sudan] plans to do about that and what, how this relates
to the flying of Ahmed Haroun, the indicted war criminal, to Abyei,
which the UN said was, had resulted in an end to these type of
problems with the Misseriya.
Acting
Deputy Spokesperson Haq: Yeah, about the role that the UN Mission in
Sudan is playing: the Secretary-General’s Special Representative
[for Sudan], Haile Menkerios, participated in two meetings of the
Standing Committee on 9 and 10 March in Khartoum. At both meetings,
the parties were unable to move beyond the issue of the deployment of
Joint Integrated Units troops to Diffra, which the Sudanese People’s
Liberation Movement (SPLM) linked with the complete withdrawal of the
so-called “oil police” out of the Abyei area. Mr. Menkerios
continues to talk to both parties to find a suitable solution to the
problem.
The
UN Mission in Sudan has verified that both sides have reinforced
their positions within the Abyei area, including the confirmed
presence of Sudanese Armed Forces and Sudanese People’s Liberation
Army troops not affiliated with the Abyei Joint Integrated Units. The
exact size and type of reinforcements is difficult to determine
due to the continuing denial of freedom of movement for the UNMIS
force.
Mr.
Menkerios has urged both sides to restrain their respective elements
on the ground, to minimize violence while the political leadership
discusses a final solution to the status of Abyei. But our
diplomatic efforts are, in fact, ongoing.
Inner
City Press: Was there any, I’d asked, I guess, Mr. [Martin]
Nesirky, to confirm that 40 Dinka youth had stoned the helicopter on
which Ahmed Haroun was flown in on, despite the very glowing
description given here. Is there? He said that he was going to
search with UNMIS, I think, that’s how I understood it…
Acting
Deputy Spokesperson: No, no, I believe Mr. Nesirky did inform you at
one of the briefings last week that there had been a demonstration on
the ground but that the situation was restored and calm was restored
very quickly.
Here
is what Nesirky said on March 10, as transcribed by the UN:
Inner
City Press: I wanted to also ask about this flight of Ahmed Haroun,
there has been a new report that when he was flown into Abyei that
actually 400 Dinka youth stormed the UN’s compound, angered at his
presence and that McClatchy/Miami Herald story says that [Salah]
Gosh, who is this former intelligence chief, and Haroun were
evacuated by helicopter from their visit to Abyei. So, I wanted to
know, one, can you confirm that in fact the UN flew him in and then
upon protest by youth, Dinka youth, flew him out? Is that true?
Spokesperson
Nesirky: Well, I can tell you that Governor Haroun was transported
there and back again. That is correct. I have already said that. As for
what happened at the time around the location where the
meeting was being held, there were some disturbances that ended
peacefully, and if I have more details precisely on what happened,
then I’ll let you know.
Inner
City Press: But I guess my thing is that, when it first came up, it
was presented, this is a very positive visit, that he’d brought
peace and, in fact, if 400 youth protested him and destroyed vehicles
and he left under fire, it seems to… would the UN fly him there
again?
Spokesperson
Nesirky: As I say, I would need to check on the precise details. There
were protests; that is the case. But also there was a result,
in the form of the agreement that I have mentioned before. But if I
have more detail, I’ll be happy to give it to you.
The
UN in four days after that statement was not able to get any more
“details” about its flying of an indicted war criminal; the UN
would apparently be willing to fly Ahmed Haroun again.
Footnote: Meanwhile,
despite
attempts to highlight the US Mission to the UN's failure to
provide its position on the UN flying a Sudanese government
official
indicted for war crimes in Darfur, the US has still not stated its
position, nor responded to questions submitted in writing about
Abyei. When the US Mission or even the new State
Department
spokesman in Washington responds, we will report it. Watch this
site.
* * *
UN
Has
No
Comment on Protests in Abyei of Haroun Flight, Partition of
Darfur
By
Matthew
Russell
Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
March
10 -- Whether on Abyei or Darfur, despite spending
over $1 billion a year the UN has nothing to say, even as Dinka
protests confront its flights of
indicted war criminal Ahmed Haroun.
On
March 9, Inner
City Press asked
Secretary
General Ban Ki-moon's spokesman Martin
Nesirky about criticism of the UN's lack of protection of civilians
in Abyei, then about its silence on Darfur:
Inner
City
Press:
there is a report that the SPLM [Sudan People’s
Liberation Movement] has threatened to stop negotiations with the
National Congress Party about Abyei and outstanding issues due to the
violence. It’s in the Sudan Tribune article, which quotes an SPLM
leader for Abyei, saying why is the UN not taking a more active role?
Meanwhile, the Sudanese Government newspaper has said that the UN
has rejected calls to get involved, either physically… either in
the physical protection of civilians or in a way other than simply
monitoring. Is that… is the Sudanese Government accurate in saying
that UNMIS’s [United Nations Mission in Sudan] role in Abyei is
simply to monitor what some said is the destruction of 300 buildings
and three villages, or is there a physical protection role that is
being implemented there?
Spokesperson
Nesirky:
Well,
two points. One is that you know quite well that the
UN Mission in Sudan was instrumental in bringing the sides together
just last week. And secondly, as you also know, we told you that an
additional company, on top of four companies already deployed in that
area, this additional company was being deployed there. So that is
extra boots on the ground.
Inner
City
Press:
Where were they when these… not to… obviously they
didn’t burn them, but when these villages were burned down —
there are satellite photos of the before and the after — is there
any… is the attempt of this new company to actually be physically
present to stop physical destruction or…? I am just trying to
understand what the…?
Spokesperson:
The
presence of peacekeeping personnel on the ground is supposed to
do a number of things. One is, yes, it is monitoring, two, it is to
investigate after the fact if they, if it happened somewhere a long
way from where they are positioned, and it is also to help people who
have been either attacked or need assistance for some other reason. And
we have seen that repeatedly. In this particular case, we are
aware of those reports that you referred to, and if I have any more
details on the location of the peacekeepers in relation to that, I’d
be happy to let you know.
More
than
thirty
hours later, there was no answer at all from the UN.
UN's Ban & spox Nesirky, cost of flying ICC indictee not shown
Also
on
March 9,
Inner City Press asked:
Inner
City
Press:
in Darfur, there is a lot of now criticism by the rebel
groups in Darfur that the Government on Monday proposed to add two
additional administrative states to Darfur; they are calling it a
“divide and rule” regime. I just wonder, given the UN’s role
in these negotiations, one, do they think that… what do they make
of these criticisms of divide and rule, and two, do they think that
the steps that the Sudanese Government is taking to supposedly seek
consent of people in IDP [internally displaced persons] camps are
sufficient, democratic and the things that the UN would like to see
done?
Spokesperson:
Well,
as I understand it, from the mediation, this has not been
formally communicated, this notion of establishing two extra
administrative areas in Darfur. This has not been officially
communicated to the mediation, and so they are waiting to hear more
about that, because, after all, that is one aspect of the
negotiations that are going on. They haven’t heard anything
officially yet. And if they do, I’ll be happy to let you know.
Again,
more
than
30 hours later there was no answer from the UN. And so the
next day
March 10, Inner City Press asked a follow up:
Inner
City
Press:
about this flight of Ahmed Haroun, there has been a new
report that when he was flown into Abyei that actually 400 Dinka
youth stormed the UN’s compound, angered at his presence and that
McClatchy/Miami Herald story says that [Salah] Gosh, who is this
former intelligence chief, and Haroun were evacuated by helicopter
from their visit to Abyei. So, I wanted to know, one, can you
confirm that in fact the UN flew him in and then upon protest by
youth, Dinka youth, flew him out? Is that true?
Spokesperson
Nesirky:
Well,
I can tell you that Governor Haroun was transported
there and back again. That is correct. I have already said that. As for
what happened at the time around the location where the
meeting was being held, there were some disturbances that ended
peacefully, and if I have more details precisely on what happened,
then I’ll let you know.
Inner
City
Press:
when
it
first came up, it was presented, this is a very
positive visit, that he’d brought peace and, in fact, if 400 youth
protested him and destroyed vehicles and he left under fire, it seems
to… would the UN fly him there again?
Spokesperson:
As
I say, I would need to check on the precise details. There were
protests; that is the case. But also there was a result, in the form
of the agreement that I have mentioned before. But if I have more
detail, I’ll be happy to give it to you.
And
nine hours
later, nothing. Nothing at all. And so it goes at the UN.
* * *
Amid
Torched
Villages
in
Abyei, UN Flew in Torcher Haroun,
Questions Unanswered
By
Matthew
Russell
Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
March
7
-- Amid the torching of villages in Abyei by
Sudanese nomads, the UN flew into
Abyei Ahmen Haroun, indicted by the
International Criminal Court for organizing nomads to commit war
crimes in Darfur, it confirmed to Inner City Press on March 4.
In
follow up,
Inner City Press over the weekend asked Secretary General Ban
Ki-moon's spokesman Martin Nesirky to
“provide
all previously requested specifics of ICC indictee Ahmed Haroun's now
second flight with the UN, and did DPKO tell the Security Council?
Was it a special or scheduled flight? How much did it cost? Did the
UN ask why Sudan's air force couldn't make the flight? Did OLA
consider and approve this? When will Patricia O'Brien hold a press
conference and take questions?”
On
March 7, with
Nesirky not having answered any of the questions, he used his noon
briefing opening to deliver praise to the government of Omar al
Bashir, also indicted by the ICC for genocide, for now agreeing to
try to avoid violence. Inner City Press asked:
Inner
City
Press:
on
Sudan, I mean, I heard your message lauding this
agreement between the SPLM and the NPC. Has the UN seen, and can it…
seen this report, and can it confirm that three villages were burned
down in Abyei, 300 buildings destroyed, and what’s the relation
between that… is this the violence that the agreement that you are
applauding will be stopping or… and what was, did Ahmed Haroun,
this indicted ICC [International Criminal Court] individual, what was
his role? Did he sign this for the NPC, and do you think that
villages will no longer be burned down in this way?
Spokesperson
Nesirky:
First
of
all, it is precisely that kind of violence and
damage with human, as well as material, cost that this agreement
would be designed to stop, and to try to stop. Governor [Ahmed]
Haroun of South Kordofan, as you know, is responsible for the
Misseriya’s respect for the rule of law and finding a solution to
their migration, and so that is why his role was crucial in that
respect.
Inner
City
Press:
What
do you say to those who say that, since he is
actively charged by the ICC with organizing nomadic tribes to burn
down villages that may be relying on him, transporting him may be not
a good idea?
Spokesperson
Nesirky:
I
think
the point here is that, as I just said, his role in
ensuring that Misseriya respect the rule of law and also in helping
to find a solution to their migration is really crucial. And,
indeed, the talks between the Ngok Dinka/SPLM and the Misseriya/NCP
really can’t take place without his participation.
So
it is
impossible to deal with murderous nomads without the UN flying in a
Sudanese government official indicted by the ICC for organizing
nomads to murder in Darfur. Is the resulting and continuing murder
any surprise?
Footnote:
Meanwhile
on
March
7 Inner City Press on deadline asked the three
spokespeople of the US Mission to the UN the following question, so
far without response:
“Does
the US State Department / Administration find the new Satellite
Sentinel Project imagery, confirming the deliberate burning of three
villages in Sudan's contested Abyei region, useful? How is the Obama
administration focusing on Abyei? Do you agree with the conclusions
of the Satellite Sentinel Project that it's systematic targeting of
civilian infrastructure, and as such, evidence of a possible war
crime?”
There
are
other
questions
to the US Mission to the UN that have gone unanswered.
Watch this site.
* * *
UN
Admits
2d
Flight
of
ICC Darfur Indictee Haroun to Abyei in Sudan, Impunity
By
Matthew
Russell
Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
March
4,
updated -- The UN
has for a second time offered a free UN
flight in Sudan to Ahmed Haroun, under indictment by the
International Criminal Court for war crimes in Darfur, the UN
admitted Friday in response to questions from Inner City Press.
On
March 3 the UN
Security Council met about renewed fighting in the disputed Abyei
region. Back in January, Inner City Press got the UN to acknowledge
they had flown ICC indictee Haroun from South Kordofan, where he
serves fellow ICC indictee Omar al Bashir as governor, to Abyei.
The
UN has defended
this controversial flight by saying that Haroun and Haroun alone
could stop violence in Abyei. The UN never explained why the
government of Sudan, which has an air force currently bombing civilians
in Jebel Marra in Darfur, couldn't itself fly Haroun.
The
UN said it was
a scheduled flight, then UN Mission in Sudan chief Haile Menkerios
admitted to
Inner City Press that it was a special flight. Inner City Press is
told such flights cost $40,000, and the UN has confirm no
reimbursement has been sought from the Bashir government.
But
now the
violence has continued, making the UN flight of ICC indictee Haroun
harder to justify even by the UN's own argument.
March
3
in
front
of
the Security Council, Inner City Press asked Council president for
March Li Baodong of China if the UN Peacekeeping official who briefed
the Council, Atul Khare, had mentioned if Haroun would again be flown
in a UN helicopter. Li Baodong did not directly answer.
At
the March 4 UN
noon briefing, Inner City Press asked Secretary General Ban Ki-moon's
spokesman Martin Nesirky to confirm or deny that that the UN would
once again fly ICC indictee Haroun to Abyei, even now that his work in
connection with the first flight has proved ineffective.
Nesirky
said
he
would
check.
Ten minutes later, Nesirky's deputy Farhan Haq announced
by speaker to all UN correspondents that yes, Haroun attended today's
meeting in Abyei, and yes, “he was transported” by the UN.
This
UN
promotes
impunity,
even
for one of the few people indicted for war crimes by
the ICC. Meanwhile Ban Ki-moon brags about the Security Council's partial
referral of the situation in Libya to the ICC -- a referral that Ban
Ki-moon did not even call for until after the Council voted to make
the referral.
This
UN
is
promoting
and
enshrining lawlessness, with no transparency or
accountability. Watch this site.
Update
of 3:48 pm -- Human Rights Watch, via Richard Dicker, submitted
this
comment:
“This
is the second time in recent weeks the UN has transported Ahmed
Haroun who is charged by the ICC with war crimes in Darfur. We have
real concerns because the U.N. should not be in the business of
transporting Haroun. There needs to be an extremely high threshold of
urgency for such action by UNMIS.”
Responses
have
been
sought
from
the Missions to the UN of France, the UK and the US,
with the latter two asked if they knew in advance of the UN's new
flight of ICC indictee Haroun. Given her
statements
this
year
about
social media, & after hours of non-response by the US Mission
to the UN,@AmbassadorRice
has been asked directly as well. Watch
this site.
Update
of
4:30
pm
--
Then this, from UK Mission to the UN spokesman Daniel
Shepherd:
“As
spokesperson, I would only reiterate the message that my two
Ambassadors have both said on the record (and published by Inner City
Press) first time around: that we aren’t going to second guess how
UNMIS fulfills its mandate to provide good offices to the
Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) parties in efforts to resolve
differences through dialogue and negotiations. I’d only add that
this work is particularly important at this sensitive time, to
contain any potential escalation after the recent Abyei violence.”
We could
note
again that violence has persisted despite the UN flying ICC indictee
Ahmed Haroun in the first time, and that it is the role of UN member
states to oversee the UN Secretariat, not to defer in this case to
what some see as its promotion of impunity - but at least the UK
would put its position on the record.
Update
of
4:43
pm
--
this too has come in, perhaps in response:
Date:
Fri,
Mar
4,
201
Subject: Haroun and Abyei
To: Matthew.Lee [at]
innercitypress.com
You
guys
ask
great
questions!
Have you noticed perhaps that the United
Nations seems to be unaware of who is causing the violence in Abyei.
And yet "diplomatic sources" report seeing the burial of 33
bodies - all southerners.
The
Arab
nomads
say
the
violence started when SPLM police shot at them
(Hitler used a similar ploy to invade Poland) - and today thousands
of civilians fled Abyei fearing another crisis like in June 2008. The
Dinka Ngok villages north of Abyei, such as Maker, have been
burnt to the ground. The end explains the means. There is a
creeping ethnic cleansing going on in the Abyei region despite the
agreements of 2005 and the Court of Arbitration ruling in 2010.
Why
fly
Haroun
to
Abyei
- what is his cv? It is, as you correctly point
out, that of arming arab militias to burn villages. I hope to see
more of your questions pinning the UN to the responsibility to
protect.
Click
for Mar 1, '11
BloggingHeads.tv re Libya, Sri Lanka, UN Corruption
Click here for Inner City
Press' March 27 UN debate
Click here for Inner City
Press March 12 UN (and AIG
bailout) debate
Click here for Inner City
Press' Feb 26 UN debate
Click
here
for Feb.
12
debate
on
Sri
Lanka http://bloggingheads.tv/diavlogs/17772?in=11:33&out=32:56
Click here for Inner City Press' Jan.
16, 2009 debate about Gaza
Click here for Inner City Press'
review-of-2008 UN Top Ten debate
Click here for Inner
City Press' December 24 debate on UN budget, Niger
Click here from Inner City Press'
December 12 debate on UN double standards
Click here for Inner
City Press' November 25 debate on Somalia, politics
and this October 17 debate, on
Security Council and Obama and the UN.
* * *
These
reports are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for a Reuters
AlertNet piece by this correspondent
about Uganda's Lord's Resistance Army. Click
here
for an earlier Reuters AlertNet piece about the Somali
National
Reconciliation Congress, and the UN's $200,000 contribution from an
undefined trust fund. Video
Analysis
here
Feedback: Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com
UN
Office:
S-453A,
UN,
NY
10017
USA
Tel:
212-963-1439
Reporter's
mobile
(and
weekends):
718-716-3540
Other,
earlier
Inner
City
Press
are
listed
here,
and
some are available
in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright
2006-08
Inner
City
Press,
Inc.
To
request
reprint
or
other
permission,
e-contact
Editorial
[at]
innercitypress.com
-
|