Candidate for UN's #2 Afghan Post Dismissed Chapter
VI of UN Charter, Ignored Arms Embargo, Kai Eide Won't Comment
Byline: Matthew Russell Lee of
Inner City Press at the UN: News Analysis
UNITED NATIONS,
March 19 -- The controversy
surrounding the reported nomination of American diplomat Peter
Galbraith to the
UN's second-highest post in the UN Mission in Afghanistan, UNAMA, was
directly
raised to UNAMA chief Kai Eide on Thursday, without it being resolved.
Eide
insisted that Secretary General Ban Ki-moon is still considering
candidates for
the post. But when Inner City Press asked if there are any candidates
other
than Galbraith, Eide said he would choose not to comment. Inner City
Press
asked for Eide's views on Galbraith's actions and statements with
respect to UN
sanctions while he was U.S. Ambassador to Croatia. Eide said he will
leave that
to the Secretary General.
What the
Secretariat should and now does know is that Galbraith is on record
that it is
not a violation to ignore UN Security Council resolutions which call
upon"
states to cooperate with Sanctions Committees, "including reporting any
information brought to their attention concerning violations of the
embargo,"
as long as such calls are under Chapter VI of the UN Charter. This
evasive and
legalistic approach to UN Security Council resolutions is hardly one to
be
expected from someone subsequently aspiring to become a high UN
official.
A problem with Galbraith re-becoming a U.S. official, sources say, is a
series of allegations that he lobbied for the Kurdistan Regional
Government without filing a registration.
Galbraith c/o Kurdistan
Regional Government site
UN Security Council
sources asked Inner City Press about the UN-relevant aspects its March 18
report on Galbraith's past,
to which this is added, from Questions
for the Record Submitted to Ambassador
Galbraith in the House International Relations Committee on May 30,
1996, at page
130 --
Question 6. Did the United States
notify the U. N. Sanctions Committee of any Iranian arms transfers to
Bosnia in
violation of the international arms embargo? Was the United States
required to
provide notice of such transfers of which it was aware by U. N.
Security
Council Resolution 740 or by any other U. N. Security Council
resolution?
Amb. Galbraith's Answer: The
United States did not violate any obligations under this resolution.
Resolution
740 contained a number of provisions, one of which "call(ed) upon"
states to cooperate with the Yugoslavia Sanctions Committee, "including
reporting
any information brought to their attention concerning violations of the
embargo." By this resolution, the Council did not impose a legally
binding
obligation on member states to submit particular information, as is
evidenced
by the lack of a reference in the resolution to Chapter VII of the UN
Charter. (Here
at Pg. 130).
Eide on
Thursday said it is up to Ban Ki-moon. So what is up with Ban Ki-moon? Will he appoint UN officials, some of whom
respect Security Council resolutions under Chapter VI of the UN
Charter, and
others of whom like Galbraith do not?
Eide also said that "I
believe that the
use of between 500 million and 1 billion dollars are never reported to
the
Afghan government." Inner City Press asked him on what he based the
statement. Eide replied it is an estimate based on which countries and
entities
do not report. Inner City Press asked Eide to name the entities and
countries.
I'll leave that for you to figure out, Eide replied.
Inner City
Press asked Afghanistan's Ambassador to the UN Zahir Tanin which
countries this
referred to. "Kai Eide should tell you," Ambassador Tannin replied.
But Eide did not say. Watch this site.
Click here for Inner City
Press March 12 UN debate
Click here for Inner City
Press' Feb 26 UN debate
Click
here
for Feb.
12 debate on Sri Lanka http://bloggingheads.tv/diavlogs/17772?in=11:33&out=32:56
Click here for Inner City Press' Jan.
16, 2009 debate about Gaza
Click here for Inner City Press'
review-of-2008 UN Top Ten debate
Click here for Inner
City Press' December 24 debate on UN budget, Niger
Click here from Inner City Press'
December 12 debate on UN double standards
Click here for Inner
City Press' November 25 debate on Somalia, politics
and this October 17 debate, on
Security Council and Obama and the UN.
* * *
These
reports are
usually also available through Google
News and on Lexis-Nexis.
Click here
for a Reuters
AlertNet piece by this correspondent
about Uganda's Lord's Resistance Army. Click
here
for an earlier Reuters AlertNet piece about the Somali
National
Reconciliation Congress, and the UN's $200,000 contribution from an
undefined trust fund. Video
Analysis here
Feedback: Editorial
[at] innercitypress.com
UN
Office: S-453A, UN, NY 10017
USA
Tel: 212-963-1439
Reporter's
mobile (and
weekends):
718-716-3540
Other,
earlier Inner City Press are listed here, and some are available
in the ProQuest service, and now on Lexis-Nexis.
Copyright
2006-08 Inner City Press, Inc. To request
reprint or other permission, e-contact Editorial [at]
innercitypress.com -
|