By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
November 14 --
When the UN's
Sixth (Legal)
Committee took
up the US as
"Host Country"
on November
14, not only
American
banks' cut off
of services to
mission but
also
restrictions
on movement
were raised.
Inner City
Press has
previously reported
how the US
restricts movement
to 25 miles
from Columbus
Circle for not
only
countries'
diplomats but
even UN staff
members from
that country.
Cuba
complained of
just this on
November 14,
saying that it
violates
international
law and
conventions,
including the
US' Host
Country agreement.
Inner
City Press
asked UN
Deputy
Spokesperson
Farhan Haq for
Secretary General
Ban Ki-moon's
position on
this restriction
on the
movement of UN
staff. He replied
that the UN
has
representation
on the Host
Country
Committee. But
apparently
Ban's UN won't
speak publicly
on
restrictions,
as it does in
other countries.
Back on
September 10,
the same day
the banking
industry's
lawsuit
against New
York City's
responsible
banking
ordinance was
dismissed, at
the UN on
First Avenue
the General
Assembly
issued muted
criticism of
JPMorgan
Chase. Video
here, from
Minute
2:59:35.
Back on March
18 JPMorgan
Chase came up
as a topic,
and target, in
a closed door
meeting at the
UN of the
Group of 77
and China on
March 18,
several Permanent
Representative
then
exclusively
told Inner
City Press.
They marveled
that the UN
does business
with JPM Chase
while the bank
cuts off many
of the member
states of the
UN.
In April, a
G77-agreed
draft
resolution
emerged,
including a
review of the
UN's relations
with JPM Chase
-- by name.
Inner City
Press has
publishing the
full text of
that draft,
below.
But in the
months since
April, the
resolution got
watered down,
until it was
adopted
without
opposition or
debate at the
end of a
three-hour UN
General
Assembly
session on
September 9.
(There was
debate about
Argentina and
sovereign debt
restructuring,
which Inner
City Press covered
yesterday here.)
Introducing
the resolution
was Bolivia,
as chair of
the Group of
77 and China;
their speech
said that
banks in the
City of New
York have
"humiliated"
several
nation's UN
missions.
Here
is the adopted
text of the
resolution,
seen in
advance by IPS,
which also
quoted Sri
Lanka's
ambassador
Palitha Kohona
about it.
Kohona was
previously,
among other
things, a UN
official, so
he should
know.
Still, the
idea that
asking Ban
Ki-moon to
press the US
to do almost
anything is
dubious. Will
JPMorgan Chase
view a UNGA
resolution in
which it is
not directly
named, only
"sub-tweeted,"
as a threat to
its
reputation?
After its
behavior
during the
subprime
lending
meltdown --
the predatory
bender -- does
that even have
to be asked?
Back
on March 18 in
the half-light
of the UN
Conference
Building's
second floor,
ambassadors
complained
that while JPMorgan
Chase is
moving to deny
many of their
missions bank
accounts, the
bank also
overcharges
them when for
example they
pay or get
paid by UN
Peacekeeping.
The
idea discussed
was to draft
and vote on a
General
Assembly
resolution on
the topic. The
US government
is required,
under the UN
Host Country
Agreement, to
try to ensure
banking
services for
countries'
diplomatic
missions.