UN
Again Demands
Press Response
to Reuters
& AFP
Complaint It
Will Not
Disclose, No
Rules
By
Matthew
Russell Lee
UNITED
NATIONS,
March 15 --
The UN's lack
of rules, and
of respect for
free
speech and
freedom of the
press are
becoming ever
more clear.
From
Monday to
Friday, Inner
City Press has
awaited a copy
of a complaint
filed
with UN
Security
by Agence
France
Presse's Tim
Witcher
and Reuters'
Michelle
Nichols
about a verbal
disagreement
which they
initiated.
No copy of the
complaint has
been provided,
despite a
renewed and
formal request
at 9 am on
March 15 to
the head of the
Department of
Public
Information,
as
well as the
chief of its
Media
Accreditation
and Liaison
Unit.
Nevertheless
at 4 pm on
March 15
UN Security's
Lenworth James
sought out
Inner City
Press again,
asking for a
written
response to a
complaint he
again refused
to show
to Inner City
Press. We're
not going to
show it to
you, he said.
You
will never get
the complaint.
How
can this be?
He added that
Witcher's
general claim
is
“harassment.”
Since Inner
City Press has
not spoken to
Witcher in
months, unless
a
single reply
“lapdog” could
be considered
harassment (it
can't),
then the
reference is
to articles
Inner City
Press has
published.
This
lawlessness
clearly can
have, and
appears
intended to
have, a
chilling
effect on
reporting, on
freedom of the
press, with
which DPI is
supposed to be
concerned (and
not
undermine.)
That
is why at 9 am
on March 15,
the request
for a copy of
the complaint,
as well as
for rules of
due process
and concerning
false or
pretextual
complaints
filed in bad
faith, were
formalized in
a seven point
letter sent to
the head of
DPI and the
chief of its
MALU. The
other points,
still
unresponded
to, will be
the subject of
forthcoming
reporting.
The
letter also
requests
belated DPI
response to
Inner City
Press'
February 27
rebuttal of a
defense of the
UN
Correspondents
Association,
a/k/a the UN's
Censorship
Alliance,
by UN
official
Stephane
Dujarric.
Dujarric took
issue with
Inner City
Press'
reporting an
on the record
February 22
meeting,
convened by
DPI, with UNCA
President
Pamela Falk of
CBS and Louis
Charbonneau of
Reuters.
Inner City
Press said,
"you are on
the record,"
and Falk said,
"he's going to
write this
up." But
Dujarric
claims it
shouldn't have
been. Can you
say,
censorship? Or
attempt to
chill free
speech?
Since
February 27,
Dujarric has
provided no
explanation.
This helps
create
the lawless,
free
press-chilling
and
Kafka-esque
atmosphere in
which Witcher
of AFP, on
UNCA's
Executive
Committee, saw
no downside to
filing a
frivolous
complaint
based on an
entirely
verbal
exchange which
he began,
saying
“lies and
distortions.”
Inner City
Press replied,
Lapdog.
But
DPI, seven
hours after
FUNCA's letter
request rapid
response, did
not
reply in any
way. The head
of DPI was
occupied at a
flower
ceremony
sponsored by
the Japanese
mission,
another FUNCA
member
observed.
That
was in the
afternoon
before
UN Security's
Lenworth James
-- he has yet
to provide
even a
business card
to Inner City
Press, much
less a written
summary of the
complaint he
has twice
demanded a
written
response to.
That
UN Security
would accept
and process,
and now twice
demand a
response
from Inner
City Press, to
a supposed
complaint that
is entirely
about
freedom of the
press and free
speech is
telling.
The UN has no
rule
of law --
witness in the
much bigger
picture its terse
dismissal of
Haiti cholera
claims --
and little
respect for
freedom of the
press.
“They don't
even want to
do their
jobs,” another
FUNCA member
said. Watch
this site.